iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

D.C. War Memorial Fight Advances In Video Calling For National Status

Posted: 03/16/2012 3:59 pm

WASHINGTON -- A Michigan filmmaker and the daughter of Frank Buckles, who was the last surviving American veteran of World War I, fired the latest salvo Friday in their battle to turn a monument to fallen District of Columbia troops into a national memorial: They released a 12-minute video pushing the project.

"Frank Buckles' cause has been taken up by the 'new lobbyist' of the 21st century -- the powerful combination of film, social media and a small board of directors," said David DeJonge, a Grand Rapids, Mich., documentary maker, in a statement. Dejonge has teamed with Susannah Buckles Flanagan to fulfill what they say were the wishes of her father when he died last year at age 110.

The video posted on the website of DeJonge's group, the National WWI Memorial Foundation, is part of a larger documentary planned on Buckles called "Pershing's Last Patriot." The current segment is titled "938" after a stalled House bill that would designate the D.C. War Memorial as the "District of Columbia and National World War I Memorial."

The film clip seeks to gloss over heavy opposition from District residents and elected officials to adding other elements around the memorial, which lists the names of 499 local service members who died in the war and were among more than 26,000 D.C. residents to serve. It recounts Buckles' visit to the once dilapidated monument and his wish to see it restored and dedicated to all veterans who served in what was once known as the Great War.

It also notes Buckles' testimony at a Senate hearing in 2009. The 108-year-old was wheeled into the hearing room by his daughter. He seemed confused.

"What am I supposed to say?" the frail veteran mumbled into the microphone. After prompting from Flanagan, he said, "Oh, it is an excellent idea" to rededicate the D.C. monument as a national memorial.

That hearing before a Senate subcommittee on national parks focused needed attention on the crumbling monument. It reopened last Veterans Day after a $3.6 million restoration spurred not only by DeJonge, Flanagan and a handful of their allies but also by D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton and the Trust for the National Mall.

The new video suggests that city officials feigned earlier support for converting the District memorial into a national monument, only to change their minds after the restoration was complete. But Norton, contacted by The Huffington Post, angrily rejected the idea that her constituents -- who, as the video notes, died for a country that then and now denies them a vote in Congress -- ever intended to give up their monument.

"This can't happen," she said of the effort to co-opt D.C.'s war memorial. "The people in the District of Columbia are adamant that it not happen."

Norton said she continues to work on having Pershing Park, a "gracious and beautiful memorial" near the White House, dedicated to the 4.7 million Americans who served under Gen. John "Black Jack" Pershing in World War I.

Although Pershing Park sits directly across from the White House Visitor Center on busy Pennsylvania Avenue, Flanagan has complained that it isn't on the National Mall, as is the D.C. War Memorial. DeJonge's video contends that a site anywhere less prestigious less than Washington's monumental core, site of memorials to World War II and the Korean and Vietnam wars, won't do. Buckles himself is buried within sight of Pershing's grave at Arlington National Cemetery.

But Norton spends much of her time as a non-voting member of the House trying to stop out-of-towners in Congress and elsewhere from trampling on the wishes of District residents in everything from abortion funding to gun control. She said she has no intention of letting a self-described "small group of committed patriotic professionals from West Michigan" trample over the District's war dead. She noted that the National Park Service, which administers the memorial site, has also come out against the effort.

"This is not moving," Norton said of the memorial legislation sponsored by Rep. Ted Poe (R-Texas) and 46 others. "The city has come together and unified to strongly oppose any attempt to confiscate a memorial paid for by the residents of the District of Columbia. Schoolchildren collected 5 cents each, and somehow we're going to make it into a national memorial? ... We are not going to allow them to take away our memorial."

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- A Michigan filmmaker and the daughter of Frank Buckles, who was the last surviving American veteran of World War I, fired the latest salvo Friday in their battle to turn a monument to fa...
WASHINGTON -- A Michigan filmmaker and the daughter of Frank Buckles, who was the last surviving American veteran of World War I, fired the latest salvo Friday in their battle to turn a monument to fa...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 48
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustinP213
I dislike all political parties.
03:14 PM on 03/19/2012
The WWI memorial must be on the National Mall. End of story.
06:46 PM on 03/19/2012
"A" WWI memorial on the National Mall is absolutely appropriate, particularly as it may appear overlooked to a casual observer since the 2004 WWII Memorial addition.

