iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

West Virginia Mine Explosion: Panel Faults MSHA Enforcement

By JOHN RABY 03/23/12 06:18 PM ET AP

West Virginia Mine

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- The federal Mine Safety and Health Administration could have prevented or reduced the likelihood of an April 2010 explosion in southern West Virginia that killed 29 miners, according to a report by a team of experts released Friday.

The independent team was appointed by Labor Secretary Hilda Solis and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health a month after the explosion to examine MSHA's internal review of its actions at the Upper Big Branch mine. The explosion was the worst U.S. coal mining disaster in 40 years.

The report says if MSHA had done timely enforcement of laws and regulations prior to the explosion, "it would have lessened the chances of – and possibly could have prevented" the explosion.

MSHA's internal review released earlier this month concluded that there was no evidence that the disaster was caused by failures by federal inspectors who missed problems or failed to inspect the areas where they exist at the mine in the 18 months prior to the explosion.

The MSHA review acknowledged multiple failures by field staff in MSHA's largest region, southern West Virginia's District 4. It also said their effectiveness was compromised by internal communication problems and by federal budget cuts that had created staffing shortages, inexperience and a lack of sufficient training and managerial oversight.

Four investigations have concluded the blast was sparked by worn and broken equipment, fueled by a deadly buildup of methane and coal dust, and allowed to spread because of clogged and broken water sprayers.

MSHA director Joe Main has said blame for the disaster continues to rest squarely with then-mine owner Massey Energy, which was bought last summer by Virginia-based Alpha Natural Resources.

"MSHA is committed to rooting out and addressing critical issues within the agency head-on, and agrees more needs to be done to ensure full and effective enforcement of the Mine Act," Main said in a statement Friday. "MSHA cannot keep miners safe alone – mine operators must commit themselves to safety and health."

The mine's former superintendent, Gary May, is set to plead March 29 to a charge of conspiracy to defraud the federal government and is apparently cooperating with prosecutors in the continuing criminal investigation. He's accused, among other things, of disabling a methane gas monitor, falsifying safety records and tipping off miners underground about surprise inspections.

Former Upper Big Branch security chief Hughie Elbert Stover is appealing his conviction of lying to investigators about the 2010 explosion. He was sentenced in February to three years in prison in what a prosecutor called one of the stiffest punishments ever handed down in a mine safety case.

Regarding the initial methane ignition, "if MSHA enforcement personnel had completed required enforcement actions during at least one of the four (prior) UBB inspections, it is unlikely that a roof fall would have occurred and that airflow would have been reduced as a consequence," the independent panel's report said. "With the proper quantity of air, there would not have been an accumulation of methane, thereby eliminating the fuel sources for the gas explosion."

And dangerous accumulations of explosive coal dust would have been rendered inert, or the mine would have been idled, had appropriate actions been taken in the months before the explosion, the report said.

Had the MSHA internal review addressed the question of whether a more effective enforcement effort could have prevented the explosion, "it would be in a better position to help MSHA define and prioritize its recommendations and succeed in implementing them," the independent panel said.

Members of the panel included former science adviser Lewis Wade, retired NIOSH physical scientist Michael Sapko, Stanford Law School professor Alison Morantz and Jeffery Kohler, director of mine safety research at NIOSH.

___

Online:

Earlier on HuffPost:

FOLLOW GREEN

Filed by Melissa Jeltsen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 171
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cerulean1299
Snarky Humanist
06:24 AM on 03/26/2012
And the cons keep talking about less regulation and every single time something tragic results. Yet they have convinced people who need the regulations the most that they are a bad idea. It's stunning sometimes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DANIELISTICALL
HISTORY IS BUT A FABLE AGREED UPON,,NAPOLEON
02:25 PM on 03/25/2012
Lessons From Exxon Valdez
But in past cases, corporations have been able to talk their way out of hefty damages. In the case of the Exxon Valdez oil spill of 1989, for example, Exxon spent more than a decade weaseling its way out of paying $5 billion in punitive damages to plaintiffs, which included more than 34,000 fishermen, natives, local governments, etc.

