iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Nuclear Fusion Power May Be Feasible, Sandia Scientists Say

Posted: 03/27/2012 8:21 am Updated: 03/27/2012 8:21 am

By: Jesse Emspak, LiveScience Contributor
Published: 03/26/2012 06:18 PM EDT on LiveScience

If new computer simulations pan out in the real world, nuclear fusion, the power source that makes stars shine, may be a practical possibility here on Earth, scientists say.

Simulations at Sandia National Laboratories in New Mexico revealed a fusion reactor that surpasses the "break-even" point of energy input versus energy output, indicating a self-sustaining fusion reaction. (This doesn't break any laws of physics for the same reason that starting a fire with a match doesn't).

Extremely high temperatures and pressures are needed to spark nuclear fusion, a process in which atomic nuclei — the protons and neutrons of atoms — literally fuse together to create a heavier element. And if the conditions are right, that fusion can release massive amounts of energy.

The results of the new study have applications in weapons testing (it's feasible to test the effects of nuclear weapons in the lab, but not in the real world) and for clean energy, as the experiment relied on deuterium, which could be extracted from seawater.

In stars, the mass of hydrogen is so large that its own gravity keeps the hydrogen and helium at the center in a small area, and the temperatures are in the millions of degrees. Essentially, the plasma (gas that has had its atoms stripped of electrons) is confined forever, and the protons can't escape and take their energy with them. So hydrogen fuses into helium, producing a lot of energy in the form of light and heat.

But that's a lot more difficult to do in a lab. For years, scientists and engineers have been looking for ways to confine plasma that is so hot it would melt the walls of any container and force atoms together to make them fuse.

Inertial fusion

At Sandia, they are testing a method called magnetized inertial fusion, in which two coils are used to generate a magnetic field. Rather than a solid container, this magnetic field confines the plasma.

A metal cylinder, which lines the inside of each of the coils, has an inner coating of deuterium and tritium (isotopes of hydrogen, the former with a single extra neutron and the latter with two). The metal liner is preheated with a laser, and then hit with a current of tens of millions of amperes. [Video: Nuclear Fusion in the Lab]

That current vaporizes the liner, but before it does so, it generates a very strong magnetic field nestled inside the one from the coils. As such, the outer magnetic field squeezes the liner with so much force that it shrinks to a small fraction of its original size. That crushing force is enough to get the deuterium and tritium atoms confined long enough to fuse into helium, releasing a neutron and some extra energy. 

The method, which is different from the controversial cold fusion in that temperatures go well above room temperature, was first proposed by Sandia researchers Stephen Slutz and Roger Vesey in December; they published their work in the journal Physical Review Letters.

In their computer simulations, the output was 100 times that of a 60 million amperes put into the system. The output rose as the current went up: 1,000 times the input power was reached from an incoming pulse of 70 million amps.

Real-world tests

Even at Sandia, there isn't a machine that can generate such a huge pulse of energy. The Z machine, a powerful X-ray generator, can hit about 26 million amperes. That might be enough, though, to prove the concept works by hitting the break-even point, where the energy put into the reaction is the same as that which comes out.

Sandia scientists are currently testing the different components of the new machine; right now, they are working on the coils, but a full-scale test should happen in 2013, they say.

Sandia spokesperson Neal Singer noted that one purpose of this work is to study the effects of nuclear explosions without actually exploding a bomb. The United States currently abides by a moratorium on underground nuclear tests. But testing warheads in some manner is essential because the nuclear stockpile is aging. Being able to create fusion reactions in a laboratory setting will go a long way toward making nuclear explosions unnecessary. [The 10 Greatest Explosions Ever]

Of course, it is still uncertain whether the reaction will work the way the researchers hope. Instabilities that appear in the magnetic fields that contain the plasma, for instance, have been an obstacle to working fusion power plants. Those instabilities allow the plasma to escape, so it doesn't fuse. But the work at Sandia is a step in the right direction, said Stephen O. Dean, president of Fusion Power Associates, an advocacy group that has pushed for development of fusion energy.

"They are working at a higher density than other fusion experiments," Dean told LiveScience. "So there's more classical physics… it's better understood." Other approaches, he said, such as using lasers to force deuterium nuclei together, produce interactions that have not been studied as extensively.

