From Mad Men to Mies: Why Modernism Holds Sway

2012-02-16-archdailyreal.jpg  |  By   |  Posted: 03/30/2012 8:35 am Updated: 03/30/2012 5:00 pm

By Vanessa Quirk
(click here for original article)

2012-03-30-madmen.jpg
Ā© Megan Jett


It’s June 1966. Mies’ iconic Seagram Building dominates New York City. Bob Dylan has just released Blonde on Blonde. The Vietnam War is escalating. John Lennon has yet to meet Yoko Ono. And Don Draper is readjusting to married life – with his 25 year-old secretary.

The excitement over Mad Men, while always eager, was positively explosive last Sunday. The season 5 premiere resulted in the show’s highest ratings to date (3.5 million viewers, up 21% from last year). While the show has always received critical acclaim, now, for whatever reason, it has reached a fever-pitch of popularity.

On a purely aesthetic level, it’s easy to explain. The show draws in audiences with a meticulous, sumptuous set design that allows a nostalgic journey back in time: when design was innovative & clean, architecture was confident (cocky even), and modernism still held its promise.

But on another level, the show is successful because of its inevitability. The very knowledge of the ephemerality of that confidence, a theme particularly relevant to audiences in the wake of the Recession, is what strikes a chord, what makes the show positively hypnotizing.

Watching Mad Men is like watching a Modernist car crash. A beautiful demise.

2012-03-30-madmen2.jpg
Chase Manhattan Plaza. 1961. By Skidmore, Owings, and Merrill. Ezra Stoller Ā© Esto


Confidence Men

From the Google Doodle to our own popular infographic on Miesā€˜ life and works (150,000 hits and counting), the hooplah surrounding Mies’ 126th birthday this week showed us that Modernismā€˜s appeal still very much holds sway.

And Mad Men tells us why. Season 5 sees the characters settled into their new office environment – from Madison Avenue (hence the term ā€œMadā€ Men) to the new Time & Life Building on 6th.

While no Seagram building, The Time & Life building was, as The New York Times noted in 2010, ā€the perfect location for an upstart firm nurturing an image of being cutting edge.ā€ The building was 92% rented before it even opened its doors; could boast tenants such as The Times, Liberty Steel and Metal, and Sterling-Cooper; and had an opening move-in that made breaking news.

2012-03-30-madmen3.jpg
Mies Google Doodle, Crown Hall Ā© Google


The characters’ perspectives and ambitions offer a non-jaded look back to what these buildings signified at their inception: confidence, possibility, power. As Blair Kamin has noted for the Chicago Tribune, Mad Men reflects a ā€time when modernism was still fresh and the backlash against corporate sterility had yet to hit.ā€

In Sunday’s episode, we hear the protagonist, Don Draper, say: ā€œNew York City is in decay. But Madison Square Garden — it’s the beginning of a new city on a hill.ā€ As Don’s precipitous decision to re-marry with his young secretary shows us, he is charging ahead in a new direction, believing all the while that new will be better. That Madison Square Garden will become a beacon of progress for the rest of the world.

But the reality is that that just didn’t happen. As blogger for the Los Angeles Times, Christopher Hawthorne, points out: ā€œthe Garden actually helped produce not a city on a hill but the seeds of a powerful preservation movement, in Manhattan and elsewhere. Almost immediately, New York realized it had made an enormous blunder by knocking down one of its most remarkable pieces of architecture.ā€

In fact, you could say the same mentality exists in New York today. When we think of cutting-edge architecture, we look not to our own soils but (as Hawthorne notes) to China and Dubai. Our own architecture has become more subdued, preservationist, quiet: nostalgic for a time when confidence was taken for granted.

2012-03-30-madmen4.jpg


A Sign of the (New York) Times

In The New York Times’ 2007 Review of its new office by Renzo Piano, ā€œPride and Nostalgia Mix in the Times’s New Home,ā€ critic Nicolai Ouroussoff has this to say:

ā€œThe New York Times Building owes its greatest debt to postwar landmarks like Skidmore, Owings & Merrill’s Lever House or Mies van der Rohe’s Seagram Building — designs that came to embody the progressive values and industrial power of a triumphant America. Their streamlined glass-and-steel forms proclaimed a faith in machine-age efficiency and an open, honest, democratic society.ā€

As you read the article, you can practically feel the author’s discomfort ooze off the page. Because we no longer live in that era. Even as workers were moving into this new ā€œtriumphantā€ building, stock prices in The New York Times were plummeting (forcing the company to lease it out), advertising was shrinking, digital media was threatening to make the publication obsolete.

Where there was once faith, there is doubt. Post-9/11, post-Internet, post-Recession, the New York Times Building is the physical manifestation of our longing for an earlier time, one that is impossible to recreate.


