iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Leon Panetta: Congress 'Put A Gun To Their Heads' By Risking Defense Cuts

By JULIE WATSON 03/30/12 09:59 PM ET AP

Leon Panetta Budget Cuts
Leon Panetta told hundreds of Marines and sailors Congress "did a stupid thing" in risking cuts to defense.

ABOARD THE USS PELELIU -- Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told U.S. Marines and sailors on Friday that Congress would be irresponsible if it doesn't act to prevent drastic military budget cuts.

In a visit to this amphibious assault ship off the Southern California coast, he also said Afghanistan is making progress against the Taliban but Iran remains a potential threat to the U.S.

A budget agreement reached last August calls for defense cuts of $487 billion over a decade, a reflection of the drawdown of two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and the pressure to reduce the nation's deficit.

The failure of Congress to come up with at least $1.2 trillion in savings means automatic cuts of more than $1 trillion next January to defense and domestic programs.

Congress "did a stupid thing" in risking the $50 billion in across-the-board reductions that would kick in next January, Panetta told hundreds of Marines and sailors.

"What they essentially did was to put a gun to their heads and to the heads of the country," he said.

Answering questions from service members and journalists, Panetta also said last year was a turning point for the war in Afghanistan, where the U.S. is winding down its combat role.

Afghan forces are doing their job in the country and more than 50 percent of the Afghan population is now living in areas secured by the Afghan government – showing the U.S. strategy of handing over the security to them is working – but ultimately it will be up to Afghans, the secretary said.

"We can't let anything, anything undermine that strategy," he said.

He said the level of violence in Afghanistan dropped last year for the first time in five years and the Taliban was weakened.

Afghanistan's neighbor, Iran, continues to be a threat to U.S. interests, however.

"If Israel decides to go after Iran and we have to defend ourselves, we could be engaged sooner than any of us want," he said.

It was not clear whether Panetta was saying the United States would automatically be engaged if Israel would attack. It also is not clear if the Obama administration has plans to be engaged with Iran.

"Our focus is on diplomacy and international pressure on Iran. I'm not going to speculate on what would happen in various scenarios other than to say that we will be ready," Carl Woog, Panetta's spokesman, said later.

"The secretary said we have plans for any contingency and we're not going to speculate about timelines or future actions," he added.

Panetta also addressed North Korea's threat to fire a missile.

"They've done this before. We thought we were in a period of accommodation with them. Now it looks like we're in a period of provocation," Panetta said, adding later: "Our hope is that you know it is just provocation for the moment."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
ABOARD THE USS PELELIU -- Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told U.S. Marines and sailors on Friday that Congress would be irresponsible if it doesn't act to prevent drastic military budget cuts. In a v...
ABOARD THE USS PELELIU -- Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told U.S. Marines and sailors on Friday that Congress would be irresponsible if it doesn't act to prevent drastic military budget cuts. In a v...
Filed by Paige Lavender  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 724
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (19 total)
photo
flaconoire
Anartist
08:39 AM on 04/02/2012
Is that his idea of a military coup? Oh, sorry, its already done.
07:12 AM on 04/02/2012
"Put a Gun to their heads",...what happened to the Pelosi speak, kinder gentle speeek?... now its keep funding the Military, before the elections it was a different story..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
jcrum417
What kind of a crazy world was I born into
06:51 PM on 04/01/2012
I would not believe a word this man says. He should be in a jail cell.
05:17 PM on 04/01/2012
What a stooge.... e works for the Obama Administration that wants to cut the military budget...yet he is out there telling the Soldiers and sailors that it is CONGRESS wanting to cut military spending.... are our troops that nieve? I know many voters are.
10:39 PM on 04/01/2012
So the SecDef is wrong about the sequester legislation passed by Congress as part of the debt ceiling deal last year? Really?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
akindependent
11:26 PM on 04/01/2012
Did you just start reading the news today? Republicans offered up the military to spare the wealthy a modest tax increase.
photo
George Hanshaw
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
02:01 PM on 04/01/2012
"This is complete dysfunction on display. Obama needs to tell Panetta who sets national policy. Hint: It isn't the "generals on the ground" or the Secretary of Defense."

Absolutely correct, it's the latest Gallup Poll......
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
senatortruth
Fox keeps me "INFROMED"!
11:59 AM on 04/01/2012
Devorah Judith

...The military does what the Commander in Chief orders...

When our men were sent back to Irrraaraaq they had to weld armor to vehicle underbellies so they could withstand boboby traps...

*****************************************

Funny how you DON'T mention that this happened

under the little TAARRAAITITITOR Buuhuhsh...

And you STILL avoid the FACT that they are NOT

held ACCOUNTABLE, just give a BLANK CHECK.

And THAT has to CHANGE.
;
HUNDREDS of BILLIONS a year WASTED.

THAT could fund the National Health Care we need...
photo
George Hanshaw
There are none so blind as those who will not see.
02:07 PM on 04/01/2012
Wrong: The entire Defense Department budget is LESS than what we already pay for Medicare and Medicaid. It's also LESS than we pay for social security. It's little more than three times what we pay for INTEREST on our burgeoning national debt.

