iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Right Whales vs. Navy Offshore Training Range

First Posted: 03/15/2012 7:26 pm Updated: 03/15/2012 7:26 pm

BRUNSWICK, Ga. (AP) — Environmentalists asked a federal judge Thursday to decide whether the Navy must halt plans to build a $100 million offshore training range because of potential threats to endangered right whales.

The Navy wants to install an undersea array of cables and sensors for training warships, submarines and aircraft about 50 miles off the Atlantic coast of southern Georgia and northern Florida. Environmentalists have sued to block the project, saying it's too close to waters where right whales migrate near shore each winter to birth their calves.

Experts say only about 400 right whales remain and a single death could bring the entire species a big step closer to extinction.

"It's possible we could find lots of right whales out on the range" along with their babies, said Catherine Wannamaker, an attorney for the Southern Environmental Law Center, in legal arguments Thursday before the judge.

The law center filed suit in 2010 on behalf of a dozen conservation groups, saying the Navy approved construction of the range before it finished studying how frequently right whales swim through the proposed 500-square-mile site.

Wannamaker said naval training concentrated in that area could put whales at risk of lethal collisions with warships, entanglement with parachutes and cords attached to military buoys and possible harm from mid-frequency sonar.

The Navy has concluded that installing 300 sensors and attached cables on the undersea range would pose virtually no threat to the whales because construction would be suspended during the calving season from November to April. It also concluded the risks of ship strikes would be minimal based on computer models showing few whales would be in waters that far out to sea. But it said further study was needed before training begins.

"There's no reason the Navy should be punished for saying it will engage in further (environmental) review," said Joanna Brinkman, a Justice Department attorney representing the Navy. Brinkman told the judge the military believes its computer models overestimated the frequency of right whales on the training site.

The Navy's lawyers also insist vessels from nearby Naval Station Mayport in Florida and Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay in Georgia routinely post lookouts to watch out for whales during calving season. No collisions between Navy ships and whales have been reported since those precautions were implemented 15 years ago.

Environmentalists argue even trained spotters have trouble seeing right whales swimming just below the ocean's surface. Their fears of whales swimming near the training site were bolstered in March 2010 when biologists recorded a right whale giving birth about 10 miles from the proposed range.

Judge Lisa Godbey Wood peppered attorneys on both sides with questions Thursday. She said she understood the environmentalists' argument — if the Navy is allowed to go ahead and spend $100 million building the offshore range, would it abandon the project if studies later found training there would put whales at risk?

However, the judge also cautioned that just because the Navy has called for future studies that doesn't mean it approved the project rashly.

"Surely you don't want to hold it against someone that they will continue to evaluate and reassess in the future," Wood said.

The judge said she planned to rule "fairly quickly" but did not specify exactly when.

Before filing suit, conservationists had asked the Navy to suspend training at the site during the five-month calving season and to comply with offshore speed limits the government imposes on private and commercial ships. The Navy refused, saying the precautions would interfere with its ability to train effectively and maintain readiness.

"The Navy's need to maintain battle-ready sailors ... is a hard fact not to be taken lightly," the Navy's attorneys said in a written motion in the case.

The U.S. Supreme Court has weighed in an earlier case involving military training vs. protecting whales, siding with the Navy in a 2008 decision. Its ruling threw out restrictions on sonar use that lower courts had imposed on the Navy during training exercises off the coast of southern California, saying the need for a well-trained military trumped possible harm to an unknown number of marine mammals.