Though this work is ostensibly to test weapons, Singer acknowledged its application to power generation, and that it would be a big step.

Dean was more emphatic. "Even though it's a weapons program, [power] is in the back of everyone's mind," he said.

Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW SCIENCE

By: Jesse Emspak, LiveScience Contributor Published: 03/26/2012 06:18 PM EDT on LiveScience If new computer simulations pan out in the real world, nuclear fusion, the power source that makes sta...
By: Jesse Emspak, LiveScience Contributor Published: 03/26/2012 06:18 PM EDT on LiveScience If new computer simulations pan out in the real world, nuclear fusion, the power source that makes sta...
Filed by David Freeman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 219
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
09:56 PM on 06/02/2012
I have a suspicion that by the time what we all call souls move to another temple(body) forward in time, which, by the way is supposed to cease as a entity for us on Dec. 21st ,Roman Calender, Mayan Clock, we who believe as the Hindus in re-incarnation Wormwood (2040) will challenge those of us alive at the time. Whoops there I used that term again, anyway,Steve Hawkins and I see it pretty much the same way, either the Universe will contract and squeeze the galaxies together or It expands and this theory will be proven un- true.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
03:12 PM on 04/23/2012
Mildly interesting, but not practical. Yet. The Polywell fusion reactor is much closer to practicality, if it works.

While we should do this research, we should be putting most of our research, development and installation budget into solar, wind, waste efficiency and plug in hybrids.

But the DOE, which in charge of nuke matters, and spend 90% of it's budget on nuke related stuff, is unfortunately also our energy department. Bad move.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GaryNOVA
Fear My Micro-bio!!!!!!!!
02:02 AM on 03/31/2012
Conservatives will believe this as soon as they find out they can make money with it.
10:04 PM on 06/02/2012
Gary, Isn't that what conservatives i.e. Republican Capitalists do? Sorta like scorpions on a frog's back while crossing a river. Business always rides on the backs of Labor. Without laborers, business won't be able to make a profit therefore failing in their mission. Yes, I will follow you to the ends of Twitter.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
10:55 AM on 03/30/2012
From the comments here it seem like too many folks watch Fox News and read Murdoch's papers and read pseudo science books/blogs and work for the Koch's and their minions.

Reminder......your on the losing side of history!!!!!!!!
01:25 AM on 03/29/2012
New Ipad power unit?
10:42 PM on 04/09/2012
As long as you don't use wifi, it should work.
01:21 AM on 03/29/2012
Warp drive is next.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Maymae
12:09 AM on 03/29/2012
Power had better come to the forefront of everyone's mind. We need to think peace, not war anymore.
foreverhippie
All your olive branches turned to spears
When yo
01:19 AM on 03/29/2012
Not only peace, but sharing and common respect and decency toward ALL.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VapeGirl
Progressive Democrat and proud of it!
12:05 AM on 03/29/2012
Until they can create and control gravity, fusion reactors will not work. The reason a star works is because of the gravity and pressure. You cannot have a star without it. It requires a huge amount of gravity to to bring the atoms so close together that they collide. This collision creates massive amounts of pressure when you consider how many hydrogen atoms are colliding at once in the heart of a star. In the heart of our own sun it is like 10 billion hydrogen bombs going off every second. Think how much gravity it takes to keep it from blasting itself to bits. It is gravity that keeps a star from exploding. Magnetism in the order that is required to make a tokamak reactor requires way to much energy input into the reactor for it to work efficiently. Nope. We need to be able to control gravity before we will ever get a fusion reactor to work.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
10:37 AM on 03/30/2012
And your're the authority.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VapeGirl
Progressive Democrat and proud of it!
09:38 AM on 03/31/2012
As of right now it is impossible to create a sustainable and efficient fusion reactor. Maybe in another 50 years or so we'll have the knowledge, material, and means to do so, but not right now. We know how a star works and that is what a fusion reactor is - a star. If you think you can create a star(even a small one, the size of a few hundred atoms) in a magnetic bubble you're crazy. That is not how a star works. Any first year physicist knows this.
02:20 AM on 03/31/2012
Why are you wasting so much time on nonsense?
11:36 PM on 03/28/2012
I'm glad that after the U.S. has spent more than $50 billion over 60 years researching controlled nuclear fusion that scientists have now determined that such reactions are feasible.

