iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

History Of Fire Milestone, One Million Years Old, Discovered In Homo Erectus' Wonderwerk Cave

Posted: 04/ 2/2012 3:29 pm Updated: 04/ 2/2012 4:08 pm

By: Charles Choi, LiveScience Contributor
Published: 04/02/2012 03:11 PM EDT on LiveScience

Ash and charred bone, the earliest known evidence of controlled use of fire, reveal that human ancestors may have used fire a million years ago, a discovery that researchers say will shed light on this major turning point in human evolution.

Scientists analyzed material from Wonderwerk Cave in South Africa, a massive cavern located near the edge of the Kalahari Desert. Previous excavations there had uncovered an extensive record of human occupation.

Microscopic analysis revealed clear evidence of burning, such as plant ash and charred bone fragments. These materials were apparently burned in the cave, as opposed to being carried in there by wind or water, and were found alongside stone tools in a layer dating back about 1 million years. Surface fracturing of ironstone, the kind expected from fires, was also seen.

Researchers found evidence of human fire use in South Africa's Wonderwerk Cave (shown here), a massive cavern located near the edge of the Kalahari Desert.


Although modern humans are the only human species alive today, originating about 200,000 years ago, other human species once roamed the Earth, such as Homo erectus, which arose about 1.9 million years ago. [10 Things That Make Humans Special]

"The analysis pushes the timing for the human use of fire back by 300,000 years, suggesting that human ancestors as early as Homo erectus may have begun using fire as part of their way of life," said researcher Michael Chazan, a paleolithic archaeologist at the University of Toronto and director of the university's archaeology center.

The research team's analysis suggests that materials in the cave were not heated above about 1,300 degrees Fahrenheit (700 degrees Celsius). This is consistent with preliminary findings that grasses, brushes and leaves were burned for these fires — such fuel would not have been capable of hotter flames.

Fire would have helped early humans stay warm and keep nighttime predators at bay, and enabled cooking, which would have made food more digestible. In addition, "socializing around a campfire might actually be an essential aspect of what makes us human," Chazan said. "The control of fire would have been a major turning point in human evolution."

Harvard anthropologist Richard Wrangham has speculated that controlled fires and cooked meat even influenced human brain evolution. He suggests that humans were cooking their prey as far back as the first appearance of Homo erectus 1.9 million years ago, just when humans were experiencing major brain expansion, and proposes that cooking allowed our ancestors to evolve larger, more calorie-hungry brains and bodies, and smaller guts suited for more easily digested cooked food.

"It's possible we may find evidence of fire use as early as Wrangham has suggested," Chazan told LiveScience.

Future research will analyze both earlier and later materials from this site to see how fire use might have developed over time.

"We're opening the question of how fire fit into the life of early humans and how that might have changed over time," Chazan said.

The scientists detailed their findings online April 2 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW SCIENCE

By: Charles Choi, LiveScience Contributor Published: 04/02/2012 03:11 PM EDT on LiveScience Ash and charred bone, the earliest known evidence of controlled use of fire, reveal that human ancesto...
By: Charles Choi, LiveScience Contributor Published: 04/02/2012 03:11 PM EDT on LiveScience Ash and charred bone, the earliest known evidence of controlled use of fire, reveal that human ancesto...
Filed by Travis Korte  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,319
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Wood
A.T.C.G...(sigh)
04:26 PM on 04/08/2012
Evolution is a fact. It's the best explanation of the progress of life on our planet. To deny this...is pure and utter balderdash. The very best minds and the very best science on our planet support my statement. That's all there is...(sigh)
07:07 PM on 04/07/2012
Is a sinking ship full of prayerful people?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
06:26 PM on 04/07/2012
I have argued for years that the advent of controlled fire, complex tools (acheulian complex) and language are tightly interwoven.

This would seem to corroborate that claim. Fascinating discovery!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Bogstomper2
Secular conservative
06:47 PM on 04/08/2012
"...the advent of controlled fire, complex tools (acheulian complex) and language..."