Some environmentalists argue that sonar can disrupt whale feeding patterns, and in extreme cases can kill whales by causing them to beach themselves. However, scientists don't fully understand how sonar affects whales.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

BRUNSWICK, Ga. (AP) — Environmentalists asked a federal judge Thursday to decide whether the Navy must halt plans to build a $100 million offshore training range because of potential threats to enda...
BRUNSWICK, Ga. (AP) — Environmentalists asked a federal judge Thursday to decide whether the Navy must halt plans to build a $100 million offshore training range because of potential threats to enda...
Filed by Jessica Leader  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:01 PM on 03/18/2012
What did you expect......after all, the military industrial congressional complex is a killing machine.....
10:44 AM on 03/16/2012
Oh come on Navy. 400 left in the wild? DO THE RIGHT THING! Protect the RIGHT whales! This is unnecessary. If they do approve it and it gets built, whales will die. When it happens. Us environmentalist are going to come at you with all we have saying "I TOLD YOU SO". Stop the production before it is too late and you regret becoming the sole reason right whales become extinct.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen lyons kalmenson
i poem/paint, sometimes, i ain't
04:18 AM on 03/16/2012
navy...do right by the right whales, por favor
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldwolf49
Religion is a tool of the evil.
01:32 AM on 03/16/2012
Bottom line.......BAM!!! Navy wins.
10:43 AM on 03/17/2012
Notice the name oldwolf.... old thinking. obsolete thinking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldwolf49
Religion is a tool of the evil.
12:59 PM on 03/17/2012
I was a squid for MANY years, not old thinking just know how the Navy works. Sticks and stones.
photo
Artemesian
Spiritual Messenger of the Earth
10:51 PM on 03/15/2012
'Before filing suit, conservationists had asked the Navy to suspend training at the site during the five-month calving season and to comply with offshore speed limits the government imposes on private and commercial ships. The Navy refused, saying the precautions would interfere with its ability to train effectively and maintain readiness.'

So what makes anyone think they'll "watch out for whales during calving season and collisions with whales" at any other time if they won't even comply now? Plus they've got the Supreme Court case in southern California as precedent. Yeah, this really looks good for only 400 whales that are extremely endangered. Anyone want to bet? It would be interesting to read any statistics for marine mammal fatalities in So. CA during the training exercises, and this new project seems a lot more extensive.

Between this project, offshore wind turbines, and oil drilling, there will be continual disruption for marine mammals and fish. But as was decided by the Supreme Court, a well-trained military trumps everything else in the world.
photo
SmolderingRuin
"All governments lie!" I.F. "Izzy" Stone
04:07 PM on 03/16/2012
You said it better than I could. F&F
photo
Artemesian
Spiritual Messenger of the Earth
10:31 PM on 03/15/2012
Why do we even need this at all? Will we ever stop spending money for defense and wars?
10:18 PM on 03/15/2012
Remember the progressive liberals and many Environmentalist have an agenda. It is to keep us weak and in their control. I'm sure the Navy can figure out how to deal with the whales so they can thrive. What we have to do as a nation to is deal with the the threat we have from within our own country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldwolf49
Religion is a tool of the evil.
01:32 AM on 03/16/2012
Wha..................? Liberals in control?????? Are you puttin' something extra in your coffee???
09:48 PM on 03/15/2012
Aren't we in a massive financial mess right now? How is building a new testing range going to help America when we have several already. Another example of gross misuse of taxpayer money by the MIC. To hell with the testing range, build a few schools or a hospital with that money, you know, something that will employ Americans beyond the several months it take to build
T-Haight
What was wrong with federalism?
08:27 PM on 03/15/2012
The million-dollar question is where the environmentalists actually WOULD approve of the Navy's use of active sonar. Since the honest answer is 'nowhere' and it has to happen somewhere, their objections would seem to be rather unremarkable.
08:14 PM on 03/15/2012
Why can't the navy do computer simulations?? Why must they have no regard for marine mammals. They use animals as weapons of war who ask for nothing in return and this is the thanks they get. How disgusting.
T-Haight
What was wrong with federalism?
08:29 PM on 03/15/2012
As noted in the 2008 ruling mentioned in the article, computer simulations don't give sailors real experience. The point of the exercise is to give the sailors a real and accurate understanding of what goes on and how their instruments (i.e., sonar) respond, and there's no effective way to simulate that.
08:39 PM on 03/15/2012
pilots get simulation training.. why can't the navy? computer simulations haven't changed since 2008? That is light years in technology.