iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

World Health Organization Aims To Fight Tobacco Smuggling With New Regulations

Reuters  |  Posted: 04/04/2012 10:31 am Updated: 04/05/2012 12:22 am


* WHO accord would set up track and tracing system for cigarettes

* Smuggling robs states of up to $50 bln in lost taxes annually

* Governments still have to adopt new treaty in November

By Stephanie Nebehay

GENEVA, April 4 (Reuters) - Health officials on Wednesday provisionally agreed a global deal to combat tobacco smuggling, a trade the World Health Organisation said makes harmful smoking too cheap and robs finance ministries of up to $50 billion a year.

The agreement will require manufacturers to be licensed and tobacco packaging to bear markings so that any goods seized on illegal markets can be traced back through the supply chain, including the companies that shipped them, to see where they were diverted.

Tobacco products sold in duty-free shops and over the Internet are covered by the accord, which obliges authorities to provide legal assistance to other countries investigating illicit but highly lucrative trade channels, WHO officials said.

Formally a protocol to the 2005 Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), the world's first public health pact, the new agreement was reached after nearly five years of negotiations, including a fifth and final round this past week.

"The primary objective of the protocol is to protect public health from this deadly trade," the U.S.-based advocacy group Corporate Accountability International said in a statement issued at the conclusion of the closed-door talks.

Tarik Jasarevic, WHO spokesman, told Reuters: "The text has been agreed by consensus."

Tobacco kills nearly 6 million people a year from cardiovascular disease, cancers, diabetes and other illnesses, according to the United Nations agency.

The text, hammered out by 800 officials from 135 countries, is likely to be adopted at a WHO meeting in Seoul this November. It then needs ratification by 40 countries to enter into force, a process expected to take two years.

"It will be mandatory, an international requirement for all cigarette packages, every single package will have that mandatory mark," Dr. Haik Nikogosian, who heads the tobacco treaty's secretariat at the WHO, told a news briefing last week.

Nikogosian said in total, government exchequers lost $40 billion to $50 billion a year to smuggling in lost duty and unpaid taxes.

"If you bring even half of that back to the governments by enforcing a strong protocol, imagine what the effect is for governments, particularly for the developing countries," he said.

Several countries in which major tobacco companies are based, including the United States and Switzerland, will not be subject to the smuggling clampdown as they never ratified the original treaty, although they do have their own measures.

"For nearly five years, Big Tobacco has fought tooth and nail throughout these negotiations in an effort to undermine progress, thwart public health policy and police itself with regards to illicit trade," said John Stewart of Corporate Accountability International.

"But the text of the final Protocol reflects delegates' resolve ... to stand together for public health and against Big Tobacco," he said.

Tobacco giants Philip Morris International and British American Tobacco have previously said they would back a protocol with effective measures against illicit trade.

FOLLOW BUSINESS

* WHO accord would set up track and tracing system for cigarettes * Smuggling robs states of up to $50 bln in lost taxes annually * Governments still have to adopt new ...
* WHO accord would set up track and tracing system for cigarettes * Smuggling robs states of up to $50 bln in lost taxes annually * Governments still have to adopt new ...
Filed by Reuters  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 102
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:23 PM on 04/08/2012
I support the re-election of President Obama but I am deeply disappointed that he has not kept his 2008 presidential campaign promise that he would submit the WHO FCTC tobacco treaty to the US Senate for ratification if he was elected President.

