iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Goldman To Fire Employees Who Can Be Replaced By Technology, Miss Performance Targets

Posted: 03/19/2012 4:49 pm Updated: 03/19/2012 6:12 pm


By Lauren Tara LaCapra

March 19 (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc has begun a new round of staff cuts in its trading and investment banking divisions, three sources familiar with the matter said, a sign of a continued penny-pinching on Wall Street.

The job cuts follow 2,400 positions Goldman eliminated last year, and further reductions are possible as the company continues to reduce costs to raise profitability, the sources said.

The latest round of cuts is part of Goldman's annual culling process in which the company fires employees who miss performance targets or can be replaced with technology or less expensive staff.

It's unclear how many people will be affected by the job eliminations, which began two weeks ago, because different divisions have received different targets, the sources said. While management has formulated an overall plan for cost-cutting, all of the job cuts may not be completed for months, said a source familiar with the matter.

Recent staff reductions have been less drastic than the culling Goldman performed in March 2011, when 5 percent of its trading staff was let go, said the sources, who have either worked at the company or recruited for it, and spoke under condition of anonymity.

Goldman spokesman Michael DuVally declined to comment on the job cuts.

In late 2011, Goldman management targeted $1.4 billion in annual cost savings that would be achieved largely through staff and bonus cuts. When asked on a conference call in January whether the bank might have to do more such trimming this year to meet the goal, Chief Financial Officer David Viniar said "there is a small amount left to go."

The new job cuts are taking place in all of Goldman's four main divisions, including sales and trading, investment banking, wealth management and investing and lending, according to one source familiar with the matter.

Many of the cuts are aimed at traders who can be replaced with new technology, or back-office, technology and operations staff who can be replaced with less expensive employees, the source said. The bank has been pushing aggressively to replace staff in high-cost areas like New York and New Jersey with less costly workers in Salt Lake City, where the company is building a sizable workforce.

Goldman has also been cutting some staff from divisions likely to be affected by new trading restrictions, such as merchant banking.

"In general the whole paradigm of the business is changing," said one source familiar with Goldman's recent job cuts. "As the business is consolidating and the volumes are going down and there's still this regulatory pressure, management is really looking at the new paradigm and seeing how many bodies are absolutely required for the business."

Many Wall Street banks weed out underperformers or costly employees, who are placed on what's known as a "RIF," or reduction-in-force, list. Morgan Stanley, for instance, cut 887 financial advisers -- many of whom were not meeting revenue targets -- from its wealth-management business throughout 2011 as part of a broader cost-cutting effort.

Goldman is known to create such lists early in the year and send at-risk employees a signal through low bonuses that are handed out in February. Those who do not get the hint are let go in mid-to-late March.

While Goldman's cuts are part of an annual Wall Street ritual, sources familiar with Goldman's trading business say. Bank management has been issuing aggressive revenue targets that have been difficult to meet, particularly with fewer traders, weak trading volumes and low morale.

One equities trading division at Goldman met revenue targets last year but was still required to cut 10 percent of its staff and reduce bonuses by 25 percent to meet cost targets, according to a source familiar with the desk. The business was required to do even more cutting in recent weeks amid weak trading volumes, even as performance targets have risen.

At a conference last month, Viniar said investors have been complaining that the bank has nearly 11,000 more staffers than it did six years ago, but only generates slightly more revenue.

Goldman's 33,300 employees generated $28.8 billion in revenue and $2.5 billion in profit last year, which amounts to $865,195 in revenue per employee and $75,375 in profit per employee. That represents a 25 percent decline in revenue per worker and a 71 percent decline in profit per worker compared with 2005.

FOLLOW BUSINESS

By Lauren Tara LaCapra March 19 (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc has begun a new round of staff cuts in its trading and investment banking divisions, three sources familiar with th...
By Lauren Tara LaCapra March 19 (Reuters) - Goldman Sachs Group Inc has begun a new round of staff cuts in its trading and investment banking divisions, three sources familiar with th...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 270
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nypapajoe
12:58 PM on 03/21/2012
Why not the human robots employed are making to much money and cutting into the bonuses of the CEOs and their executives!
11:56 AM on 03/21/2012
Progress via the wonders of technology. Humans become obsolete. How wonderful.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ebanks84
Grandma knows best!
09:33 AM on 03/21/2012
Blankfein is the dead weight that needs to go. He wouldn't hardly be missed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
authorized-user
macho macho man
08:29 AM on 03/21/2012
We should require this also be done in Congress and agency administrators.
Who would notice a robot replacing a sedentary, mindless legislator who only reacts when money is placed in their hand and they sign a form?
At least the robot wouldn't be sexting or hiding in restrooms.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Unclebuggies
10:31 PM on 03/20/2012
Wow, they have robots that can replace swine?
photo
Ajax Johnson
Am I myself or is it just me?
09:06 PM on 03/20/2012
If they can come up with a robot that can steal while doing God's work they won't need any employees.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
GerryS
I WANT to pay $1 million per year in taxes, or mor
07:01 PM on 03/20/2012
not a one of Goldbar Sacks employees has a heart or a soul,

replace all of them--------------
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
javajava
Pastafarian Liberal Progressive Socialist Hippie
06:18 PM on 03/20/2012
I wonder why the thought of a trader losing his job I find amusing.
06:14 PM on 03/20/2012
At least they're still doing God's work...
photo
settleUdown
I don't watch Fox, so use a different quip.
05:26 PM on 03/20/2012
They said the same thing about automatic elevators. There was a HUGE union of millions of elevator operators that literally dissolved overnight due to the automatic elevator. Fortunately they all went on to do work that machines can't do and we benefit from that as a society. A Duh!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigWillyG
04:42 PM on 03/20/2012
Hasn't replacing people with machines when cheaper been the norm since the late 18th century?
photo
settleUdown
I don't watch Fox, so use a different quip.
05:24 PM on 03/20/2012
They never get it. When "robots" can do things for us, we can work elsewhere and more work gets done. Everything this site comes up with skips the brain and goes directly for the hearts of zuc kers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigWillyG
05:36 PM on 03/20/2012
So sadly true. At least this at least made a try at being "intelligent" instead of going straight into moral panic like half the stuff on here.
04:20 PM on 03/20/2012
Over the last 40 years, computers have replacied people by the millions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
irishlion7
03:30 PM on 03/20/2012
the money changers/counters are out to increase there money and the number of unemployed.
By ether relying upon tech. or lower cost less knowelgable employees. Forgetting the simple rule that it takes anywhere from six months to a year for a low level employee to learn enough of the foiables of the business an politics of the office to return any money on there training. So if you have a business assoc. or accounts with Goldman that is not in there top 1% I would advice pulling your money out now and not think of going back to them for at least eighteen months when the new staff is capable of spotiing the simple errors that take's since month or more to correct following it's electronic trail you have been warned!
photo
Jackcravell
I never ate your homework!
03:03 PM on 03/20/2012
It is the only way for GS to keep a sense of moral outrage from developing within their ranks
02:54 PM on 03/20/2012
A snake eating its own tail.