iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

North Korea Rocket Launch A Military Intelligence Opportunity For US, Allies

By ERIC TALMADGE 04/ 5/12 12:58 PM ET AP

North Korea Rocket Launch
This March 28, 2012 satellite file image provided by DigitalGlobe shows North Korea’s Tongchang-ri Launch Facility on the nation’s western coast. As the U.S. and its allies decry North Korea's planned rocket launch, they're also rushing to capitalize on the rare opportunity it presents to assess the secretive nation's ability to strike beyond its shores. (AP Photo/DigitalGlobe, File)

TOKYO — As the U.S. and its allies decry North Korea's planned rocket launch, they're also rushing to capitalize on the rare opportunity it presents to assess the secretive nation's ability to strike beyond its shores.

If North Korea goes ahead with the launch, expected between April 12-16, the United States, Japan and South Korea will have more military assets on hand than ever to track the rocket and – if necessary – shoot it out of the sky.

Behind the scenes, they will be analyzing everything from where the rocket's booster stages fall to the shape of its nose cone. The information they gather could deeply impact regional defense planning and future arms talks.

Military planners want to know how much progress North Korea has made since its last attempt to launch a satellite three years ago. Arms negotiators will be looking for signs of how much the rocket, a modified ballistic missile launcher, uses foreign technology.

"There are a number of things they will be watching for," said Narushige Michishita, a North Korea expert with Japan's National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies. "If North Korea does get a satellite into orbit, that means it could deliver an object anywhere on the globe, and that has intercontinental implications."

One thing analysts could quickly test is North Korea's insistence that the satellite launch is a peaceful mission. Experts can easily estimate from photographs the rocket stages' mass ratio – a measure of their efficiency – and that will give a quick indication of whether the rocket is designed primarily to be a space vehicle launcher or long-range missile.

They also will be watching where the rocket goes.

North Korea says it will fire the satellite into a polar orbit. The "splash zones" for the booster stages suggest it will travel south over the East China Sea and the Pacific, rather than the easterly path it chose for a launch in 2009 that sent the rocket directly over Japan's main island.

That could indicate North Korea is being more cautious about its neighbors' reactions – though it has alarmed others such as the Philippines which could be in the rocket's path. But the launch could also have military implications.

If North Korea were to attack the United States, Michishita said, it would likely launch to the north. It can't feasibly conduct such a test, because that would anger Russia and China, which would be under the flight path. Launching to the south can provide similar data.

Actually reaching the splash zones is another hurdle. In its 2009 launch, the stages barely made their zones, suggesting they had lower thrust than expected.

Analysts stress that success by no means suggests North Korea could pull off an attack on the U.S.

North Korea has a long way to go in testing the technologies required for re-entry – a key to missile delivery that is not tested in satellites. And while it is believed to be capable of producing nuclear weapons – and almost certainly wants to put them on a military-use missile – it is not yet able to make them small enough to load into a warhead. Doing so will likely require another nuclear test, which North Korea hasn't done since 2009.

The launcher itself is another issue – and it has a history of failure.

The Unha-3 rocket that will be used is believed to be a modified version of North Korea's long-range Taepodong-2 ballistic missile, which mixes domestic, Soviet-era and possibly Iranian designs.

North Korea launched its first Taepodong-2 in 2006 and it exploded just 40 seconds after liftoff. A follow-up attempt in 2009 got off the launch pad and successfully completed a tricky pitching maneuver, but analysts believe its third stage failed to separate, sending it and the satellite it carried into the Pacific.

Even so, physicists David Wright and Theodore Postol of the Union of Concerned Scientists say the 2009 launch displayed major strides over the Taepodong-1. If modified as a ballistic missile, they say, it would potentially give the North the capability to reach the continental United States with a payload of one ton.

In an analysis of the 2009 launch, Wright and Postol suggested North Korea relies heavily on a stockpile of foreign components, likely from Russia. If data from the upcoming launch confirm that, it may mean Pyongyang's missile program is severely limited by the isolated country's ability to procure new parts from abroad.

That could figure into future arms talks. If North Korea is running out of the parts it needs, it isn't likely to conduct frequent missile tests and may be more willing to agree to moratoriums. More emphasis on blocking its imports would also make sense if the North cannot manufacture what it needs.

What analysts find out will figure into regional security planning for years to come – as North Korea's first attempted satellite launch did in 1998.

Japan and the United States responded to that launch by pouring billions of dollars into the world's most advanced ballistic missile shield. That shield includes a network of sea-based SM-3 interceptor missiles and land-based PAC-3 Patriot missiles.

Japan is now mobilizing PAC-3 units in Okinawa, which is near the path of the upcoming launch and where more than half of the 50,000 U.S. troops in Japan are deployed. It's also mobilizing PAC-3 units in Tokyo, which is much farther from the rocket's expected path. South Korea is taking similar steps – which it didn't do in 2009.

The U.S. will be watching with equipment that was unavailable in 2009: a Sea-Based X-Band radar system, aboard a Navy ship that left Pearl Harbor late last month.

U.S. officials claim the SBX system is so powerful it can track a baseball-sized object flying through space 2,500 miles (4,000 kilometers) away. Further, if U.S. military satellites detect a flash of heat from a missile launch in North Korea, within a minute computers can plot a rough trajectory and share that information with Japan.

Tokyo and Seoul warn they will use their interceptors on anything that threatens their territory, though that is highly unlikely. No country has ever shot at another country's satellite launch, and, barring any major surprises, the North Korean rocket will be traveling mostly over water, not populated areas.

"Whether it comes close to our southwestern islands or not, this will have significant implications for our missile defenses, and how they should be adjusted in the future," said Hiroyasu Akutsu, a senior fellow and Korea expert with the National Institute for Defense Studies, a think tank run by Japan's Defense Ministry.

