iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Budget Produces 2013 Deficit Of $977 Billion, According To CBO

Obama Budget Cbo

ANDREW TAYLOR   03/16/12 04:10 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — A new analysis of President Barack Obama's budget for next year says the deficit scenario for next year isn't as rosy as the White House figured last month.

Friday's Congressional Budget Office report said Obama's budget would produce a $977 billion deficit next year – $75 billion more than predicted by the White House.

Over the coming decade, CBO says Obama's policies would result in deficits totaling $6.4 trillion. Deficits would be even higher were it not for Obama's proposals to raise taxes on higher-income people.

The White House seized on the figures as validation of its claims that Obama's budget brings the deficit under control – at least when measured against the economy, the measure used by most economists in evaluating the deficit.

"CBO found that by 2016 deficits as a share of the economy would be below 3 percent – a key milestone of fiscal sustainability," said White House budget office acting director Jeffrey Zients. "Debt held by the public will decrease and then stabilize as a share of the economy, also a key indicator of improving fiscal health."

The nonpartisan CBO said Obama's budget office consistently overestimates tax revenues over the coming decade. CBO predicts revenues on average that are about $120 billion less each year than predicted by the White House.

Still, CBO said Obama's budget would generate somewhat lower deficits over the coming decade than the White House predicts. Much of that is due to lower interest costs and less generous cost-of-living adjustments in Social Security benefits.

The forecasting differences for 2013 aren't unusual and generally are caused by CBO's less optimistic view of the economy over the next couple of years. The White House forecasts higher income and corporate profits.

For the current budget year, CBO says Obama's policies, if enacted, would generate a $1.25 trillion deficit. That's $74 billion better than the White House forecast but still represents the fourth consecutive year of trillion dollar-plus deficits.

The report is a precursor to the annual budget debate in Congress. House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wis., plans to unveil his budget plan next week, which will call for sharply lower spending on federal health care programs, lower taxes than called for by Obama and less money for the day-to-day budgets of federal agencies than called for in last year's budget and debt pact.

"The president will not fulfill his promise to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term – after four straight deficits in excess of $1 trillion, CBO estimates next year's deficit will be even higher than the president claims," Ryan said in a statement.

The House GOP measure won't get anywhere with Obama or Democrats controlling the Senate, however. Expectations are low for any election-year progress on the deficit as Obama and his GOP rivals continue to differ on raising taxes and curbing the explosive growth of popular benefit programs like Medicare.

Senate Democrats plan on using spending "caps" set by last year's budget pact for an upcoming round of spending bills and don't anticipate scheduling a debate on a broader budget blueprint.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — A new analysis of President Barack Obama's budget for next year says the deficit scenario for next year isn't as rosy as the White House figured last month. Friday's Congressional ...
WASHINGTON — A new analysis of President Barack Obama's budget for next year says the deficit scenario for next year isn't as rosy as the White House figured last month. Friday's Congressional ...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 52
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SportyJim
procrastination app coming soon
11:43 AM on 03/19/2012
Funny that this story was buried on HP. I haven't found a story talking about the Pres. declining popularity #'s either.
09:03 PM on 03/16/2012
I did some calculations on the Total Public Debt Outstanding based on presidential inaugurations using this gov website:
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np

When Bush came into office on Jan 20th 2001 the total public debt was $5,727,776,738,304. When Bush left office it was: $10,626,877,048,913

So in Bush's 8 year term he contributed to the total public debt approximately: $4,899,100,310,609

When Obama came into office the debt was:
$10,626,877,048,913

As of 3/16/2012 (9:00 PM Eastern time) the Total Public Debt Outstanding was approximately
$15,564,809,891,767

In Obama's 3 years 1 month and 27 days in office he added $4,937,932,842,854 to the public debt which is more than Bush added in his 8 years in office.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NanaPuddin
Proof is in the Puddin
03:54 PM on 03/20/2012
% increase of food stamps
% decrease in GDP
% increase in unemployment
% increase in foreclosures
...

Get it? Its a recession, silly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tangelan
You will not cast aspersions on my asparagus.
10:40 PM on 03/20/2012
And what policies has he added that contributed to the $4 trillion? Keep in mind that the ACA hasn't been fully implemented. Also, the full effects of his policies haven't even hit the deficit because they they go over 10 to 20 years. Maybe you should learn how deficits work.
12:57 AM on 03/26/2012
Your issue seems to be with basic math and treasurydirect.gov.

It seems to pain the partisans when something seems to make their guy look bad. It is a shame when people let partisanship blind them from numbers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
02:40 PM on 03/16/2012
lets start by ending the wars and stop spending money rebuilding a country that doesn't want us there and continues to blow up what we built and kill our kids. it is time we end that expense immediately. Lets work on not giving profit rich oil companies any more subs or tax credit. lets cut our aid to any country that doesn't bear our own interest. lets invest in our energy economy and stop sending billions to other countries. we grow this economy and then we can reduce the amount of money the govt has to spend. if we increase employment, we would decrease UI benefit, decrease medicare aid to the less fortunate.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reron
02:03 PM on 03/16/2012
Unless we make long term tough decisions looking forward 20+ years the debt will not shrink dramatically. I think many people think that we can tackle this in a couple of years and fix the problem. That won't happen. There have only been 2 or 3 years of balanced budgets in the last half century, 1956 and in the late 90's. Now if my memory is correct we have had both Dems and R's running the show in that period. We have a revenue issue, the health care costs associated with Medicare and Medicaid, military spending are the fixed costs we need to address. Discretionary spending only represents a small portion of our costs and arguing about NPR, planned parenthood, etc is only political fodder. It does not seem like the American people or it's leaders really want to come to grip with the large drivers of our national debt. There is certainly no dicussion of sacrifice or the compromises needed to solve the problem. Just our leadership pandering to their respective bases. Even doing the right thing it will take a generation plus to correct this.
photo
hrc04
put on your pants and go home.
01:10 PM on 03/16/2012
I'm guessing this will be the day the GOP kisses and makes up with the CBO.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pb28
02:40 PM on 03/16/2012
republicans have a selective friendship with CBO
01:04 PM on 03/16/2012
Way to bury this one, HP.

