iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Newt Gingrich's Marriages: Affairs And Divorces Of Past Presidential Candidates Explained (PHOTOS)

Newt Gingrich Divorce

The Huffington Post   Brittany Wong First Posted: 03/16/2012 8:33 am Updated: 03/16/2012 12:49 pm

How much weight should the personal lives of presidential aspirants carry in the voting booth? The question of whether or not candidates' private lives is fair game -- or even relevant -- to campaign coverage has long been debated by pundits, voters and even the candidates themselves.

This campaign season, no GOP presidential hopeful has come under more scrutiny for his marital history than Newt Gingrich. For almost three decades, the thrice-married former speaker of the House has fielded questions about his split from first wife, Jackie Battley -- namely, that he'd served her divorce papers while she was in the hospital undergoing cancer treatment (a story that Gingrich and his daughters have vigorously denied.)

But in January, Gingrich was forced to respond to another personal allegation when second wife Marianne Gingrich appeared on ABC News and accused him of asking her for an open marriage in 1999 in order to be with Callista Bisek -- the woman who is now his third wife. On January 19, the same night the interview was aired, moderator John King opened CNN's GOP debate in South Carolina by asking Gingrich if he wanted to respond to the claims. Gingrich lashed out at the "destructive, vicious, negative nature" of much of the news media.

"Every person in here knows personal pain. Every person in here has had someone close to them go through painful things," Gingrich said. "To take an ex-wife and make it two days before the primary, a significant question in a presidential campaign, is as close to despicable as anything I can imagine."

But what was presumed to be an issue for voters in South Carolina ended up having little effect. In the run-up to the vote, the Christian Scientist Monitor reported that Gingrich's lead had actually increased in the wake of his ex-wife's accusations, likely due to skepticism over Marianne Gingrich's claims. At the time, Public Policy Polling data on South Carolina voters showed that only 31 percent of voters said they thought Marianne Gingrich's accusations were true, while 35 percent thought they were false and 34 percent were unsure. Fifty-one percent of voters had "no concerns" about the interview's revelations. Their votes told as much; Gingrich won the South Carolina primary with 40 percent of the vote.

But voters haven't always been so forgiving. From FDR's long-hidden affair with a younger woman to the questionable chronology of John McCain's divorce, click through the slideshow to see how marital infidelities and divorces have played out among voters of yesteryear.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt
1  of  7
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
It's been well-documented that 32nd president Franklin Delano Roosevelt had an affair Lucy Mercer, the younger woman who served as wife Eleanor's personal secretary beginning in 1913. According to the New York Times, the affair likely started in 1916 and was discovered by Eleanor in September 1918, when she stumbled upon a batch of incriminating letters while unpacking her husband's bag. Though Eleanor offered Franklin a divorce, his strong-willed mother, Sara Delano, urged him against it. It wasn't just her; in Russell Freedman's 1992 biography of FDR, the president's son Elliot is quoted as saying that political adviser Louis Howe tried to convince Roosevelt "that he had no political future if he did this."

In the end, Franklin and Eleanor stayed married and the affair stayed under wraps during the election and after. As the New York Times writes, Roosevelt was one of the many politicians of yesteryear, who "with the help of an obliging press and retinues of discreet enablers," kept their private life private.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST DIVORCE

How much weight should the personal lives of presidential aspirants carry in the voting booth? The question of whether or not candidates' private lives is fair game -- or even relevant -- to campaign ...
How much weight should the personal lives of presidential aspirants carry in the voting booth? The question of whether or not candidates' private lives is fair game -- or even relevant -- to campaign ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 765
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rebecca Carey
Proud Liberal.
03:35 PM on 03/19/2012
Newt's failed marriages and lack of character don't matter.
He is not (was never) a viable candidate.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pcs5141
cut the crap
03:47 PM on 03/18/2012
All of the indiscretions of the Kennedys didn't seem to hurt them except for getting assininated.Teddy the woman chaser/killer kept getting re-elected.
02:28 PM on 03/18/2012
The Republicans love to pick on others, yet hide their own foibles.
Luke 6:42 says: "How can you say to your brother, 'Brother, let me take the speck out of your eye,' when you yourself fail to see the plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye."
Regarding Newt's divorces, he must be forgetting Mark 10:11 & Luke 16:18: "...whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her."
So much for using your religion to blast the other candidates.
02:22 PM on 03/18/2012
Until the GOP stops harrassing the left with their sordid affairs the right will have to keep theirs in the spotlight as well. They fired the first shot that is for damn sure!

