iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Shell Arctic Spill Response Plan Gets Approval

Posted: 03/28/2012 3:44 pm

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Federal offshore drilling regulators on Wednesday approved Shell Oil's spill response plan for exploratory drilling in the Beaufort Sea, drawing strong criticism from environmental groups that claim oil companies cannot clean up oil in ice-choked waters.

The announcement by the Interior Department's Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement said the decision followed the agency's thorough review of the plan for Arctic Ocean waters off Alaska's north coast. The agency in February approved Shell's oil spill response plan for the Chukchi Sea off Alaska's northwest coast.

Shell hopes to drill exploratory wells in both locations during the summer open-water season using separate drilling ships. Shell Alaska spokesman Curtis Smith said in an email that the approval is a major milestone.

"It further reinforces that Shell's approach to Arctic exploration is aligned with the high standards the Department of Interior expects from an offshore leader and adds to our confidence that drilling will finally commence in the shallow waters off Alaska this summer," he said.

The federal government estimates 26.6 billion barrels of recoverable oil and 130 trillion cubic feet of natural gas are in the Arctic Ocean's outer continental shelf reserves.

Shell Oil Co., the U.S. arm of Royal Dutch Shell PLC, hopes to drill up to three wells in the Chukchi during the short open water season this summer and two wells in the Beaufort.

Shell's response plan calls for more than a dozen vessels accompanying the drilling ships. One would carry a capping stack that could be lowered to the ocean bottom to control a blowout. Skimmers and boom would be on board other vessels and the flotilla would include a tanker to hold captured crude oil.

Environmental groups contend petroleum companies cannot adequately clean up a spill in temperate waters, as demonstrated by BP's 2010 Deepwater Horizon blowout in the Gulf of Mexico, much less remote, frigid Arctic Ocean waters that may see ice ranging from slush to icebergs.

Cindy Shogan, director of the Alaska Wilderness League, called the approval disappointing.

"There is no viable way to clean up an oil spill in the extreme conditions of America's Arctic Ocean, yet the Obama administration continues to give the green light to Shell Oil's plans for drilling this summer," she said in a statement. "We can only hope that President Obama shows the leadership he promised and refuses to bow to the demands of Big Oil by not granting Shell the final permits it needs to begin drilling in July."

"The Obama administration once again decides to let Shell play Russian roulette with the Arctic ecosystem," said Brendan Cummings, an attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, in an email to the BSEE announcement.

BSEE Director James Watson said in the announcement that Shell still needs agency approval for specific wells before it can drill, and that it must demonstrate its spill response capability.

"We have conducted an exhaustive review of Shell's response plan for the Beaufort Sea," Watson said. "Our focus moving forward will be to hold Shell accountable and to follow-up with exercises, reviews and inspections to ensure that all personnel and equipment are positioned and ready."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Federal offshore drilling regulators on Wednesday approved Shell Oil's spill response plan for exploratory drilling in the Beaufort Sea, drawing strong criticism from enviro...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Federal offshore drilling regulators on Wednesday approved Shell Oil's spill response plan for exploratory drilling in the Beaufort Sea, drawing strong criticism from enviro...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
Kommonman
Blame it on Dyslexic fingers..next question
02:59 PM on 04/05/2012
Here is the spiill response plan....20 million rolls of paper towels...2 million bottles of dawn dishwashing detergent and millions of gallons of toxic dispersant....just like always
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsmithsfamily
odviusly i cant spel
09:58 PM on 04/01/2012
reward for there fine work in the gulf
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
05:09 AM on 04/01/2012
Finally! Billions of dollars spent and 5 years down the drain, but atleast now we can get up there and explore, see what we have there. 130 tcf is nothing to laugh at - would fuel the US powergen requirements for some time if we can get a pipeline extension laid in. Also, 23 billion bbls of oil, at $100 p/bbl, means, even at 12.5% royalties (not including sales taxes, lease payments, etc.) almost $ billion dollars in revenue to the feds for those fields alone. Think of the number of windmills we can put in for that much money! Next, let's open up California and the rest of thw West Coast, as well as the 1/2 of the GOM we can't drill in, and the entire East Coast - use the royalties to completely Repower America! No more coal!
08:16 AM on 04/01/2012
I question the wisdom of drilling in the Beaufort Sea at this time. Most likely the natural gas would be exported to Japan and would require a NLG terminal in Valdez. While this would benefit Alaska and the energy companies, long term it does not serve the best interest of the US.

Concerning oil, the major environmental impact in Alaska has already occurred, the TAPS pipeline. This pipeline has a capacity of ~1.8 million bpd yet only 600K bpd flow thru the line. We need to increase production to keep this pipeline viable.

Bottom line is, TAPS has already impacted the environment, keep it running.

This is where extreme environmentalist can cause more harm than good. What poses more risk to the environment, drilling in the Beaufort Sea or opening up ANWR?

That is a no brainier in my opinion. We should open up ANWR now and keep the Beaufort Sea as a long term reserve.

Beside with global warming, the ice in the Beaufort Sea may be minimal in the future.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsmithsfamily
odviusly i cant spel
09:56 PM on 04/01/2012
gee wounder y the ice might be minimal
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littlerabbit
04:29 PM on 03/29/2012
It's all a shell game -- no one agrees that we have the capability to clean a spill in the arctic, especially when there is ice. How can we approve anything like this based on the age old assurances people received in Prince William Sound with the Exxon Valdez, the BP fiasco in the Gulf and the assurance the Pebble Partnership gives regarding Pebble Mine in Bristol Bay? Assurances don't work, but yet Congress and the President are satisfied with that.
11:54 AM on 03/29/2012
Seems like we have spill problems in the North Sea, off the coast of China and Brazil.........

Can the oil companies operate safely? It does not appear so.
11:44 AM on 03/29/2012
Obama..what are you doing?