iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Push On Violence Against Women Act Shows Democrats 'Scheming,' Republicans Say (UPDATE)

Posted: 03/15/2012 6:25 pm Updated: 03/15/2012 7:42 pm

WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats began their push to renew the Violence Against Women Act on Thursday, as the Republican leader accused them of perpetuating a scheme to make the GOP look bad.

"I mean, if you're looking for the reason Congress has a 9 percent approval rating, this is it," said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), arguing that the attempt to renew the law, which expired in 2011, is part of a broader attempt by Democrats to rig legislation so that the GOP can't back it.

"A day after we read a headline in the Congressional Quarterly about Democrats moving to slow a jobs bill that got 390 votes, we see a story today about how the No. 3 Democrat in the Senate is 'scheming' to spend the rest of the year hitting the other side," McConnell said in a floor speech.

"At a moment of economic crisis, the No. 3 Democrat in Senate, the Democrat in charge of strategy over there, is sitting up at night trying to figure out a way to create an issue where there isn't one -- not to help solve our nation's problems, but to help Democrats get reelected," said McConnell, referring to Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).

"The American people need to know what's going on in the Democrat-controlled Senate," McConnell said, entering Thursday's Politico story into the record.

But Democrats were not deterred, sending several woman senators to the floor to make the case for renewing the Violence Against Women Act.

"I think what we want to let people know is that we women care," said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) shortly after her turn at the mic, noting that one Republican, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, had joined them.

"The Violence Against Women Act is an important commitment to victims of domestic violence and sexual abuse that they are not alone," said Murkowski. "This is a promise that resources and expertise are available to prosecute those who would torment them and also a reason to believe that one can actually leave an abusive situation."

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) scoffed at McConnell's complaint, noting that his party had delayed the transportation bill over a proposed amendment from Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) that would have let employers cancel coverage of their employees' contraception.

"I have traveled across New York state discussing my vision for how to grow the economy and create jobs by finding common core values to pass what shouldn't be partisan ideas," Gillibrand said. "After stalling the transportation bill for weeks over an ideological fight to roll back women's access to basic health care, this is the kind of hypocritical rhetoric that Americans are tired of seeing in Washington."

Feinstein also suggested that any scheming was not on the Democratic side.

"Let me put it this way: There's been a long litany of attempts to weaken services to women -- and the last one was about a week ago with the Blunt amendment -- and over the past 20 years that I've been here, all over reproductive rights," Feinstein said. "About once a year, there's been something on reproductive rights. It's been a constant battering ram. Equal pay for equal work -- that was difficult to move."

Republicans have argued that they are not opposed to the Violence Against Women Act as it was passed before, but they don't like new provisions that would extend greater protections to undocumented immigrants, gays and transgender individuals and would grant more authority to tribal prosecutors.

"I think it's things that have never been in the Violence Against Women Act, because if we had just a straight reauthorization, it would pass 100 percent," said Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Noting that the cost of the legislation had been cut by more than $100 million, Feinstein said she'll be interested in seeing which parts the GOP tries to strike.

"We'll see if this is part of an effort to essentially reduce services to women, whether it's because the bill adds same-sex people, whether it's because the bill affords the services to people who are here in undocumented status," she said.

Since all Republican members of the judiciary panel voted against the bill in committee last month, Feinstein also worried that proponents will have to overcome a filibuster to pass it.

With 53 Democrats in the Senate plus five Republican co-sponsors of the bill, it is still just shy of the needed 60 votes, although Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) said Thursday that she would vote to at least start debate. She added that Republicans should have a chance to vote on changes to the legislation.

"I think we need to take up the bill, and I think we need to have an open amendment process," Hutchison said. She expressed concern that the tribal provisions could create double jeopardy for accused abusers, who might be charged in tribal and state courts.

Senate Democrats could bring up the bill as soon as next week, but hope to get to it before the Easter break. The House has not taken any action on a companion measure.

UPDATE: 7:45 p.m. -- Sen. Grassley's office later released a statement, insisting that the Republican leadership would not get in the way of reauthorizing the law as long as the GOP alternative was considered as well.

"The Violence Against Women Act program has strong bipartisan support in the Senate," Grassley said. "It's a shame that the majority party is manufacturing another partisan, political crisis, because in actuality, there is no concern that the VAWA will go away. The law is being funded and VAWA programs are running as they have since the reauthorization actually ran out last year."

His office also pointed to Grassley's full statement raising his concerns with the bill at a hearing last month.

Michael McAuliff covers politics and Congress for The Huffington Post. Talk to him on Facebook.

