iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Long-Term Health Care: Higher Costs, Less Coverage

Long Term Care

First Posted: 03/21/2012 3:25 pm Updated: 03/22/2012 12:25 am


(The writer is a Reuters contributor. The opinions expressed
are her own.)
By Kathleen Kingsbury
March 21 (Reuters) - Patricia Rief-Heskett purchased
long-term care insurance 15 years ago because she was worried
about the rising cost of nursing home care. Now that the Omaha,
Neb., retiree is 67, she worries that coverage won't be
available if and when she needs it.
Rief-Heskett recently received notice from John Hancock
Financial that her $200 monthly premium would practically double
this year, to $370. Torn between paying pricey premiums or
giving up hard-earned benefits, she decided to compromise on the
benefits. "I can't afford to let that policy go now,"
Rief-Heskett says.
Even with the increase, premiums on existing policies will
be a lot less than what customers would pay for a new policy
today, John Hancock said in a statement. The firm is seeking
rate hikes of about 40 percent, on average, in all 50 states for
both individual and group policyholders. Minnesota and Illinois
are two states besides Nebraska where some policyholders have
seen 90 percent increases.
Other insurers are pulling back altogether in the face of
rising nursing home costs and an aging population. Prudential
Financial Inc. recently announced it will stop selling
individual policies at the end of March, becoming the 10th out
of the top 20 carriers by sales to leave the market in the past
five years, according to industry-backed research group LIMRA
International. Berkshire Life Insurance Company of America
stopped offering long-term care insurance at the end of last
year, and MetLife stopped issuing individual policies in late
2010.
Rief-Heskett's not having it: She recorded a You Tube video
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0oIFdI0Fvts), and, along with
what she calls "a small group of little old ladies" is lobbying
Congress to cap long-term care insurance fees.
The video might be exceptional, but the story isn't. More
than 7 million Americans have long-term care insurance today, by
LIMRA estimates. Consumers across the country are getting hit
with steeper premiums and limited benefits. Prices on new
long-term care plans today are between 6 and 17 percent higher
than comparable coverage one year ago, according to the 2012
National Long-Term Care Insurance Price Index published March 14
by the American Association of Long-Term Care Insurance
(AALTCI).
Low interest rates (which make it harder for insurers to
manage investment pools to cover claims), unpredictable medical
costs and a tough regulatory environment are some of the key
reasons that insurers give for leaving the market, despite
demographic trends.
"The long-term care industry is still young and only now is
seeing actual usage data, which indicate the need for rate
increases," the statement from John Hancock said.
Some 70 percent of people over 65 will require long-term
care services -- including assisted living, nursing home or home
care -- during their lifetime, according to the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services. Costs, on average, range from
$4,000 to $8,000 per month.
For consumers who can't afford to self-insure against big
costs like that, there are few alternatives. Medicare doesn't
cover such expenses, and individuals with more than $2,000 in
assets can't qualify for Medicaid assistance.
Here are some tips on how to buy a long-term care policy or
make the most of an existing one:

- Consider a policy that limits coverage to three or five
years. Most consumers now choose those short-term plans because
they are cheaper than lifetime policies and typically cover most
long-term care situations, according to AALTCI. In fact, a
recent survey found that three-year coverage was sufficient for
92 percent of people who had it and had to file claims, said
Jesse Slome, AALTCI's executive director. Expect to pay an
average of $2,700 per year to cover a couple of 55-year-olds on
a three-year benefit plan that pays out a $150 daily benefit,
according to AALTCI. For married couples, consider a
"shared-care rider," in which plan benefits can be used to cover
expenses incurred by either spouse or both. That's more
expensive than one policy but cheaper than two.

- Reconsider inflation protection. Premiums drop if buyers
forgo inflation protection. A 5 percent compound growth option
for benefits was once the norm, meaning a $100 daily benefit
became a $265 daily benefit after 20 years. Adding this
safeguard today raises the cost of a policy by 120 to 240
percent for a 55-year old, according to AALTCI.
Eliminating inflation protection is the route Rief-Heskett
ultimately chose, effectively freezing current benefits in order
to keep her premiums low. It's a less than ideal choice, warns
Bonnie Burns of the nonprofit California Health Advocates,
because nursing home costs keep rising and it could be a couple
of decades before you call upon your benefits.
For some, she says a better alternative may be to walk away
from a costly policy and shop for another. You can stop paying
premiums altogether and keep coverage equal to the premiums that
you have already paid. In certain states, the law requires
insurers to allow this once premium hikes hit a certain
threshold. So if you've paid $20,000 in premiums, your new
maximum lifetime benefit would be $20,000.