Exxon appealed a 1994 verdict in which an Anchorage jury awarded $5 billion in punitive damages to the plaintiffs; the damages were then halved to $2.5 billion. Then the company appealed to the Supreme Court, which capped damages at a little more than $500 million. (The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals later ruled that the company was still obligated to pay $470 million for interest on the damages.)
08:21 AM on 03/25/2012
Just wait until the republicans take over and get rid of all regulation of industry. You'll have plenty of coal, gas, oil - and disease and death. At the same time, your water will become undrinkable, your air foul and dangerous, your trees defoliated, your meadows ugly, your oceans cesspools, and your life worthless.
06:31 PM on 03/25/2012
Sang and nine year old's working down in the mines.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floridan56
Irony: it's what's for dinner.
04:08 AM on 03/25/2012
Big oil (and pharma). are the bullies on the block of civilized life for the rest of us. They roll by all their own 'rules' while making new ones to suit them, as they go about stomping on people just only to shake them down for their measily little bit of lunch money .- but on such a massive scale.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PlayTOE
Morals evolved due to cooperative group living
12:42 AM on 03/25/2012
What the report really says is that the mine 'owned' the inspectors.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
floridan56
Irony: it's what's for dinner.
04:01 AM on 03/25/2012
The way it all seems to work with oil and gas these days.
They write their own rules as they go and however best it suits the quest for profit, not safety.
photo
Americanwoman55
live, laugh, dance, run with scissors
08:52 PM on 03/24/2012
Virginia Govenor how about protecting the living!!!

Virginia Govenor you are ready to shove probes into women because you say you value life. Well step up pass laws to protect life, right now Govenor. Protect these coal miners with good laws!!!!

Or are you just a an animal that likes to shove things into women's privates!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cerulean1299
Snarky Humanist
06:08 AM on 03/26/2012
As much as I enjoyed and agreed with your post, it's actually West Virginia.
photo
Americanwoman55
live, laugh, dance, run with scissors
03:19 PM on 03/26/2012
OOPS!!!
photo
Americanwoman55
live, laugh, dance, run with scissors
08:49 PM on 03/24/2012
Rick Santorum ,unitl he ran for POTUS, sat on a large Coal Mine Board. Anyone know the name of it?

Rick is all for DE-Regulation of Coal mining?

Remember that when you go to vote!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cerulean1299
Snarky Humanist
06:09 AM on 03/26/2012
Good point but no one looks into the Pope of Pennsylvania because he says so many outrageous things that deflect from the truth.
photo
Americanwoman55
live, laugh, dance, run with scissors
03:18 PM on 03/26/2012
Well, take a look now because he is trying to get into the White House and let's be honest he hate the EARTH!!! He made a big salary lobbying for De_Regulation in coal mining!!! Time to bring it up!!!
Zip Zinzel
If a Nation expects to be both Ignorant & Free . .
05:35 PM on 03/24/2012
MSHA is committed to rooting out and addressing critical issues within the agency head-on, and agrees more needs to be done
===========
1) How many of the Top People in charge of this operation are IN JAIL, or served any jailtime?
TO THEM, THIS IS JUST A COST OF DOING BUSINESS, exactly like it is in China. To them and the EconomicElites in the GOP, the costs of these disasters is lower than the cost of doing things right.
IF IT'S A PUBLIC COMPANY, the costs of these disasters are borne by the shareholders, not the folks at the top who continue to get the high salaries & bonuses

2) MORE IMPORTANTLY, the ultimate reason for this whole problem is mostly due to nonstop efforts of GOP Politicians to defund every regulatory agency in existence.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:11 PM on 03/24/2012
So the regulators were nickled and dimed into uselessness...another Republican strategic win.
firstwizard
Sure I talk to the voices! It keeps them calm
05:09 PM on 03/24/2012
Talk about a misleading headline. I thought that they were blaming the regulations for the explosion.

