iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Robert Redford's 'Watershed' Documentary Raises Awareness For Worldwide Water Conservation

First Posted: 03/26/2012 8:59 am Updated: 05/26/2012 5:12 am


* "Watershed" documentary aims to stoke social awareness

* Colorado River exemplifies water issues worldwide

* Redford, son focus on people as solution to problem

By Robert Muir

WASHINGTON, March 26 (Reuters) - Actor and director Robert Redford, a longtime environmental activist, has teamed with his son to film a documentary about the Colorado River system, which conservationists believe is endangered by decades of development and global warming.

Redford, 76, who lives in Utah, traveled to Washington, D.C. along with Jamie Redford, a Northern California resident, to discuss the urgency of the message in their film, "Watershed," featured recently at the D.C. Environmental Film Festival.

Both father and son have been tireless vocal advocates for conservation, particularly in the western United States. Their documentary, produced by Jamie Redford and narrated by his father, draws attention to the enormous and, they say, unsustainable demands on the Colorado River system that provides much of the American west with water.

"The watershed issue is something that's happening all over the world, where the need for water is greater than the amount of water to provide for it," Robert Redford told Reuters.

"I think we're picking the Colorado River as an example of what's going on with watersheds all over the world and trying to focus on that and draw attention to it."

The river flows from the Rocky Mountains 1,450 miles (2,333 km) to the Gulf of California. But, as the Redfords' film points out, the water rarely makes it that far because of the multiple demands of agriculture, industry and communities upstream.

The film opens with an explanation of the history of the Colorado River system's development, starting with the Colorado River Compact of 1922, which provided for the equitable division and apportionment of the water among seven states in the U.S. and two in Mexico.

But "Watershed" holds that the compact, 90 years later, has transformed one of the world's wildest rivers to the point where it will soon be unable to provide sufficient water for the populations dependent upon it.

"With population in the region expected to reach 50 million by 2050, temperatures rising and precipitation patterns becoming more erratic, demand will outpace supply unless we embrace a new water ethic" Redford says in the film.

A star of hits including "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid", "All the President's Men", "The Sting" and the Oscar-winning director of "Ordinary People," Redford hopes "Watershed" serves as a warning.

"There's a new water reality that people have to be aware of, and I think looking at the Colorado River as an example is what this film's about.

"I think it's using art as a tool for social awareness, you know, making a film about an issue and then getting it out to as many people as possible increases awareness. Maybe increased awareness will help solve our problem," he said.

The film illustrates the various demands on the Colorado River through the eyes of the people who live on it, from a fly-fishing instructor near the river's source to farmers and families living downstream. Jamie Redford said that by enlisting real people in the project, the issue was more likely to resonate with audiences.

"It was pretty clear from our point of view that what we wanted to do was specifically focus on people, and we wanted to take a positive look at what is a challenging situation," he said.

"So, in that regard, we found characters up and down the river from the headwaters all the way out to the Colorado delta in Mexico that are fighting to make a difference and are making a difference and setting an example of what you can do."

As a California native and long-time resident of Utah, Jamie's father said he has watched the gradual depletion of the Colorado for 50 years and that the issue is too important to ignore any longer.

"You've got 30 million people dependent on that water source, and a lot of that dependency is urban renewal, booming metropolitan cities. You've got drinking, you've got sanitation and you've got electrical generation. You pull that off the river," said Redford. "Plus, the agricultural water rights that the farmers and ranchers have. You've got a depletion that has to be looked at."

An early supporter of President Obama, Redford said he is disappointed by the administration and Congress's progress on future fuel sources, noting that non-sustainable, carbon-based fuels are a major contributing factor to global warming and the problems facing those who depend on the Colorado River.

But no one in government, Redford said, is courageous enough to make decisions that could prevent worsening of the situation.

"The future is about young people," he said. "Young people coming on today, like Jamie my son, his son, other generations coming, what are we thinking about them?

"I think we have such a tendency to think short, short term, and therefore apply short term solutions to longer term problems. We're just not going to get there unless that changes." (Editing By Chris Michaud and Bob Tourtellotte)

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Filed by Jessica Leader  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 46
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Howes
Video Online Training
05:50 PM on 05/09/2012
Clean Water the Solutions is Training Education the only way to show how we can help so we do have access to clean water. I have Video Online Training to help people www.isoclasses.com be certified to show you care
photo
Artemesian
Spiritual Messenger of the Earth
11:45 AM on 03/27/2012
California is so far in debt that their taxpayers and seniors could never handle the huge expense of desalinization. If we keep on the way we are going, it will be like the water wars of the 1920s in the West. $1 a day? Where are people getting that figure? It seems woefully underestimated.

