iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

More Than 100 Million Unnecessary Tax Returns Filed Each Year

First Posted: 04/ 6/2012 10:59 am Updated: 04/ 6/2012 2:35 pm

Taxes



By David Cay Johnston

April 6 (Reuters) - On March 28, the U.S. Justice Department sought to close a nationwide chain of income tax preparation shops it accuses of fraud. The action underscores the potential for abusive business practices that taxpayers face because Congress has failed to embrace technology that would eliminate most tax returns.

The Justice Department wants a federal judge to shut down Instant Tax Service, whose sole owner is Fesum Ogbazion of Dayton, Ohio, saying he is responsible for "extensive and pervasive tax fraud." It also sued four of his 276 franchisees. The company has not responded to the lawsuit.

Congress could easily eliminate fraud by abusive tax preparers, as is alleged in the Ogbazion case, and save taxpayers billions of dollars annually, by simply ending mandatory filing of tax returns for most taxpayers.

About 100 million taxpayers -- those whose income is entirely from wages and retirement funds, and who do not itemize deductions -- should not have to file returns. The government already has the information it needs to calculate the taxes these people owe, once they supply their marital status and number of dependents. It would not take much to automate their income tax payments, as many other modern countries do.

I put the chances of Congress taking such a sensible course at one in 84,000. That's about the same as the odds of being indicted for a tax crime in 2011, based on an analysis of official data by Syracuse University's Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse ().

Congress will not act because individual income tax returns, which for most people are make-work that creates a drag on the economy, provide tidy revenues for Intuit, the maker of TurboTax software, H&R Block and other legitimate corporations that profit from preparing tax returns. These companies have considerable resources at their disposal to spend on lobbying politicians to keep the tax filing requirement. One sign of their determination: Intuit in 2006 donated $1 million in support of an unsuccessful candidate for California state controller who opposed optional state-prepared returns in California. Intuit has said there are serious problems with the program, which remains in operation, but in my view none of Intuit's criticisms stands up to scrutiny.


A SIMPLER TAX CODE

Intuit, H&R Block and other tax firms say that they help people pay the least tax and avoid costly mistakes. But these concerns would be easily addressed by simplifying the tax code. In my view, any business that depends on government-induced inefficiency should be swept into the dustbin of history.

Another reason reform is unlikely is that politicians have learned from Republican pollster Frank Luntz over the years that riling up voters against the Internal Revenue Service attracts votes and campaign donations. Actually fixing the problem by ending tax filing for the vast majority would require politicians to come up with other ways to get donors to open their checkbooks. Republican politicians who follow Luntz's advice seem not to realize they are attacking law enforcement, a strategy that would offend many of their donors if applied to the FBI or street cops.

Short of ending tax filing for most Americans, Congress could license tax preparers -- instead of only requiring that they identify themselves with a unique number. We don't trust amateurs to inspect elevators or audit charities, so why do we let just anyone charge for preparing tax returns? This is especially true given that U.S. Taxpayer Advocate Nina E. Olson has thoroughly documented false and fraudulent reporting by tax preparers who are exempt from IRS professional conduct rules because they are not accountants, enrolled agents or lawyers ().

The case of Instant Tax Service appears to be particularly egregious. The Justice Department alleges that the company charges its customers, who are mostly poor and unsophisticated, as much as $1,000 for 15 minutes of tax preparation. It "encourages its franchisees to lie to the IRS about anything," the department said in court papers.

The government's complaint quoted Ogbazion, the company's owner, as saying that "every tax return being done is pretty much fraudulent" at a franchise in Los Angeles. Ogbazion did not revoke the franchise, but did sue it for royalties, the department said. According to the Justice Department, Ogbazion said he did not pay attention to customer complaints because, if he did, he "wouldn't be able to sleep at night."

Ogbazion's business and personal phones are disconnected. At the one listed number that was answered a woman said he was no longer reachable there. Ogbazion also did not respond to messages to his work and home email addresses.


100 MILLION UNNECESSARY RETURNS

The Justice Department brings a high-profile tax case pretty much every year as the mid-April tax deadline approaches. But this misses the much bigger picture: More than 100 million unnecessary tax returns are filed each year, costing billions of dollars in software or preparation.