These developments are also likely the source of the conservative/progressive dichotomy. You know at some point there was a progressive caveman saying, "Try this new thing we invented called 'cooking the antelope'. It kills the parasites in the meat, and it tastes great!"

And no doubt some conservative caveman refused, saying, "Cooking the antelope is so gay."

On the other hand, we probably lost a few progressive cavemen who got a little too experimental with their diet and ate bad berries. This goes to show that both conservatism and progressivism can be survival traits. It just depends on the circumstances.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
07:32 PM on 04/08/2012
"Cooking the antelope is so gay"...

Laughing so very hard right now...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerorem
Linus v. Lucy
04:18 PM on 04/07/2012
Were there any spoons, needles, traces of cocaine or heroin?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whirlpool
founder walnut tree congregation
07:18 PM on 04/11/2012
There is something wrong with you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerorem
Linus v. Lucy
08:52 PM on 04/11/2012
Mountain Dew cans, ribs, potato chip crumbs, sports memorabilia?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:51 AM on 04/07/2012
I love stories like this, especially when accompanied by a picture or two. The science is fascinating, but the pictures make it easy to imagine this actually being one's living environment.

Plenty big enough for a whole clan or tribe from the looks of it.

What I don't understand is the long and silly debates between folks who deny science for whatever reason, and those who try to set them straight.

Those folks will NEVER be set straight, and actually feed of the efforts of those who think THEIR comment will be the one that turns on the figurative light over their heads.

I ignore them, and recommend the same - unless you enjoy knocking and knocking on doors where no one is home...
photo
GoodwithWood
Dis eas all yoooour fault
11:38 AM on 04/08/2012
Well wrote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FreeThinker in AZ
World traveler & Green Progressive
07:28 PM on 04/06/2012
From the pic I can see the salt and pepper the bone and a bit of BBQ sauce,,,,Why do men love to barbecue so much ? The smell of flesh burning over an open flame ? I think its built into us...

To think they had all the same feelings (mental states) such as pleasure and pain, distress, torment...Love..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
11:17 AM on 04/08/2012
Women in my family love BBQ too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Wood
A.T.C.G...(sigh)
03:57 PM on 04/08/2012
Ahhh yes...and after the repast...three fingers of the favored lighter fluid du jour...and a fine cigar. Decadence...(sigh)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FreeThinker in AZ
World traveler & Green Progressive
10:29 PM on 04/08/2012
Happy Easter Bob !!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:40 AM on 04/06/2012
This is interesting, but how does it affect the Kardashians?


;-)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:26 PM on 04/05/2012
I was brought up in a Christian church. I was taught the Bible, the story of creation, etc, and accepted it all early on. Gradually the blinders were removed, sometimes due to circumstance, sometimes critical thinking, sometimes simply chance. I've watched from the sidelines, I've pursued it intensely, I've been privileged to know some wonderful Christians, and I've witnessed scandal after scandal. I believe it is fine and logical to believe in a creator, however, to paraphrase what someone has already said, man created religion. This has been born out repeatedly, sometimes in direct confrontations with the church, from Galileo to Darwin to Hawking. One thing I have learned on the spiritual side is that faith is akin to delusion, and as such it is blind. A second is that hope is the desire that motivates that faith, and that is a very powerful motivator. And I have in my lifetime witnessed the sporadic evolution of the policies and principles held by several religions to keep up with the evolution of scientific discovery. I have learned to trust scientific fact, as it has no issue with learning the truth for truth's sake.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:52 AM on 04/07/2012
I tend to agree with those who say that life is about the journey - not the destination.

Yours has clearly been a growthful journey...
06:49 PM on 04/07/2012
Good for you!

