iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Coal Ash EPA Standards Pushed By U.S. Green Groups

Posted: 04/ 5/2012 2:33 pm Updated: 04/ 5/2012 4:28 pm


April 5 (Reuters) - A coalition of environmental groups filed a lawsuit on Thursday to force the Obama administration to finalize new rules regulating the containment and disposal of coal ash, a power plant byproduct activists say threatens public health.

Earthjustice, the Sierra Club, the Environmental Integrity Project, and several other groups want the Environmental Protection Agency to finalize coal ash standards the agency proposed after a massive and expensive 2008 spill.

"It is well past time the EPA acts on promises made years ago to protect the nation from coal ash contamination and life-threatening coal ash ponds," Earthjustice attorney Lisa Evans said in a statement. The groups filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

The EPA proposed regulating coal ash, or byproducts of coal combustion in power plants, in 2010, after a spill at a storage site at a Tennessee Valley Authority power plant.

The 2008 accident caused a flood of sludge for which cleanup was estimated to cost more than $1 billion.

Environmental groups way coal ash disposal can lead to groundwater contamination from improperly built storage ponds and landfills. The EPA has said contaminants such as mercury, arsenic and cadmium in coal ash could cause cancer if they get into the water supply.

Earthjustice last week released data obtained from the EPA that shows previously unknown instances of contaminated groundwater at 29 U.S. power plants. The report shows arsenic, lead and other pollutants in water near the coal-fired plants.

"When plants are monitoring they're generally, much more often than not, finding the contamination," Evans said. "Which then, of course, begs the question of, why aren't there federal protections to stop this contamination?"

The EPA did not respond to requests for comment.

The Obama administration is going into a tough election year fighting accusations that its regulations will stifle business in a struggling economy. Republicans in Congress have attacked the EPA in particular, accusing it of a war on coal-fired power plants due to new emissions rules.

The agency proposed two versions of the coal ash rules. One would be tougher on existing facilities; both versions would require liners and groundwater monitoring at new storage sites.

The final rules are expected sometime this summer, but Evans said the EPA needs to set a hard deadline to finish.

Lawmakers from both parties have criticized the proposed changes. Some say regulating coal ash would stifle industries that use recycled waste. In a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson in 2010, 35 senators argued the proposal would place unfair burdens on utilities and could cost jobs.

The U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill in October that would hand the responsibility for regulating coal ash disposal to the states. A bipartisan group of senators backed the bill, but it has not gained much attention since. (Reporting By Emily Stephenson; Editing by David Gregorio)

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW GREEN

Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:22 PM on 04/05/2012
Just as suspected, the republicians put profits and jobs ahead of public health and enviormental polution control. What good is a job or profits if the residents involved suffer the health and eviormental consequences. Oh, I forgot that the people getting the profits do not suffer these health and enviormental consequences and they pay these poor people wanting jobs very little in compensation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
11:56 AM on 04/06/2012
A gentleman of the same name was a famous nuclear engineering professor at North Carolina St. Any relation? Coal ash is more radioactive than nuclear effluent under normal operating conditions.
10:02 PM on 04/05/2012
I was wondering about the small reference in the article to recycled waste. I purchased wood fencing made from manufacturing ash. I assume this was coal ash, when I asked the supplier they said it was a waste product from coal power plants. This wood was 35 cents a foot, is maintenance free and great fencing for horses, as it breaks cleanly if a horse runs into it. It is extremely flexible, yet very strong. Unfortunately, the company went out of business, who knows why. The product was great and I am sorry I can't buy more. I try to buy recycled products whenever I can.
07:27 PM on 04/05/2012
Earthjustice, the Sierra Club, the Environmental Integrity Project are all toxic to this country they are as bad as the dumpers because there is no middle ground
05:08 PM on 04/06/2012
they are toxic cause there is no middle ground?
05:51 PM on 04/05/2012
Coal Ash rules not surprisingly unpopular among some government officals and businesses. However these new rules show a step in the direction of regulatory policy reform and realization rather than just expecting impossible.Applying these new rules to NEW plants and not those currently existing is a very smart and important move by the EPA both for regulatory practices and businesses (http://eng.am/wJ61AM). Such a method of building a symbiosis between regulation will really help us to begin to fix our problems and make some progress.