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats began their push to renew the Violence Against Women Act on Thursday, as the Republican leader accused them of perpetuating a scheme to make the GOP look bad. "I mean...
WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats began their push to renew the Violence Against Women Act on Thursday, as the Republican leader accused them of perpetuating a scheme to make the GOP look bad. "I mean...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,457
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (93 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS

photo
peegan 02:27 AM on 03/16/2012
"At a moment of economic crisis, the No. 3 Democrat in Senate, the Democrat in charge of strategy over there, is sitting up at night trying to figure out a way to create an issue where there isn't one -- not to help solve our nation's problems, but to help Democrats get reelected," said McConnell

The man is right and you all need to give him a break. For instance, all those laws  Read More...
Boopsie2008
Hold the Vision-Trust the Process: Obama/Biden
12:35 PM on 04/27/2012
I just saw a film clip of Boehner on TV. He was pounding the podium about Democrats making this such a big political deal. Yeah, they sure did, by publicizing how Boehner & Co. planned to raid the Health Care Act funding and just hurt women in another way to fund this. And will he consider, instead, aA few more bucks from the very rich to pay for this? Not a stinking chance in h*ll.
photo
nazztea
And they called dis here cat ... Da Nazz!
10:21 PM on 04/05/2012
The GOP wants to preserve their "right' to browbeat (or otherwise) their women into following the party position on any given subject.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
maxwelldog
even if i don't go anywhere, I'll still be late.
06:00 PM on 04/05/2012
Now, Mitch....
Don't make me call Mr. Wizard to pull you out of another jam!

Seriously...your stance is that Democrats want to enable women, and possibly (GASP!) give them their rights, and YOU are AGAINST that?

I thought at first I might have been overdoing the bit about Republicans not wanting women's votes, but I see now the call is for something else entirely.

YOU [ #%*)(@# ] WANT TO TAKE AWAY THEIR VOTING RIGHTS....don't you?
It would certainly make it easier on YOU, I reckon. They couldn't POSSIBLY deny your manly power and strength, then, eh?

Let me be BLUNT about that...
Retire now. It will save you spending money on a lost cause.

OK, Mr. Wizard! Take him away!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hadtoregister
12:49 PM on 03/28/2012
The Republicans are correct in their actions. This law has good intentions but has become too broad, damning to anyone suspected of violence, opens the door for 'vindictive actions,' and gives illegals another oppurtunity to stay in the U.S. even after the violence threat is neutralized, gone, or jailed. The intentions of the law are fine, but what about victims of violence such as senior citizens, in recent decades, men have been beaten by women or someone related to the woman, what about them to be fair? Plus, violence can be any form or a woman can just THINK she may be hurt; just way to broad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:49 AM on 03/22/2012
So a 15 year old girl from Utah was killed for refusing sex. My sincere condolences to her parents and her family and friends. This is why the Republicans need to stop playing around with women issues. Especially the Violence Against Women Act.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
supra21
This dog hunts
12:12 PM on 03/17/2012
So, Mitch, let me ask a couple of questions. You claim that the Dems are "creating issues" where there are none. Isn't that a little like the GOTP's stand on abortion and birth control? Isn't that a LOT like Santorum's attack on porn? Seems to me the Pubs have a lock on creating non-issues.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pappa
Truth Sayer
11:53 AM on 03/17/2012
I am a democrat who have never voted Republican. In this instance, the Democrats are wrong. It is not the original bill that is objectionable. Here are the facts of the bill that is wrong: First, a non-native American can be convicted in tribal court (not of his peers) for an alleged violence against a female, gay, bisexual, trans-gender tribal member. Tribal laws are different for each tribe and not appealable to State or Federal Courts. Second, an illegal female, gay, bi-sexual, immigrant will not be deported if they state that violence was committed against them. Remember that under the law, violence does not have to mean physical violence. In summary, a US citizen can be incarcerated by a tribal jury or elders (you dont have a choice) and your property confiscated and you dont have appeal rights through the state or federal system. Immigration attorneys are now advertising that if you are an illegal female, gay, bi-sexual, transgender and a violent act was committed against your, you don't have to be deported.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ennis438
08:37 AM on 03/17/2012
If Mitchell and his Republipunks are worried the Dems are trying to make them look bad, as usual, they are out to lunch. The GOP does not need the Dems to make them look bad. They are real good at doing that all by their sweet selves. Now, they seem to be for domestic violence, willing to vote against a bill offering more services for battered women. Real nice , Punks. And by the way, Sir Mitchell. Don't bother to use your standard anti-government nonsense speech. Remember it is sweet you that are loving the idea of this government you hate entering womens bedrooms and dictating your warped thinking . Now be a good boy and salute your Taliban friends, Mitchell.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pastori Balele
Graduate degree
03:16 AM on 03/17/2012
I predicted right - American women of all colors are now going to join me fight against any GOP nominee -he does not become president. Women now know what will happen if any of these so called GOP potential nominees is elected. Any of these GOP nominee will make sure women are slaves again - no rights and pushed back to the kitchen. They are fighting for limited government to ensure women don’t have same rights as theirs. America - be careful with Republicans. They want you to be slaves again. That’s why I am encouraging you to join me to vote for President Obama in November.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gold7246
07:26 AM on 03/17/2012
What you are saying is LIE. The GOP is not against the Violance Against Women Act. But Schumer and his ILK have loaded up the bill with amendents that don't have anything to do with the basic bill. It is another attempt by Dems to sleazily slide thru other legislation that they know the Repubs don't support, and then turn around, like you are doing, and accuse them of "hating women." The Dems do this very often to try and discredit the GOP on illegal immigration bills, and minorities, all so the can lie to the American people that Repubs are against them. LIE< LIE
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:15 PM on 03/17/2012
Well said in a very descriptive kind of way, especially the use of the word sleazy:
Now please tell us what added amendments specifically are you talking about?