Dubya refused to submit the FCTC to the Senate because of his tobacco friends, but it is vital for the USA to be of this global movement.
02:36 PM on 04/05/2012
Why is the W.H.O. involved in this? How bizarre . . . or is it? . . .
photo
lensamy
Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
12:35 PM on 04/05/2012
Another reason why smoking is stupid! I rather keep my lungs and money. Thank you!
photo
Angrykitteh
You're on double secret probation....
08:07 AM on 04/05/2012
Oh my, my. Black market cigarettes! What is this world coming to???? (sarcasm)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:05 AM on 04/05/2012
LOL - This is NOT about health! Greedy governments are not getting enough - that's what this is about!!
08:04 AM on 04/05/2012
What I get a kick outa is when the politicians put in a new law about tobbacco, or a tax like in WIS. they say the tax will bring in 1 mill.in revenue.... So they spend 1.3mill and people stop smoking due the cost.. And they only bring in 654K..and the the budget short-fall process starts a new... Hypocrites every time without hesitation....
05:18 AM on 04/05/2012
here in ny they talk about the stores and how our children are exposed to the cigarette marketing. it stares them in the face when they walk into a store. well i ask how about all the ads for Alcohol still on the tv a place where this generation spends alot of time. How many teenage alcoholics are there? think about it. smoking kills over time, Alcohol and driving kills immediately! do we see an increased tax and ads on tv what alcohol does to a person over time? Nope. just something to think about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carlbfree
02:24 AM on 04/05/2012
Is it not funny how governments say smoking is so dangerous, and needs to be controlled, but yet they make 50 billion a year off of smoking they don't give a damn about the dangers they only care about the money. and the more laws they make on smoking the more money they can make,they are all hypocrites
05:19 AM on 04/05/2012
So, you want a total ban? Complete prohibition?
03:19 PM on 04/05/2012
Why does it always come down to one extreme or the other? However, as many are pointing this isn't about health, it's about money, the government isn't getting enough of their cut. The fundamental issue and problem lies is what should the governments role be in this and where does that cross individual rights?
Some say the purpose of government is to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty (current and future). It seems to me that promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty (current and future) are in conflict here. Prohibition violates liberty but government tacitly promoting tobacco use because they don't want to lose a revenue stream goes against the general welfare.
If an individual wants to grow and smoke their own tobacco that should not be restricted. Banning consumption creates a prohibition environment, and we all know how well those work. Why should the government tacitly encourage tobacco production by granting corporate legal/tax status to industrial producers of poison. Surely this violates promotion of general welfare.
barbra1971
Sherry Hunt my hero
02:07 AM on 04/05/2012
"Tobacco kills nearly 6 million people a year from cardiovascular disease, cancers, diabetes and other illnesses, according to the United Nations agency."

Why are people dying from this deceases and they never smoked in their life? Is it possible that there may be an other cause too?

Why are we fed garbage and nobody is half as excited?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stape45
No brag, just fact.
04:16 AM on 04/05/2012
Non-smokers breathe the air too. Sometines, the same air.
photo
Angrykitteh
You're on double secret probation....
08:00 AM on 04/05/2012
It isn't all second hand smoke. Pollutants in the air, etc. contribute as well. Its odd how many more people have asthma, and other respiratory illnesses, than ever before and so many of those people have rarely, or never, been exposed too second hand smoke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
artfish
Searching for true news
07:05 AM on 04/05/2012
Pollution from plastics, mercury from burning coal, junk in our food...go figure. The blame game is manipulated by politics and money.
08:20 AM on 04/05/2012
And insurance co's...
12:30 AM on 04/05/2012
Why not crack down in illegal labor? Oh, yeah, illegals drive down wages.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Shuck
Properly used, profanity is punctuation.
10:12 PM on 04/04/2012
Coming soon in your neighborhood, the war on cigarettes. What, you say it's already started? Just wait, they're not done, they're going to criminalize smoking ASAP...
photo
gomezrules
Why Don't We Do It In The Road?
09:57 PM on 04/04/2012
So govts the world over tax tobacco to encourage people to quit, then whine that they aren't getting enough tax dollars? Typical. They (the vaunted WHO) doesn't ever appear to be too concerned about, say, illicit drugs that take a huge toll on users.

I don't smoke, and I do not like being around those who do when they are doing so, but I APPLAUD those who are seeking tobacco from other sources than those that the govt taxes so intensely.
08:12 AM on 04/05/2012
I live in WIS. and a pack is 7.50.. So I bought then equipment and bulk tobacco and rolled my own for 1.65 a pack.. all was fine untill it was noticed what many were doing.. The gov raised the tax on bulk tobbacco.. Making my choice cost 3.75 a pack still cheap but when I visited OHIO I found bulk tobacco at 16.50 a lb.. now a realatve ships me 2 lb a month.. And my cost is back to 1.65.. no wis tax on me, I guess I am a smuggler but I pay my bill's not the politician's...
photo
Anybodyseenthepopos
אני כלום בלעדיהם
09:51 PM on 04/04/2012
DO they know the cigarettes can come out of the package?

The US loses 100BILLION Annually to offshore accounts. That is $$ that is supposed to be taxed, but has been removed from the democratic process.

You want $$? Check in with the Uber-Rich. They have plenty to spare.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
turnkey44
Support your local Animal Shelter
09:26 PM on 04/04/2012
That's funny, the insurance companies want you to stop smoking and the government wants you to continue, they both want your money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marinfan
09:15 PM on 04/04/2012
Counter economy. Make something illegal or tax it and a counter market is created. Also known as "the black market."