iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood Fields Presidential Candidate

By MAGGIE MICHAEL 03/31/12 06:33 PM ET AP

Egypt Muslim Brotherhood
In this Thursday, March 3, 2011 file photo, Khayrat el-Shater, the lead strategist for Egypt's largest opposition group, waves by Egyptian flag after being released from Tora prison in Cairo, Egypt. (AP Photo/Mohammed Abu Zaid, File)

CAIRO -- The fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood named its chief strategist and financier as a candidate for president on Saturday, a surprising reversal of an earlier pledge to stay out of the race and a move that sets the group on a collision course with Egypt's military rulers.

The long-outlawed Brotherhood already controls about half of the seats in parliament and had been concerned that contesting the presidency would bring a backlash from liberals and Western countries fearful of an Islamist takeover.

But in a dramatic shift that amounted to a political bombshell in Egypt, the Brotherhood nominated deputy leader Khayrat el-Shater. The multimillionaire businessman has played a key role in guiding the group through the tumultuous transition since the ouster of Hosni Mubarak in last year's popular uprising.

Because of the Brotherhood's success in the parliamentary vote and the reach of its grassroots political organization, the candidate it nominates or backs will be considered the frontrunner in the race for the May 23-24 vote.

And if el-Shater wins, the Brotherhood would completely dominate the political arena and could push for changes such as stricter adherence to Islamic law. A Muslim Brotherhood government could also translate into rockier relations with Israel and the United States.

The decision will likely antagonize the ruling generals, who are worried about shielding their significant business interests and other privileges from civilian oversight and are wary of too much power concentrated in the hands of a single group.

"We don't want to reach a confrontation that affects the path of the nation," Mohammed Morsi, top leader of the Brotherhood's political arm said.

The decision will also widen the gap with liberals and secularists, who fear that the Brotherhood – which has largely espoused moderate rhetoric in the past year – will implement a hardline Islamist agenda once it has solidified its political position.

Already, Islamists enjoy a comfortable majority on a 100-member panel tasked with drafting a new constitution for Egypt, which has raised serious alarm among the nation's large Christian minority and liberals.

The candidate was announced at a Cairo news conference and ended weeks of speculation and confusion within the group.

It split the Brotherhood's Shura council, or legislative body, into two camps: one in favor of fielding a candidate and one against, fearing the repercussions, according to a Brotherhood official. He spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

Mahmoud Hussein, the group's deputy leader, said the decision to run a candidate was made in the face of "attempts to abort the revolution," after the military council refused several requests by the Brotherhood to appoint a government.

The group won close to half of parliament seats in the country's first post-revolution elections in November. That victory was largely due to the Brotherhood's grassroots organization.

El-Shater, who is in his early sixties, joined the Brotherhood in 1974. He has been jailed four times for a total of seven years on charges relating to his membership in the Brotherhood, which was outlawed more than 50 years ago.

He is seen as the iron man within the group, the one who steers talks with the military council, orchestrator of parliamentary elections and the negotiator with Arab Gulf countries and International Monetary Fund over loans.

"El-Shater is the real power center and he is struggling to expand the group's powers within Egypt's system and institutions against the generals' will," said Khalil el-Anani, expert on Islamist movements.

El-Shater will go up against other candidates with greater name recognition and a stronger television presence, such as ex-Arab League chief Amr Moussa.

Since its victory in parliamentary elections, the Brotherhood has been emboldened to press its demands. Foreign officials and diplomats flocked to its offices, and the group has even negotiated with international organizations on loans.

However, the group's power was curtailed by Egypt's interim constitution, which gives the ruling military council the sole authority to form or sack a government.

After the parliamentary victory, the Brotherhood demanded that the military council allow it to form a new Cabinet. With the government failing to address deepening economic and security problems, the group was concerned its own popularity might be dented now that it rose to the leading political bloc.

The ruling generals refused and Kamal el-Ganzouri, the prime minister, waved a court order in the face of the Brotherhood leader to dissolve parliament if the group pushed further on trying to dismiss the government.

