iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Autism Rates: New High In U.S. Inspires Renewed Debate

Autism Rates

First Posted: 03/29/2012 1:44 pm EDT Updated: 05/29/2012 5:12 am EDT


* New estimate is 25 percent higher than in 2006

* Rate for boys is five times that of girls

* Experts question whether increase is real (Updates with CDC news conference, details on autism debate)

By Sharon Begley

NEW YORK, March 29 (Reuters) - About one in 88 children in the United States has autism or a related disorder, the highest estimate to date and one that is sure to revive a national argument over how the condition is diagnosed and treated.

The estimate released on Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention represents an overall increase of about 25 percent since the last analysis in 2006 and a near-doubling of the rate reported in 2002.

Among boys, the rate of autism spectrum disorders is one in 54, almost five times that of girls, in whom the rate is one in 252.

"One thing the data tells us with certainty - there are many children and families who need help," CDC Director Thomas Frieden said at a press conference.

The reported spike in the prevalence of autism and related disorders raised questions about whether it is real or an artifact of greater awareness that has led parents, teachers, and even health-care providers to see symptoms of autism in children who would not have received the diagnosis a generation ago.

If it is real, that suggests that some change in the environment might be responsible. In recent years suspicion has focused on everything from mercury, a known neurotoxin, in air and food, to the increasing age of new mothers and fathers.

There is a good possibility that much of the reported increase in the prevalence of autism is illusory, however. When asked about this during the news conference, CDC's Frieden pointed out that "doctors have gotten better at diagnosing the condition and communities have gotten better at providing services, so I think we can say it is possible that the increase is the result of better detection."

Advocates for people with autism nevertheless seized on the new data to call for more research to identify the causes of autism-spectrum disorder and for more services for those affected by it.

"This is a national emergency and it's time for a national strategy," said Mark Roithmayr, president of the research and advocacy group Autism Speaks. He called for a "national training service corps" of therapists, caregivers, teachers and others who are trained to help children with autism.

"Inevitably when these statistics come out, the question is, what is driving the increase?" said Roithmayr. Better diagnoses, broader diagnostic criteria and higher awareness, he estimated, account for about half the reported increase.


EXAMINING RECORDS

The new analysis from the CDC comes from the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, which currently operates at sites in 14 states.

To determine whether a child has autism or a related disorder, what CDC calls "clinician reviewers" examined the medical and school records of 337,093 eight-year-olds in those states in 2008 and conducted screening. Children whose records included either an explicit notation of autism-spectrum disorder or descriptions of behavior consistent with it were counted as falling on the autism spectrum.

The prevalence of autism in the states monitored by CDC varied widely, from a high of one in 47 in Utah to one in 210 in Alabama. Experts said that variation likely reflected differences in awareness of the disorder among parents, teachers and even physicians, as well as differences in the availability of services, rather than any true "hot spots" of autism.

Autism spectrum disorders are marked by a suite of symptoms, all arising from atypical brain development that results in problems with socialization, communication, and behavior.

Although the disorder can be mild or severe, in general children with autism have difficulty communicating and making friends. Many find it painful to look other people in the eyes, which impairs their ability to understand what others are thinking and feeling.

There is no brain-imaging test for autism, let alone a blood test or other rigorously objective diagnostic. Instead, physicians determine whether someone fits the criteria laid out in the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, or DSM.

The manual has undergone significant changes over the years, including in the diagnostic criteria for autism. In its current version, someone must fit at least eight of 16 criteria, including symptoms involving social interaction, communication, and repetitive or restricted behaviors and interests.

The previous version was stricter, describing one diagnostic criterion as "a pervasive lack of responsiveness to other people." In the current manual, that became "a lack of spontaneous seeking to share .... achievements with other people" and friendships that appear less sophisticated than the norm for a child's age.

The earlier manual also required "gross deficits in language development" and "peculiar speech patterns" for a diagnosis, while the current one lists difficulty "sustain(ing) a conversation" or "lack of varied . . . social imitative play."

