iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Ryan Grim
GET UPDATES FROM Ryan:

Social Security Battle's New Turn: Unions Call For Increase In Benefits

Posted: 03/16/2012 4:22 pm Updated: 03/16/2012 5:50 pm

Trumkasocsec
Richard Trumka is the president of the AFL-CIO, which is calling to increase Social Security payments

Throwing the debate over Social Security on its head, the AFL-CIO is issuing a call to expand the program rather than shrink it.

Social Security's current benefits are too low, the labor group wrote in a statement published Wednesday. Advocates of the program are lining up behind the union.

"Labor just stood up for every American -- union and non-union alike -- who values Social Security and wants it to be there for themselves, their children and grandchildren. Social Security is a uniquely American solution, not a problem, the AFL-CIO's Executive Council just declared," said Eric Kingson, co-director of Social Security Works, announcing his group's backing of the new position.

The nearly 54 million people drawing Social Security benefits receive, on average $1,073.80 per month, according to the Social Security Administration, HuffPost previously reported. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities estimates the program keeps about 20 million people out of poverty, including 13 million elderly Americans.

Gary Engelhardt and Jonathan Gruber, in a 2004 National Bureau of Economic Research report on the program, calculated that each 10 percent cut in benefits would lead to a 7.2 percent increase in poverty. Such cuts are beginning to seem likely, despite the robust state of the program's finances, which can cover full benefits through 2037 and boasts a surplus trust fund of $2.6 trillion as of this past fall. Reversing that trend and increasing Social Security payments likely would lead to a reduction in elderly poverty, if past history is any guide.

"It is time to stop thinking of Social Security as a problem and start thinking of it as a key solution to our retirement security crisis," the AFL-CIO statement begins, arguing that aging baby boomers are increasingly vulnerable as a result of flattening wages and a financial crisis that devastated 401(k)s.

A more generous Social Security, the AFL-CIO argues, is the best fix. "While Social Security is an obvious solution to the [retirement] crisis, its current benefit levels are too modest. Social Security’s income replacement rate is one of the lowest of all the industrialized countries," the statement says.

The AFL-CIO is a longstanding opponent to any reduction of Social Security benefits or raising of the retirement age. The union said calls for cuts are unjustified, and that the program is fiscally sustainable.

"The reason why the debate in Washington, D.C., has gone so far in the wrong direction is that the enemies of Social Security have spent enormous amounts of money spreading misinformation about the program," the statement says. "The truth is that Social Security is not in crisis. It can pay all scheduled benefits through the year 2036 and three-quarters of all scheduled benefits thereafter. If Social Security were a pension plan, it would be in the 'green zone' -- the healthy zone -- under the Pension Protection Act. Social Security does not contribute one dime to the deficit, it is legally prohibited from borrowing or going into debt and it is not a significant driver of long-term fiscal imbalances."

Proponents of cuts to Social Security, including presidential candidate Rick Santorum , say cutting the program is necessary to curtail the national debt.

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Throwing the debate over Social Security on its head, the AFL-CIO is issuing a call to expand the program rather than shrink it. Social Security's current benefits are too low, the labor group wrot...
Throwing the debate over Social Security on its head, the AFL-CIO is issuing a call to expand the program rather than shrink it. Social Security's current benefits are too low, the labor group wrot...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 435
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
RTGerdes
Registered Republican Since 1971
04:13 PM on 05/18/2012
Social Security is on an unsustainable spending path. Government wants to increase the tax burden even more to pay for it which isn't fair to younger people. Cutting benefits people have come to expect after paying into the system over their entire working life is equally unfair.

What's the solution? The NCPA believes free market solutions can solve many of our nation's public policy problems. One solution to ease Social Security's pains is what is known as the "Alternate Plan." The Alternate Plan has worked for more than 30 years for public employees in three Texas counties and shown that not only is it safe but that many of the retirees receive more than twice what they would have under Social Security. Read about it here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
06:00 PM on 03/17/2012
The republicans have been lying about the viability of Social Security for decades. They have always complained about how it was a burden to the debt and the deficit when it has been anything but. They've wanted to use it as a piggy bank for any and everything. The second they flipped their position they gave up their leverage. However, although I trust them only a little more, the democrats are now playing political games with it fooling around with the payroll tax. The reality is that I am leary of BOTH sides when it comes to the longevity of
Social Security.

