iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Space Junk Forces ISS Astronauts to Take Shelter in 'Lifeboat' Capsules

Posted: 03/24/2012 9:48 am Updated: 05/08/2012 2:29 pm

Space Station 2

By: Tariq Malik
Published: 03/24/2012 01:53 AM EDT on SPACE.com

This story was updated at 8 a.m. ET.

A leftover piece of an old Russian satellite forced six astronauts on the International Space Station to take shelter in a pair of lifeboat-like space capsules today (March 24), but zipped harmlessly by the outpost to the crew's relief.

The piece of space junk was spotted too late to move the orbiting laboratory out of the way and flew as close as 6.8 miles (11 kilometers) when it zoomed by at about 2:38 a.m. EDT (0638 GMT), NASA officials said.

While the chances of collision were remote, the potential danger of a hit was enough for Mission Control to order the station crew — which includes three Russians, two Americans and a Dutch astronaut —to seek shelter in two docked Soyuz space capsules just in case a quick escape to Earth is required.

"I don't see anything, which is good news," one of the station astronauts said in Russian, which was translated in a NASA broadcast.

It was the third time in 12 years that station astronauts took shelter from a close space debris pass. [Space Junk Photos & Cleanup Concepts]

NASA and its partners typically order an avoidance maneuver when a piece of space junk is expected to pass close by the space station and there are several days of advance notice. But this latest space debris threat was initially spotted on Friday morning, too late to plan a major maneuver, NASA officials said.

"We're not too concerned about it, but it's too late to do a [debris avoidance maneuver]," station flight director Jerry Jason radioed station commander Daniel Burbank, of NASA, and his crew late Friday.

According to NASA updates, the space debris is a remnant of the Russian Cosmos 2251 communications satellite. In 2009, the defunct spacecraft crashed into the U.S. satellite Iridium 33 in a massive space collision that created a huge cloud of more debris. The crash created 2,000 pieces of orbital debris.

While the size of the space debris was difficult to pin down, it was "relatively small," NASA spokesman Rob Navias said during NASA TV commentary of the space trash flyby.

NASA astronaut Don Pettit, who is the other American aboard the space station, radioed Mission Control Friday to say he hoped to try and snap a photo of the space debris if it was possible. But the space debris whizzed by the space station unseen.

Space junk is a growing threat for astronauts on the space station, as well as other satellites orbiting Earth. According to recent estimates, there is about 6,000 tons of space debris in orbit today. NASA and the U.S. military's Space Surveillance Network regularly track about 20,000 pieces of the debris in order to help other active satellites avoid collisions with the orbital trash.

You can follow SPACE.com Managing Editor Tariq Malik on Twitter @tariqjmalik. Follow SPACE.com for the latest in space science and exploration news on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

Copyright 2012 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Related on HuffPost:

GALLERY: SPACE JUNK
Loading Slideshow...
  • NASA explains that the low Earth orbit region of space is "the most concentrated area for orbital debris." NASA <a href="http://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/photogallery/beehives.html" target="_hplink">says</a> of this image (and the following two pictures): <blockquote>The following graphics are computer generated images of objects in Earth orbit that are currently being tracked. Approximately 95% of the objects in this illustration are orbital debris, i.e., not functional satellites. The dots represent the current location of each item. The orbital debris dots are scaled according to the image size of the graphic to optimize their visibility and are not scaled to Earth. These images provide a good visualization of where the greatest orbital debris populations exist. Below are the graphics generated from different observation points.</blockquote>

  • <a href="http://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/photogallery/beehives.html" target="_hplink">NASA</a> says of the image: The GEO Polar images are generated from a vantage point above the north pole, showing the concentrations of objects in LEO and in the geosynchronous region.