There's nothing wrong with golf or golf courses, but the world is overrun with them, and when you think of how they affect our water with usage, and the amount of water, chemicals and fertilizers needed to maintain them, chemicals and fertilizers that go right back into the watershed, especially when it something that is not critical to our survival. Plow some of them under and grow crops on them!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:51 AM on 03/27/2012
Bob, your son will be too busy paying off the national debt to worry about much else.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
08:12 AM on 03/27/2012
Desalination isn't the answer for industry and agriculture?

If a farmer got his irrigation water through desalination and he wanted to use one acre foot of water per year per acre of farm land, it would cost him 70 thousand dollars to irrigate 100 acres of farm land for one year. It now cost about $700 to desalinate one acre foot (325851 gallons) of water. What do you think this would do to the price of food? Where does a farmer get $70,000? Also the cost increase to refine petroleum with desal-water would make fossil fuel refining uneconomical.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SitandStay
Lorenzo&BushH8ter
08:30 AM on 03/27/2012
And, Saudi Arabia has a fossil-rock aquifer that is in the throws of being maxed out.
That's 30 million Arabs without water for their wheat.
And the 100,000 acres of the most significant aquifer in S. America, the Bush family bought, replete with a Special Forces installation near by, may find itself under stress as outlaws cut down the Paraguay forest to raise cattle. Illegally. And of course Central and South America have an "oil problem" in which the oil companies just absolutely destroy the land and hence the water, where ever they go.
Farming will have to shift to more sustainable crops instead of raising corn for cattle (which kills and diseases the cattle anyway) and no even the waters are polluted by fish farming.
Crazy I tell you, just crazy. And short sighted as shell.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kye154
04:53 AM on 03/27/2012
The biggest problem to water in the Colorado River is the way it is administered by the Colorado River Commission. It is essentially a commission made up of the adjointing states in the basin, and the federal government who represent the federal interests and control of the dam. The states however, are the major players in this, and all of them want as much water as they can get from the river, almost to the point of going to war with each other like they almost did back in the 1920's. There is no incentive for the states to conserve any water, and environmental considerations are last on the list. They want the water, because it means revenues to the states. The states are reluctant to control the population growth and industrial needs, because that too is taxable source of revenue for them. They basically don't care if they over populate the deserts which has a very finite supply of water resources. They just raise everyone's water rates, and get them to conserve that way. That is their idea of water conservation, conserve the water but don't loose the profits from it. One day, a severe drought will happen, and they will be forced into a drastic situation. Water laws in the U.S. are really very arcane, and were never designed with conservation in mind. It is all about property rights, entitlements, and states' domain. Unless state governments can get beyond that, they are not going to conserve anything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SitandStay
Lorenzo&BushH8ter
08:18 AM on 03/27/2012
You are correct. In Georgia, they have been fighting in the halls of injustice for over a decade. Georgia, Florida, Alabama and Tennessee fighting over the Chattahoochee River, a strem compared to the Colorado. They go to court arguing over the demands of water releases from Lake Lanier in Georgia. Florida uses an endandered species as basis for need, snail darter, while Georgia whines and moans but does nothing. Actually, I take that back, Georgia aids and abets stream depletion by refusing to inforce runoff laws of construction sites. The EPA needs broader scope and power with massive teeth. The counties and cities are disgustingly wasteful and if there was a way to monitor the silt that would be a good way for cities downstream to force compliance, but since they are all guilty, not one entity will comply.
Meanwhile, water sources and resources are privatized and bottled for shipment across the ocean while politicians sell their grandchildrens birthrights to polluting industries with high water usage and uberwealthy wait quietly for the masses to start genuflecting for a drinkable 8 ounces.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ronald Malaney
01:54 AM on 03/27/2012
if Robert and his son play golf then they are a huge part of the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
01:51 AM on 03/27/2012
So, we have a wanna be environmentalist who raped the Earth for a ski resort, killing and raping an ecosystem in the eco-nomy of all life, like oxygen releasing, the atmosphere, the climate, the sequestration of the heat trapping gases, the entirety of Earth's biogeochemistry, the nitrogen cycle, the hydrological storage and flux, the very life zone of the Earth, the biosphere/ecosphere or life itself.

So, if he can kill the planet, it is open season for Earth, right? Okay, what's next?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Crabtree
01:58 AM on 03/27/2012
shhhhh he is a liberal and liberals can do no harm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
02:15 AM on 03/27/2012
I hope you jest! Yarrrr, killing the Earth, still kills the planet, right?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aleks Hunter
Dear God, please save us from Your followers.
08:39 AM on 03/27/2012
Get over the liberal/ conservative thing. It doesn't matter, when the water's gone your political convictions won;t help sate your thirst. So keep on fracking and yelling "drill baby drilll"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Organic-Guy
Organic Gardener, Carpenter, Philosopher, Agitator
12:26 AM on 03/27/2012
And with fracking we deliberately pollute hundreds of millions of gallons of water for eternity, some of it with radioactive material and then we throw it away. Does that sound like the behavior of a sane culture?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mumi009
"The truth will set you free"
04:59 AM on 03/27/2012
My thoughts exactly! The same companies that frack in the U.S.are now in Germany wanting to do the same environmental carnage that they have been doing in the U.S. The German reistance is growing as in the U.K. and Australia. France and Bulgaria have forbidden hydraulic fracking outright.