In Washington, Pentagon press secretary George Little also said the launch was being tracked closely out of concern for debris.

"Debris is a concern with any launch anywhere ...," he said Thursday. "Obviously, anything you put up in the air, if it comes down, you want to be able to assess where it goes and what the potential impact will be."

___

Associated Press writer Pauline Jelinek contributed to this report from Washington.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW WORLD

Filed by Ryan Craggs  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
For Realz
Silence is compliance.
06:30 AM on 04/06/2012
And the UN just sent North Korea many advanced computers for their "patent office" in pyongyang. WIPO via the UN via China.... Wonder what Kim Jong Un will use them for?
01:03 AM on 04/06/2012
Apparently they have the knowhow. We can't stop that. If it is used for non military use why shoot it down? Let it go up and learn from it. This is beginning to sound like attacking Iran. We consider these people nut cases and maybe some of them are, but in the past they agreed to stop their nuclear program if the US would sign a agreement not to attack them. This was negotiated under Clinton. All bets were off under the Bush administration. Why is it that we need to be a threat to the world. At least the world we do not agree with even if they have done us no harm. We are creating enemies.
photo
irrenmann
won't read your angry replies :D
04:42 AM on 04/06/2012
"Creating enemies?" Are you pretending there was no Korean conflict?
04:39 PM on 04/06/2012
No. There wasn't. Government sources always refered to it as a police action. Of course there was a war. I am not pretending anything. And yes, us and they are creating enemies. All for the benefit of the MIC. There is big bucks to be made with perpetual war, conflict, police actions and what ever other nomenclature you want to hang on it.
11:25 PM on 04/05/2012
I say learn what we can and if it threatens anyone then bring it down
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennishastings
Musician
08:39 PM on 04/05/2012
The mighty boot of imperialist United States power must come down on them, squishing them like a bug!! They are NOTHING. They must be shown the ultimate lesson! The mountains of North Korea will glow in the dark soon after our initial assault! The plains will resemble the moon and this land of neo-communistic tyranny will....

Mom? Is dinner ready?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tc399
Your personal Eschatologist.
07:27 PM on 04/05/2012
The SBX was pulled out of storage and left Pearl last week to watch this event. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea-based_X-band_Radar It would not be sent for something like this unless there was a plan to defeat the launch and recover the payload.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fpwillson
Fighter for justice and the truth
06:52 PM on 04/05/2012
Rather than "shoot it down," which would involve some ship-based missile which the North Koreans could track, wouldn't it make more sense to use one of our big lasers to destroy it without leaving a trail back to our ships?
Of course, they'd know who did it, but at least they couldn't prove it.
A perfect chance to try out one of our newest defense systems (in the real world).
photo
For Realz
Silence is compliance.
06:37 AM on 04/06/2012
"Of course, they'd know who did it, but at least they couldn't prove it." Mr. Obama is that you posting as fpwillson? It sure sounds like you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fpwillson
Fighter for justice and the truth
12:02 PM on 04/06/2012
However did you guess?
05:31 PM on 04/05/2012
If North Korea goes ahead with this launch then it should be all cards off the table. Stop trying to negotiate with these third world terrorists. They should be dealt with brute force as that is all they seem to understand.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
andretta15
04:05 PM on 04/05/2012
good opportunity for japan to test a anti missile, missile, or the u.s. to test a laser or some other type of missile defense !!
02:07 PM on 04/05/2012
The Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force and the U.S. Military should shoot this missile down if it enters the Japanese air space. The US, Japan, and South Korea needs to take a firm but effective hand with North Korea by stop shipments of food, heavy fuel oils, and other assistance for 10 years. If the North Korean Government needs food and heavy fuel oil for its army and people then let Russia, China, and Iran begin sending tons of aid. Then the world will see how long that will last?

Taming North Korea is easy by sending no food and fuel oil, cut of their international banking, and enforce embargo against military exports from bullets, missiles, and nuclear technology.

My question is why hasn't the West perform this action yet?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
joetherealist
The economy isn't broken; it's fixed
03:25 PM on 04/05/2012
Because they are of no strategic value to us (read: no oil), and they are NUTS. The US and Japan are quite certain that they would not hesitate to attack SK or Japan, and that would be a bloodbath. Mostly NK blood, to be sure, but nobody really has the stomach for it. So they will remain the petulant bratty children of the region.
01:11 PM on 04/05/2012
Who gave the leader the 3 stooges haircut?
02:09 PM on 04/05/2012
Three Stooges haircut is correct? Why, he make Larry look good!
12:39 PM on 04/05/2012
With the death of his father the new Kim will be anxious to prove himself to the hardliners he is capable of being ruthless and oppressive as the previous dictatators.
YourMindsEye
I know what you are thinking.
11:29 AM on 04/05/2012
Post it Huff Post!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leesmkt
11:28 AM on 04/05/2012
Just shoot the thing down period!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hugh Albert
Moderation in somethings
01:53 PM on 04/05/2012
Given the amount of military information this launch, successful or not, will provide to its enemies, why is it going ahead at all? I just don't understand the reasoning.
Surely the worst that can happen is no justification for the very small chance of some advantage accruing to this benighted regime?
06:11 PM on 04/05/2012
In fossilized oligarchies the momentum of the past becomes the real dictator. They do the nuttty because they planned to do it. One tiny bit of flexibility would be felt like an earthquake.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hugh Albert
Moderation in somethings
08:34 AM on 04/06/2012
They must be truly nutty, as you say. Mind you, any regime that starves its people for generations is hardly going to win awards for forward planning.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]