Morton Ann Gernsbacher, a professor of psychology and autism researcher at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and others have cited these changes to question the reality of the reported autism increase.


ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS

Scientists had long estimated that 90 percent of autism risk was genetic and 10 percent reflected environmental factors. But a 2011 study of twins by scientists at Stanford University concluded that genes account for 38 percent of autism risk and environmental factors 62 percent.

Exactly what those factors are, however, remains the subject of intense research, with two large studies funded by the National Institutes of Health examining everything from what the mother of a child with autism ate during her pregnancy to what cleaners were in the house and what pollutants were in the dust.

"There is not a clear front-runner" among possible environmental causes of autism, said Craig Newschaffer, chair of the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Drexel University School of Public Health and lead investigator of one of the NIH-sponsored studies.

There is, however, what he called "good evidence" that any environmental culprit is present during the second or third trimester, the peak of synapse formation. Scientists believe that faulty brain wiring underlies autism.

They have also focused on factors that have changed in the last two decades, including pregnant women's use of certain antidepressants, increasing parental age and the rise in pre-term births and low-birth weight babies, said Newschaffer.

Even as experts disagree on whether the reported increase in the prevalence is real and what causes the disorder, there is a clear consensus that "the earlier a child is diagnosed the more he will benefit from interventions," Dr. Coleen Boyle, director of CDC's National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities said during the news conference.

Unfortunately, the nation has made slim progress on that front. In 2006, the median age of diagnosis was four-and-a-half years. In 2008 it was four years - an age when experts say is too late for interventions to do all the good they would if begun earlier.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that children be screened for autism at 18 months and again at 24 months. Parents should look for symptoms such as failing to point, not making eye contact, and being slow to develop language, said APA's Dr. Susan Hyman.

"It is critical to act quickly if there is a concern about autism," Frieden said.

Research funded by Autism Speaks found that autism costs the United States $126 billion annually. That reflects the cost of healthcare, special education and other services, as well as loss of productivity, underemployment and unemployment among adults with autism. (Reporting by Sharon Begley; Editing by Michele Gershberg and Philip Barbara)

FOLLOW HUFFPOST PARENTS

* New estimate is 25 percent higher than in 2006 * Rate for boys is five times that of girls * Experts question whether increase is real (Updates with CDC news confer...
* New estimate is 25 percent higher than in 2006 * Rate for boys is five times that of girls * Experts question whether increase is real (Updates with CDC news confer...
Filed by Reuters  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 67
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:22 AM on 04/01/2012
The real question is this. what is causing Autism?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MIMom
Your ad here.
02:50 PM on 03/30/2012
The one thing I have learned over the last couple of days after this news came out...We sure do have a lot of armchair doctors in this country.

"It's Formula! No it's vaccines! No, it's lazy parents! It's big pharma! It's GMOs!"

There's certainly no doctor shortage around HERE. {snark}
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Celiene
Human.
01:23 PM on 03/30/2012
GMO corn. GMOs in general.

Another thing I was thinking is Listeria. A pregnant woman can get it and suffer little or no symptoms. Symptoms are flu-like. This theory came from an on-line convo I was having with several women with Austistic chldren, and the fact that they all craved nad ate soft serve yoghurt and or ice cream. They were all joking about how the would crave Dairy Queen. SOFT SERVE DAIRY SHOULD NEVER, EVER BE EATEN DURING PREGNANCY!

Scientists should look for the Listeria bacteria.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MIMom
Your ad here.
02:47 PM on 03/30/2012
"This theory came from an on-line convo I was having with several women with Austistic chldren, and the fact that they all craved nad ate soft serve yoghurt and or ice cream. They were all joking about how the would crave Dairy Queen. SOFT SERVE DAIRY SHOULD NEVER, EVER BE EATEN DURING PREGNANCY!"