  • A rendering from the<a href="http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/ESOC/SEMN2VM5NDF_mg_5_s.html" target="_hplink"> European Space Operations Center</a> shows objects in low Earth orbit. The ESOC says of the image: <blockquote>70% of all catalogued objects are in low-Earth orbit (LEO), which extends to 2000 km above the Earth's surface. To observe the Earth, spacecraft must orbit at such a low altitude. The spatial density of objects increases at high latitudes. Note: The debris field shown in the image is an artist's impression based on actual data. However the image does not show debris items in their actual size or density. Note: The debris objects shown in the images are an artist's impression based on actual density data. However, the debris objects are shown at an eggagerated size to make them visible at the scale shown.</blockquote>

  • Objects in low Earth orbit, as viewed from over the equator. (via <a href="http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/ESOC/SEMN2VM5NDF_mg_6_s.html" target="_hplink">ESOC</a>)

  • An example of orbital debris impact. NASA writes of the image, "An impact that completely penetrated the antenna dish of the Hubble Space Telescope."

  • A photo of "orbital debris reentry," taken in 2001. "A Delta 2 third stage, known as a PAM-D (Payload Assist Module - Delta), reentered the atmosphere over the Middle East. The titanium motor casing of the PAM-D, weighing about 70 kg, landed in Saudi Arabia about 240 km from the capital of Riyadh," says NASA.

  • The impact of orbital debris on the panel of the Solar Max experiment.

  • Space Traffic Cam

    This 2009 photo provided by the Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp., shows technicians working on the Space-Based Space Surveillance satellite in Boulder, Colo. The satellite is a $500 million U.S. Air Force spacecraft that will provide the first full-time, space-based eye on thousands of other satellites and pieces of debris that could crash into American assets circling the Earth. (AP Photo/Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp.) NO SALES

  • Space Traffic Cam

    This 2009 photo provided by the Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp., shows technicians working on the Space-Based Space Surveillance satellite in Boulder, Colo. The satellite is a $500 million U.S. Air Force spacecraft that will provide the first full-time, space-based eye on thousands of other satellites and pieces of debris that could crash into American assets circling the Earth. (AP Photo/Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp.) NO SALES

  • Simulation Of An Explosion In GEO (After 2 Days)

    The <a href="http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/ESOC/SEMN2VM5NDF_mg_1.html" target="_hplink">ESOC</a> explains what happens after an in-orbit explosion occurs: <blockquote>A geostationary satellite has a velocity of about 3 kms/second (11,000 kms/hour). The fragments are ejected with a much lower velocity and thus stay close to the initial orbit. However, some will travel a bit faster and others a bit slower. Within a few days the debris cloud will form a diffuse ring at 36,000 km altitude around the Earth.</blockquote>

FOLLOW SCIENCE

By: Tariq Malik Published: 03/24/2012 01:53 AM EDT on SPACE.com This story was updated at 8 a.m. ET. A leftover piece of an old Russian satellite forced six astronauts on the International Spa...
By: Tariq Malik Published: 03/24/2012 01:53 AM EDT on SPACE.com This story was updated at 8 a.m. ET. A leftover piece of an old Russian satellite forced six astronauts on the International Spa...
Filed by David Freeman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 446
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
photo
bryanzth
Honest to Goodness USA Patriot!
05:54 PM on 06/21/2012
Well not to worry about space aliens. Our junk would knock 'em out of the sky! ;o)

BZ.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:18 PM on 03/31/2012
Please, there is an relatively easy solution.

Use space based electron beams or ion beams to charge up space junk so it is pulled down into our atmosphere and to Earth.
photo
uniqumm
Hot Snark served with relish
05:13 AM on 04/01/2012
Ummmm ...... You have a design?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:20 PM on 04/01/2012
A big ion gun and electron beam running on solar power.

One beam is fired at the atmosphere and the other at the object you want to pull down.

Here's an article that give you the math and physics one would need to see if the thing is practical.

http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1968SAOSR.271.....S/0000003.000.html

It concludes you need over 1000 volts to effect the orbit, which is easy to get with beams. You can easily get 100's of thousands of volts. And the beams, propagate near the speed of light over long distances with scan rates faster than any object.

Great anti-satalite weapon too. Oh well.
09:23 AM on 03/29/2012
:...which includes three Russians, two Americans and a Dutch astronaut."

