iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

John Edwards Sex Tape Won't Be Shown To Jurors

John Edwards Trial Date

MICHAEL BIESECKER   03/26/12 01:52 PM ET  AP

GREENSBORO, N.C. — Prosecutors on Monday asked the federal judge overseeing the upcoming criminal trial of John Edwards to limit how much jurors can be told about the legal fight over a sex tape featuring the former presidential candidate.

Both sides agreed at a pre-trial hearing that the video made by Edwards mistress Rielle Hunter should not be shown to jurors deciding whether the Democrat is guilty of campaign finance violations.

However, Edwards' defense team argued they should be free to question former campaign aide Andrew Young about inconsistent testimony he gave after Hunter sued him in state court to regain possession of the tape. The attorneys hope to use that testimony to undercut his credibility.

Young, who initially claimed paternity of the child Edwards fathered with Hunter, helped hide the pregnant mistress from the public during the 2008 presidential primary. He is now expected to be a key witness against his former boss.

The nearly $1 million secretly paid by two wealthy campaign donors to care for Hunter is at the heart of the six criminal counts against Edwards. He has pleaded not guilty.

Edwards' trial is set to begin April 12.

Hunter sued Young and his wife in 2010 over control of the sex tape, which had been left at a property controlled by Young. He found the tape and later described it in a bestselling memoir.

During the resulting court fight, Young gave sometimes conflicting accounts of how many copies he made of the tape and how many people saw it.

A state judge found the Youngs in contempt of court for not following his orders to turn over all copies of the tape, though the contempt threat was dropped once the Youngs complied.

Prosecutors said Monday that U.S. District Court Judge Catherine C. Eagles should strictly limit what can be said about the sex tape case during Edwards' criminal trial. To do otherwise, they argued, could allow Edwards' lawyers to launch a "trial within a trial" strategy, using issues involving the sex tape to unfairly attack the government's witness and confuse the jury.

Eagles did not indicate when she might rule on the issue.

Hunter and Young agreed to a civil settlement last month that requires all copies of the sex tape in possession of the North Carolina court to be destroyed. However, it has been suggested in court documents that Young previously gave a copy of the tape to federal investigators.

Prosecutors reaffirmed Monday that they have no intention of playing the tape in court, but suggested they may have to describe contents of the tape to jurors if defense attorneys question Young about testimony in the civil case.

That presents a dilemma for Edwards' defense team, if the potential damage to Young's credibility outweighs the possible harm to Edwards in describing the tape to jurors. Edwards' wife, Elizabeth, was dying of cancer when the tape was made.