Correct me if I am wrong. (hate to open that door, but..) But isn't also there a problem even if the mines are cited for violations? When the mines and their owners are cited for regulation violations, isn't the way it's set up now that there are so many "appeals" and other ways of getting around the violations that nothing ever gets done about them?
06:34 PM on 03/25/2012
I read an interesting article some time ago, saying the mine owners found it cheaper to just pay the fines instead of repairing what was wrong with the mines. It's all about the almighty $$$ and screw the safety of the people making you rich. Despicable!!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cerulean1299
Snarky Humanist
06:11 AM on 03/26/2012
And yet I bet a majority of these miners vote GOP therefore further endangering their lives.
firstwizard
Sure I talk to the voices! It keeps them calm
02:48 PM on 03/26/2012
In this case I think it has more to do with the lobbyists than the Representative. Just like the oil industry. The lobbyists tell the Senators and Congressmen how to vote no matter who is in the seat. Money buys a LOT of votes.
04:55 PM on 03/24/2012
In theory, the Agency by its non-actions allowed the "industry" to "regulate itself". Both the Agency and the Industry are to blame.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Davidrfunk2
We has seen the enemy and he is us
04:53 PM on 03/24/2012
So let me get this straight. Corporations buy off The Republicans and Democrats to gut the regulatory arms of government including MSHA or put people in charge that will look the other way. Saying all this regulation is stifling job creation. So the mine owners take this as a sign that no one is minding the store and the light is green to put far less money in to safety. After all those funds could be profits instead of safe mines and 29 people die. I think that sums it up.
04:29 PM on 03/24/2012
This is a "hot potato" that has been handed back and forth with impunity. Past experience proved to Mine owners that abuses would not cost more than a few million dollars, easily paid out of the mega millions earned by these giant corporations. Nothing will change until mine owners are aggressively pursued and laws enforced. The Kabuki theater played out to assuage the public knee jerk, and temporary, reaction to the tremendous loss of life has been very successful. Meanwhile, widows and orphans are made to hold their tongues, in case someone else in the family needs a job. Apparently MSHA has its hands tied by the political element involved in making sure that political contributions keep on flowing.
04:14 PM on 03/24/2012
Correction: Lack of regulation caused the mine explosion. What is going on with journalism?
firstwizard
Sure I talk to the voices! It keeps them calm
05:06 PM on 03/24/2012
Wow. That's what I was wondering!!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
getoffmyside
Paradigms Shift.
05:12 PM on 03/24/2012
Thank you for that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
prettyinpink
Liberalism-Ideas so good-they're MANDATORY
04:09 PM on 03/24/2012
So far, though, Labor Secretary Hilda Solis and MSHA chief Joe Main aren’t saying anything beyond their prepared statement, which tried to blame the whole thing on a previous administration — despite the fact that the March 2009 orders to only review 1 mine per field office and no more than 3 mines per district for POV orders came after President Obama took office.

In its preliminary report, the Inspector General said MSHA made this decision based on “resource limitations.” So far, neither the IG nor MSHA nor the DOL has explained exactly what that meant.

There weren’t any major indications from the Obama administration of any resource limitations. In fact, top administration officials repeatedly said the exact opposite — to the public, the press, the mining community and Congress.

http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2010/06/25/if-msha-needed-more-resources-for-safety-enforcement-why-didnt-president-obama-ask/
04:15 PM on 03/24/2012
Capitalism: an idea so good it's REGULATED.
08:46 PM on 03/24/2012
Well this has to be a first, a person on the right....who can spell! Seriously, good to meet you! A first on the HP!!

If these claims are true (I don't know the West Virginia Gazette ), If Obama HAD stepped up inspections...Republicans would be moaning about regulation "stifling growth", loudly, and sanctimoniously.

Regarding what's "mandatory"....Republicans love to "mandate" tons of stuff. Currently, it's mandating a woman watch an abortion video (what the....?!), mandating a woman gets transvaginal ultrasound, mandating all kinds of voter id (only in the Presidential election though, not in the Republican primaries! Only where there's lots of minorities, and elderly people!) even though there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud (South Carolina just did a study, going back 15 years, and found approx. 300 cases of voter discrepancy, usually because a person voted by absentee and then died.

http://www.drudge.com/news/152988/still-no-voter-fraud-south-carolina
http://www.postandcourier.com/news/2012/feb/27/pew-studydoesnt-showvoter-fraud/
(just two of many articles about it)

Obama had/has more on his plate than any other President before him, Bush left the biggest mess of all time, there's only so many hours in a day! Never been a "perfect" President, I give him a pass (if what you reported in your comment is, in fact, "fact"...you can never take a right winger at their word anymore, ever, sorry) (fanning u though!)