Do we pay a little more than France and Belgium and the Netherlands? Yeah, but then e had to go to war to resque their sorry butts from the Germans twice in the last hundred years - either to keep them from losing (WWI) or to rescue them AFTER they had lost (WWII).

How much is your liberty worth? I'll grant you, I'd no longer give a dime or an American life for that of our European 'allies.' THAT contingency planning we can certainly defund.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Berettasskeeter
For what we are about to receive, may we be truly
08:22 AM on 04/02/2012
You forgot to also mention that the military is a Constitutional Power of the central government, while "providing" health care is NOT!
Semper fi
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
jeliz
Think for yourselves.
10:22 AM on 04/02/2012
It's also Six times more than any other country on earth. Aren't we prepared? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures
argved
Less socialism (for the wealthy)
11:33 AM on 04/01/2012
We need to have a more humble foreign policy that values the mental and physical health of our troops and doesn't send them abroad seeking dragons to slay. If we did that we would as a consequence spend a lot less money on our military.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rmax53
GOP efforts fail, again!
11:02 AM on 04/01/2012
It's like asking a barber if you need a haircut. Of course Panetta will discourage defense cuts. Even my fiscally conservate Senator Kelly Ayotte, who rails against government spending, is now railing against defense cuts that threaten the Portsmouth Shipyard. So it's always going to be the case with these hypocrites, Cut spending, but not spending that benefits me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pappadave
Sane and rational...and Conservative!
12:09 PM on 04/02/2012
The military services and their upkeep and supplies are one of the very FEW things that the government does that are completely constitutional. Most everything else isn't...welfare, social security, the EPA, FDA, and the myriad other alphabet agencies financed with our tax dollars to no REAL benefit to anyone except the bureaucracies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rmax53
GOP efforts fail, again!
01:24 PM on 04/03/2012
It's clear to me from statements like yours that you have no idea what the Constitution allows (hint: it allows Congress to create laws and the agencies to enforce them). You are obviously misinformed, but you're in the right place if your mind is open to being educated about how those agencies and programs work to benefit citizens. Or would you prefer to drink lead in your water?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rich3324
Likes: Chasing villagers. Dislikes: Fire
10:52 AM on 04/01/2012
But cuts would mean we need to reduce our world wide empire.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Berettasskeeter
For what we are about to receive, may we be truly
08:31 AM on 04/02/2012
To what empire do you refer?? After serving for 26 years, I never found one.
Semper fi
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pappadave
Sane and rational...and Conservative!
12:11 PM on 04/02/2012
Exactly. Colin Powell said it best. Of all the wars in foreign lands in which we've engaged, the only thing we've asked in return from the countries in whose aid we sacrificed our lives and fortune is enough ground to bury our dead. That's SOME "empire."
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
The Dude67
Question the official narrative
10:20 AM on 04/01/2012
Leon Panetta, United States Secretary of Defense believes Congress (i.e. y'all) are an afterthought: 

Panetta was asked by Senator Jeff Sessions, “We spend our time worrying about the U.N., the Arab League, NATO and too little time, in my opinion, worrying about the elected representatives of the United States. As you go forward, will you consult with the United States Congress?”

The Defense Secretary responded “You know, our goal would be to seek international permission. And we would come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress.”

-------------------------

That's was a couple of weeks ago.  Combine that with the quote from this article:
"If Israel decides to go after Iran and we have to defend ourselves, we could be engaged sooner than any of us want," he said.
America is a Nation in name only.  It's citizens little more than an annoyance to the global elite.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
The Dude67
Question the official narrative
10:11 AM on 04/01/2012
"If Israel decides to go after Iran and we have to defend ourselves, we could be engaged sooner than any of us want," he said.
In other words, The United States military operates at the behest of Israel.  Well, at least the clarity is refreshing.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tacevad
American SS Card Carrying Socialist
10:00 AM on 04/01/2012
Sorry Leon, We the People have been overfunding the MIC for 30 years..time for THEM to start using OUR money more wisely.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dogpaddle47
Cui Bono
09:51 AM on 04/01/2012
Even after defense cuts, the US will still have a defense budget several times the size of ANY other country.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
The Dude67
Question the official narrative
10:13 AM on 04/01/2012
We spend more than the other top 21 nations combined.  4 times more than that of China which shares physical borders with 14 other Countries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dogpaddle47
Cui Bono
10:27 AM on 04/01/2012
WASTE!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PCPrincess
I'm probably gaming.
09:50 AM on 04/01/2012
Sounds like the gun is pointed at Panetta's head and the one holding it is the almighty 'Military Industrial Complex'.
09:39 AM on 04/01/2012
Dem vs Dem. His boss is the one who made sure the Super Committee failed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
akindependent
11:38 PM on 04/01/2012
Yeah, remember how cooperative those Republican committee members were? Hey, putting the militiary on the line to save the wealthy from a small tax increase was their idea, no?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pappadave
Sane and rational...and Conservative!
12:13 PM on 04/02/2012
No.