iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Justice Department eBook Lawsuit Against Apple, Publishers Advances Toward Settlement: Sources

Reuters  |  By Posted: 03/30/2012 4:26 pm


By Diane Bartz

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Justice Department could reach a settlement in the next few weeks with Apple Inc and some of the major publishers suspected of colluding to push up electronic book prices, according to two people close to the negotiations.

While negotiations are still fluid, the settlement is expected to eliminate Apple's so-called "most favored nation" status, which had prevented the publishers from selling lower-priced e-books through rival retailers such as Amazon.com Inc or Barnes & Noble Inc , the people said.

The deal could also force a shift, at least temporarily, in pricing control from publishers to retailers, one of the people said.

Such a move to a "wholesale model" would not only benefit consumers but also Amazon, which had been the leading bargain e-book retailer with its Kindle reader.

"It would be a positive for Amazon because the company's greatest strength is as a high-volume, low-price retailer and the wholesale model plays into that," said Jim Friedland, an analyst at Cowen & Co.

The Justice Department is seeking to unravel agreements Apple secured from five publishers about two years ago, as the Silicon Valley company was launching its iPad and was seeking to break up Amazon's dominance in the digital book market.

The publishers are Simon & Schuster Inc, a unit of CBS Corp ; Lagardere SCA's Hachette Book Group; Pearson Plc's Penguin Group (USA); Macmillan, a unit of Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck GmbH; and HarperCollins Publishers Inc, a unit of News Corp .

The Justice Department declined comment. Apple did not reply to calls seeking comment. The publishers involved either did not return telephone calls or declined comment.

As part of the agreements with Apple, the publishers shifted to an "agency model" that allowed them to set the price of e-books and give Apple a 30 percent cut.

Prior to that, Amazon had operated on the wholesale model, in which publishers sold books to retailers, which were then free to set whatever price they wanted.

Amazon was able to charge only $9.99 for many e-books, sometimes pricing new releases or popular e-books below cost, to draw in shoppers.

The tactic worried publishers who felt readers might get used to cheaper books and that Amazon would gain more market power, putting downward pressure on sales and prices of physical books.

The Apple agreements effectively barred publishers from allowing rival retailers such as Amazon to sell the same e-books at lower prices.

Friedland estimated that a switch back to the wholesale model could increase Amazon's revenues by about $1.1 billion this year and $1.6 billion in 2013, although gross profit may not increase as much because of the expected discounts.

The impact on Apple is expected to be minimal. Apple generates about $50 million from e-book sales, a tiny portion of its revenue of more than $100 billion.

GROWING PRICES

The Justice Department and the European Commission are examining whether the way that Apple reached its agreements with the publishers rose to the level of violations of antitrust law.

While agency pricing itself is legal, the Justice Department believes that publishers may have colluded to implement it with e-book retailers.

Apple's push for agency pricing was detailed in Walter Isaacson's biography of Apple founder Steve Jobs, who died last October. Jobs was aware of publishers' frustration with Amazon's low-price strategy and took advantage of it, according to the book.

Isaacson quotes Jobs as saying: "So we told the publishers, 'We'll go to the agency model, where you set the price, and we get our 30 percent and yes, the customer pays a little more but that's what you want anyway.' ... So they went to Amazon and said, 'You're going to sign an agency contract or we're not going to give you the books.'"

When Apple entered the digital books market with its iPad in January 2010, Amazon had nearly 90 percent of the e-book market.

Amazon now has about 65 percent of the e-book market, while Barnes & Noble has 20 percent and Apple has 10 percent at most, according to Cowen & Co estimates.

As the market shifted, prices have risen.

A class action lawsuit against Apple and the publishers that was brought last year in a Manhattan court on behalf of e-book customers said the price of e-books sold by the five publishers rose 30 to 50 percent in just a few months after Apple reached its deals.

Despite the higher prices, the digital book market has continued to grow rapidly.

The e-book industry has grown from $78 million in sales in 2008 to $1.7 billion in 2011, according to Albert Greco, a book-industry expert at the business school of Fordham University.

Greco estimates e-book sales will be $3.55 billion in 2012.

In its request to dismiss the private lawsuit, Apple said it individually negotiated separate vertical agreements with each of the publishers and it insisted on agency pricing because it had "no desire to incur the losses that would flow from retailing in such an environment."

Andrew Gavil, who teaches antitrust at the Howard University School of Law, said the consumer would win under a Justice Department settlement that rips up the agency model, even temporarily.

"The consumer will be the short-term winner because the autonomy to set the price of e-books will go back to Amazon. Manufacturers may have to lower the price of hard cover books. They may have to adjust their expectations of profits of hard copy books," said Gavil.