Mad Men speaks to that impossible longing. It presents the past, both its shiny exterior and its darker underbelly, but always suggests the change that we know is coming.

When the opening credits start, we are in a 1960s interior, following our protagonists’ footsteps. The interior falls apart first, advertisements slide down the wall, and we fly with the falling man out the building itself. Mies-ian structures, colorful advertisements, images of beautiful women fly by until – suddenly – our man isn’t falling, but sitting. With a cigarette in hand. The episode begins.

Unlike, say, the exact recreation of a ’60s animation in the opening credits of Catch Me If You Can, the ā€œfalling manā€ sequence is referential, but not a replica. The music, the font, the computer generation all frame the show from a 21st century perspective.

Because despite the smooth, confident exteriors of our Mad Men, we know that they’re falling apart on the inside. The Modernist promise of Miesā€˜ structures cannot last for ever, progress cannot be sustained, power is not eternal. But the illusion of it is still sexy, the longing still holds sway.

Our man may be falling, but we’re with him all the way.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article stated that Season 5 of "Mad Men" debuted the new offices at the Time & Life building. The text has been changed to reflect that the move took place prior to Season 5.

FOLLOW CULTURE

By Vanessa Quirk (click here for original article) Ā© Megan Jett It’s June 1966. Mies’ iconic ...
By Vanessa Quirk (click here for original article) Ā© Megan Jett It’s June 1966. Mies’ iconic ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dtroppy
11:59 AM on 04/03/2012
Modernism is always classic....
photo
studioh!
bridging the snarchasm
06:30 PM on 03/31/2012
it's a mod mod world
03:37 PM on 03/30/2012
Mad Men refers to the optimistic past, but it certainly doesn't celebrate it, not in the way that so many comedic and romantic Technicolor movies of the 50s and early 60s did. This is no Breakfast at Tiffany's.

The office lives of Mad Men's characters may take place in sunny modernist surroundings, but their suburban houses are conventionally unmodern. The apartments of Peggy and Joan, and Don's post-divorce pad in Greenwich Village, are dreary and dark, reflecting the compromises they make every day.

Modernism succeeded as a style in large part because it was cheap. Exposed steel framing and sheet glass windows were much less expensive to erect than masonry, granite and classically inspired ornamentation. Box-like modernist office buildings contained more useful office space per floor. Aesthetics agreed with economics.

The trouble with modernist design was that so much of it was boring, lacked character and aged badly. Too many "exiting", "new" modernist office towers, apartments and airports seemed sterile and dull within a few years of their construction - like the values of many of Mad Men's characters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Patrick Flannery
Editor, nerd, dad.
12:17 PM on 03/30/2012
Crap. Mad Med succeeds because people crave the optimism and energy of the modernist worldview, and they crave it because it works. But has been denied to them by a sneering liberal intelligentsia concerned only with making their own fortune off their self-fulfilling prophesies of decay and post-everythingism. I hope Mad Men's popularity signals a new change in society where people aren't afraid to smoke a cigarette any more and don't feel so guilty about making money that they turn at every opportunity and snap at the hand that feeds them.
photo
captainindustry
then that will be my story.
09:21 AM on 04/01/2012
Ageed. Mad Meds most assuredly played a pivotal role.
photo
oneeasyrider
E=mc2: From light you exist
02:39 AM on 04/22/2012
"But has been denied to them by a sneering liberal intelligentsia concerned only with making their own fortune off their self-fulfilling prophesies of decay and post-everythingism."

Love projection, Patrick. Most surprising coming from an editor. Nevertheless, no less amusing. Anyway, so let's assume you were able to impose your wish, which in your mind would be terrific, I'm sure. However, wouldn't it be a cruel joke (you know how the devil works), if this time around, you were the one left on the outside looking in while a different select few enjoyed the entitlement?

Perspectives...can't they just be a buzz-kill sometimes?
10:35 AM on 03/30/2012
Love this article.
10:23 AM on 03/30/2012
In addition to architectural design, I’m fascinated with how ā€œModernā€ design permeated the advertising and promotional materials of the period with vivid colors and abstract shapes. If you look at 60s ads, while many may look dated, the ones that display ā€œModernā€ sensibilities look sleek, elegant and compelling even today. I’ve been archiving original, early-60s promotional materials on my blog. I love the real Mad Men-era design flare as much as the swinging vintage hors d'oeuvres and cocktail recipes. Even if you can’t duplicate the design at home, you can party in authentic Mad Men-stye. Here’s my guide to throwing the perfect 60s vintage cocktail party: http://thevodkaparty.com/how-to-throw-an-authentic-mad-men-era-cocktail-party-the-inside-skinny/