iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Increase In Autism Reported, Doctors Say Check Early

By LINDSEY TANNER 03/30/12 11:32 AM ET AP

Autism Increase

CHICAGO -- At 18 months, Cristina Astacio spoke only a few words, wouldn't respond to her name and shunned other kids in her day care group. Last October, her worried parents found out why.

She has a mild form of autism, a diagnosis being given to more U.S. children than ever before, largely because of more awareness and better diagnosis.

According to new government statistics, the rate is about 1 in 88. That means autism is nearly twice as common as it appeared in data the government gathered 10 years ago. The largest increases are in Hispanic kids like Cristina.

The definition of autism has changed over the years, and Cristina might not have been considered autistic two decades ago.

But experts say kids like her are lucky in a way, because her parents recognized early that something was wrong. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report issued Thursday found that 40 percent of kids weren't diagnosed until after age 4. Evidence shows that children who are identified early and get help have the best chance for reaching their potential, said CDC Director Dr. Thomas Frieden.

The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends autism screening for all children at age 18 months and 2 years.

Diagnosing the developmental disorder relies on observing behavior. Autism can't be cured, but treatment including intensive behavior therapy can help many kids function better.

The academy's Dr. Susan Hyman said many children who aren't making eye contact and aren't talking "may have autism, but they may have other things." She said it's important for parents to be persistent about their concerns with their doctor so their kids can be evaluated.

Kristy Batesole, of Atascadero, Calif., says she suspected something was wrong with her son, Keegan, even when he was a hard-to-calm overly fussy baby. He learned words, but by age 2 stopped talking, would spend hours opening and closing doors and sometimes bang his head on the ground.

Though he started getting special help in preschool in Nevada, he wasn't formally diagnosed with autism until last year, at age 6, after the family moved to California, where there are more autism specialists.

Cristina Astacio gets two hours of behavior therapy six days a week. Her mom, Charisse, says the little girl now responds to commands and speaks about 50 words. The most special are two words Cristina never said before. "Now she says `mommy' and `daddy,'" Astacio said. "It's wonderful."

Christina's dad, Christopher, is a special-education teacher in the New York City; most of the kids in his class are Hispanic and many have autism.

"I remember back in the past, a few kids here and there had autism, not like the way it is now," Astacio said. "I'm really curious why so many kids are being diagnosed."

Experts, including CDC researchers, think broader screening and better diagnosis have largely contributed to that. But autism's cause remains a mystery, and government researchers are seeking answers.

The latest numbers are based on 2008 data from 14 states. The new rate is nearly two times higher than data suggested in 2002, roughly 1 in 150 kids. And it's 23 percent higher than a later estimate of 1 in 110 based on 2006 data. Rates are highest in boys and white children. But the biggest rate increase was among Hispanics, from 1 in 270 in 2002 to about 1 in 125 in 2008.

That rate increase also is likely due to better awareness. The CDC report says there's no strong evidence of any racial or ethnic difference in risk factors for autism and that it's likely the condition is underdiagnosed in blacks and Hispanics.

Melissa Miller, a St. Petersburg, Fla., mom whose daughter, Chelsea, was diagnosed last year at age 2, said many people still misunderstand the disorder.

"I think many people hear `autism' and think `Rain Man,'" she said, referring to the 1988 movie featuring Dustin Hoffman as the mathematically brilliant but socially impaired autistic savant.

"The autism spectrum is so vast, and all of our children are different. Many of them don't rock back and forth or have savant skills. They are sweet, affectionate, intelligent, goofy – and exhausting – kids," Miller said.

Proposed revisions in the manual that doctors use to diagnose mental illness would streamline autism criteria. Critics contend the suggested changes would be too narrow and exclude children who need educational and behavioral services.

Hyman noted that since the manual's last revision, in 1994, much has been learned about autism. "There's a real possibility the new definition will be better for children," she said Thursday at a CDC news conference.

CDC officials say research into causes of autism will help determine if there's been a true increase or just better diagnosis.

Genetics is believed to play a role. Studies have found no connection with childhood vaccines, but other factors under investigation include mothers' illnesses or medication during pregnancy. First results from the CDC study are expected next year.

Geraldine Dawson, chief science officer for the advocacy group Autism Speaks, said the new figures indicate "a public health emergency that demands immediate attention."

Her group estimates that U.S. autism costs total $126 billion each year, including costs related to diagnosis and treatment. That estimate also includes treatment for severely affected adults and lost wages.