(Reporting by Diane Bartz with Additional reporting by Alistair Barr in San Francisco; Editing by Gary Hill)

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW TECH

From our partners


By Diane Bartz WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Justice Department could reach a settlement in the next few weeks with Apple Inc and some of the major publishers suspected of colluding to pu...
By Diane Bartz WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Justice Department could reach a settlement in the next few weeks with Apple Inc and some of the major publishers suspected of colluding to pu...
Filed by Reuters  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:17 AM on 04/03/2012
Contrary to what seems to be popular opinion here, ebooks don't actually cost that much less to make. The cost to print is a fraction of the selling price:

http://journal.bookfinder.com/2009/03/breakdown-of-book-costs.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/booksblog/2011/aug/04/price-publishing-ebooks
http://michaelhyatt.com/why-do-ebooks-cost-so-much.html
http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/08/pr_burningquestion_ebooks/
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/01/business/media/01ebooks.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

so ebooks should really only cost about $3 less than a print book.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stressedtothebone
Fatalist and cynic
08:46 AM on 04/02/2012
I've complained about the overpriced ebooks on Amazon's forum a couple times and many readers have been complaining. Yes, we know Amazon has not control over the issue...But, I'm happy that the government stepped in to end the collusion.

Hopefully, we'll start seeing reasonable priced books. It's unfair for a paperback to be sold for $10.90 and an ebook $11.00 (pricing just an example).
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
07:58 PM on 03/31/2012
Frankly Apple tends to try to push anti-trust laws as far as it can and then as soon as the government starts to look at it back off of the specific item that has raised their interest (and avoid the broad restrictions that might come from a full scope investigation like what happened with IBM and Microsoft).

So for example Apple used to require that iOS apps had to be produced by their own tools (and thus cross-platform development was impossible).  Then when the EU opened the antitrust process based on that...;the requirement was dropped.

There is no problem with an 'agency model' but as soon as part of the agreement said that the publishers could not let anybody else sell for less it jumped into price-fixing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:26 PM on 03/31/2012
This potentially could be very bad for Amazon.
Since they are selling their Kindles at or below cost they must make money on the books.
Apple on the other hand can easily afford to sell the Books at or below cost crippling Amazon in the bargain.
With the agency model Apple was prevented from doing that.
photo
Barbarian At The Gate
Fortune favors the bold.
05:54 PM on 04/01/2012
Apple's goal was to make 30% profits on the sale of E-books. They would not sell them at or below cost.

Apple does not have an e-book reader equivalent. They have the iPad. However, the iPad does not have an E-Ink screen which is specially designed for E-book readers. They work in direct sunlight with no glare.

Amazon was selling their e-books at cheap prices before the Apple agency model, so going back to those prices would fit their original business model.
06:03 AM on 04/02/2012
The agency model was cooked up between the publishers and Apple to the detriment of Amazon, which was already selling ebooks cheaply. This ruling is very very good news for Amazon.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cael
07:17 PM on 03/31/2012
"Isaacson quotes Jobs as saying: "So we told the publishers, 'We'll go to the agency model, where you set the price, and we get our 30 percent and yes, the customer pays a little more but that's what you want anyway.' ... So they went to Amazon and said, 'You're going to sign an agency contract or we're not going to give you the books.'""

And that shows how Greedy and scummy Steve Jobs was.
06:50 PM on 03/31/2012
Interesting topic...some ebooks are now embedding QRcodes in the top corners of the pages to allow people to link to maps, additional info related to the content, images, etc. Wonder how copyright laws will be enforced...with SOPA and PIPA basically being left on the table, can only imagine how all this new technology will play out. Most countries have their own laws and many of our major competitors refuse to enforce US laws...don't really see how this will be able to be controlled or if it can be, will be interesting to see how it plays out...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AAKAlan
Web Developer, photographer, artist, old fart.
05:37 PM on 03/31/2012
This is just another case of a publishing industry fighting the inevitable technology changes that it cannot control.

I'm a huge reader - up to 200 books a year. And I was unsure if I could deal with a Kindle, giving up the satisfaction of the printed page and hard covers. Well, that lasted less than a day once the Kindle was in my hand. Now I'm on the Kindle Fire, and get a huge chunk of all my media electronically on the single device. And love it.

My experience has been similar to tens of millions of Americans who have abandoned print books and the trees that get cut down to print them, the trucks that burn hydrocarbons to deliver them, the space in the bookstores that needs to be lit, heated and air-conditioned in order to store them.

Yet, despite the dramatic decrease in the cost of publishing that eBooks afford, the price of new best-selling eBooks is still about the same as the price of hardcovers in most stores. Why? Because of collusion in the marketplace and Apple's desire to break into the book publishing business and disadvantage their competitors. As usual, the consumer loses.