___

Follow AP writer Michael Biesecker at twitter.com/mbieseck

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
GREENSBORO, N.C. — Prosecutors on Monday asked the federal judge overseeing the upcoming criminal trial of John Edwards to limit how much jurors can be told about the legal fight over a sex tape...
GREENSBORO, N.C. — Prosecutors on Monday asked the federal judge overseeing the upcoming criminal trial of John Edwards to limit how much jurors can be told about the legal fight over a sex tape...
Filed by Katy Hall  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 414
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
06:57 PM on 04/23/2012
I can't believe this guy threw away his political career and his family for that woman. How dumb and selfish can you be? He's definitely going to get jail time....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hwteenstars
01:22 AM on 03/28/2012
You know, I just don't get the personal sex tape thing. I don't need to replay it, I was there. If I need to replay it, maybe I should just do it again. Maybe I just feel that sex is like theater, it is in the moment, it is an interaction of inspiration, interpretation and participation. It just loses it's real essence on video tape. Further, there are some things that I have learned that I personally prefer to do in private. I don't really need to memorialize for future generations my attempts to create future generations, most of which failed. Hopefully, likewise I hope that future generations will understand that sometimes due to their existence, my ministrations did succeed and they don't need to see it to verify it. Likewise I don't need to video my daily excretions, my hygiene routines or moments of slumber, indolence, breathing, drinking, eatings or incoherence. So, as you might expect, I have no sex tapes nor will I ever burden myself or anyone else with one. It is not that they are so much an embarrassment as they are commonplace and boring, depicting a feat more common than the annual extinguishing the candles on a birthday cake. I don't film myself walking up stairs, putting my hand in the mailbox, paying bills, chewing gum, folding sheets, ironing or doing the dishes either. If I need verification of myself having sex, I will simply look in a mirror.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mostlyindignant
02:17 PM on 04/02/2012
and this is relevant how?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:42 PM on 03/27/2012
There seems to be an overabundance of testosterone--on a bi-partisan basis.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nerdiac
03:36 PM on 03/27/2012
I know those jurors are relieved! We've all read the description, no one needs anything further than that. Seeing the actual thing might ruin appetites for a few years. On second thought, maybe that's a great diet plan!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:23 PM on 03/27/2012
Edwards is going to learn the same lesson Blago and Rzeko did about messing with Barack Hussein Obama.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
anon004
Yes, it's true -- reality has a liberal bias
09:55 PM on 03/27/2012
Relevance?
cornell0673
every saint has a past & every sinner has a future
12:47 PM on 03/27/2012
Rush will be deeply disappointed, another tax payer funded sexcapade that he cant watch
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anitaroosevelt
want some Ayn Rand with those fries?
11:06 AM on 03/27/2012
After the way he betrayed his wife, I hope he goes to jail asap.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trentonjordan
87 US cities and counting
10:57 AM on 03/27/2012
Time for Mr. Edwards to start thinking of his "porn name".
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
msoverall
I think, therefore I'm not a Republican!
10:51 AM on 03/27/2012
The jurors are exceedingly grateful for small mercies. Amen.
10:05 AM on 03/27/2012
Stick a fork in him....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muscle guy
Vietnam Special Forces Veteran
09:00 AM on 03/27/2012
why isnt this slime, who lied thru his teeth, and tried to lie his way into the presidency, in jail??
well if he gets off, I"m sure obama can use him, he"s well qualified for the obama administration
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
numushazi
Reagan raised taxes eleven times as President
11:08 AM on 03/27/2012
You are a nut!
photo
christopherflynn
The wreligious wright is always rong...
01:32 PM on 03/27/2012
don't mess with her...she was in the 'special farces'....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mostlyindignant
02:20 PM on 04/02/2012
Muscle guy has not been paying attention. This is a trial to determine if campaign money was (mis) used to hide Hunter or if the money was a direct gift. Snap to!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
puppynip
Perpetual kindness, my wish for all !
04:41 PM on 03/27/2012
LOL ! Definately Obama's type !
08:25 AM on 03/27/2012
Since they have the child with his DNA, why would they even need this "sex tape"?? It's already proven he cheated on his wife and had a mistress. All that's left is whether or not he used campaign funds, etc. to pay her. I think, in this whole mess, maybe the Young's behavior should be looked into, as well. After all, they took the videotape AND apparently cooperated in allowing people to think he was the father, etc. Sounds like he was in it for some money.
wwhatever747
Whatever Karma Bites, Let it be, U asked for it.
08:18 AM on 03/27/2012
There's nothing for the jurors to see if it was presentable.
photo
TheTruthHurts101
Punish Success, Reward Failure - Because its FAIR!
08:04 AM on 03/27/2012
And to think that you silly libbys were drooling to get this bafoon into the White House. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1dabut1
Power is not alluring to pure minds. Thomas Jeffer
10:39 AM on 03/27/2012
still better than anyone the gop has on their ship of fools.
photo
christopherflynn
The wreligious wright is always rong...
01:33 PM on 03/27/2012
and then some.............. f & f
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:40 PM on 03/27/2012
he should have gone to would-be Pres. Newt for moral advice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
indy girl
Sorry, this micro-bio did not meet HP guidelines.
07:58 AM on 03/27/2012
"John Edwards Sex Tape Won't Be Shown To Jurors"

...and in related news:

"Edwards Jurors Profoundly Grateful"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MUDPUPTN3
08:27 AM on 03/27/2012
LOL!!!!
septsong
noonesbusiness
09:26 AM on 03/27/2012
tee hee....:)