I think it's tragic that so many Christians have made their religious faith contingent on believing a bunch of stuff about the world that's clearly contradicted by evidence. If they'd just stop treating the Bible as a science book, they could be more secure in their faith and not feel so threatened by modernity and intellectual growth. They're basically holding themselves back by insisting that evolution didn't happen, and so on.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:05 AM on 04/08/2012
Someone once wrote, "There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in [all of our] philosoph[ies.]
photo
itruth
fideistic deist with socratic tedencies
09:14 PM on 04/05/2012
So who waants Mastadon steaks?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Riverman
The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,
04:36 PM on 04/06/2012
There is still 60 + million years of separation between this fire and the death of the dinosaurs.
photo
itruth
fideistic deist with socratic tedencies
07:39 PM on 04/06/2012
Mastadon was a mamal like a Wooly Mamoth cousins of modern Elephants
photo
GoodwithWood
Dis eas all yoooour fault
11:54 AM on 04/08/2012
Daaaaaarrrrrrr
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
06:28 PM on 04/07/2012
We were eating Mastodons easily about 11k ybp...this is much, much older.
iflew
Pro Publiae Bonae
06:45 PM on 04/05/2012
Wow! Any idea if it was a planned and controlled manmade fire, or was it an opportunity fire?

Fossilized marshmallows and graham crackers probably wouldn't show. Most likely they cooked a reptile or small mammal. Could be some DNA grease.
12:08 PM on 04/06/2012
If you mean "opportunity fire" as one which these hominids found, and kept alive in their cave, then the answer is no.

The fire area was somewhat deep into the cave, and it is a bit unlikely that a naturally occurring fire would get that deep into the cave.
photo
GoodwithWood
Dis eas all yoooour fault
12:05 PM on 04/08/2012
Fire can be carried and kept alive for many moons.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080301083313AAEhVhv
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Riverman
The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars,
04:42 PM on 04/06/2012
Surely there was a considerable time between the first capturing of wild fire and learning to start fire from scratch. The absence of wood suggested a primitive fire to me so I too was wondering if this was a captured fire that was being kept alive within the cave.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
06:31 PM on 04/07/2012
Flint knapping was well underway 1 million ybp. Doesn't take much time before you select the right hammerstone (ironstone or some such) and you notice that your knapping makes sparks. The Acheulean complex, and in particular, the hand ax needed almost daily upkeep.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brill Street
01:08 PM on 04/04/2012
I'd like to know how the deniers explain Neanderthal man, obviously human, but extinct. Did God goof? Was Adam a Neanderthal or another, presumably earlier hominid? Even if you don't accept that we come from the same tree as primates, sharing a common ancestor, how do you explain the varied other hominids that we know have existed prior to ourselves? Or are all fossils prior to homo sapiens irrelevant because they point to evolution of our kind? Deniers always find fault with the evidence and ask for proof beyond the evidence we already have, but seem unwilling to address the obvious questions that arise from the evidence we do have. Evolution has occurred in humankind whether you want to that accept it extends back to a primate split or not. To pretend it didn't takes serious blinders or extreme rationalization and self-deception.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:59 PM on 04/04/2012
Likewise, the ones that claim to understand evolution but don't is amazing.

Neanderthal ( along with cro-magnon, denisovion)is scientifically no different from homo sapiens. To claim it went extinct is false. At best you can only state that those population groups have few desendants in todays populations. There is NO evidence to support evolution.

This articale actually points to more problems with evolution. Now, tools and use of fire occuring eailier dose not help evolution. It flatens the so called "tree".

Modern science is disproving evolution. Unless you think that a being is smart enough to control fire and also to dumb to know how to create hotter fires in a cave mind you.
Makes an amazing story for evolution but has no science to support it.

Self-deception, indeed. But you are the one decived.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eric in Manhattan
Compromise is NOT a dirty word
03:48 PM on 04/04/2012
Deniers of evolution are as ignorant as they are stubborn. Keep clinging to your hope that the bible was right. It wasn't. The earth is not 6000 years old.
05:52 PM on 04/04/2012
Actually there are skeletal differences between the neanderthal skeletons and modern humans. Neanderthals were shorter and stocky compared to homo sapiens of their time period. By examining where the muscles attach to the bone, we can tell they were more muscular than homo sapiens. We assume they were stronger. Whether neanderthals where a branch of homo sapiens or their own species is still being debated - Science does that. It may never resolve that question.

When you say there is no evidence to support evolution? Are you talking evolution in general or just Human evolution?