I am glad that the AFL-CIO is standing up for the program and the people. At times they seemed to have lost their way, but if they are getting behind this issue, then I can get behind them.
05:36 PM on 03/17/2012
Sounds like more Kabuki Theatre!

So, let's see: the AFL-CIO issues a statement that they want to see Social Security benefits increased (easy to do since they KNOW that it WILL NEVER HAPPEN) just days after they throw their support behind President Obama's 2012 election campaign.

Enter the so-called "left" talking heads on MSNBC and the barely centre left corporatist radio personalities (who vehemently claim to be "liberals"), and what have you got? A very transparent attempt to "set up a narrative" that allows President Obama to appear to be the "sensible center" even as he "guts" both Social Security and Medicare in pursuit of "The Grand Bargain" that he so desperately wants to strike with Conservatives.

Democratic Senators Warner and Durbin (part of Dem leadership) are in the process of having the Bowles-Simpson Fiscal Commission recommendations put into legislative language in hopes of striking a Grand Bargain, and passing into law "entitlement reform" BEFORE the November election.

Indeed, it is the so-called "Washington Consensus" that entitlements must be destroyed in order to avoid paying back the monies that have been pilfered over the years to engage in wars and empire building.

Where do you think all the money is going to come from for President Obama's pet projects: Education, Infrastructure, Research and Development, etc.? The answer is: it comes at the expense of the elderly.

Please make it known to your respective Senators, representatives, and the White House, that this is absolutely unacceptable.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
05:35 PM on 03/17/2012
Yeah. Good luck with this. We have no money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chipper1
12:20 PM on 03/17/2012
Sooner or later we WILL have single payer health care and join the other advanced nations in taking care of ALL our people, not just the rich those wealthy enough to afford outrageously priced health insurance. Why the selfish wish to deny health care to others is beyond me and certainly doesn't show us to be a "Christian" nation.
12:58 PM on 03/17/2012
"Why the selfish wish to deny health care to others is beyond me"

Nobody's denying them anything, I understand why people don't want to pay for their own health insurance and also yours.
photo
AMERICABLESSGOD
It's the least we can do
10:01 AM on 03/17/2012
Can anyone tell me why unions are so hellbent on bankrupting this country?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WowJones
Non union slaves built the White House
10:52 AM on 03/17/2012
Your strawman is poorly constructed.
12:59 PM on 03/18/2012
Actually the banks have bankrupted this country.
09:44 AM on 03/17/2012
"A more generous Social Security, the AFL-CIO argues, is the best fix"

Why is it that today people believe that SS is supposed to be a retirement fund rather than a supplemental fund to a person's own savings?

It was never supposed to be a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.
photo
AMERICABLESSGOD
It's the least we can do
09:57 AM on 03/17/2012
It's because progressives have indoctrinated generations of Americans to believe its the role of government to support the people. Greece, here we come!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pedestrian101
09:30 AM on 03/17/2012
Hey Richard could we hold the Democratic National Convention in my home state of St.Louis MIssouri.
photo
dvtaz
Conservative to the core. Make my day!
09:19 AM on 03/17/2012
The AFL-CIO is simply looking for more payback for assuring Obama's election. Evidently Richard Trumka hasn't had enough sleepovers at the White House.
smo1111
President Obama - The greatest One
09:12 AM on 03/17/2012
Good job, Mr. Trumka!!! Now, press to increase wages in this country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrTaban9
09:07 AM on 03/17/2012
it is legally prohibited from borrowing or going into debt

This is the one thing I don't understand, "Prohibited From Borrowing". The system is PROHIBITED but the lawmakers HAVE BEEN TAKING THE MONEY FOR UMPTEEN YEARS NOW. From what I was lead to believe (reading all the crap about this system and it's so called problems) is that the MONEY is there, it is just that it is in I.O.Us, the POLS have been BORROWING the money for all kinds of ear marks with promises of repayment in the future, so far no one has paid back a nickel I don't think.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
windy33
08:55 AM on 03/17/2012
all places of business needs to get back to pensions. not the dam 401's that they try to convince people that they are so great. when tha fat cats of wall street and the bankers get done loading their pockets then they crash this whole country and we lose everything they get bonuses and we are left with nothing. so you wonder why that ssi is all some people have left. and there needs to be reaqlly really stiff rules aqnd regulations on pensions so that no company can take it and pis# it away like many did before.
09:42 AM on 03/17/2012
"all places of business needs to get back to pensions"

How's that working out for the states?

