iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Yellowstone River Spill Response Plan Eyed By Exxon, Agencies

Posted: 04/ 6/2012 11:32 am

BILLINGS, Mont. (AP) — Exxon Mobil Corp. is working with government agencies on a plan to speed up the response to oil spills along Montana's upper Yellowstone River, after a major spill last year left local officials scrambling to deal with an ill-defined threat, state and federal officials said.

The goal is to provide enough training and resources to take action on major pipeline, refinery or railway spills within 24 hours, or before outside help can arrive.

Exxon would pay to plan and possibly equip the stepped-up response under a settlement with the state over pollution violations from its July pipeline break near Laurel.

The effort is in the early stages and the company has not yet submitted a formal proposal. State approval is needed for the work to count toward Exxon's remaining $1.3 million obligation under the settlement.

The company's 12-inch Silvertip pipeline broke beneath the Yellowstone one weekend last July, releasing an estimated 63,000 gallons of oil. Less than 1 percent of the oil that spilled was recovered during a cleanup that cost an estimated $135 million after pipeline repairs were factored in.

Officials fear some oil leftover from Silvertip could re-emerge during high waters this spring. Samples of possible oil sheen found on the river this week near Laurel are being tested, and results are due this month from the Montana Department of Environmental Quality.

DEQ scientist Laura Alvey said Exxon will be responsible for cleaning up any more oil discovered from last year's spill.

The company is currently monitoring about 45 sites along the river where oil was left in place because officials determined removal would be more damaging, Alvey said.

The plan for future spills would cover seven counties in south-central and southeast Montana — Yellowstone, Carbon, Stillwater, Sweetgrass, Park, Gallatin and Big Horn. Most of the region's oil and gas facilities, including three refineries, are concentrated in two counties — Yellowstone and Carbon counties.

Steve Merritt with the Environmental Protection Agency said the hope is to have any needed training done and equipment in place by the end of the year to handle a significant spill.

Yellowstone County's director of disaster and emergency services, Duane Winslow, said that in the future, rural volunteer firefighters could be trained in spill response "so it's not just Exxon's 25-person strike force or whatever they had that Saturday morning."

Exxon eventually brought in hundreds of cleanup contractors but that took time because many came from the Gulf Coast, where spills are more frequent.

An Exxon spokesperson said it was premature to comment since it has not submitted its proposal. But an Exxon emergency response advisor, John Dunn, said this week that the company wants to make the effort "as productive as possible."

Pipelines, railways and oil industry trucking routes cross the entire region — a mix of developed and pristine areas that includes the Yellowstone River's world famous trout fishery and Montana's largest city, Billings.

The spill marred about 70 miles of riverbank and damaged scores of farms, residences and other riverfront properties. No major drinking water sources were contaminated.

Because the river was flooding at dangerous levels during the spill, Merritt said there was little that local emergency responders could have done to stop the oil from moving downstream even with a better response plan in place.

But he said better communications among government agencies and the company could have made downstream residents and communities more prepared.

Downstream counties east of Yellowstone were slow to be notified of the spill, delaying the shut-down of some water intakes.

There were also complaints that a late-night evacuation order that followed the spill did not cover people living beyond the immediate vicinity of the pipeline break.

Merritt said having sufficient equipment and training in place to handle the next spill becomes all the more important as an energy boom sweeps into eastern Montana from the Bakken oil fields North Dakota. More drilling is increasing the amount of crude being piped, railed and trucked in the Yellowstone watershed.

"We recognize the emerging oil transportation that's going to happening because of the Bakken," Merritt said. "We want to make sure all those operators that are here and all those refineries that have been there for a long time are engaged in this process."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW GREEN

Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
03:50 PM on 04/09/2012
those white thing,s in the creek are called diapers

they soak the oil up

best if they do not have to be used it the first place though
photo
Artemesian
Spiritual Messenger of the Earth
06:57 PM on 04/08/2012
Now it's not a matter of if, but when. :(
12:45 AM on 04/08/2012
I can't understand why Canadian oil sands have to be piped across several states to Texas refineries. Is the cost of building refineries near the Canadian border so great that the environmental risks of the Keystone Pipeline are worth it? Will someone please enlighten me?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tjconkster
Occupy the Voting Booth 2014
08:30 PM on 04/08/2012
Tankers...easy access to the tankers that will take the crude and products derived from the crude to the World Market...

Canada will send oil to Asia even if Keystone XL pipeline proceeds, Harper says
http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/1155608--canada-will-send-oil-to-asia-even-if-keystone-xl-pipeline-proceeds-harper-says

Is Canadian Oil Bound for China Via Pipeline to Texas?
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/energy/2011/08/110819-keystone-xl-canadian-oil-and-chinese-market/

How much would Keystone pipeline help US consumers?
Canadian firms behind it say it will supply Gulf Coast export markets
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46689167/ns/us_news-christian_science_monitor/t/how-much-would-keystone-pipeline-help-us-consumers/#.T4Iv0NmQOF8
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:29 PM on 04/07/2012
Obsessing on the last few drops of oil in the world will only make things worse. Much worse.