- Be realistic about what you're buying. "I advise clients
to consider a long-term policy as a way to ease costs rather
than cover them entirely," says Charles Farrell, a tax attorney
and CEO of Denver-based Northstar Investment Advisors.
How much insurance you need depends on your annual income
and local care costs, Farrell says. If investments and Social
Security generate $50,000, for instance, then insurance need
only cover $50,000 to pay for the most expensive long-term care
(estimated to be around $100,000 per year). Of course, this math
changes if a healthy spouse shares your income.

- Get coverage in your early 50's. Buy before the aches and
pains of aging set in, because insurers are becoming more
circumspect about the policies they issue. "If you have any sort
of healthcare hiccup in your past, you won't get coverage,"
Farrell says.

- Ask if your employer offers group coverage. If you opt for
coverage in the first 60 days of employment, you generally have
guaranteed acceptance.
Workers who leave jobs are usually allowed to convert their
group long-term care insurance plan to an individual plan. But
that coverage could change slightly if your former employer
cancels the group contract, and of course, rates could always go
up.
If your employer doesn't offer a group plan, associations or
churches often do. Your health history has to be approved in
order for you to buy into one of these plans, but prices of
group plans are typically lower than those of individual plans.

- Understand what you are getting. Long-term care policies
are extremely technical. Some plans come with 90-day elimination
periods before coverage begins. Others provide specifications
about care that can vary depending on what state you happen to
be in.
"If an insurance company can find a reason to disqualify you
or not pay a claim, it's in their financial interest to do so,"
Slome says. "It might not be in the consumer's best interest,
but it is reality."
Nearly one in three initial claims are denied, according to
a 2010 independent U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
audit, although "insurance companies tend to err slightly on the
side of approving claims that may not meet policy contract
benefit eligibility," the report said.
That's only for customers who manage to hang on to their
insurance until they have a claim to file. "Right now we're at
the mercy of the insurance companies," Rief-Heskett says. "The
scary part is that they could raise premiums again next year."

(Editing by Linda Stern, Lauren Young and Andrea Evans)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MONEY

(The writer is a Reuters contributor. The opinions expressed are her own.) By Kathleen Kingsbury March 21 (Reuters) - Patricia Rief-Heskett purchased long-term care insurance 15 years ag...
(The writer is a Reuters contributor. The opinions expressed are her own.) By Kathleen Kingsbury March 21 (Reuters) - Patricia Rief-Heskett purchased long-term care insurance 15 years ag...
Filed by Reuters  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 40
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Akla
Leave No Trace, Just a Good Impression
08:49 PM on 03/25/2012
This is the issue we have failed to address and will cause costs to rise sharply. Most people have no idea and no plan for their old age health care. Insurance companies do not want to offer affordable plans and the govt does not require it. The market for nursing homes, long term care etc is booming. Plan now. Do you really want to spend years in a home being taken care of--fed, bathed, clothed, etc just because technology and medicine allowed you to survive the heart attack, stroke or accident? What else could you do? There is no dignity in dying these days, no dignity in nursing home care settings. What is your plan?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldguy60
04:49 PM on 03/23/2012
I took out long term care at age 46. I paid into it until age 70. The premiums went up modestly every single year until age 70 ;then it went through the roof. They wanted over $2000 a month to continue my policy. Same thing happened on my term life insurance .I paid a modest amount for 45 years ;then when I hit 75 ,they wanted a $5,000 annual premium.(Policy was for $100,000).
10:20 PM on 03/23/2012
Thanks for sharing that. Maybe more people will begin to understand how insurance companies are ripping us all off. Don't care what kind of insurance it is, as soon as you have a claim or in the case of long-term care you are beginning to get to the point where you need it they make it unaffordable to continue the premiums. Why is this not illegal??
photo
baxtron
tek phlarpt
11:18 AM on 03/23/2012
capitalism at its finest. just die I guess.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:57 PM on 03/22/2012
Canada gives out a supplement to families who want to build a granny cottage in their backyard. That's what humane governments that care for their elderly do. We have all the money in the world to start illicit wars for bizillionaires and give them every subsidy under the sun but nothing for the average citizen who pays for these generous subsidies to the wealthy.
04:33 PM on 03/22/2012
The Canada Health Act, which came into force April, 1984, reaffirmed Canada’s commitment to socialized medicine and the original principles of the Canadian health care system, as embodied in the Medical Care Act and the Hospital Insurance and Diagnostic Services Act

Long-term care services (i.e. home care and nursing home care), usually the everyday type we need as we are aging (what we call in the states as “custodial care”, are placed in a category called "extended services"’

'Extended services' are not deemed 'medically necessary' and as such are not an insured service in the Canada Health Act such as doctor services and hospital services are! This means those in Canada end up providing most of the care for a family member themselves or paying for care.