Does it matter how Snewt would do as the leader of the free world, no, he'd suck at the job even if he was as sinless as Christ Himself! As would Sanitarium and Runnmey. Sadly Oblowhard is the best of the sorry bunch and that's only cause he's had the job for the last 3 plus years!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sallyslide
retired, female
09:14 PM on 03/17/2012
I am surprised that his record in the House as Speaker was not a bigger issue than his multiple marriages. We are a forgiving nation and that's a good thing, but his record on the job is enough reason to not have him considered for any office, certainly not as President.
06:29 PM on 03/17/2012
One's personal life is one's character. Newt has zip character.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Helena Williamstom
02:00 PM on 03/17/2012
It says to me he has commitment and moral issues. Untrustworthy comes to mind.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Just My Thoughts 2011
Life's but a walking shadow
11:55 AM on 03/17/2012
It does matter. Their choices say a lot about their character, and the morals and values they represent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Willow712
democratic socialst
11:28 AM on 03/17/2012
The old quote, "Don't do as I do, do as I say!!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen lyons kalmenson
i poem/paint, sometimes, i ain't
11:05 AM on 03/17/2012
pecadillos are the pride of politicos, and although they are salacious and entertaining, they should not be considered as any reason to vote or not to vote for a candidate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Irantergosum
10:08 AM on 03/17/2012
Newt Gingrich's divorces do matter. They matter because all Republicans spout that they are holier-than-thou, God-loving, family values paragons of virtue.

Of course, they are nothing of the sort. You can look at the long list of hypocrites in their party including adulterer Newt Gingrich, former Senator Larry Craig (Minneapolis airport men's room toe-tapping homosexual), David Vitter (Louisiana adulterer and Senator who was reelected), Mark Foley, former S.C. governor and adulterer Mark Sanford, Senator Bill Frist, Henry Hyde (of impeachment fame), Ken Mehlman (George W. Bush's campaign finance manager (who confessed to homosexuality after fiercely opposing laws protecting gays and lesbians) and David Dreier a recently avowed homosexual who supports the Defense of Marriage Act, as well as voting against gay adoption, and against inclusion of homosexuals as a protected class in hate crime.

There are many more Republicans who walk a different path when it comes to their self-described higher moral values when in fact they are reprehensible hypocrites whose personal behavior and lifestyles are astutely hidden from public disclosure.

Yes, Gingrich's divorces do matter.
09:19 AM on 04/07/2012
Interesting that your comments about Republicans are exactly what you accuse them of doing and that is disclosing all their foibles but not mentioning those of the other party, and yet that is what you are blaming the Republicans of doing.
10:06 AM on 03/17/2012
For me it isn't about if he is not faithful (to many wives) or if he is divorced (multiple times).
It isn't this for any candidate really even if it is smoking pot in college etc etc.
It is that he is hypocritical about it.
You cannot have no respect for marriage you cannot pretend to make rules about marriage. or condemn anybody else for doing what you have done.
You cannot have smoked pot or imbibed and then turn around and say it is a horrendous crime.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Willow712
democratic socialst
11:03 AM on 03/17/2012
I think it is hilarious, who said they didn't inhale, Clinton? and President Obama said, "that's the idea, to inhale." LOL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gourgandine
French but friendly :))
09:37 AM on 03/17/2012
It is hard for me as French to understand how private life can be taken in account in politics because we have a very strong law forbiding journalists to talk about private life.... That's how everybody in the media knew abour Dominique Strauss Khan excessive sexual behaviour and how it never was explicitely written about . I feel that if a politician is presenting a progam about family values, religious believes, and an image of marital blithe and perfection, then yes, it should be taken in consideration if it is a lie. For the rest, it is personnal matters. But if a guy lies about that part of himself, what else is he going to lie about when he is in charge of a town, a state or a coutry ???
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
elizlucinda
a mind is a terrible thing to waste
08:47 AM on 03/17/2012
the personal lives of the candidates for the most part should have no effect on a candidancy unless like Newt, you throw stones while standing in your own glass house.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeffrey Marks
07:14 AM on 03/17/2012
If these men did not vigorously pursue a "family values" agenda, then no, it would not matter. However, these men are subject to seeing if they walk the walk, and Newt does not. It's hard to believe Newt is "protecting marriage" when his bedroom has a revolving door attached.

I am curious as to those left out by HuffPo here. Eisenhower also had an affair, JFK had many, Nixon is now rumored to have had a gay affair, Reagan's own divorce was more clouded by rumors of infedility, GHW Bush was rumored to have had an affair, Clinton wasn't mentioned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Willow712
democratic socialst
11:06 AM on 03/17/2012
LBJ reportedly ambushed women and had roving hands, Clinton won the Presidency after his Genifer Flowers mess. Everybody knew R. Reagan had been divorced, but nobody really heard much about it. And I didn't know that supposedly Jane Wyatt divorced him because he had gotten interested in politics? That's just plain weird.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dawlishgal
02:16 AM on 03/20/2012
Jane Wyman.