iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Giselle McDonald, 74 And Homeless, Can't Receive Chemo Because She Lives In Her Car (How You Can Help)

Homeless People

First Posted: 03/16/2012 8:58 am Updated: 03/16/2012 6:55 pm

Giselle McDonald weighs 92 pounds. Her stomach cancer and lymphoma make it hard for her to keep her food down. And while she'd like to start chemotherapy, the San Jose, Calif., resident has been denied because of her address, Mercurynews.com reports.

That's because McDonald, 74, lives in her beat-up Ford Escort and is on a waiting list to get into housing.

"My whole life has been nothing but stress, and I'm tired,'' she told the Mercury News. "I want to have some peace and calm."

Getting to the top of the housing waiting list could take more time than she has, according to the Mercury News.

That's the situation across the country, where homeless shelters and advocates are facing tough decisions about who they can help, and when.

In Florida, legislation recently included $3 million for homeless coalitions across the state -- a last minute decision that comes as only slightly relieving, as the money is specific to paying staffers, not helping homeless the Orlando Sentinel reports.

"I can't understand why homeless families should come last," Debra Susie, executive director of Florida Impact, a nonprofit which works to reduce hunger and poverty throughout the state, told the news source.

McDonald's case also exemplifies another issue: the risk elderly homeless people face. The Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress describes the toll in this year's report:

"The most notable difference between older and younger homeless adults is the older adults’ compromised health status; one study found that they were 3.6 times as likely to have a chronic medical condition as homeless adults under 50. Another study found that 85% of homeless persons over age 50 reported at least one chronic medical condition. Homeless adults between ages 50 and 62 often have healthcare needs similar to those of people who are 10 to 20 years older."

On the East Coast, the Boston Medical Center's program Elders Living At Home addresses this plight, and has helped house more than 2,500 elderly homeless find permanent housing, MySouthEnd.com reports.

The program is recently spotlighted by the movie "Being Flynn" starring Robert DeNiro, which tells the story of a strained father-son relationship and elderly homelessness in Boston.

Eileen O'Brien, director of Elders Living at Home told NECN.com that on any given night there are 1,200 elderly homeless on the streets of Boston alone.

"It's beyond deplorable, it's unconscionable," she said. "It's sort of a dirty little secret in this country. People think there's a safety net for older people and there really isn't."

Without a safety net, Giselle McDonald relies on hope.

She told Mercurynews.com that she promises she would keep her apartment clean if she got one, and despite the hard times, McDonald has one more fight in her.

"I'm like a bulldog -- tenacious," McDonald said. "I have my teeth into life; I won't let go."

To help Giselle McDonald get housing, donations may be sent to:

Giselle McDonald
P.O. Box 5128
San Jose CA 95150-5128

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article stated an incorrect address for sending donations.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST IMPACT