AOL headlined this as "Impossible Energy Source ... Possible?" for some reason.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Acorn Tree
in the beginning man created god.
03:58 AM on 03/29/2012
it was once thought to be impossible so theheadline kinda makes ense
04:12 PM on 03/29/2012
When was that?
photo
britishsteel
one man with courage makes a majority"
11:30 PM on 03/28/2012
That's fission. This is fusion, preferable if possible.
photo
britishsteel
one man with courage makes a majority"
08:50 AM on 03/29/2012
well where as thourium is absoulutely doable " May Be Feasible" Is pie in the sky.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
09:03 AM on 03/29/2012
If thorium is the solution, then it's a pretty stupid question.
photo
britishsteel
one man with courage makes a majority"
09:30 AM on 03/29/2012
About as stupid as electric, wind power, solar power , ethanol , and bio. Its all about cost effectivness vs output and means of out put.
07:38 PM on 03/28/2012
Ok They think that Fusion Power is Possible because of a Computer Simulation?
Does anyone else see The Problem here or is it just me? Programmers can make anything they want to happen, happen if thats the way the program has been writen that doesnt mean that it is possible in real life
10:17 PM on 03/28/2012
Why would they want to make a false assumption and lead the scientific world off course. They would have to record scientific data and measurements down to the inch. The theory itself makes sense since Nuclear Fusion is a true thing since we can observe it from the process of the sun. Magnetism is also proven to keep away the particles expelled from when the Sun creates energy since the planet Earth has a magnetic field to protect from radiation. So, it makes sense in principle and I would not see why they would lead the scientific world off course if it could lead to the greatest discovery known to man. Virtually limitless energy able to replenish itself and given off to the public for use. We would stop fossil fuel consumption by a huge margin and our energy usage would decrease drastically. Though if every city on the planet were to have nuclear fusion, a lot of saltwater would disappear. If anything, it would make iron, since when a star goes through nuclear fusion, an iron core is made until there is no more particles left to create more energy, goes into supernova or possible black hole or other possibilities.
11:59 PM on 03/28/2012
Does this mean the flux capacitor on the Delorean in Back to the future is and antique now?
10:37 PM on 03/28/2012
Fusion is perfectly possible. It has basically already been demonstrated experimentally at JET (Joint European Torus) and a Japanese facility. The problem is that CHEAP fusion is, most likely, not possible any time soon. And by the time it will be possible, we won't need it any more.

There is a good likelihood that fusion reactors will, eventually, find their ultimate application... as the propulsion units of interplanetary spacecraft. But that's probably 100-150 years away.
06:15 PM on 03/28/2012
We can send a man to the moon. We can make a hearing aid device smaller than a grain of rice. So------ why can't they figure out how to make a car battery for the Chevy Volt that gets more than 26 miles per 12 hour charge ???
10:39 PM on 03/28/2012
Of course they can figure it out, but then they would have built a real electric car and not a poorly designed Prius knock-off.

:-)
01:23 AM on 03/29/2012
And a VERY LONG extension cord.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:43 PM on 03/28/2012
Depends on how much you want to pay for it.
photo
king soloman
I'Am the cats Pajamas! ! ! !
06:12 PM on 03/28/2012
sub-atomic science. Gotta love it!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fredhstclr
05:54 PM on 03/28/2012
sounds likea REAL BIG BANG theory......what happens if you can't stop it.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ray Kurilla
06:43 PM on 03/28/2012
It needs fuel is why it won't continue.
10:18 PM on 03/28/2012
The fuel needed is from saltwater(mainly), so it is finite and thus won't increase further than what is necessary.
Al Schrader
Don't limit your potential
05:42 PM on 03/28/2012
Actually, the article is incorrect. The protons and neutrons don't fuse together, the atoms fuse together. For example, two Hydrogen atoms fuse into one Helium atom. The Helium atom is a tiny fraction lighter than the two Hydrogen atoms and the difference is shed as light and heat in accord with Einstein's E = mc^2 formula.

This is not what is occuring on stars like our Sun. It's something else. How do I know ? I've done it in my laboratory here in Florida....Alfred-