iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Indiana School Principals' Certification Exam To Be Overhauled

 |  By Sarah Butrymowicz and Scott Elliott  |  Posted: 03/19/2012 1:14 pm Updated: 03/19/2012 1:17 pm

This piece comes to us courtesy of The Hechinger Report.

INDIANAPOLIS -- Indiana is poised to dramatically overhaul the way it determines whether educators are qualified to become principals.

Starting in the fall of 2013, Indiana will abandon its mostly multiple-choice test for the administrator license required to become a principal or vice principal.

Instead, the new test will feature "real practical, applicable scenarios—case-study kinds of things—that actually show that you know what you're talking about," said Marg Mast, director of educator effectiveness and leadership in Indiana's state department of education.

Several states are discussing the idea of creating a new principal certification test, but Indiana is the only one currently doing so, according to Ben Fenton, co-founder and chief strategy and knowledge officer of New Leaders, a New York City-based nonprofit group that trains principals in 12 urban areas across the country.

The change is coming at a time when the job demands of school leaders are shifting dramatically and when Indiana—like many states—has increased the number of teacher observations that administrators must conduct each year as well as the amount of feedback they must provide.

Starting this fall, all teachers in Indiana will be observed at least four times a year by school administrators.

"That has really shone the spotlight on principal preparation," Mast said, "and whether people have the capacity to do the work we're asking them to do."

Some of it requires intuition and solid problem-solving skills, said Pam Hardy, principal at Garden City Elementary School in Wayne Township.

"In many cases, these are 22-year-olds coming into the profession and they are doing what they think is best," she said. "As a principal, you learn that from experience" and get better at helping teachers improve.

Indiana is betting that a heavy focus on principals' teacher-evaluation skills will make a difference.

Research has shown that having an effective principal in a school is nearly as important as having an effective teacher in the classroom. A 2009 study by New Leaders found that principal effectiveness accounts for 25 percent of a school's impact on student gains, while teacher effectiveness accounts for 33 percent.

Illinois and Kentucky are in the process of changing their accreditation standards for principal-preparation programs. Other states, such as Louisiana, are considering ways to rate such programs.

"A number of states are doing things on the principal-preparation front," said Fenton, of New Leaders. "But what is so interesting about Indiana is [the department of education is saying], ‘Could we take a stronger role in … certifying which educators are ready to be principals?' "

Indiana, like most states, now uses a test for principals developed by the nonprofit Educational Testing Service. The test has 100 multiple-choice questions and seven short essay questions on it.

Kris Kingery, a first-year principal at Eagle Elementary School in Pike Township, remembers taking the test four years ago. The essay questions, he said, were mostly reactive.

"It would say something that happened and ask what you do," he said. "Maybe a child has measles or there's been a fight in the cafeteria."

The new test might instead describe a teaching problem the principal candidate might observe in the classroom and ask how the candidate would react to it.

Kingery thought that might be useful. Among the more valuable classes in his principal training program was one on evaluation in which they watched videos of lessons and discussed the strengths and weaknesses of the teachers.

"It was really helpful to hear what other people were seeing, especially when it was different from what I was seeing," he said. "They might have had a different definition of what student engagement was. Their districts might be different in philosophy. It was nice to hear their perspectives and why they felt that way."

Still, Mark Pugh, principal of high-achieving Indianapolis Public School 90, said there should be a balance. Principals have to be prepared not only to perform effective evaluations but the day-to-day challenges of the job.

"There are many situations as an administrator that you are presented with," he said, "and you have to have a solution, and fairly quickly."

Also, different leadership styles work for different principals. Training, Pugh said, should allow people to think about their style and how to make it work in various settings. And new administrators also have to be willing to take on tough tasks—which is hard to teach.

"It's a lot easier to plan out a scenario about what you say to a teacher," he said. "It is a much stronger test of character and courage to have the face-to-face conversation with that person."

Indiana's new test is under development with New Jersey-based Pearson Education, which is a major national player in standardized testing for students and future teachers alike.

Pearson, which already creates teacher certification tests for 17 states, says it hopes the exam will become the new standard across the country.

But, for now, Indiana is striking out on its own—and that concerns John Somers, director of graduate programs in the School of Education at the University of Indianapolis.