___

Online:

___

AP Medical Writer Mike Stobbe in Atlanta contributed to this report.

FOLLOW PARENTS

Filed by Jessica Samakow  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 177
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
10:30 PM on 05/22/2012
In the old days those with Autism and ADHD were called stupid, slow, duds, oddballs, weird, strange, or losers. Now they have nice clean labels for them, thus the increase.

Plus the Internet makes everyone an expert and gives the Cranks all kinds of false information to feed their unshakable beliefs.
06:33 AM on 04/04/2012
while ago there was a mass vaccine inoculation of south Korean children. It was found later after followup testing that about one in 38 were found labeled Autistic. I will find doc on this and submit in near future.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
08:44 PM on 04/01/2012
I think we need to really research this, including researching whether we are calling some kids with introverted personalities who reach their speaking developmental milestone later "on the spectrum" and treating them accordingly.

While treating actual cases of autism earlier is always better, it's not better to pathologize a range of normal personality types and behaviours and subject that child to interventions which if unnecessary, may produce adverse effects.

Like ADHD, I think we need to both look at the reasons for the epidemic-like rate and explore whether label-bias is part of the problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaurieAnn
Charity is NOT a substitute for justice.
11:55 PM on 03/31/2012
I am just grateful that many, many more children are now receiving necessary intervention services years sooner than they would have even 10 or 15 years ago.  My 14 year old sone never received in-home behavioral therapy because he wasn't diagnosed until age 6.  I was telling his pediatrician that something was right when my son was only 4 months old.  My son missed what would most likely have been the best possible therapy for him at the best possible time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitycheck101a
The Matrix is an artificial construct...
05:03 PM on 03/31/2012
I tthink we all know what is the most likely culprit:

"Study Finds Industrial Pollution Begins in the Womb"

Hundreds of Toxic Chemicals Measured in Newborn Babies

http://www.ewg.org/reports/bodyburden2/newsrelease.php
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaurieAnn
Charity is NOT a substitute for justice.
12:00 AM on 04/01/2012
I tend to buy into the environmental pollutants camp myself.  Although I also believe that there are many types of autism (not just levels such as Aspergers, PDD-NOS, HFA) which appear very similar but which have different etiologies.  Having my one and only child at age 36, husband age 38 it would just seem reasonable to me that I was carrying quite a toxic load.  This was 15 years ago now but there is still no good testing for prospective parents who'd like to have some guidelines on the probability of having a child with autism; something I'd really like to see.
02:22 PM on 03/31/2012
It's a spectrum disorder-meaning those with the disease essentially fall all the Bell Curve-upper tail very high functioning and successful, lower tail the worst cases and majority in the middle
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lightwins
We are all one
01:55 PM on 03/31/2012
The enormous increase in autism shows me that there is definitely something we are consuming or being exposed to that is causing this. This is not just happening, or just genetic. And don't expect studies to show that drugs are involved--whether vaccines or drugs during birth and pregnancy--the studies are controlled by the drug companies, and so is the FDA.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kneadles
02:05 PM on 03/31/2012
Yes. We see the establishment talking about everything -- early detection -- but the horrifying fact that there is a huge increase in actual cases, not just increased awareness. Let's talk more about the possible causes, among them, the ridiculously high number of vaccines given right after birth. A new -- still developing -- brain being bombarded with 36 toxins, viruses, chemicals and all manner of yuk. And no one seems to be talking about the fact that some children cannot rid their bodies of heavy metals the way "normal" children's bodies can.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lightwins
We are all one
02:57 PM on 03/31/2012
Right, there is NO WAY all those toxins being put into infants are not affecting them in a harmful way. Each body is different, so some children will be able to process it, but too many cannot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Quotidien
01:46 PM on 03/31/2012
The pesticides in our produce, the genetically altered chicken, fish, beef, the chemical additives that processed food companies add to increase their profitability are all contributors to these modern ailments that we are suffering from.

Since they have billions of dollars to spend on lobbyists in Washington, the average American is helpless in reversing this trend.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mitch Johnesee
03:02 PM on 03/31/2012
Is there any proof for any of your contentions? The ideas might sound good, but is there any science behind it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John MC
12:51 PM on 04/03/2012
Maybe the people behind the Autism studies and why it is increasing want more people to be diagnosed with Autism so they can get more money?
01:34 PM on 03/31/2012
The only source of the vaccine - autism connection was the Wakefield fraudulent report.
Wakefield was paid by a lawfirm to falsify a report so they could sue the vaccine makers.