However, "The" World War I Memorial was actually dedicated by those who fought in the war back in 1921 and was called "the National Memorial" by President Calvin Coolidge when it was opened in 1926, a quote which can be found in primary source publications. This is a great discussion that brings attention to a generation who deserve further accolade by our present society, but, we must be cautious not to become anachronistic and disregard the work, intent and commemoration of those who actually fought in the war because of predilections in geographic location.

Thank you for your passion to draw more attention to those who have served our country, particularly those men and women of the Great War.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustinP213
I dislike all political parties.
10:30 AM on 03/21/2012
Good color on the issue.
10:01 AM on 03/19/2012
Now if he was just from D.C he would have some cred with regards to THIS particularly momument.

Put it a Pershing Park, its not on the mall but its has more visibility and traffic than the current DC WWI memorial which is out of sight.
11:52 AM on 03/19/2012
The idea is not to have a monument that people drive by every day and see it out of their cars window, the idea is to have it at a place where people flock to every day to honor veterans. That's what the National Mall is. That's why 25 million people visit it every year. Put it in Pershing Park and you'll get a bunch of locals using it as a place to eat their bagels on their lunch break.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Parade Keegan
I Can Hear You
01:16 AM on 03/19/2012
One national memorial for the heroes of each war is enough. If each state or district wants one too that's fine... but it should be on state/district land not federal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustinP213
I dislike all political parties.
03:17 PM on 03/19/2012
Well, there isn't a national monument for WWI soldiers. So, one must be built on the Washington Mall.
12:26 AM on 03/19/2012
"In Honor of Those Who Served in The World War In Defense of Liberty and Our Country" is written at the base of the Liberty Memorial Tower, which is taller than the Statue of Liberty, and was dedicated in 1921 by Gen. Pershing (of the later named Pershing Park above) along with four Allied European Commanders from the Great War. The complex, which included two museums (now with a 2006 addition), is dedicated to those who served in "THE" World War. This Memorial existed before any of the wars were fought that we think of as being war memorials in the DC area discussed. Does a Memorial mean less because of its geographic location?

Honor the intent of the Memorials and those who built it- there is tremendous history and sacrifice behind both. Pay homage and honor those DC soldiers- their sacrifice is not lessened because there are other wars and other Memorials that were built up around their Memorial. Americans did build a grand monument and tremendous memorial to honor those who sacrificed during the Great War on a space that would take up about 1/3 of the National Mall- all before a Congressional designation of "national war memorial" existed.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
07:34 AM on 03/17/2012
Let's not forget that WWI Vets were at least as great as those fighting in WWII. For the most part, they were all volunteers often dropping out of college for idealistic purposes of saving the world. They were the men who lost everything during the depression raised families during the depression and they were the successfull leaders who made America such so that we won WWII. If anything, they deserve a monument, a grand monumnent not for what they did in two short years but in lifetimes often spanning a century that made modern America.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OCCUPYHERALD
Live, Love, Laugh,share, grow.
02:12 AM on 03/17/2012
In 1983 I slept in this Monument , It was soo neglected and was falling apart then, I was told that there had been no money dedicated to its preservation , when it was dedicated, Later that day I found a ww1 Memorial close to McPherson park! I was Down in Washington in January and saw the restoration of this grand portico/ pagoda , I urge everyone to go to see it! course the tidal pool is all dug up and the fences make anyone who is in a non motorized wheelchair or crippled , a difficult journey , the Monument is not wheelchair assessable
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trilingual
11:46 PM on 03/16/2012
Kansas City has by far the largest and most impressive memorial to the veterans of World War I in the U.S. Yes, there are memorials in some other cities, but none really compare to the Liberty Memorial in size and grandeur, and the Liberty Memorial also houses the official National World War I Museum, which is amazing -- it has the largest collection of World War I artifacts in the nation. The Liberty Memorial should be officially designated the National World War I Memorial as well, which would bring some federal funding to help support the complex which is currently paid for by Kansas City taxpayers alone, even though it is national in scale and scope.
photo
David DeJonge
Co-Founder of WWI Memorial Foundation
12:19 AM on 03/17/2012
The current pending law would recognize both locations as national. Could it get any better? http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c112:1:./temp/~c1123ZUk4n:e16975:
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trilingual
01:02 AM on 03/17/2012
Well, that certainly is a Solomonic bit of legislation! But if it brings a national designation to the Liberty Memorial as well as to the museum, and generates some federal funding, that would be a good thing!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OCCUPYHERALD
Live, Love, Laugh,share, grow.
02:15 AM on 03/17/2012
largest collection of WW1 artefacts is in Germany , second largest was in new Cumberland Pennsylvania till 1998! over 2000 artillery wheels with real rubber alone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raker
10:33 PM on 03/16/2012
Please, no more uglyass monuments on the Washington Mall.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OCCUPYHERALD
Live, Love, Laugh,share, grow.
02:16 AM on 03/17/2012
I cant Believe they let a Chinese Guy put Chinese eye on Martins monument!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I say the things that have to be said.
02:55 AM on 03/17/2012
It's not on the mall, man. It's in the city of D.C.
HoosierInMaryland
HuffPo says my 'micro-bio is empty'
05:30 PM on 03/19/2012
So, let's see.