"The heart of the conflict is the new political arrangement, the power sharing scheme and what share the Muslim Brotherhood would have," el-Anani said. "The el-Shater card will complicate the game and push the relationship with the ruling military council to risky ends," he added.

Power in Egypt has long been concentrated in the office of the presidency, something that could change with the drafting of a new constitution.

One thing that may have lent urgency to the Brotherhood's nomination of a candidate is the possibility that Mubarak's former vice president, Omar Suleiman, may run. His campaigners said in a statement that by next week, he will finalize his decision.

Suleiman would be the ruling generals' preferred candidate, someone who would try to keep the old political system intact and protect the privileges of the military.

The decision to run a presidential candidate may also have as much to do with the Brotherhood's internal politics as its long-term plans. Two other Islamists – one a relative liberal and the other a hardliner_ are also running for president.

The Brotherhood has already sacked a number of its followers for supporting rival presidential candidate Abdel-Moneim Abolfotoh, who was expelled from the group when he defied the decision to not run in presidential elections.

In the first reaction to the group's decision, Kamal el-Helbawi, longtime group leader and spokesman for the group's office in London announced his resignation in an interview on Dream 2 TV and accused the group of acting like Mubarak's party.

"I won't stay in the group one day after today because of their lies," he said.

El-Shater also faces off against the two other Islamist candidates, although the impact of him splitting the Islamist vote is lessened because the top two candidates in the first round of balloting will go on to a run-off.

FOLLOW WORLD

CAIRO -- The fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood named its chief strategist and financier as a candidate for president on Saturday, a surprising reversal of an earlier pledge to stay out of the race and...
CAIRO -- The fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood named its chief strategist and financier as a candidate for president on Saturday, a surprising reversal of an earlier pledge to stay out of the race and...
Filed by Clare Richardson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 152
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
11:43 PM on 04/03/2012
The real test of a democracy is not when the first party or president is elected. It's after the second election, when the first party peacefully transfers power to the newly elected one. The second election won't happen for years, so we cannot judge whether Egypt has become a democracy yet. It's still in transition.
scipio2009
Alan Wolfe's "The Future of Liberalism"
07:31 PM on 04/03/2012
This is going to proceed forward, as does everything else when re-establishing a people's voice in their nation, in countless steps, right or wrong.

For all the folks on here, seemingly arguing that the Egyptian people should've been merely happy with having Mubarak decide everything for them, go suck a lemon.

The process is messy, but it is still a defiantly Egyptian process. I wish the Egyptian people the best in this endeavor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ussuri
ask questions, question answers
01:38 PM on 04/03/2012
democracy at work. congratulations Egypt.
10:35 AM on 04/03/2012
too bad he wasn't a super nice guy that likes children and puppies like I thought he would be. Too bad. I hope he doesn't get elected. I would run, but I don't want to fly all the way over there.
09:04 PM on 04/02/2012
Say so long to Egypt...
photo
Roelvdwegen
Card-carrying Socialist and proud of it!
01:57 PM on 04/02/2012
"and a move that sets the group on a collision course with Egypt's military rulers."

And Egypt's people. Make no mistake, a great many never voted for the Brotherhood.
photo
Boduognat
Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'entrate.
10:19 AM on 04/02/2012
wow.... Muslims threatening to vote for Muslims in an Islamic country... in an election !!!

oh... the outrage...
Rosin the Bow
Palestine doesn't want peace. Meshaal said so
12:44 PM on 04/02/2012
No, the outrage only comes when Jews vote for Jews in a Jewish country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ussuri
ask questions, question answers
01:36 PM on 04/03/2012
what a nonsense.
10:32 PM on 04/01/2012
If anyone can turn around the collapsing Egyptian economy..the Muslim Brotherhood can. Obviously what Egypt needs is more lslam...forget about those noisesome Copts. Lots of luck.
04:05 AM on 04/02/2012
Khayrat el-Shater is a successful businessman, just like Mitt Romney! I'm sure both will turn their respective countries' fortunes!
12:47 PM on 04/02/2012
LOL...
11:46 AM on 04/03/2012
And for that you a star, the point is well taken. Kudos!
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
08:19 PM on 04/01/2012
So the MB lied when they said they were not going to seek the presidency.
Not that the MB lying should surprise anyone.

