iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

FDA To Require Tobacco Companies Report Dangerous Chemicals

By MATTHEW PERRONE 03/30/12 05:54 PM ET AP

Fda Tobacco Companies
The FDA is planning to require tobacco companies to report the levels of dangerous chemicals in their products. Cigarettes and tobacco on display in a Liverpool news agents on December 9, 2008, in Liverpool, England.

WASHINGTON -- Tobacco companies will be required to report the levels of dangerous chemicals found in cigarettes, chew and other products under the latest rules designed to tighten regulation of the tobacco industry.

The preliminary guidance issued Friday by the Food and Drug Administration marks the first time tobacco makers would be required to report quantities of 20 chemicals associated with cancer, lung disease and other health problems. The FDA will release the information in a consumer-friendly format by next April.

"Cigarettes are the only mass-consumed product in this country for which consumers don't know what's in them, until now," said Dr. Lawrence Deyton, director of FDA's tobacco center, in an interview with the Associated Press.

Ammonia, carbon monoxide and formaldehyde are among the ingredients or byproducts of tobacco that are subject to the new rule.

Regulators have identified more than 93 harmful or potentially harmful chemicals in tobacco products, though the agency is only focusing on 20 for the coming year. The agency will take comments on the guidance until June 4. There is no deadline for when the documents will become final.

A law enacted in 2009 gave the FDA authority to regulate a number of aspects of tobacco marketing and manufacturing, though the agency cannot ban nicotine. FDA also gained authority to set standards on levels of harmful ingredients in tobacco products, though the agency is not yet using that power.

The same law lets the agency approve new tobacco products that could be marketed as safer than what's currently for sale.

In separate guidance issued Friday, the FDA laid out the scientific studies it will require before any company can market a so-called modified-risk tobacco product. Companies must submit extensive testing data on health risks for users and non-users, behavior changes and consumer understanding of marketing materials for new products.

"The law sets a high standard to make sure that tobacco products marketed to reduce risk actually reduce risk," Deyton said.

The FDA's handling of modified-risk products has been highly anticipated by both the public health community and bigger tobacco companies, which are looking for new products to sell as they face declining cigarette demand due to tax increases, health concerns, smoking bans and social stigma.

Some tobacco companies have alternatives like snus – small pouches like tea bags that users stick between the cheek and gum – and dissolving tobacco – finely milled tobacco shaped into orbs, sticks and strips. But they are not explicitly marketed as less risky than cigarettes.

The FDA is required to respond to a company's application within a year of its submission and acceptance. FDA officials would not comment on how many applications have been submitted to date.

FOLLOW BUSINESS

WASHINGTON -- Tobacco companies will be required to report the levels of dangerous chemicals found in cigarettes, chew and other products under the latest rules designed to tighten regulation of the t...
WASHINGTON -- Tobacco companies will be required to report the levels of dangerous chemicals found in cigarettes, chew and other products under the latest rules designed to tighten regulation of the t...
Filed by Bonnie Kavoussi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 454
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
01:50 AM on 04/04/2012
I don't see the point of this. Everyone knows cigarettes are terrible for your health yet people still choose to smoke. I'm sure the FDA can find something more important to look in to.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Serio420
11:54 PM on 04/03/2012
Did the big tobacco execs who run this sector of the FDA come up with this measure? What a fantastic way to get smokers to give up on these other products and go right back to cigs. I'm sure those other companies are gonna have to pay big fees to get approval too.
10:19 PM on 04/03/2012
worse than pot, do you know why the government won't shut them down is because a lot of them are hooked on it and really it's a drug that they are hooked on.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustinP213
I dislike all political parties.
04:17 PM on 04/03/2012
Good news.

I strongly recommend that people never try cigs (since many people have addictive personalities). I've had a half a pack in my life, and I've never smoked since.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tracerhaha1
It's time to end the war on (some) drugs.
04:14 PM on 04/03/2012
Look for big tobacco to fight this tooth and nail.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThaGovna
I walk on water, eat bullets, and poop ice cream.
03:01 PM on 04/03/2012
"...though the agency cannot ban nicotine."

Somebody should then...

Question?

Has there ever been a real push to ban cigs?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JustinP213
I dislike all political parties.
04:16 PM on 04/03/2012
Nope. And, surely, you know why...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThaGovna
I walk on water, eat bullets, and poop ice cream.
04:46 PM on 04/03/2012
Yeah, but... I dunno. You'd think something so undeniably deadly would trump that...