Oh, what brillant medical minds you must have been conversing with. HOW did you get an appointment? Please.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
howtowasteyourlife
09:09 PM on 03/30/2012
Listeria also lives in meat, cheese, vegetables, hard surfaces, porous surfaces, door knobs, countertops, kitchen utensils, appliances, and pretty much everywhere else on Earth. Should pregnant women avoid all these, too?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Celiene
Human.
12:10 PM on 04/02/2012
Doctors say to NOT eat soft serve dairy.
12:51 PM on 03/30/2012
It is an epidemic. I know so many families in my circle with ASD sons...it's so normalized now. One friend has 2 sons on the spectrum. It's to the point that when someone has a son, everyone silently holds their breaths until they're around 2. I personally believe the causes are largely environmental, secondarily genetic. Are we poisoning ourselves out of existence?
12:28 PM on 03/30/2012
Ignorance is Bliss :) You have to live autism to understand it. We must have the schools better prepared to handle our autistic children. There should be no debate. You could diagnose my child a mile away! His Dr. said " I don't care about this debate" fact is I see more and more kids coming into my office that are just like your son! (meaning, you don't need a screening, a test or anything else for that matter to see he is clearly autistic). My son has come very very far! Diagnosed at 20 months old, ABA, VBA, OT, ST, PT - if you don't know those abbreviations, then that is my point... enjoy the bliss LOL It's unreal!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
calamityjohn
09:03 AM on 03/30/2012
I would guess in order to bolster the concept of "diagnosis change" the article leaves out the dates of the DSM revisions.
DSM I = 1952
DSM II = 1968
DSM III = 1980
DSM IIIR = 1987
DSM IV = 1994
DSM IVTR (text revision no diagnostic changes) = 2000

My son just turned 19 .. he could be diagnosed from a distance of 400 meters .. people have been making this diagnosis rate claim for his entire life. I have yet to see anybody try to back that up with some sort of study instead of just making the claim.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Julia Bailey
09:24 AM on 03/30/2012
Why should tax dollars pay for that? do you think its useful to diagnose at a distance? Is diagnosing your son from a distance going to help cure autism? What exactly are you asking us to spend money on?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
calamityjohn
09:56 AM on 03/30/2012
the 400 meters comment was an attempt at a joke … many cases of autism are not hard to diagnose. .. I said he could be diagnosed at 400 meters .. not should be ..

I was trying to make the point that my son is very obviously disabled
He just turned 19 .. he is 6 ft. 4 and 260 lbs .. built like a linebacker .. and he
functions at around the level of an 18 month old .. at the severe end of the spectrum ..

My son is not unique among this explosion of diagnosis .. the idea that we were just missing all these severely disabled kids is ridiculous .. the idea that they are being misclassified could have been true decades ago but not since the 1980s

And to add to your issue about money .. not figuring this out is costing society plenty .. We cared for our son in our home until recently (at the point his size made him physically beyond our abilities) .. it cost us as a family plenty .. some years two thirds of my middle class pay .. both our careers were put on hold ..

My son (is now 19) and costs society two on one specialized care and housing for the rest of his life ..
photo
Unrepentant
lex parsimoniae
11:13 AM on 03/30/2012
"Why should tax dollars pay for that?"

Because you are a compassionate and caring person who wants their family, friends, and neighbors to have productive and fulfilling lives?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brian Hudson
Educator and freelance creator.
10:50 AM on 03/30/2012
The argument about diagnosis -- as the article itself notes -- isn't just about the changing *definition*, but changes is *how cases are diagnosed by doctors* and a greater awareness to the spectrum in health care.

It's also worth noting that a ton of money was wasted in the last decade chasing a MacGuffin put out there by a crook based on made-up data about 10 British kids. If Andrew Wakefield had died in a fire a month before publishing his bogus "research," the whole field of autism research would be leagues ahead of where it is now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
calamityjohn
11:42 AM on 03/30/2012
I have been dealing with this for just shy of twenty years .. and in that time this same argument (of your first paragraph) has been made constantly .. for how many decades is that a viable explanation ?