In New York City, pension costs have gone from $1.3 billion 10 years ago to $8 billion. To put that number in perspective, pension costs now eat up one in every six tax dollars that city residents pay — and 12% of the entire city budget.

That’s more than the operations of the Police, Fire and Sanitation departments combined.

In Suffolk County, pension costs have gone from $13.9 million to $136 million, even though the staffing levels of the county have remained fairly constant. In 2001, Suffolk County’s pension costs averaged $1,352 per employee, as compared with $18,202 in 2011. That represents a 1,246% increase. Had the pension costs remained at 2001 levels, the county could have saved $1 billion — which could have gone to lower taxes and expand services.

or

“Suffolk County’s pension costs per employee have risen over 1,200 percent in the past decade, that is an unsustainable mandate and it is crowding out other investments we must make in our communities,” said Suffolk County Executive Steve Bellone. “I am pleased to join with Mayor Bloomberg and local officials from throughout New York who understand the need for pension reform.”
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
windy33
02:00 PM on 03/17/2012
like the 401" here today gone tomarrow and the bankers get it all and bonuses
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chipper1
12:21 PM on 03/17/2012
Pensions can vanish in an instant. Ask the employees of Delphi. Poof. Gone.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
windy33
02:02 PM on 03/17/2012
and i wrote that stiff rugulations need to be put in place that they cannot touch it. i know because we have a pension plan at ge aqnd they would love to get their hands on it but they can't and my pension from there is doing well for me. i paid into it for 37 years and ge put in as well. but they cannot touch one dime of it.
08:53 AM on 03/17/2012
Instead of sending unions dues to the union chiefs to squander send the money to social security.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrTaban9
09:20 AM on 03/17/2012
Instead of sending unions dues to the union chiefs to squander send the money to social security.

You have been very mislead my friend. As an old time union official I can tell you that in all my years with one of the largest transportation unions in the country, I have NEVER seen any union official ever get one cent of the Dues that are paid. Those dues go to towards many many things. Medical Benefits, Retirement, Legal Fees, Salaries for the Clerks and Administrators who handle all the paper work involved when you have 35- 40.000 members in just one big city alone. My union represented Transportation Workers, Airline Mechanics, Hotel/Motel Workers, Casino Workers, and a host of other job titles to numerous to mention here other than transportation workers. The Union was International and stretched from Coast to Coast.

Also you can't just send money off to Social Security as if to say here's a donation for you guys, it doesn't work that way, there are laws and limits and special collection procedures for SS that have nothing to do with UNIONS OR THEIR DUES.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
windy33
08:48 AM on 03/17/2012
go trumpka i am with you all the way
08:31 AM on 03/17/2012
OK Republicans what do you say to that? Tax the rich or punish grandma or grandpa....your choice.
08:55 AM on 03/17/2012
Shows how out of touch unions are with reality.
photo
Taterhead McGobstopper
Paddle faster, I hear banjos ...
08:57 AM on 03/17/2012
Shows you have no idea what you're talking about.
09:48 AM on 03/17/2012
Nonsense.SS ispaid for from your pay check while you are working.So why do you think your money should not be there when you retire?
09:22 AM on 03/17/2012
First be careful who you get in bed with.
Second mean test the benefits and anyone with a union pension over 70,000 should stop getting checks..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:38 AM on 03/17/2012
Why? I paid into it, but get nothing? If you want to give me back the past 40 years of payments I have made to the fund- then I'm good with that.
Otherwise, there is no reason why I shouldn't get the benefits that I paid for.