Meanwhile, the way Congress has written tax laws, and the way courts interpret them, makes it hard to pursue tax cheats. The average time for each criminal tax prosecution the Justice Department completed last year was 740 days, more than double the 345 days in 1992. Last year, the Justice Department completed only 3,656 criminal cases in which tax was the main charge, the analysis by Syracuse University's Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse shows. No wonder the odds of a criminal tax indictment, while still minute, were 75 percent higher two decades ago.

The Justice Department relies on a law enforcement theory known as general deterrence. The strategy is to bring widely publicized cases to keep people in line. But the IRS criminal division website lists just 79 criminal cases in 2011. Figuring the others requires perusing 90 websites run by local U.S. Attorneys. Many convictions get little or no news coverage, which means zero general deterrence.

Canada, with a ninth of the U.S. population, listed all 204 tax convictions last year at the Canada Revenue Agency's website (). Claude St-Pierre, Canada's director general for tax enforcement and disclosures, told me that posting all convictions is both a deterrence strategy and an effort to educate Canadians so they do not get lured into tax scams.

Congress should fund more prosecutions, many more, so the Justice Department does not have to reject 40 to 50 percent of criminal referrals by the IRS. Following Ottawa's lead, the IRS should prominently post every criminal conviction and every request for a civil injunction (a much less expensive law enforcement strategy than prosecution) at its website ().

The real solution, though, is to get rid of the archaic, frustrating make-work for 100 million taxpayers whose only benefit is profits for tax preparation firms.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

By David Cay Johnston April 6 (Reuters) - On March 28, the U.S. Justice Department sought to close a nationwide chain of income tax preparation shops it accuses of fra...
By David Cay Johnston April 6 (Reuters) - On March 28, the U.S. Justice Department sought to close a nationwide chain of income tax preparation shops it accuses of fra...
Filed by Reuters  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:24 PM on 05/01/2012
The author may be correct about one hundred million people having income only from w-2 jobs, however what is being forgotten is income is only part of the tax equation... you also have deductions and credits. Every one with high medical expenses, high sales tax paid, job expenses, moving expenses, education expenses, energy credits, new home buyer incentives... all of these people would have to still file, bringing the number of "unnecessary" returns down significantly.

You also can deduct ira contributions. How would the government know about these?

There is certainly a lot of room for reform, but I'm not ready to follow this author's plan.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snewell
10:29 AM on 04/09/2012
OUR TAX CODE AND SYSTEM IS SET UP BY THE RICH FOR THE RICH TO HELP THE RICH, ALL THE CONFUSIION IS INTENTIONAL, SO THE MIDDLE CLASS CANNOT SEE HOW THEY PAY FOR EVERYTHING, SO THE RICH CAN PAY NOTHING
11:06 AM on 04/08/2012
There is a simple way to do away with the filing of tax returns for most Americans. Base the tax owed to the government on the paycheck, not the yearly income. Everyone making $500.00 per paycheck would pay the same tax on that $500.00. The same with every other paycheck. Coupled with this would be the backloading of deductions; which means that at the end of every year each person would send in a postcard sized form declaring how many dependents they have. The government would send them back a check; with the same amount given to everyone per dependent. Other deductions would be handled in the same manner. Progressive taxation would be maintained, with a higher percentage of income withheld from larger paychecks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gonzo333
11:06 AM on 04/08/2012
The system is set up yto benifit the rich. The rest of us get screwed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
authorized-user
macho macho man
09:51 AM on 04/08/2012
T-Party will declare all filing is unnecessary.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
phatdaddy51
heros;jefferson, paine and beth warren
09:44 AM on 04/08/2012
the country has never paid as much attention to our do nothing congress as it has in the last couple of years.
if we're gonna wait for 'em to do anything with tax codes or procedures ......yuh better bring a book,yuh could be waiting awhile

politicians and their dependents,the banks, like all things that might be questioned, to be as absolutely confusing as possible.

'cause politicians take pride in their ability to baffle yuh with bullshat.
barrada nicto
Optimism is necessary.
07:39 AM on 04/08/2012
There is something basically wrong with a system that requires citizens to spend many hours of their own time computing the amount of taxes they must pay.

It's just wrong. The huge potential for error and cheating makes it that much worse.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:12 PM on 04/07/2012
Sounds so simple for people who don't itemize and if they have a year where they could itemize, they could file ammended returns.