The National Park Service, in accordance with Federal law, defines the National Mall as encompassing the area:
"Constitution and Pennsylvania Avenues, NW on the north, First Street [NW] on the east, Independence and Maryland Avenues [SW] on the south, and 14th Street [NW] on the west." (Thus technically, the Washington Monument, Lincoln Memorial, Jefferson Memorial, World War II Memorial, the cherry trees, etc., are ALL not on the Mall.)

The District of Columbia War Memorial that memorializes DC citizens who participated in World War One is located in West Potomac Park slightly off of Independence Avenue. It is WEST of 14th St., NW, therefore it is NOT part of the National Mall.

And one other thing - the District of Columbia War Memorial contains the names of African-Americans and women along with white men, the first memorial in the US to do such.
10:28 PM on 03/16/2012
David......per your Wikipedial link........

Liberty Memorial in Kansas City, Missouri houses the official World War I museum of the United States. Designated in 2004 by the United States Congress as America's official museum dedicated to World War I, the new museum opened to the public in December 2006.

How can you state this isn't the official US WW1 Memorial...?
photo
David DeJonge
Co-Founder of WWI Memorial Foundation
11:12 PM on 03/16/2012
Well: "On September 21, 2006, Secretary of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne declared Liberty Memorial a National Historic Landmark." Because I have had meetings with the museum staff, president and watched the senate testimony where they stated they are the de facto memorial and not the national memorial. Again, great place, great people that have done incredible things but they are not the national memorial. If they become a national memorial their maintenence would fall under the dept. of interior/ national park service or the US govt. would pay for their maintenance. And the US govt is not paying for it. The great people of KC are. I admire KC and the museum and continue to salute them for their commitment to WWI.
11:45 PM on 03/16/2012
I saw the video and understand you have a personal interest in this. I can appreciate the interest in having a WWI Memorial in Washingtion, DC. I can only repeat, it exists today in Kansas City, Missouri as the Liberty Memorial. I think you are simply dealing in semantics. Again, some links....

http://www.theworldwar.org/s/110/new/index_community.aspx
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Memorial
http://dcist.com/2012/01/wwi_memorial.php
http://dcist.com/2012/01/wwi_memorial.php
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OCCUPYHERALD
Live, Love, Laugh,share, grow.
02:17 AM on 03/17/2012
A national historic landmark is a great Honour! comes with maintainable monies as well
photo
David DeJonge
Co-Founder of WWI Memorial Foundation
11:18 PM on 03/16/2012
This is the link to the hearing: http://www.energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings-and-business-meetings?ID=1391f3aa-cf84-199f-d2a3-e311b63ee95c

There are also public records on it but it is fact- not national memorial. National Museum yes. Memorial- no.
photo
David DeJonge
Co-Founder of WWI Memorial Foundation
09:58 PM on 03/16/2012
For those interested here is the link to the video: http://youtu.be/hnDX-D-jlxs
photo
David DeJonge
Co-Founder of WWI Memorial Foundation
09:57 PM on 03/16/2012
There is NO national WWI Memorial. Kansas City has an incredible memorial- great museum, great staff and committed patriots to be admired. By all means go visit there. But there are also memorials in: Indianapolis, St. Louis and many other locations. In 2006 Congress said they could be a national symbol- not the national memorial. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Memorial
12:03 AM on 03/18/2012
Fair enough, but what gives you the right to steal a monument that was paid for for a specific purpose by a city/district? The District has just as much of a right to have a local monument as ALL those other locations you mention.
photo
David DeJonge
Co-Founder of WWI Memorial Foundation
08:05 AM on 03/18/2012
OK what part of this is not being understood? A) Nothing will change the DC Memorial. B) The DC Memorial will not be stolen or altered in any way. C) We have only talked about (as the video explains) placing some yet to be determined and approved sculptures in the woods near it.