We have lots of fossil evidence of evolution of whales, and other creatures. Whales is the most recent one I have read about. We have fossils that show the development of modern whale species from ancient land mammals, that probably lived in the water most of time (maybe like hippos) to fully aquatic creatures. The fossil evidence shows how there limbs changed into better forms for swimming and how the nostrils climbed through to forehead to to top of the head to be what we recognize os their blow hole.

As for human evolution, you are correct human fossils are rare. That is why when one is found, it usually commands some headlines. But every day, there is a chance to discover more.

Evolution happened and still happening.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brill Street
12:54 PM on 04/04/2012
The science deniers are amazing. They don't believe in fossil evidence, scientific dating or geology. They would need to be presented with full skeletons of every hominid that's ever existed to even begin to consider that humans have evolved over time. They must be ignorant of how precise the study of human anatomy and skeletal structure is, that the decay of elements is a constant that can be used to measure age and that things can be surmised from evidence that is not totally complete.
It's obviously that your car's been hit if you come out of the house and it's dented, but that kind of logical inference in science is viewed as invalid. It's irrelevant to them that we share 98% of our DNA with primates or that species of man have existed and gone extinct. It's a willful embrace of ignorance, most of it is based on the "poof" concept of creation in Genesis. The deniers think they know what happened based on Genesis, written to be grasped by far less enlightened people thousands of years ago. While there's nothing wrong with thinking that were created by a Supreme Being, there is something wrong with thinking we know how He did it. We clearly don't.

Thankfully, most Christians are rightly, theologically free to see evolution as one of God's mysterious ways, free to use the powers of reason that God gave us to understand our natural world and the things in it, including ourselves.
03:59 PM on 04/04/2012
You are correct Brill, however unfortunately it doesn't matter how much evidence is collected, they will never accept it becuase it has nothing to do with science, and everything to do with their religious beliefs.

The same science that collects evidence for the reality of evolution is the very same science that has collected evidence for the reality of gravity, relativity, and germ theory. They will never deny the reality of those things of course, because belief in them doesn't violate their religious beliefs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:11 PM on 04/04/2012
to bad bushes are still in caves
09:21 PM on 04/04/2012
What bad bushes?
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
02:48 PM on 04/07/2012
As in George, I'm guessing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:51 AM on 04/04/2012
I always wondered why I like staring at fires, now if only I could figure out why I like hammering nails……
04:24 PM on 04/04/2012
Noa was your farther
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:05 PM on 04/04/2012
aaah, no, I dont have any less-than-6000 year old middle eastern genetic markers! ;-(
well i'll never know now!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
c-tom
Badges we don't need no stinking badges
03:06 PM on 04/07/2012
Because it's fun to hammer nails. It's like throwing a ball or skipping. It is just flat out fun to do.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:14 PM on 04/08/2012
No doubt its fun, but when you think about it….hammering nails?.... there’s something more going on there!
photo
mfg75123
micro who
11:36 AM on 04/04/2012
How do they know he was a
Homo or Erect
just say'n
01:07 PM on 04/04/2012
They dated the remains of the fire through radiometric testing at approx 1 mill years ago.
At that time, the hominids that were living where Homo Erectus.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Milks
Ecologist
02:02 PM on 04/06/2012
It was 1 million years ago, not 100 million years ago (which would have been during the Cretaceous).
photo
Maezeppa
Happy-Happy Joy-Joy
02:49 PM on 04/07/2012
You're right that the radiometrics place the time - but I'd do something about those extra zeroes.  ;-)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:07 PM on 04/04/2012
homo erectus will go the sameway as the neaderthal. From a brute to a very human looking person. Why becuase science is destroying the myth of evolution. Now he can use tools and control fire. We will soon be commenting on his art.
06:05 PM on 04/04/2012
While neanderthal was portrayed as brutish is early recreations of their bodys, some things are still very true.
The leg bones of neanderthal are short comparer to homo sapiens of their time period.
Where muscles attach to the bone, we see evidence of much more musculature on neanderthals.
They had an occipital bun that homo sapiens do not have.
06:07 PM on 04/04/2012
There is no myth of evolution.