iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Jampa Yeshi, Tibetan Exile, Sets Self On Fire In Self-Immolation Anti-China Protest WARNING: GRAPHIC PHOTOS

Jampa Yeshi Self Immolation

First Posted: 03/26/2012 3:35 am Updated: 03/27/2012 6:28 am

NEW DELHI (AP) — A Tibetan exile lit himself on fire and ran shouting through a demonstration in the Indian capital Monday, just before a visit by China's president and following dozens of self-immolations done in China in protest of its rule over Tibet.

Indian police swept through the New Delhi protest a few hours later, detaining scores of Tibetans.

The man apparently had doused himself with something highly flammable and was engulfed in flames when he ran past the podium where speakers were criticizing China and President Hu Jintao's visit.

Fellow activists beat out the flames with Tibetan flags and poured water onto him. He was on fire perhaps less than two minutes, but some of his clothing had disintegrated and his skin was mottled with black, burned patches by the time he was driven to a hospital.

About 30 such protests have occurred over the past year in ethnic Tibetan areas of China, and a Tibetan self-immolated last year in India, where many exiles reside. Beijing has blamed the Dalai Lama for inciting them and called the protesters' actions a form of terrorism.

Tibetans inside China and exiles say China's crackdown on Tibetan regions is so oppressive, those who choose such a horrific form of protest feel they have no other way to express their beliefs.

Activists said the exile who self-immolated Monday is Jamphel Yeshi, 27, who escaped from Tibet in 2006 and has been living in New Delhi for two years.

He was burned on 98 percent of his body and his condition is critical, according to the Association of Tibetan Journalists.

Protesters initially prevented police from taking him to the hospital, but officers eventually forcibly took him away.

While activists had been whispering Monday morning that something dramatic was expected at the protest, organizers insisted they were not behind the self-immolation.

"We have no idea how this happened, but we appreciate the courage," said Tenzing Norsang, an official with the Tibetan Youth Congress.

Hu is expected to arrive in India on Wednesday for a five-nation economic summit. Norsang called on the summit participants to discuss Tibet.

"If you care about peace you should raise the issue of Tibet," he said. "Hu Jintao is responsible for what is happening there."

At the protest site, a large poster of Hu — with a bloody palm print over his face — said: "Hu Jin Tao is unwelcome" at the summit.

More than 600 demonstrators marched across New Delhi to a plaza near the Indian Parliament. Some carried posters saying "Tibet is burning" or "Tibet is not part of China."

"This is what China faces unless they give freedom to Tibet," said Tenzin Dorjee, a young onlooker.

China says Tibet has always been part of its territory. Tibetans say the Himalayan region was virtually independent for centuries.

Many of the protesters who have self-immolated in China are Buddhist monks or nuns, often in their teens or early 20s. They have done so while calling for the return to Tibet of the Dalai Lama and to protest Chinese rule over their homeland. Security forces have taken many away, and it's unknown how many survived.

The origin of this form of protest is unclear. Some activists see inspiration from the Arab Spring protests, set off by a Tunisian fruit seller's self-immolation. Others see historical examples among Buddhist monks: those who protests Vietnam's crackdowns in the 1960s and Chinese in the last imperial dynasty.

The economic summit Hu will be attending this week involves the leaders of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, who form a grouping known as BRICS.

Police in New Delhi were already bracing for protests by the tens of thousands of Tibetan exiles who live in India. Security around the summit location has been tightened, and roads leading to the hotel will be closed to the public a day ahead of the meeting.

Rajan Bhagat, a spokesman for the Delhi police, did not know how long the protesting Tibetans would be held, or how many had been taken into custody.

Tibetan protesters normally are held for anywhere from a few hours to one day — often to stop them from further embarrassing Indian authorities during Chinese visits — though detainees legally can be held for up to one week.

1  of  11
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
An exile Tibetan Buddhist nun cries in Dharmsala, India, Monday, March 26, 2012 during a candle lit vigil in solidarity with a 27-year-old Tibetan Jamphel Yeshi, who immolated himself in New Delhi, just ahead of a visit by China's president Hu Jintao. (AP Photo/Ashwini Bhatia)

Earlier On HuffPost:
FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

NEW DELHI (AP) — A Tibetan exile lit himself on fire and ran shouting through a demonstration in the Indian capital Monday, just before a visit by China's president and following dozens of self-immo...
NEW DELHI (AP) — A Tibetan exile lit himself on fire and ran shouting through a demonstration in the Indian capital Monday, just before a visit by China's president and following dozens of self-immo...
Filed by Ryan Craggs  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,835
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (41 total)
01:45 AM on 03/29/2012
You know what he said right before he lit himself on fire? HEY YA ALL WATCH THIS. What a dummy.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
Pod-gers
Jeremy Lin = Game Change
02:08 PM on 03/28/2012
Perhaps if we pointed out who invented matches we could dissuade this unnecessary sacrifice?
05:14 AM on 03/28/2012
0:21 a primitive form of fire engine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Montana
12:36 AM on 03/28/2012
Just before the Beijing Olympics had begun, Tibetans were violently rioting within the region because they're absolutely against so many Han Chinese moving and living there, perpetuating what they feel is a Chinese pursuit in diluting Tibetan regional identity. The problem is that Tibet has never existed as a nation or region separate from China, semi-autonomous perhaps, but never independent in history. That is an enormous misconception from people in the West with their hearts in the right place but knowledge of history and facts a bit skewed.