Perhaps it should be worded differently?

Think of it this way: As you walk down the mall you would look at the now restored DC War Memorial (by federal money not DC money) and say: "Oh there is the DC War Memorial and look over there- there is another memorial. That is the National WWI Memorial. I wonder what the story is as to why there are two memorials here? Look they are near each other. Isn't it nice that they fixed up the old memorial, did nothing to it and don't those statues in the woods help us understand WWI better?

Or try this: The location of the DC and National World War One Memorials- emphasis plural.

This is a political spin being put on this effort. NOTHING will happen to the DC War Memorial.
09:25 PM on 03/16/2012
The National World War I Memorial exists today.....It's the Liberty Memorial in Kansas City, Missouri.....

http://www.theworldwar.org/s/110/new/index_community.aspx
12:16 PM on 03/19/2012
The National WWI Memorial does not exist today. It never has. If the "Liberty Memorial" were National, it would be called "The National WWI Memorial". But it's not. The Museum however IS National and that's why it's called the NATIONAL WWI Museum. Even the president of the Liberty Memorial has called it a "De-facto" National memorial because he knows that none really exists and he feels his is the closest to the real thing. Calvin Coolidge called it ONE of the most impressive and elaborate memorials in the nation, but that's about the closest the Liberty Memorial has gotten to a National status. It's just the facts.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
magnolialover
09:10 PM on 03/16/2012
I can't believe we don't have a WWI national memorial. I don't believe we should make the DC WWI monument into a national monument, it has its own significance. We should make a memorial, a NEW memorial.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OCCUPYHERALD
Live, Love, Laugh,share, grow.
02:23 AM on 03/17/2012
Go to France, there you will see the brothers who lie in Perfect row, after row, and wonder how could they do this all again 20 years later? Tears will form @ the mention of passionnals, Ypres, Arras, Bella Wood, the Somme, and the Poppies of Flanders. so Many poppies soo many young men! soo Many swea hearts!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
magnolialover
08:03 AM on 03/17/2012
I have been. It is amazing and mind boggling all at the same time. I recommend any and all Americans go there and see the cemeteries from WWII and WWI.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
07:53 PM on 03/16/2012
I am the last surviving son of a WWI vet, my brother, a WWII vet having passed away. It is both amazing and apaling that the United States of America has never adequately honored these heros, the first men who fought overseas in a truly international war and not just a war that involved only the interests of the enemy and the US. To go further, these were the men who were promised bonuses for their service and never received them and when they camped in Washington in 1932 to claim those bonuses were fired up by none other than the head of the Army at that time Douglas McArthur, to some still a hero. Many were killed. The US deserves and needs this monument and the men who served deserve it.
12:52 AM on 03/17/2012
"...amazing and appalling..." Exactly. There is absolutely no excuse for the US govt. to have betrayed and fundamentally ignored the service and sacrifices of these veterans for so very long. You nailed it. Thank you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OCCUPYHERALD
Live, Love, Laugh,share, grow.
02:49 AM on 03/17/2012
Their Honours are in france where they died! Go and see , if you cant go. then Go to Utube, Ww1 - Videos, Clips and Movies on sevenload
GSR
Crouch! Touch! Pause! Engage!
05:59 PM on 03/16/2012
I love the WWII memorial. It's mesmerising.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OCCUPYHERALD
Live, Love, Laugh,share, grow.
02:51 AM on 03/17/2012
Abitt huge, considering the american showed up late to the dance!
GSR
Crouch! Touch! Pause! Engage!
05:32 AM on 03/17/2012
The Pacific War was as nasty as Northern France and Belgium in WW I. The US losses were massive. Those men and women earned a huge and moving memorial on the Mall. 65 years later they got one.