Conclusion: Something this rational will never pass.
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
08:03 PM on 04/07/2012
The feds could also eliminate tax preparation fraud by simplification of the tax laws. But that won't happen because the bureaucrats like it to be confusing and complex.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
firewired
Compared to what?
05:52 PM on 04/07/2012
Confusing! Every election time that I can remember, people wanted adjustments to the tax codes. Politicians promised it. Tons of exceptions were codified in the process over the years. Is ANYONE any better-off because of it all?

Once upon a time years ago, I worked as a temp. at a regional "forms distribution center" for the IRS. You CANNOT IMAGINE, IN YOUR WORST DREAMS, how many different kinds of forms exist for every little thing! That warehouse is the size of a fairgrounds, and pallets of forms are stacked to the ceilings!

Surely, with all the brilliant minds we have today, someone can come up with a better means of taxation! There MUST be a better way, and one that would induce some fairness or equality when applied.

Total overhaul and reform (if not downright elimination of) our nonsensical taxation system is enough for me to vote for someone who actually DOES SOMETHING to change it. If only we all could agree on what to do.......

I guess it will never happen.
mavpay
I am WE THE PEOPLE
01:50 PM on 04/07/2012
Thank You, David Cay Johnston! You continue to be a reliable source who provides valuable information about these issues.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oftenon
cartoons are the best explanation
01:10 PM on 04/07/2012
A hundred million unnecessary returns -?? Profit again trumps reform.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:56 PM on 04/06/2012
Isn't it common knowledge that the IRS, in its abundance of laws and guidelines, falters at doing their own interpretation of the tax codes.
07:59 PM on 04/06/2012
Not only is this a poorly thought out article...but not well researched at all. The writter I.RS should licence preparers, not just require a pin number...they announced their plans to do so three years ago and it will go into effect next year.
Also..the majority of state returns start where the federal stops...so the preparers would still have to compute the federal return to do an correct state return. The line that all the information is already in the hands of the IRS is dead wrong...any one that pays property tax, medical bills, or makes charitable contributions knows better.

I wish places like HP would think before posting nonsense articles such as this...at least make sure the reporter knows what they are talking about.
11:10 PM on 04/06/2012
@ Cold, your post is riddled with errors while none are in my Reuters column, which HP, a client, posted.

You confuse itemizers with the 2/3rds who file simple returns. The California system works well and serves a a model for my plan.

And as for my bona fides, you should take a moment to look up my track record on this subject, including what I teach, what I have published and what honors others have bestowed on me and my reporting on taxes,
03:05 AM on 04/07/2012
The fact is that the IRS has already started their licencing procedure...which will add another rung in the ladder of enrolled agents and CPA's. You seemed to have missed this...as well as the fact that a preparers pin is used so that they no longer have to put their SS on everyones tax return.

I am well aware of the difference between itemizers and those that do not and can say I have never seen a day care center report their charges to the IRS or the local appliance store report that new furnance or installation that may qualify for an energy credit. Two things that people miss all the time.

There are solutions to the massive paper work that is done every year, but leaving the filing of the return up to the IRS is not one that I think should ever be encouraged and whereas it may feed into the CA return (however I am doubtful since CA is a more complicated state then many) it will not work for most, nor would it work for recipical states or the hundreds of different rules that would be involved.

Sorry, but after 40 years in the field I know full well what is reported to the IRS and it is not enough to file a return and I would question the privacy laws if it were.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kate McCloud
There will be disappointment, but never shame
05:01 AM on 04/07/2012
DCJ?
Pardon my ignorance, but doesn't Cold have a point when it comes to filing state returns? They can't be completed unless one completes federal return first, yes?
06:28 PM on 04/06/2012
Anyone who graduated high school should be able to do their own taxes, unless their tax situation is complicated (i.e., they have a lot of investments or are self-employed), in which case they should already have an accountant. Even if the government eliminated the need to file, I'd file anyway to make sure my taxes were being figured correctly. I don't trust anyone but me to do my taxes correctly.
11:14 PM on 04/06/2012
@JimD1, do you trust stores to calculate your sales tax? Your motor fuels tax?
If you file a simple return and take only the standard deduction then there is no issue about how much you owe. The only facts the IRS would need would be your marital state and dependents.

My column was not about itemizers and defined just who my proposal applies to.

While you think most high school graduates "should be able" calculate their own tax liability, the many billions spent on tax preparation for people with simple returns suggests this is not so.