"According to BMJ, (British Medical Journal) Wakefield received more than 435,000 pounds ($674,000) from the lawyers. Godlee said the study shows that of the 12 cases Wakefield examined in his paper, five showed developmental problems before receiving the MMR vaccine and three never had autism."
http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/01/05/autism.vaccines/index.html

Numerous statistical studies in peer reviewed medical publication have repeatedly shown that autism rates increased, at a time when MMR vaccination rates were constant.
Kaye et al., 2001, Dales et al., 2001,

Taylor et al. 1999 found that the autism rate was the same when no MMR vaccine was given. (Don't reply with the Amish thing. They vaccinate. It's a myth)

There is such a large pool of vaccine recipients and autism diagnosis to analyze that If there was a causal link, the data would demonstrate it unequivocally. The data in fact clearly shows that a link is so statistically improbably that it cannot exist.

This "controversy" would not even exist if not for Wakefield's fiction.

If you still think there is a link, here is some great reading...
http://www.asatonline.org/intervention/articles/smartpeople.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lightwins
We are all one
01:56 PM on 03/31/2012
I don't buy it!
06:12 AM on 04/01/2012
Then I suggest you do what I did.

Read the legitimate studies and reports. Listen to the most respected experts.
For me, the statistical reports carry greater weight because they are larger samples and not as subject to an "experts" opinion like the Wakefield report.
The London report was over 500 kids. Wakefield had 12.

This Danish study had over 500,000 in the population.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12421889?dopt=Abstract

Johns Hopkins has a long list of reports on vaccines.
Read and make up your own mind.
http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/cc-mmr.htm

Avoid the blogs and opinion pieces, they all eventually lead back to Wakefield.

Full disclosure: I do not work in any medical field. My opinion is my own.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goodmarina
Most People use Religion to justify their bias!
01:59 PM on 03/31/2012
although i can see what you are saying ...  the concerns about vaccines and their connection was discussed long before Wakefield's "research". 

there is something to be said about reactions some children have to vaccines -- what that connection is (if any) is yet to be completely determined.  

i am equally suspicious of the reports that come out of the medical community because they, too, are heavily funded and governed by people from Big Pharma.  

i am not anti-vaccine -- but i think a balanced perspective of both sides is essential
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
02:04 PM on 03/31/2012
good point. perhaps it's time for an independent study.

I worked with autistic kids back in the early seventies and this was a very, very rare thing. Now, a generation later, there are two in my immediate family and we're not a large group (only two siblings with children The number of autistic kids is HUGE.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lightwins
We are all one
03:00 PM on 03/31/2012
I don't trust ANY of the reports coming out of the medical community. Yes, they are funded by Big Pharma. And, it is common sense that shooting an infant full of a vast number of toxins will have a detrimental affect!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
standup11
Some people just never learn.
01:24 PM on 03/31/2012
The amount of uninformed people on this topic is stunning. Where are some of the people posting here getting their information from? Fox News? You surely aren't getting it from reading books, magazines, health studies or any other reliable source. In the past 25 years there have been thousands upon thousand of new chemicals formulated that are used in food production. They are making people sick starting in infancy. Is autism related to all these chemicals? I believe they are. An increase in diagnosing the illness is only part of the overall problem here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lightwins
We are all one
01:50 PM on 03/31/2012
You said it for me. I couldn't agree more. There is a vast amount of information available (not in mainstream media) about all the chemicals we are now eating or exposed to that are causing cancer and many other ailments, including autism.
photo
AmericaninIndia
American Capitalist Pursuing the Dream in India.
01:19 PM on 03/31/2012
Autism rates around the world:

UK: 2.98 per 10,000
France: 16 per 10,000
Norway: .45 new cases per 1,000
Saudi Arabia: 1.8 per 1,000
Hong Kong: 1.68 per 1,000
Venezuala: 1.1 per 1000

The United States: 1 out of every 88 children, or 11.3 per 1,000

Obviously something is terribly wrong in the States!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
edejan
01:43 PM on 03/31/2012
France also seems remarkably high.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
02:06 PM on 03/31/2012
I suspect it's the food additives in animal feed. Way too many in our foods and humans are at the top on the food chain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
calamityjohn
01:15 PM on 03/31/2012
My son is now 19 .. and on the very severe end of the spectrum (to generalize .. he functions at about an 18 month old level)..