On your second point .. as long as there is no defined causality .. you are going to see a wide range of things ..

amplified by a medical/pharma community that has allowed the influence of profit to leave it suspect

and amplified by a distrust of the medical community by parents that feel ignored, shunned, blamed, and frustrated with generations of little or no progress.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sanfran55
08:32 AM on 03/30/2012
Who has the last normal child?
07:30 AM on 03/30/2012
My son is nearly indistinguishable from his same age peers in his classroom now, at age 6. At age 2, he didn't talk, make eye contact, or play. He lay on the floor, enjoying the ceiling fan movement. We were lucky, we received every early intervention, including diet changes, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy. The cost was probably in the hundred thousand dollar range, luckily most of his therapy was covered by our insurance and our excellent school district. I have no idea why my son has autism, he was not vaccinated, I had excellent prenatal care, and his father and I were in excellent health. But, I also know that because of the early interventions professionals (and lay persons alike) will say to me, "You can tell he was not properly diagnosed, he was just a late bloomer."
He was not a late bloomer. He still has some delays in his social play, in his speech, in his mannerisms... they might always be there.
There is a dx spike, it isn't because of the new criteria, there is a stressor in the environment, either on the pregnant mother, or on the young baby, that is causing this. We NEED to find it.
07:12 AM on 03/30/2012
Aside from mmr- 2001 was just about when chicken pox vax came out - AMAZING wouldn't you think- People just refuse to believe what these things are doing to their children.
photo
hardrain77
R3VOLUTION
02:27 AM on 03/30/2012
The average infant by the time they're 1 year old is advised to have at have as much as 12 different vaccines--many of which come in 5 in 1 booster shots that contain an astronomical amount of aluminum among other nefarious ingredients to give a baby with a compromised immune system (animal and fetal tissue to name a few). No, they do not affect every child the same way, but you'd have to be a head in the sand ignoramus to not believe that they have an adversely negative affect on a portion of the populace that are unnecessarily exposed to them.
07:17 AM on 03/30/2012
You should then know what effects vax have on the generation now having difficulty with fertilization. 1 in 8 (a horrific number) of American couples today are infertile. Vax? And the fact that majority of their mothers most likely used some form of hormone birth control before conceiving them? Something is terribly wrong with the stats on the growing problems with children today with this and many other problems they have that other generations never encountered.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Julia Bailey
09:27 AM on 03/30/2012
Without data to support your claims, they are just talk talk. Mental masturbation.
10:03 AM on 03/30/2012
Will you please point out a study (that has not been discredited) that links vaccines to autism. Or is that too much to ask?
photo
hardrain77
R3VOLUTION
02:39 PM on 03/30/2012
It's only theory, but you'd have to be ignorant of environmental concerns to not believe vaccines have some adverse affect considering both vaccine and autism rates are the highest here than anywhere else in the world. And by the way, Dr. Wakefield's 14 year old study was never discredited, you were just made to think it was. It was always meant to be a small trial size of case studies, never a whole consensus.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
jozie
Is war about who's right or who's left?
12:49 AM on 03/30/2012
I am around the education system and children and adults with disabilities enough to have encountered this misdiagnosis that everyone seems to assume is there, but I can't say that I have seen or even directly heard of one person who was misdiagnosed as being on the Autism Spectrum. So to all of you who say that is what is happening, I would be very interested in seeing your proof.
07:36 AM on 03/30/2012
I am with you. We went from 20 years ago when I was the only person I knew that had a child with this strange affliction "they" called autism, (the prevalence according to the Autism Society of America then, in the early 1990's was 1:10,000 people, the ratio was 7:1 boys/girls). Awareness and diagnosis expansion are important, but not as important as what people are truly witnessing in the field.
10:04 AM on 03/30/2012
There is a monetary incentive in the public school system to misdiagnose children...the more learning disabilities, the more federal money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:29 AM on 03/30/2012
Where is the "more federal money" going? Are you aware that many special education classrooms that have a life-skills curriculum try to come up with self-sustaining student-run businesses so they can fund activities? How come so many children get no more than .5 hours a week of certain therapies needed to augment their daily instructions? Misdiagnosing is, indeed, a problem, but those of us who DO have a child with autism can tell you that "riding the wave of federal funding" is not all people assume it is. There is not as much funding as you seem to believe there is, and services have to be justified through an IEP. I've never been to an IEP that lasted less than two hours, and there is a lot of negotiating and give-and-take between parents and school district.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
jozie
Is war about who's right or who's left?
10:50 PM on 03/30/2012
Where do you get that information? Most schools are stressed to their limit trying to provide services for all the students who need it. There is only so much to go around. Special ed students are not the cash cow that they are being made out to be. If you would be so kind as to state your sources for this, I would be happy to look at them.
10:42 PM on 03/29/2012
i think maybe certain situations with daycare play a role. when my dtr wast 8 wks old i had to go to work and she went to a daycare home i thought was adequately staffed .i noticed in the 1st wk her milk intake went down each day .she startled easily & would cry & scream which wasn't her norm .the one thing most telling was lack of eye contact with me when she was fine when home but different after daycare. she avoided eye contact & i had to really work with her to get her to interact with me the same again. the pediatrician told me to immediately get her out of there. called it depression not autism & said not enough attention. found out later the lady kept way more kids than she was supposed to. not against working moms, was one myself FT with both kids in daycare. i wonder if a correlation in certain situations but would not xplain a mom not working who has autistic child..just a thought.
07:20 AM on 03/30/2012
Sorry you had a bad experience in daycare, and I was a p/t worker so I could be home with my children. BUT, my daughter and her friend own a daycare. I can assure you, this is not the case in all daycares. They are fully staffed, love their children like their own, and that is NOT the cause of autism anyway.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:33 AM on 03/30/2012
I was a stay-at-home mom and I ended up with one neuro-typical child and one severely autistic child. I do believe that day care situations can weigh heavily on a child's development, but this is not always the case. I was an attentive mother, very involved with the children, both went through the same immunization protocols and the youngest, literally overnight, lost all eye contact, vocabulary, etc. I don't have anything against working moms, mind you, or day care...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:34 PM on 03/29/2012
It just makes me think of ADD/ADHD in the 90s.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sanfran55
08:23 AM on 03/30/2012
And there's a load of meds they give the kids for it too. Frightening. What are we doing to our children?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
MIMom
Your ad here.
03:51 PM on 03/30/2012
There are no meds for ASD.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hharrison22
07:07 PM on 03/29/2012
The DSM V is set to come out next spring. For the first time, autism will officially be considered a spectrum disorder. We will continue to see the prevalence rate increase given the new diagnostic criteria which has a wider umbrella. From a clinical standpoint, early diagnosis is difficult given that there is such a significant variability in speech development during the first three years. Unfortunately, in many of the milder cases, there is a "wait and see" period that has to occur. However, even without an official diagnosis, parents should still seek help for their child if they are having difficulty meeting developmental milestones.