A Dutch astronaut?! Well, at least we know if there's a hole in the shell, we've got the right person with the right solution!!
photo
uniqumm
Hot Snark served with relish
05:14 AM on 04/01/2012
Good one! (even if it is a bit sick!)
photo
bryanzth
Honest to Goodness USA Patriot!
05:57 PM on 06/21/2012
Ouch. I had to think about that.

BZ.
06:18 PM on 03/27/2012
Does anyone know if they have discovered a planet perhaps in a far, far distant galaxy named New Jersey?
If so, then we could just send all the space junk there.
09:24 AM on 03/29/2012
They have, but as yet, no intelligent life exists there.....
05:26 PM on 03/29/2012
LOL, LOL, LOL Good one!
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
04:42 PM on 03/30/2012
... look harder. There do seem to be primitive organisms on the shore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Victoria Institutions
English versus the feudal languages!
12:10 PM on 03/27/2012
What I noticed was something different; on what I had pondered on some 30 years back! What is NASA doing, sharing technical knowledge and expertise with a competing nation?
photo
uniqumm
Hot Snark served with relish
05:16 AM on 04/01/2012
Is this a question from someone from the Victorian Age?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Victoria Institutions
English versus the feudal languages!
01:43 PM on 04/01/2012
I do not think anyone from the Victorian Age would have pondered on such things. Collective wisdom in English nations vanished only after WW 2.

There were traditional statutory think-tanks who would filter out what is good and bad for the nation, and also map and chart the ways and manners of dispensing and disseminating developing technologies, taking into consideration the possibility of it becoming the weapon of competing powers.
06:00 AM on 03/27/2012
Great...space is also trashed by us!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Knot MaFawlt
Intelligent life on Earth? Prove it.
12:53 PM on 03/29/2012
I know, I'm embarrassed by our arrogance in trashing everything we can reach. No excuse; I believe each of us should leave the planet with a contribution to making it a better place, not a trashier one. Yes, we DO have a responsibility to all life on Earth and we are failing miserably.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
badandyjax
Badges, we don't need no stinking badges
05:43 AM on 03/27/2012
But Capt, Kirk. I'm giving her all she's got. Raise the shields Scotty. Macoy get down to sick bay and check out nurse Chappell. Spock your with me in shuttle craft. Sulu you have the con. And Youman Rand you stay close to me in case were out there to long I may need drugs and sex
04:15 AM on 03/27/2012
why don't they mount a sun powered laser with a base of 360 degree's, or even a armed large nail gun
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
04:47 PM on 03/30/2012
Because a 17,000 mph 10g nail is not something you want to meet coming back at you.

You could probably deflect little things with a laser - if you can see them coming, and it was big enough.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:08 AM on 03/27/2012
My Dear Sweet Friends,

One question; when do we begin to actually clean up?
12:43 AM on 03/27/2012
It was the USS Enterprise NX-01.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jt John
Sword of Damocles
12:40 AM on 03/27/2012
Pity the ISS will be destroyed.... I really hoped it would stay in space as a testament to mankind's dedication to science.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
04:48 PM on 03/30/2012
Mankind's dedication to keeping Ukrainian missile designers busy,
and rednecks in Alabama and Florida employed.

Mankind must work through grafting GOP congressmen.
12:20 AM on 03/27/2012
slow news day, so NASA had to invent some!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barry Clarke
Retired Air Traffic Control Aviation Meteorologist
12:13 AM on 03/27/2012
Hmmm, just think of how much wasted energy it took to lauch 6,000 tons of space debris into orbit................
12:13 AM on 03/27/2012
Oh no, the junk was 6.8 miles from the space station?....That's almost as scary as the meteor that came within 65 million miles from earth a few months ago !!!.....I never want to come that close to dying ever again !!!!!....(Sarcasm intended) !!!!
12:07 AM on 03/27/2012
All the more reason why we need to develop shield technology before going into space. Lots of junk floating around at high speed.
12:18 AM on 03/27/2012
Maybe we could lock a transporter beam on it or something cool like that !!.......Whatya think?