It's time to switch to rooftop pv solar, offshore wind, efficiency, plug in commuter hybrids and waste bio char biofuels. This combination of green fuels has been cheaper for a few years now, is doubling every year, and is not growing worldwide while fossil and nukes are shrinking in total output.
06:20 PM on 04/07/2012
This happend like a year ago. And people are just now starting to care?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
04:10 PM on 04/07/2012
Machine automation could have made most all the parts needed to make solar and the LiFePO4 battery. Robotics also could have made small motors and mirrors really cheap needed to concentrate the sun into molten salt energy storage.
However...
The renewable energy future was buried by politics as usual, far in the past.
02:56 PM on 04/07/2012
And, I am guessing, Montana just can't wait for the Tar Sands oil that will be coming down through the Keystone XL pipeline that President Obama will approve within a year of his second term. This diluted Bitumen will really curl the fish and fry the grasses.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
12:31 PM on 04/07/2012
Cleanups are just public relations. It would be better to just let the microbes eat the oil. Oil is dead plants and animals after all. Cleanup operations only double or triple the amount of hazardous waste. Or worse. Remember the beaches in Alaska? Cleanup included steam cleaning these beaches. Billions of of plants, animals and microbes were destroyed. The beaches became sterile. No wonder there is still oil on those beaches. Humans can only make a bad thing worse. Oil and gas has been "escaping" onto the surface of the Earth for millions of years. We egotistical humans think we can stop or improve the process.
02:53 PM on 04/07/2012
And the toxic chemicals added to oil to produce better flow through the pipelines? Oh, ya, you kind a didn't remember them?
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
06:07 AM on 04/07/2012
My solar panels have never spilled a single drop of oil into the environment.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:22 AM on 04/07/2012
Nationalize our reserves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
12:37 PM on 04/07/2012
We already did in 1977. We The People make over a trillion dollars a year in the petroleum business each and every year. We let politicians handle the money matters. And the environmental matters. Politicians and oil companies and pipeline companies work for us. We pay them to supply us with the poisons we spread all over this nation. We The People spill millions of gallons of oil, gasoline, diesel and antifreeze each year on roads made out of the same stuff as they propose to pump through the Keystone Pipeline. We The People are lucky. Rain washes this sludge into the environment so that our roads don't become too slippery to drive on. Still be careful in a light rain. This sludge floats on top of the roads. Motorcyclists always must be careful to avoid this sludge. I notice in parts of the country where there is little rain, they spray water on the roads followed by a sweeper.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brutusmojo
live w/motherearthnot juston her
05:42 PM on 04/06/2012
those pipes should be triple layered.an ounce of prevention!" disgusting greed.
photo
Artemesian
Spiritual Messenger of the Earth
09:01 PM on 04/08/2012
And the tankers should be double-hulled! :)
photo
Cory111
Life is truly good...
05:41 PM on 04/06/2012
Right now, today we have more oil in storage then we can use. There is no need for further drilling and the pipeline from Canada is a scam to ship oil out of our country.

Obama 2012
09:58 PM on 04/06/2012
Finally something to export.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
10:26 AM on 04/07/2012
Indeed, our big corporations have done a great job of giving away all our jobs, and are working to get rid of all OUR natural resources, and industries, like general aviation. Ultimately do nothing but cost us money to clean up their poisonous mess they leave behind.
03:51 PM on 04/06/2012
Oil companies do not develop a plan for clean up until after a disaster strikes.

Did BP have a plan to deal with the spill in the Gulf? Did not look it. Was not effective.

Preventing the spill in the first place with proper safety and environmental practices would be better.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
10:28 AM on 04/07/2012
They were "supposed" to have a plan, but no one bothered, at our lovely interior/noaa departments to make sure there was/is such plans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
12:45 PM on 04/07/2012
We owned the oil in the GOM. It was our responsibility to develop plans.
We let MMS do it. BP followed those plans.
One good thing, the polar bears weren't harmed.
MMS must have written a good plan.
What happened to MMS?
Congress made it disappear before the inquest.
It was obvious that Congress didn't know it's annulus from a hole in the ground
during the inquest. These are the people we voted into office to steward our oil.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tangelan
You will not cast aspersions on my asparagus.
03:51 PM on 04/06/2012
Isn't the Yellowstone area just a big volcano? Is drilling for oil in that area the best idea?
photo
plans includingdog
what a nice day.
05:48 PM on 04/06/2012
It will not drill deep enough to reach the magma supply.And for me Toba is a more destructive super volcano.
09:59 PM on 04/06/2012
Same type.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
12:47 PM on 04/07/2012
The article is about a pipeline near the Yellowstone River. It has nothing to do with drilling or the Yellowstone National Park.