"The child psychologist who thought she had all the answers to parenting until she became one herself." www.themommypsychologist.com
06:07 PM on 03/29/2012
The high functioning / Asbergers side of Autism spectrum has always been there. The science, math, and engineering fields have been filled with them from time immemorial. We just have a name for it now and have "medicalized" it.

There has always been a wide range in human behavior. It is only in this age of "measured norms" that people who are able to find niches that match their talents and personalities in society are viewed as "deficient" - be that the boy who doesn't want to sit at a desk all day or an introvert who is not interested in the social games of the swarming extroverts.

Fullblown autism is a serious problem. But the high functioning end of the spectrum is not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dugmaze
Any man's death diminishes me
11:55 PM on 03/29/2012
"Asbergers "
Asperger's
02:26 AM on 03/30/2012
My wife is a special needs teacher and from her experience I can tell you that this jump is real. Perhaps there is better diagnosis today, but to suggest that this is the primary reason does not hold up to what she has seen in the last 15 years.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sanfran55
08:27 AM on 03/30/2012
I am too, and I can tell you that there has been an increase in the past 15 years of what is expected of young children - kindergarten is the new first or second grade, expecting writing, homework, reading chapter books, etc. When children don't meet the requirements, then comes time for the labels and the meds. Read up on who pays for these studies - Big Pharma.