"I think any teacher- or principal-preparation program needs some kind of national test," he said, "so you can compare your candidates against other candidates on the national level."

Leaders of other principal-preparation programs are supportive of the new test and standards, but say they won't be a cure-all.

"It's really easy to just respond to a set of skills or competencies and lose sight of these larger values and beliefs," said Gary Crow, chair of the Educational Leadership and Policy Studies department at Indiana University.

He added that successful leaders are "not just those who know how to use data. They also have this sense of urgency. That's something that's beyond a set of skills and competencies."

A version of this story appeared in The Indianapolis Star on March 18, 2012.

The Hechinger Report and Indianapolis Star have teamed up to produce a series on new teacher effectiveness measures in Indiana.

Read the rest of the series

You can also read our previous series on the similar issues in Tennessee, Wisconsin and Florida.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW EDUCATION

 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldwolf49
Religion is a tool of the evil.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jp90
06:04 PM on 03/21/2012
Besides passing an exam, prospective principals should also have a minimum of 10-15 years of classroom experience (I'd prefer 15). How can you effectively evaluate a teacher if you've barely been one yourself? Our principal is a former gym teacher who was in the classroom maybe 7 years and he wouldn't know a good math lesson if it hit him in the head.
10:45 AM on 03/20/2012
A good step in the right direction but I would push for some type of written exam that measures at least some level of intelligence. There are too many unintelligent principles leading schools, especially in urban settings. In my district, a principal set a state record failure of 39 times on her principals exam. So what happened to her - she was hired as one of the heads of Human Resources. She is currently in charge or hiring and firing teachers. We need systems to hold teachers and school leaders accountable. http://solutions-for-schools.com/
Allthosewhowander
My micro-bio is a microclimate
01:08 PM on 03/20/2012
Administrative accountability needs to be addressed instead of the continued demonization of teachers. The bloated bureaucracy is collapsing under its own weight and landing on teachers, staff, students, and schools. The school system need true reform from the top down. Get rid of politics and the business model and let real educators make decisions that can help education.
10:41 AM on 03/21/2012
In order to do and write up 4 observations a year of every teacher on your staff - they may number over 100, you don't have to be intelligent, you have to be a machine.
02:01 PM on 03/21/2012
Principles can use administrative staff if they have a school with numbers as large as 100 faculty. A principles first duty is to lead his or her school. They are not figure heads but the individual who failure or success rely on. We need innovate and intelligent leaders. No person who fails a certification test - including a written portion - a number of times should have the privilege of leading a school. Especially one in need. http://solutions-for-schools.com/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
geogeoff
10:33 PM on 03/19/2012
What is the point in evaluating an experienced teacher four times in one year, year after year? Administrators should be focused on assisting new teachers and struggling teachers to improve the art of teaching, not just evaluating!
Allthosewhowander
My micro-bio is a microclimate
08:50 PM on 03/19/2012
The quality of leadership in any work environment has a tremendous amount of influence. Too many administrators in schools are completely disconnected from instruction, learning, discipline, staff development, and learning. This may be a step in the right direction for quality control of administration in schools. Strong administrators have nothing to worry about and should be celebrated for their skillset and performance. This should weed out principals who do not belong in schools. The next move should be to examine the quality of district level positions. There is little transparency and very unclear job responsibilities with many district bureaucrat positions. Top down reform in schools districts will be a step in the right direction.
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
04:14 PM on 03/19/2012
principal effects are cumulative over time, which means they tend to have even more impact than teachers, who generally only have a student for one year. furthermore, there's an interaction effect. principals affect teachers over time, which can result in a faculty that is confident and inspired, or burned-out and plodding along. basically, the higher up the food chain you go, the more of an impact you make.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
geogeoff
10:30 PM on 03/19/2012
Disagree! A teacher can have a direct impact on one student, that a principal or school superintendent may not! Case in point, a Journalism teacher who encourages a student to major in Journalism at university had a direct impact on that student.
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
10:12 AM on 03/20/2012
apples and unicorns. you're talking about the specific effect of one person upon one other person, and in that context you're right. i'm saying that as a population, bigger effects are made indirectly than directly. the quality of teacher-learner interaction is not a static variable endemic to one individual, it depends heavily on other variables.