I am not a big fan of the GOP but from an objective stand point both sides give as much as the get.
12:01 AM on 03/17/2012
be careful there Mitchy ol'dude, you might scheme all over yourself....
11:24 PM on 03/16/2012
Aside from male-only compulsory Selective Service registration, the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) is the most egregiously sexist piece of legislation enacted into law in the last 100 years. No matter how much some women wish for female-only victimhood, the REALITY is that domestic violence is not like cervical cancer -- anyone (male or female) can be a victim and anyone (male or female) can be a batterer. Yet, VAWA has callously turned a blind eye toward male victims of domestic violence, including denying them benefits, such as psychological counseling, simply because they are male. Barack Obama and the Democratic Party cannot be both a champion of VAWA and a champion of the principle of EQUALITY OF RIGHTS under law. Clearly, VAWA is repugnant to that principle. Moreover, VAWA could never withstand scrutiny under a federal Equal Rights Amendment (such as was passed by Congress in 1972, falling three states short of ratification). Nevermind VAWA'S flagrant discrimination against men; Barack Obama and the Democratic Party have made pandering to women -- and their perceived "special interests" -- a central strategy of presidential and congressional campaigning. How shameful.
09:33 AM on 03/17/2012
It is true that the Act should be changed to "combating domestic violence" or something similar to help all who are abused. Republicans have hurt themselves by continually fighting against women's rights and their safety.

Republicans deserve to be beat up over this as long as they continue to treat women like second class citizens. They brought this on themselves.
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
10:54 PM on 03/16/2012
Democrats don't need a "scheme" to make Republicans look bad, they're doing a fine job all by themselves. All of the bizarre requirements for birth control (explaining your "medical necessity" to an employer) and abortion (trans-vag invasion) and stalling on renewal of this legislation addressing violence against women: this is the GOP.
09:36 AM on 03/17/2012
No doubt. Just step out of the way and watch them run their party into the ground.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:20 PM on 03/17/2012
Faved also for your microbio which evoked a chuckle.
08:48 PM on 03/16/2012
Yes, there are many reasons for being against the VAWA. If people were worked up by the femprop presented here they could easily find criticisms.

Various groups and persons including Rush Limbaugh, Marc H. Rudov and Glenn Sacks have voiced concerns that VAWA violates due process, equal protection and other civil rights. The United States Constitution enshrines Freedom Of Association and specifically outlaws state-sanctioned home invasion. [7]

A main criticism of VAWA is that it allows an individual to claim 'fear' of imminent physical harm[8] without any supporting physical evidence to obtain a restraining order. This has resulted in an explosion of orders, principally by women against men, in order to get leverage in divorce and child custody cases. The effect on those charged under VAWA include loss of children, home, finances and stable employment. In Massachusetts[9] some 30-50,000 ROs are issued annually.

Other defects in the law include a loss of the constitutional right to trial by jury. Fathers' rights organizations such as the The Fatherhood Coalition[10] have called for the repeal of the law.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
traceymarie
the President is black, deal with it
09:38 PM on 03/16/2012
lmao....The addition of Lesbians, transgenders and illegal women cause the outrage, stop lying
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
10:57 PM on 03/16/2012
Fave, already a Fan
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pappa
Truth Sayer
11:57 AM on 03/17/2012
Read my statement of agrement; where US citizens would now loose their rights under this Act.
photo
SteveDenver
Progressive and liberal, just like Jesus Christ.
10:57 PM on 03/16/2012
RUSH LIMBAUGH OPPOSES IT? Then it must be beneficial to women.
03:20 PM on 03/20/2012
Allred is suing Limbaugh. I want to know when she is going to sue Maher or letterman for things they said. Oh, wait! They're Democrats!
06:56 PM on 03/16/2012
Can't allow the laws of America to protect people who are not here legally, really? Where is the humanity of the GOP? Silly question.
photo
Jett7
You're gonna need a bigger boat.
06:38 PM on 03/16/2012
The GOP makes itself look bad but always blames someone else for their despicable and unacceptable behavior.
03:20 PM on 03/20/2012
LMAO. Just like Obama is always blaming anyone else for his mistakes and problems.