Long Term Care insurance and Critical Care insurance are now purchased by many people in Canada today.

This has nothing to do with a government being "humane". The government doesn't grow money on trees. This means there is only so much money to go around. Those with assets should plan on their own. Long Term Care insurance is a major way to do this, one I did myself.

Dr. Robert Weed
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:54 PM on 03/22/2012
Yes, but then you have a private company reneging on its promises charging people whatever they want for the price of care ? Do you honestly believe that it costs $10,000/month to take care of granny in a nursing home? What are they getting for that type of care? Patients in most nursing homes sleep all day long, watch a little television, then go back to sleep and that costs $10,000/ month?
01:34 PM on 03/23/2012
Canada must be different when it comes to insurance then. Here they rip you off for years and just when you are getting old enough to need it (God forbid they have to actually pay a policy) they raise rates (all legal) until you can't afford the premium. Just like health insurance in America. The reason so many people are uninsured is because they can't pay $800 a month or more for insurance premiums.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:50 PM on 03/22/2012
Just another phoney schmoney scam to rip off hard working Americans. This is a good reason to invite grandma or auntie into your home, build an addition and let her live out her life in peace and comfort. It's cheaper. Not easy but if you make the commitment and both sides are relatively happy then its a win-win.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldguy60
05:11 PM on 03/23/2012
Unfortunately, most cities have zoning laws that will not just let you add a separate "granny flat/cottage " to your property.You are better off adding an attached apartment with a separate entrance.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:50 PM on 03/23/2012
Yeah, that works. Anything so that they don't rip off granny for overpriced care. $10,000 plus/month, RIDICULOUS!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:53 PM on 03/24/2012
A good opportunity for the government to acquire foreclosed properties and convert them into various levels of senior care and put the unemployed to work. Charge wealthy Republicans and Democrats exhorbitant rates for care and let everyone else pay on a sliding scale according to income. Any extra money can be invested in new businesses to help the poor and disabled. Thes eare opportunities that shouldn't be passed up. Surely there are excellent "out of work" managers that could run a tight, nursing home ship and kill two birds with stone.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:42 PM on 03/22/2012
I knew this would happen, especially with all the greed and avarice of these corporations today. They baited all generations into buying this "Necessary" insurance and made huge profits. Now that the biggest group is about to retire, time to PULL THE RUG OUT!! These companies need to be held to account for their fiscal irresponsibility and their "funny" math for shareholders!
04:39 PM on 03/22/2012
This is a silly response. Insurance companies are paying millions every day for events which most people will end up needing. This does not seem like funny math to me. By the way, who are the "shareholders"? Ummm, us ... people who own stocks, mutual funds, pension plans, 401k's etc.

Perhaps you should spend some time with actuaries who understand and study risk and money. A good friend of mine is one. There is strong science to this stuff. We need insurance companies to manage risks in order for us to protect things like our home, car and assets.

Meanwhile, relax.
04:51 PM on 03/22/2012
Really Dan? Not all ionsurance companies are evil. I bought Long Term Care insurance after seeing how the insurance company was wonderful when my mom needed care. Without that insurance she would have lost all her assets and ended up on public aide. However, with all the benefits she is getting top quality care, was able to stay home for years and now in a good nursing home .... paid for by her Long Term Care policy.

I thank God for that policy and I now have one myself.
01:41 PM on 03/23/2012
Well, good luck having it pay anything when you need it. That is, if they don't increase your rates 500% or more when you actually get old enough for them to maybe pay out. Insurance companies are not the same as when our parents paid for their policies. Glad it worked for your Mom but have a feeling you won't be so lucky. Watch the video.
02:24 PM on 03/22/2012
John Hancock gave policy holders an opportunity to avoid the premium increase if they lower their inflation factor which was at 5% compound. They policy holder was able to “lock in” their gains in the policy and going forward the benefits would increase but at a lower rate.

This option made lots of sense to policy holders so they could keep an affordable plan for the physical, emotional and financial burdens Long Term Care places on family and friends.

Yes, Prudential left the Long Term Care market (except for group coverage). However, companies have gone in and out of the Long Term Care insurance market since it started in the 1970’s. Hartford just announced they are leaving the life insurance market. Nobody is suggesting a crisis in life insurance.