This is all about forming an Islamist confederacy that the MB sees stretching from Morocco to Syria, a new Caliphate.

All of which will be a real problem for the rest of the world.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:13 PM on 04/02/2012
To be fair, the military is giving them an excuse to lie and look like heroes doing it.
11:48 AM on 04/03/2012
You are early on drugs, I guess you need to stop reading you medieval literature! You are the best when it comes to demonize Egyptians.
05:50 PM on 04/01/2012
Let the Egyptian people decide. It is possible that the "Brotherhood" has overreached in its bid for power. This should, hopefully, bring together all who oppose their predictable effort to further destroy the modern state of Egypt. We shall see.
04:34 PM on 04/01/2012
Arab Spring more like Arab Tzunami
10:32 PM on 04/01/2012
The Arab world is falling off a cliff...
11:50 AM on 04/03/2012
Most probable there will be a new order based on a secular states, there are many minorities and some are very powerful. Time will tell.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fapescia
03:09 PM on 04/01/2012
The Muslim Brotherhood must represent all the people who made the revolution possible. It is way past time to turn out all the Generals even if it means another civil war. They will never give up power voluntarily.
03:04 PM on 04/01/2012
HP buried this story. Confirms my suspicion that it's infiltrrated.
12:56 PM on 04/01/2012
Why does it seem that the only way to get rid of dictators in that area of the world is to replace them with religious ones? Why are they afraid of women having rights? As the more nurturing of the sexes, are they afraid that peace would be declared and they'de run out of gullible people to become terrorists? One post here was ironic in that it drew similarities between the Republicans seeming lack of respect for women's rights and adherence to religious principals and those of the religious fanatics in the middle east. Others think Obama is leading the country into Islamic Socialism as if there could be such a thing. What the Arab Spring is looking like is an attempt by groups like the Islamic Brotherhood and others to turn the area into the United States of Islam where women will be on leashes like dogs and just as the military took no crap from the lowly, now they will do the same except this time in the name of their "god".
04:19 AM on 04/02/2012
How about the rest of the world lets the Egyptians vote as they wish? Isn't that what democracy's about? Or is it only democracy when people in the MENA region vote for people that are plaint to Western demands?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
loOranks
I am the master of my fate; captain of my soul
08:34 AM on 04/02/2012
We've also let the Germans vote as they wish back in the 30's.

Democracy only is as good as the values that inform its participants; and we know the values of the Muslim Brotherhood.
11:52 AM on 04/03/2012
I challenge you read a bit of history and stop this ranting propaganda, do you remember when women were allowed to vote in the USA? When were they allowed to own property? Rather than saying it is Islam, say it is human civilization.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fapescia
12:38 PM on 04/01/2012
If the Muslim Brotherhood will advocate for and directly improve the conditions for the Palestinians and especially the people of Gaza then God bless them and we hope they come to power.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
10:09 PM on 04/01/2012
except of course if "we" includes women, gays, Copts, and young liberals and forward-thinking secular types.
10:33 PM on 04/01/2012
The average HuffPo poster has never heard of Hassan al Banna so I think you are wasting your time..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ChimpestryII
Nothing is free, only paid for by others.
12:04 AM on 04/02/2012
Trying to remember the last time a political party deeply rooted in religious dogma advocated for and directly improved the conditions of a significant percentage of their own people, let alone the people of a foriegn state. Governments improving the conditions of foriegn peoples is rare, very rare when those governments are under the control of religious or philosophical extremists. Whatever advocating the MB may do for the Palestinians and the people of Gaza will be primarily for the benefit of the MB; any improvement in plight of the poor Palestinians will be just an unintended bonus.

Of course, what the Palestinians, whether in Gaza or the West Bank, really need is relief from their inept/corrupt leaders and those who have used their territory to launch several thousand rockets into Israel. I doubt the MB is going to do much about either the Palestinians corrupt leaders or rocket launchers, since the leaders will make good allies and the rockets are not landing in Egypt.