Figures don't lie, but liars figure...
photo
notmoderate
There's always money in the banana stand
02:31 PM on 03/16/2012
what do you mean, "bury". It's on the site.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
02:44 PM on 03/16/2012
where is the burying of this information. it is out there for everyone to read. oh it might be buried because the right don't get their news from any other place but fox. don't worry, it is would be posted and spinned on fox very soon.
This budget is still much better than anything the republicans are putting out there. they want to destroy this country and the economy while creating more problems.
03:01 PM on 03/16/2012
"Much better"? LOL - you like being bankrupt like Greece!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chadizzy
12:56 PM on 03/16/2012
Just what we need another trillion in debt! Wow!
01:26 PM on 03/16/2012
That's coming EVERY YEAR due to Obama's policies.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:23 PM on 03/16/2012
And just what 'policies' would you like to see enacted?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
02:45 PM on 03/16/2012
yes because there is no carry over from other president that is creating this problem. because we are not still paying for the wars that republicans pushed for, and are still pushing for.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
kmswriter
This mean we can't be friends?
12:46 PM on 03/16/2012
When doing a budget you always budget high - expecting to get to a point where everyone agrees...this is done all the time....so when the cuts by the republicans are negoitated ( I know, blasphemy) we will be where we need to be to run the country - the Ryan budget is DOA....anything ryan puts on the table is just another vote for the Dems....ryan can take his voucher and "where sun don't shine"....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:44 PM on 03/16/2012
You have to be total absolute LIR to make a 977 billion dollar error of this magnitude. In the real world he would have been fired instantly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:36 PM on 03/16/2012
Cherry picking isn't the way to see this problem if accuracy is your aim.
"The forecasting differences aren't unusual>>>> CBO's less optimistic view>>>> White House forecasts higher income and corporate profits. Over the coming decade, CBO says Obama's policies would result in deficits totaling $6.4 trillion."
Huge! I agree but this is not the result of current spending, its the result of deferred spending and the idea that those who make under 30,000 a year can contribute more while those who who 3 million will contribute less.

As for the real world....few live there, most live either in fantasy land or they are well inside the bubble.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
02:50 PM on 03/16/2012
get your facts right.
12:43 PM on 03/16/2012
KILL THE TAX CUTS! SHEESH!!!
12:35 PM on 03/16/2012
We should not expect an honest picture by any governing party in America because lying is second nature to whichever party is in power.
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
12:49 PM on 03/16/2012
OK. Next.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:45 PM on 03/16/2012
Why are these projections considered to be lies? Do you think algorithms simply concoct false outcomes at the whim or intent of the operators? The CBO is an independent body charged w/ analyzing data. To do so they employ statistics. Statistics rarely account for rates of change. Its " best guess" or a WAG, either way its still a guess.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SpeakupNation
Pray for the dead and fight like hell for the livi
12:26 PM on 03/16/2012
Of course rolling back the Bush tax cuts would be might helpful in this regard...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deltalady
12:36 PM on 03/16/2012
A promise will be made again to do so, but it won't happen. Reality will set in the day after the election and the status quo will be preserved.
photo
SantaMonican
Visit the carousel, in the Hippodrome, on the pier
01:39 PM on 03/16/2012
Vote obstructing republicans out. Tax the rich.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:48 PM on 03/16/2012
A promise? You me a proposal. A proposal becomes policy when it reaches agreement. Fat chance of that if Republican cooperation is necessary.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Liberalstevek
12:11 PM on 03/16/2012
Everything I've read shows the Republicans candidates proposals are even worse. They think it will get better if they just lower taxes more for the rich. Romney's projections for growth were silly and he won't even give enough details so it can be accurately evaluated.
11:53 AM on 03/16/2012
February's deficit was $229 billion a record. In the last three months accumulated deficit was $650 billion. CBO estimate is already off, more than the Obama budget estimates, in the wrong direction.
02:24 PM on 03/16/2012
February is tax refund month. Its always the highest month. Lots of refunds are a positive sign of work and over withholding.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
02:53 PM on 03/16/2012
i am sure you looked at the great recession and it cause on the economy. you looked at the current war and it effect on the deficits. we have deficit issue, however it is not going to be solve by destroying the economy and workers. republican plan competely destroy the workers, country and the economy, while still creating a deficit.
11:35 AM on 03/16/2012
Obama said he would cut Bush's $1.3 trillion annual deficit in half by his final year. Its not going to happen now.

But its moving in the right direction.
11:55 AM on 03/16/2012
The only way the current deficit is actually moving is up. Obama speculation has it going down BIG difference. Unless of course you happen to be one of the 10% remaining that actually believe any thing he says.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:42 PM on 03/16/2012
Like the President has any control. He can only suggest, The House has to start the Budget, the Senate can make changes, but the President can only sign or veto, then manage the money as can best be done within the dictates of Congress.

The President USED to have the power to not spend allocated money, he could direct agencies to only spend a percentage of the allocated funds, but Congress took that power away from the President back in the 70's, it seems that they did not like the President cutting spending without their blessing!
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
01:19 PM on 03/16/2012
Are you really that obtuse?

We are talking about Yearly Deficit, not the overall deficit.