We can live without oil and gas. We cannot live without clean, fresh water and air.

The motto of the U.K. group "Don't frack with us!"
:
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
hazbro24
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro- HST
09:58 PM on 03/26/2012
It's a resource wall, and we're hitting it. We're like suburban deer running around without predators until every garden is foraged dry.
08:21 PM on 03/26/2012
Redford's environmental activism has outshone his brilliant acting career. It is good that his son is picking up the mantle and carrying the word to the younger generation who have never seen his dad's movies. Having lived in the Coachella Valley of Southern California, I have seen the water wars for Colorado River water between San Diego and the massive winter agricultural regions of the Imperial Valley to the south of where I lived. Even at Lake Havasu, part of the Colorado River at the Arizona border, lake levels are at record lows. This cannot continue, but it appears as if elected officials don't bother about what happens tomorrow, so long as they have control of today..
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
05:58 PM on 03/26/2012
Desalination is no solution to global drinking water scarcity. It's energy intensive, and greenhouse gas emitting. It destroys the ecosystem of the sea as its heavy brine sinks to the bottom of the ocean killing all aquatic life there. Aquatic life also gets caught in the intake. Desalination would kill hundreds of thousands of invertebrates and fish each year. We need our scarce renewable energy resource elsewhere rather than using it to produce fresh drinking water if we want to get away from using fossil fuels and nuclear energy. We must concentrate on reducing the Earth's population as a means of conserving scarce drinking water resources. Japan had three nuclear plants producing desalination water, but no more! Ditch the nuclear idea!
It cost $700 to desalinate 300,000 gallons of water, so how much would it cost to replace the Colorado river?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
hazbro24
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro- HST
10:15 PM on 03/26/2012
$700 for 300,000 gallons will sound like a bargain when the aquifers are dry.

I'm pretty sure you could get $700 for a barrel of water in some places.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
08:15 AM on 03/27/2012
Where does a farmer get $70,000 to irrigate 100 acres of farmland for one year at one acre foot per acre per year? Where do oil refineries get the water to inexpensively refine motor fuel? The price of everything would need to double or triple.
05:33 PM on 03/26/2012
Too many people and too few resources.

We have a water crisis, a food crisis, an energy crisis, a financial crisis, a jobs crisis and an over population crisis.

Every problem is made harder to solve with the worlds ever growing population.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:44 PM on 03/26/2012
The West would have plenty of water if the enviornmental movement would stand out of the way and let Californians build desal plants such as they have in Australia.

Desal is not plenty cheap for personal consumption - it works out to less than $1 per day to per for your desaled water. The problem - the environmental movement in this country won't let them be built.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
06:28 PM on 03/26/2012
C'mon! C'mon! Don't be so unrealistic! At the going price of $650 per acre foot of desalinated water, it would cost us $9,555,000,000 to replace the water of the Colorado river since the Colorado river produces 14.7 million acre feet of water per year. Where ya gonna get the 10 trillion dollars a year to do what the Colorado river does by paying for desalination? And this is just one of our rivers! Water is Money! Big time Money! Water is the wealth of America. Don't waste it!
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
06:32 PM on 03/26/2012
Oops! I mean 10 billion dollars! The Colorado river gives us 10 billion dollars worth of drinking water a year for free.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:56 PM on 03/26/2012
OK - the average American uses a little more than ~500 litres per day. That's about 135 gallons per day, or less than 0.0005 acre feet of water per person per day. So I was wrong - it isn't a dollar per day, it's a quarter per day. Or, for a family of 4, a dollar per day (which is probably why I remembered that number).

So again, by your own reckoning, it's a dollar per day per family for desaled water. Frankly, I'd rather buy it and waste it as desired than conserve it, knowing it's that cheap.

But the "druids" hate this sort of behavior, so they're blocking the desal plants. Hopefully not forever.

But I'm not fooled. At a dollar per family per day, it's not a "water shortage" problem. It's a "Druids won't let us use technology" problem.
01:22 PM on 03/26/2012
SOL1765 - Here's an idea, makethe large costal cities in California build desalination plants, that'd free up a whole lot of the colorado rivers water
01:11 PM on 03/26/2012
I have so much respect for Robert Redford for all the work he has done and continues to do for the betterment of humankind. Thank you for being yet another voice to speak up about the precious need to preserve our fresh water supplies. Gas drilling via Fracking must stop. Renewal energies must be developed for our future