Giselle McDonald weighs 92 pounds. Her stomach cancer and lymphoma make it hard for her to keep her food down. And while she'd like to start chemotherapy, the San Jose, Calif., resident has been denie...
Giselle McDonald weighs 92 pounds. Her stomach cancer and lymphoma make it hard for her to keep her food down. And while she'd like to start chemotherapy, the San Jose, Calif., resident has been denie...
Filed by Emily Heinz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gordon Hilgers
Poet and writer
06:45 PM on 03/23/2012
You'd think her doctors or the hospital would make some calls and get her in a blasted apartment! What's wrong with people these days?
photo
imanormalalien
and yes, it's a MGMT reference
10:19 PM on 03/18/2012
and yet for some reason, people slander the great healthcare systems in Canada and Europe..
09:06 PM on 03/18/2012
this is horrible! where are the pro-life advocates?
11:10 PM on 03/17/2012
Thank you HP! Maybe she can use my address! Or I'll help get her one. "There but for the grace...". Screw SJ med system; she is our sister, mother, daughter...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DuxMom
Wine merchant, parent, artist
02:59 PM on 03/22/2012
Can you help her? are you in her area? Sounds like she needs someone to advocate for her.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
celticmaiden7475
08:35 PM on 03/17/2012
Seems in this country life really is not worth much. It's sad when you think about if you got sick and couldn't work you loose the insurance that could help save your life then you go bankrupt anyone of us could be this lady. Hope she can get help do she can die on a bed and not in her car
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
randinoel
God is the only way to ever-lasting life.
05:34 PM on 03/17/2012
This is sick.
08:45 AM on 03/17/2012
Hospitals should not be allowed to deny people medical care just because they don't have an address. A federal law needs to be put in place.
maxfax
Taa - dah!
01:52 AM on 03/17/2012
Keep your cancer dollars on the local level, help someone who can't get help, don't send your dollars to a clearing house with a political agenda.
photo
anewdaywilldawn
for those who stand long
01:03 AM on 03/17/2012
It seems to me they don't want to bother with her, they want her to just go away and die. And this is the United States of America.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sandra Stipp
03:46 PM on 03/20/2012
It all comes down to money and how sad is that???
photo
anewdaywilldawn
for those who stand long
11:47 PM on 03/21/2012
It's very sad. I just can't believe this is happening in the United States of America. It's just mind boggling to me.
12:27 AM on 03/17/2012
this is terribly so sad! Isn't this abuse to deny anyone, in any shape or form not to recieve treatment, because they dont have an "address"? Shame to those that denied her medical treatment! If she was in NJ, I would take her in, in a heartbeat,(including her cats if she does have them)and my wonderful neighbor who volunteers to take patients for cancer treatments would be glad to help! I only say this, because Im a working woman, also caring for my elderly father who is in declining health at this time. Something is so wrong here! It makes me feel embarrassed we live in this country that acts this way! They help abused animals, for which Im grateful for, but what about homeless humans? May God Bless this woman every step of the way, I sure hope there will be a "happy ending"?
11:18 PM on 03/16/2012
Every state in the United States should have a couple Nursing Homes for the terminally ill elderly, where they also receive medial care. Does a place like that exist?
11:15 PM on 03/16/2012
Regardless of the prognosis, shouldn't this woman be able to die in a safe, clean, comfortable place as pain free as possible. This is heartbreaking and anyone who says yeah but needs to do some serious soul searching.
maxfax
Taa - dah!
01:53 AM on 03/17/2012
It is the United States of America, you would think so.
10:36 PM on 03/16/2012
The unfortunate truth is that she should be denied chemotherapy until she has a stable, safe place in which to recover...

That being said, the fact that our society is completely willing to just let this happen to people is the injustice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:28 PM on 03/17/2012
You are right. I a patient is young and otherwise healthy, chemo protocols are tough. At 74, homeless, undernourished, nauseous, and surrounded by germs even in a shelter, she would still be at great risk. Sadly this is the face of no Universal Health Care (the Socialized Bogeyman), and an unwillingness of the majority to pay more to care for those who do not have the capacity to do so. Fact: better safety nets require higher taxes. Government can do this. Private charitable donations cannot do more than supplement because facilities require consistent, steady income streams. Her story is a statement about America's priorities. Just so sad.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ms.understood
pro-choice | liberal | womanist
08:12 PM on 03/16/2012
Jesus Christ!!! this is just too much. it seems like the government would have a fund or something that our tax dollars go to so that the homeless can get medical treatment. i wonder if they can go to their local health department and get some type of medical treatment? i certainly hope so.
06:22 PM on 03/16/2012
In all actuality, what is the prognosis for patients treated with Chemotherapy in "lymphoma" and/or "stomach cancer" combined? There may be a more humane and actual reason beyond age and homelessness that we don't get to learn about from our "scientific" pundits and institutions. Let the media have its sensationalism but they just may have the story wrong- Insidious "media terror."
10:39 PM on 03/16/2012
As a journalist, I don't think the point of the article was to be a 'terrorizing media,' but the best decision to completely round out the article is talk to a representative of the hospital to get their statement on why she is not allowed treatment. This only shows one side of the story. If the hospital refused to comment or couldn't be reached, that should be included that so the audience knows.
11:55 PM on 03/16/2012
Homelessness and poverty are deplorable conditions anywhere. The point journalists miss is the actual relatedness between cancer and chemotherapy. It is not a win- win situation in which "Chemo" imparts a cure by virtue of being administered. In fact, chemotherapy is toxic and may be the proximate cause of death rather than the condition it was "designed" to help. The paradox is that healthy people can tolerate chemo better whereas debilitated patients probably succumb to the proposed chemical "cure" sooner.