"It's been proven drinking while driving ends lots of lives"
"Hmm... I know! We'll ban it! Make it illegal!"
"Good thinking! Next on the agenda is cigarettes. They've been proven to kill even more people than drunk driving. I think we should make them illegal too... Naaaaah! That's waaaaay too radical!"
01:47 AM on 04/04/2012
Really? It would be an all time low if cigarettes have to be sold on the black market
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThaGovna
I walk on water, eat bullets, and poop ice cream.
09:07 AM on 04/04/2012
I'm sorry. What point are you trying to make exactly? Just speak plainly so I don't misunderstand and assume something you're not saying because one way to look at your reply is that cigs being sold on the black market is worse than the deaths cigs cause. Cigs don't get you high or drunk. The only reason people continue to smoke is because of the addiction. Banning cigs won't result in the type of stuff that went on during prohibition of alcohol for example, or even marijuana. There is no reason for people to risk jail time over something that only gives you an addiction and cancer. But yeah. Explan yourself.
02:13 PM on 04/03/2012
What's the big deal, same stuff you find in a typical meth operation! Smokers already know they are going to have slow horrible deaths long before their time and are corporate junkies that keep them in caviar so I doubt this is going to make any new synapses fire!
05:47 AM on 04/03/2012
THE SMOKERS SHOULD QUIT TOBACCO AND SMOKE WEED INSTEAD ITS NATURAL AND GOD MADE IT NOT MAN. NO CHEMICALS ADDED
07:07 AM on 04/03/2012
Tobacco Companies shouldf just change plants? they could change the plant they are using now, from tobacco to WEED, leave out the chemicals, create farm jobs, tobacco companies rise again and be able to do God his giving the seed, rain and water,We are the addicted ones , You need to quit Killing us with all the chemicals and make things right with a plant that does not need 93 chemicals. Sounds like a PLAN to me, I would love to be able to put the cigarettes down, They got is by the Balls, give us smokers, Lega;ize Weed and save US ALL!
07:05 PM on 04/03/2012
PEOPLE WHO DON'T LOOK AT WHAT THEY WRITE SHOULD DO SO AND LEARN TO TAKE OFF CAPS WHEN WRITING A COMMENT OTHERWISE IT LOOKS LIKE COMPLETE S***.
I agree, caps are just annoying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shad0w24
02:14 AM on 04/03/2012
2 and a half years since I quite smoking and will never go back.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Fi
A Gluten-Free life!
06:04 AM on 04/03/2012
12 weeks for me, no way I'm paying those prices again.
tccat4
We all have a right to our opinion, like it or not
01:57 AM on 04/03/2012
Smoking is a choice... why doesn't the FDA give a damn about all the additives given to our Beef and poultry and the other foods we eat...... This is just another way to raise the price of tobacco... which has been around for thousands of years, remove all the additives and sell it as natural as it was meant to be. Then close the FDA and replace it with something that will actually improve the food we eat...... Look what the FDA has done for medications that would actually help people.. they are paid off by companies with loads of cash who do not care for anyone period.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:01 PM on 04/02/2012
Is this really going to change things?
They tried better labels, they tried to better inform the public.
And it did nothing.
This will do the same.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:11 PM on 04/03/2012
Agreed this is really just another attempt to show that liberals care and are "doing something." They know full well it won't have the desired effect.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:12 PM on 04/03/2012
Yup. One thing, though, to the liberals. If they were really "doing something" then they would try to handle a 14 trillion dollar debt. But then they won't get reelected, I suppose. Silly me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Grapetrader
I guess I will have to wait till 2016
10:48 PM on 04/02/2012
I see no reason why they should not be required to list the harmful chemicals or shall I say toxins that are found in cigarettes. A more informed public is a better off public.
10:24 PM on 04/02/2012
Good. It's about time someone reeled in these companies. Hope they have to indicate the percentage of nicotine in the cigarette since they can at will increase or decrease the amount depending on their sales. Sales start to slide down the amount of nicotine is increased.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edwin Keever Jr
Go to Face Book Mr. Ed The person, not the horse
10:21 PM on 04/02/2012
My problem with smoking is this. I second hand smoke. It's cheep but I never get to choose the brand!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ty2010
10:19 PM on 04/02/2012
I would rather have that than pay state extortion.