Not having a policy at all doesn’t make sense for anyone with assets to protect. The risk of needing Long Term Care is substantially greater than the risk of something happening to your home or car.

Buying a smaller plan can still provide a large amount of value, especially in states which have partnership plans in place which provide dollar for dollar asset protection.

Making a claim for a vast majority of people is not difficult. This insurance still remains an affordable and smart way to plan. Working with a specialist so they can help with plan design, underwriting and explaining what these plans do for them and their families.

Matt McCann
Divisional Manager
ACSIA Long Term Care, Inc.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:43 PM on 03/22/2012
Take your PROPAGANDA somewhere else.
02:57 PM on 03/22/2012
Dan,

Not sure which part you thought was PROPAGANDA. However, I went into this business due to a personal experience. My mom, at age 59 ended up into a nursing home so I saw first hand the burdens Long Term Care creats on a family. I have many personal clients and have seen how a policy has a positive impact at the time of claim.

In my role now I help Long Term Care specialists help their clients plan for the physical, emotional and financial burdens Long Term Care places on family and friends. I have seen first hand how all the top insurance companies pay their claims and help the policy holders. The top 10 companies are paying around $11 million a day in claims.

This is a real issue and an affordable way to plan is available for people. The federal/state partnership program, available in most states, provides dollar for dollar asset protection if you have a qualified plan in place.

The article was missing some important information and I set the record straight. Truth not PROPAGANDA.

Have a great day.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldguy60
05:22 PM on 03/23/2012
Nice try,Matt . Long term care is a complete rip off for most people .Only the wealthy can afford it when you hit 72 .I paid for long term care for over 25 years(Prudential) and when I hit 72 (still in good health) my premiums went through the roof. I had no choice, but to drop it. Thanks a lot, robber!P.S I was never told at anytime that the premiums were going to skyrocket at age 72. I never would have bought it in the first place.
05:33 PM on 03/23/2012
Don't want to speak for Matt but that is not true. Premiums are intended to remain level based on age and health at the time of application. Now if you don;t but at 50 or 55 and WAIT till you are 72, then it would be based at the age 72 rate and your health at that time.

If Pru had an increase it was not based on your age. You always have a chance to adjust benefits to avoid an increase. My mom had a policy and it never went up and she used the benefits.
01:48 PM on 03/22/2012
This story is very misleading. The Hancock policy holders have an option to just reduce their inflation level from 5% to a lower amount without any premium increase. Since most of these policy holders have had benefits which are now much larger and have grown faster than most long term care costs have, this is an outstanding option.
photo
Counterglow
Werner Heisenberg may have been right.
03:22 AM on 03/22/2012
7. Marry a Canadian.
01:45 PM on 03/22/2012
Canada does not cover Long Term Care.
photo
Counterglow
Werner Heisenberg may have been right.
02:28 PM on 03/22/2012
Of course not. Health care is a provincial responsibility. The federal government provides equalization payments to the provinces, which in turn provide health care.

As I said...marry a Canadian. If you want to be picky, pick one from a province with the best long-term care.
11:17 AM on 03/25/2012
That is 100 percent untrue. In Ontario you will pay $1,600 a month for a standard room which is 35% of the cost, the taxpayers pay the other 65%. If you cannot afford $1,600 a month you will also be subsidized even further and you are not forced to sell your house or deplete your assets to pay either.
photo
LovingLove
You only have one life , so LIVE.
12:11 AM on 03/22/2012
This is sad that our elderly citizens are being treated so poorly. We can build up other countries who hate us, yet we can't provide the basics for those who paved the way for us. This is not how you treat elderly people. They should have have to worry about how their medical bills will be paid or how they will pay for their prescriptions.
04:42 PM on 03/22/2012
This is why we all need to PLAN, very easy when we plan ahead. We can't just depend on the government. The government can take care of the poor the rest of us NEED to plan.
photo
LovingLove
You only have one life , so LIVE.
07:48 PM on 03/22/2012
Most people don't make enough to save. Even for the elderly people who saved, it is not enough money to keep up the the rising cost of medical cost. That is the problem.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oldguy60
05:25 PM on 03/23/2012
The elderly have Medicare. Most have kids, who do not want to be bothered by having them around ,like they are in Europe.
11:20 AM on 03/25/2012
Seniors in Europe are not treated any differently by their families. It has nothing to do with "not being bothered". You try looking after a bedridden Alzheimers patients 24/7 while you are working full-time and then come back here and do the guilt thing. I would never expect any child to do that for me, it's being very selfish to expect somebody to do that. In countries where people do look after old people themselves it's because there are many people around to spread the load and there is no public system so you would die in the street without your family.