I'm thrilled that the court now sees it the same way. It's just time for the big publishing companies to start moving away form the inefficient resource-costly mode of selling books and get with the times - before they end up in the same terrible shape as the recording industry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
05:50 PM on 03/31/2012
Actually, Steve Jobs used to talk all the time about his desire to bring the price of books way down through technology. I have no doubt this was a compromise to keep the publishing industry from (supposedly) losing money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AAKAlan
Web Developer, photographer, artist, old fart.
06:43 PM on 03/31/2012
Not according to the quotes I've read from Jobs, including the quote in this article. He was thrilled to get 30% of a full-retail price. You have to understand that it was not uncommon, in Apple's business model for Apple to make 100%-200% markups, the kind of margin he would never see in book sales. Apple has settled, pretty much on 30% off-the-top in content sales, including music and apps. The only way he could get that margin in books was to let the publishers price it through the ceiling and then take his 30%. Amazon works on a much lower margin, and this was Jobs' play to try to knock off Amazon.

Even with his illegal pricing arrangement, he didn't do that. Does anyone by best-sellers from Apple?
photo
Barbarian At The Gate
Fortune favors the bold.
06:00 PM on 04/01/2012
I have a question about the Kindles if you don't mind answering. I have a Samsung Player that has a glossy screen. It is annoying in direct sunlight. I read the dedicated e-book readers like the Kindle touch have E-Ink displays that work great in direct sunlight and mimic the look of real paper.

Do you find the dedicated e-book readers have an advantage with their displays over the color tablets that do everything like the Kindle Fire?
06:13 AM on 04/02/2012
I have the regular Kindle which is just a black and white display and it is fantastic in all lights. I was on a flight recently with a direct beam of bright sunlight coming through the window onto the screen and it was still easily readable, just like paper would be. I'd like to get an iPad but when I do I won't be using it for reading books. The kindle has completely won my heart there, and to the point where I find it's easier to read in most lights than printed paper!
03:46 PM on 04/02/2012
I find the screen of the Kindle MUCH better for reading than any tablet I've tried. Not only is it good in direct sunlight I also find it generally easier on the eyes than staring at what is basically a light source for hours at a time.

The only problem I have with it (and the reason I may eventually add a tablet to my options) is PDF's, because whilst they can be converted the conversions can be almost useless if the original document is at all complex (e.g. lots of illustrations/diagrams).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:26 PM on 03/31/2012
This is good news for the consumer long and short term. Book prices will be lower for best sellers and reasonable for others.
03:11 AM on 04/03/2012
not good for those of us who would like somewhere other than amazon to buy books from in 5 years
photo
Barbarian At The Gate
Fortune favors the bold.
12:20 PM on 03/31/2012
The private lawsuit was filed against Apple and the 5 publishers around August of last year. The DOJ comes along and the 6 companies cave-in almost right away.

Thank you DOJ for benefiting the consumer and keeping free market business alive.
g9
conservation ,Your grandchildrens future
09:01 AM on 03/31/2012
your library has thousands of books to download ...free
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AAKAlan
Web Developer, photographer, artist, old fart.
05:41 PM on 03/31/2012
Free, if you're willing to wait for thirty other patrons to read it before you can get your hands on it. Free except for the cost of fuel and time to drive to the library, pick up the books and return them.

On the other hand, when I complete my current book at 2:00 am, I just touch a few icons on my Kindle Fire and I'm ready to start the next one. And I saved the hydrocarbons, forestss and utilities required to produce, ship, shelve and protect the paper books.

And, BTW, Amazon offers thousands of books for free, as well, and theirs do not incur the additional environmental, time and utility costs of those in the library.
g9
conservation ,Your grandchildrens future
10:03 PM on 03/31/2012
I download at home...so no driving unless I want a book not available online
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSAY
Res ipsa loquitur
05:50 PM on 03/31/2012
And if everyone did that, there would be no books.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
malexandria
08:07 AM on 03/31/2012
We finally get reasonably priced ebooks again. $7.99 - $9.99 was a good model until Apple came along! Paying ($14.99) hardcover prices for ebooks is ridiculous!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AAKAlan
Web Developer, photographer, artist, old fart.
05:46 PM on 03/31/2012
My sentiments, exactly. Every time I am tempted to download a new bestseller, I note Amazon's apology for the price (Sorry, not set by us, but by the publisher) and forgo it. I've found so many indie-published books for free-to-$2.99 and I'm proud to patronize these authors directly and cut out all the middlemen who profit from their creativity.

I just recently discovered Joel Golden's legal and police procedurals and they're just as good as anything I've read from Grisham or other high-priced authors. Most are only $.99.

Bravo, Amazon, who made its fortune delivering value to consumers. Blechhh to Apple which creates pretty devices but manages to stick it to the consumer every step of the way. Kudos to indie self-published authors who are forging an infinitely closer relationship with their readers than ever existed before!!

Fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stressedtothebone
Fatalist and cynic
08:42 AM on 04/02/2012
I've been buying quite a few indie-published books; I refuse to pay for overpriced ebooks.
correctingerrors
Real micro-bio censored by HuffPost, as usual
07:05 AM on 03/31/2012
Good morning!

Stating the day with a good news story.