not a year has gone by without an article explaining the increase in cases as improved diagnosis ... for how many decades is this explanation going to be valid ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaurieAnn
Charity is NOT a substitute for justice.
12:07 AM on 04/01/2012
I'd really like to see some sort of 'toxic load' pre-natal or better yet pre-pregnancy test developed that could help prospective parents (most likely the mother) determine a risk percentage for having a child with autism specific to her own body.  While I love my son with autism had there been a pre-natal test available I would have taken one.  It's just my husband and I caring for our son, we have no extended family help nor are we ever likely to.  The fear of what could happen to our son when we're gone is overwhelming sometimes.  I'm sure you are familiar with that same feeling.  All the best to you and yours!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Proserpina Libera
01:14 PM on 03/31/2012
I think they need to take a closer look at the drugs given to women during hospital labors, especially the ones that effect the nerves and brain. Inductions, C-sections, epidurals, and other augmentation rates are rising at the same time as these autism diagnoses.
photo
bonthomme
"Don't you know who I think I was?"
01:43 PM on 03/31/2012
I think you'd be better served by focusing on things that are persistent in the environment, not a singular 'trigger'. The human body, even infants, is incredibly adept at fending off a point insult. It doesn't fair nearly as well against a persistent factor, whether it's in the food, the water, or the ambient environment (i.e. television).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nobbska
I have crossed oceans of time to find you
01:10 PM on 03/31/2012
I ask this question because I want to understand
Is it possible that the increase in autistic diagnosis in children is due to it being the diagnosis of the month?
Are parents that don't take the time, or have the time to engage with their children rushing to this diagnosis because the child is not "acting" like they think they should?
Are clinicians to quick to diagnose autism
I am not a parent of an autistic child, and again I ask because I'm trying to understand.
It just seems to me that in the past few years there has been a rush to judgement to diagnose things such as autism because its popular.
I think that if our kids were given more hands on, face to face time, not held up to standard set by someone else, and allowed to be kids and develop at there own pace, they and their parents, would be happier and healthier.
Am I way off base here?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
calamityjohn
01:29 PM on 03/31/2012
1. rates of diagnosis of autism have been rising rapidly for at least 30 years.

2. Although I do think there is a certain amount of increased diagnosis due to a wider net being cast .. and perhaps my perception is off being a parent of a child with autism .. but my wife and I are also educators (and have been for decades) .. and the number of children we see with classic autism seems way up .. (I chose the words classic autism since I don't think this is much due to shifting classification of people who would have gotten an MR label etc.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaurieAnn
Charity is NOT a substitute for justice.
12:10 AM on 04/01/2012
As the parent of a child with autism who's son was diagnosed late and missed all forms of early intervention therapy (which has the best outcomes) I say it's better to err on the side of caution and diagnose early.  Get the child intervention programs.  In many instances, quality early intervention provided for enough hours early enough can bring about significant gains in development.  That's what's most important, to me at least.
photo
Justtheobvious
Res-erected.
01:05 PM on 03/31/2012
They are being diagnosed because the doctors get kickbacks to push the expensive drugs made by big pharma.

Show me a kid nowadays that isn't on adderal(speed) or some other adhd medicine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roshi98
Dum spiro, spero
05:23 PM on 04/01/2012
Doctors get paid a LOT more to treat sick kids than to write scrips, even with the supposed kickbacks added in. Seems a bit of a bogus accusation to me.
12:14 PM on 04/03/2012
As a retired doctor, I can tell you that we do NOT get kickbacks to "push the expensive drugs"... there are other, more subtle ways to induce prescribing "expensive drugs" but I won't get into that. There are NO kickbacks.
As a matter of fact, virtually all drugs are "expensive" nowadays. The pharma cos have dramatically increased the prices of all drugs(very quietly), and the ones they can't raise the price on, they don't produce... so there are dire shortages of some drugs. Vaccines in particular are not money makers at all. They are a pain to produce and don't give any profit, and the only reason they are produced is because of legal protection from the federal government for liability, but they are lifesavers. No more measles, no diphtheria, no rubella, no more H. flu meningitis, etc etc.
It's a VERY complex problem; pharma co's are extremely at fault for most of it. But don't blame (most) doctors, they're doing the best they can with what info they have.
AND... vaccines do NOT cause autism; the only study that claimed they did (Wakefield) was retracted due to fraud, and Wakefield lost his license.
Bottom line: we still don't know exactly what causes autism or why the rates are increasing. It's not just more diagnosis, although that is a factor; there are many more kids with autism nowadays.