"Free Tibet" is entirely absurd because before the Chinese had come in to modernize the Tibetan region, it was a place run by a theocratic aristocracy under the authority of the Dalai Lama, living under luxury and worship, by the mass of slavish serfs in dire poverty and grossly unequal disparity where torture was commonly applied as punishment. It was never a "free" or particularly nice place regardless of naive projections of a peaceful, Buddhist mountain paradise. The Chinese, although they are guilty of human rights abuses and oppression of minorities who want some autonomy, modernized Tibet and allowed Tibetans the freedom to be educated in schools, have things like running water, and liberated them from total isolation and suffocated under a social strata where they lived like slaves under an opulent aristocracy. That is why a slogan like "Free Tibet" is just absurd and entirely ignorant of history.
03:16 AM on 03/28/2012
So it sounds like the new catch phrase for communism should be "It's for your own good" because after as long as you provide running water and electric it's ok to commit human rights abuses and oppress minorities.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Montana
08:32 PM on 03/28/2012
The point is that before the Chinese stepped in to modernize the region is that Tibet was also guilty of many human rights abuses, under an autocratic aristocracy keeping most Tibetans uneducated, isolated, and under a strata where they lived in extremely poor serfdom worshiping the Dalai Lama under the threat of torture like eye gouging while the ruling monks lived in luxury. I would call that massive oppression. Wouldn't you?

My point was that the Chinese agenda of unifying and modernizing the entire nation had at the very least allowed Tibetans the benefit of schooling, education, running water, electricity, and the freedom to leave so they can seek better opportunities elsewhere. Being oppressed under dire poverty and serfdom under a theocratic aristocracy under the threat of grotesque torture does not make them better off. The DPRC is guilty of human rights abuses, political repression, and oppression, but reasonably it's the lesser evil of how Tibet used to be before the Chinese moved in. You should do a better job of understanding that and knowing history before towing the line of things that never were reality nor were they ever factual.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:52 AM on 03/28/2012
According to Dalia Lama, "Tibet is backward" and and is greatly benefiting from Chinese investments and improvements in infrastructure, modernizing and development.
But of course DL also insisted that the modernizing must be coupled with more autonomy for Tibetan people, particularly preservation of Tibetan culture.
I agree with that wise approach.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Montana
08:25 PM on 03/28/2012
It's not unreasonable but I've talked to a lot of people from China, old and young, who had given me consistently and surprisingly insightful thoughts elaborating: China is not ready for democracy. It's somewhat stunning but there is a valid kernel of truth in that. China isn't a country of homogenous people, even if the Han Chinese are dominant, as there are a lot of minorities and some of them separatists. I've been consistently told that if China had gone the way of a free democracy, it would be a relatively chaotic place absent of the many economic and rapid advances in modernization accomplishments that have unabashedly benefited the people. Human rights abuses and political repression are a grave concern, but there is truth the DPRC government has been fated as the world's biggest superpower to eclipse us precisely because they've commanded their country and peoples by carrying out a unified agenda and their economic objectives with it.

The reality is that Tibet has never been independent from China and won't be. Many Han Chinese have relocated there and skewed the demographics because it is China. There are regions like Xinjiang where the Uyghur people have been fighting for autonomy because they are Turkic-speaking and not Chinese. "Autonomy" in Tibet's case, if they had their way, would be to drive all the Han Chinese out may very well recognize the Dalai Lama as a supreme authority just as they used to before Chinese modernization. It won't happen.
10:46 PM on 03/27/2012
slightly different from what some islamic groups do--however, if there is outrage regarding using teens and young people for martyrdom to terrorize other people why isn't there outrage regarding using teens and young people with self-immolation--where is the Dali Lama opinions regarding self-immolation or perhaps it does not matter based on that religion's values..
photo
Crisdean Wulver
We've got our priorities screwed up.
11:23 PM on 03/27/2012
Your ignorance of Buddhism is appalling. It would be against Buddhist ethics to try to persuade someone to burn themselves to death. These people are choosing it for themselves. That way the Karma is only on them.

Watch the movies "Kundun" and " Seven Years in Tibet." When they were digging up the ground for a new building or roadway, construction was often interrupted to save earthworms from being killed.

I leave it to you to decide if there's a difference between killing masses of innocent people and setting oneself ablaze in a way that harms no but oneself.

Jesus! I would have thought common sense would enable you to see the difference.

Forgive me for assuming you have common sense.
03:35 AM on 03/28/2012
actually, i highlighted there was a difference between jihadist suicide and self-immolation. i also highlighted that the dali lama based on "religious" values (i.e., existences, paths, karma etc) does not believe it matters. which quite frankly would be the same as your statement regarding Karma. If it is not the dali lama's karma, why would he care about your karma. However, balance....action and inaction still results in karma. ignorance and knowledge is balance. Ironically there are those who pretend to be omnipotent and all knowing when in actually it is everywhere and decided about by anyone including myself. even the dali lama would agree that your epistemology is no greater than mine. so who cares about the burning children or should tibet just burn or that the monks karma?
photo
Pod-gers
Jeremy Lin = Game Change
02:07 PM on 03/28/2012
Yes, the Three Hands Washed theory of avoiding responsibility.

In Buddhist Ethics a 'king' is required to sacrifice his own 'emancipation,' in order to keep the peace.

Where is the Dalai Lama's compassion? Of course he should speek out clearly on this subject.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:03 AM on 03/28/2012
Except for a few meaningless phrases DL has utterly failed to address this serious problem in Tibetan Sangha under his DIRECT authority. This is shameful. And I say that as someone with enormous respect for DL in other areas. But not this one.
09:13 PM on 03/27/2012
Comparing how the original settlers dealt with the native americans, the Chinese are not any worse. In fact, today Native Americans as a group have the highest suicide rates along with the lowest employment rates in the US. China has taken cue from the US by giving its minorities special privileges such as exemption from the one-child policy, as well as reserved college spots, both which are extremely valuable benefits to the ordinary Chinese. Just as with the US though, these programs do not make everyone happy.

What has happened with the suicides is extremely tragic. However, if the Tibetans want their independence the target they should aim for is the general Chinese population, and not the Western media. Given the history of invasions by Western nations against China, external pressure especially from the West will not work. China bashing instead will only unite the Chinese as a whole and make Tibet independence even more difficult. This is why the Tibet independence movement is failing.
shylove2
warfare state is pathological
08:42 PM on 03/27/2012
Never a word is mentioned of the 5 US self-immolations against the Vietnam War nor mentions their lack of press coverage or their lack of influence on our war policies..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Achilles1963
Anti war Anti Spying Anti Assassination Veteran
09:24 PM on 03/27/2012
Why would they? The things you speak of are common knowledge to anyone over the age of 45 or so. No need to even speak to the younger generation about it, if they cared enough about history to study it they would already know about what happened during that era.
07:38 PM on 03/27/2012
Keep burning yourselves, which only proves that gas is inflammable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Achilles1963
Anti war Anti Spying Anti Assassination Veteran
09:27 PM on 03/27/2012
Yes, while I appreciate their beliefs I have never considered public suicide to be especially helpful as a problem solving tool. If he was willing to die for his beliefs he should have picked up a rifle and fought for them.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:12 PM on 03/27/2012
I do not understand why China won't let go of Tibet, except out of sheer hatefulness. Is it financially beneficial to them to hold it? I don't think so. This is just hate based, that's all. They just want to punish the Tibetan people for existing.
08:16 PM on 03/27/2012
Would the United States let go of Hawaii? There's a Hawaiian independence movement, you know. Oh, and Hawaii was originally annexed under far more troubling circumstances than the latest Tibetan reunification. Tibet has a relationship (however you want to characterize it, either tributary or subject) with China dating back centuries. Hawaii isn't particularly resource rich either. It just happens to be American territory the same way Tibet is Chinese territory. Countries like to keep their territory. There's no hate involved.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:53 AM on 03/28/2012
Brilliant come back Kwyang. Xie, xie.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:08 PM on 03/31/2012
Hawaii is militarily strategic, and it could not have been made a state if it hadn't agreed to it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sbrannon
thinker, photojournalist, humanitarian
05:49 PM on 03/27/2012
It must be horrible for someone else to take over control of your country.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:54 AM on 03/28/2012
As an American you'd know all about it.
04:04 PM on 03/27/2012
This is so aweful. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to make any difference.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
revr
inside watching and listening
03:49 PM on 03/27/2012
This one has been done to death.

“War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is strength.” George Orwell, [1984]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xenubarb
Nebulon V
02:13 PM on 03/27/2012
They did that in Vietnam too. I do not recall if it had any impact back then. Probably a futile gesture of terminal despair.
08:27 PM on 03/27/2012
Self-immolation did have an impact in Vietnam, because the intended audience was not the South Vietnamese government that was actively suppressing Buddhism, but rather the Americans. Our government was supporting the administration of President Ngo at the time, but in the aftermath of the self-immolation, it became abundantly clear to us that Ngo did not have the support of the public, and we sanctioned a violent coup to remove him. Ngo was shot in the back of an APC within six months.

This of course doesn't apply to China. We have no leverage of that sort in China. Furthermore reliable foreign polls consistently show the vast majority of Chinese are highly supportive of the government due to the astounding pace of economic development the country has been able to achieve for the last few decades. The average Chinese does not consider Tibet to be a foreign country, does not consider the Tibetan demands for independence to be reasonable, and does not oppose the government's policies on Tibet. Let me put it this way: 9% of Americans approve of the job Congress is doing. 90% of Chinese approve the job the Communist Party is doing.
photo
kanamartin
I vote democrat, but I'm no liberal!
02:09 PM on 03/27/2012
OMG!!! This is HORRIFYING! How desparate do you have to be to set yourself on fire! May the Lord touch hearts and minds.....I'm without words...