iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

March Weather Records In United States Surprise Scientists

Posted: 04/ 9/2012 3:03 am Updated: 04/ 9/2012 12:08 pm

WASHINGTON (AP) — It's been so warm in the United States this year, especially in March, that national records weren't just broken, they were deep-fried.

Temperatures in the lower 48 states were 8.6 degrees above normal for March and 6 degrees higher than average for the first three months of the year, according to calculations by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. That far exceeds the old records.

The magnitude of how unusual the year has been in the U.S. has alarmed some meteorologists who have warned about global warming. One climate scientist said it's the weather equivalent of a baseball player on steroids, with old records obliterated.

"Everybody has this uneasy feeling. This is weird. This is not good," said Jerry Meehl, a climate scientist who specializes in extreme weather at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. "It's a guilty pleasure. You're out enjoying this nice March weather, but you know it's not a good thing."

It's not just March.

"It's been ongoing for several months," said Jake Crouch, a climate scientist at NOAA's National Climatic Data Center in Ashville, N.C.

Meteorologists say an unusual confluence of several weather patterns, including La Nina, was the direct cause of the warm start to 2012. While individual events can't be blamed on global warming, Couch said this is like the extremes that are supposed to get more frequent because of manmade climate change from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and oil.

It's important to note that this unusual winter heat is mostly a North America phenomenon. Much of the rest of the Northern Hemisphere has been cold, said NOAA meteorologist Martin Hoerling.

The first quarter of 2012 broke the January-March record by 1.4 degrees. Usually records are broken by just one- or two-tenths of a degree. U.S. temperature records date to 1895.

The atypical heat goes back even further. The U.S. winter of 2010-2011 was slightly cooler than normal and one of the snowiest in recent years, but after that things started heating up. The summer of 2011 was the second warmest summer on record.

The winter that just ended, which in some places was called the year without winter, was the fourth warmest on record. Since last April, it's been the hottest 12-month stretch on record, Crouch said.

But the month where the warmth turned especially weird was March.

Normally, March averages 42.5 degrees across the country. This year, the average was 51.1, which is closer to the average for April. Only one other time — in January 2006 — was the country as a whole that much hotter than normal for an entire month.

The "icebox of America," International Falls, Minn., saw temperatures in the 70s for five days in March, and there were only three days of below zero temperatures all month.

In March, at least 7,775 weather stations across the nation broke daily high temperature records and another 7,517 broke records for night-time heat. Combined, that's more high temperature records broken in one month than ever before, Crouch said.

"When you look at what's happened in March this year, it's beyond unbelievable," said University of Victoria climate scientist Andrew Weaver.

NOAA climate scientist Gabriel Vecchi compared the increase in weather extremes to baseball players on steroids: You can't say an individual homer is because of steroids, but they are hit more often and the long-held records for home runs fall.

They seem to be falling far more often because of global warming, said NASA top climate scientist James Hansen. In a paper he submitted to the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and posted on a physics research archive, Hansen shows that heat extremes aren't just increasing but happening far more often than scientists thought.

What used to be a 1-in-400 hot temperature record is now a 1 in 10 occurrence, essentially 40 times more likely, said Hansen. The warmth in March is an ideal illustration of this, said Hansen, who also has become an activist in fighting fossil fuels.

Weaver, who reviewed the Hansen paper, called it "one of the most stunning examples of evidence of global warming."

___

Online:

National Climatic Data Center: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov

James Hansen's study on climate extremes: http://bit.ly/HQzxeq

___

Seth Borenstein be followed at http://twitter.com/borenbears

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW GREEN

Filed by Jessica Leader  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 505
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
06:51 PM on 04/30/2012
If God created all things, then God created birth control. I wonder what the planet would like right about now if women had used birth control worldwide when the stuff first became available and had two or three children apiece at most. Every step of the way the Catholic Church with its homophobia or opposition to birth control stands in the way of progress, not to mention castrating homosexual boys and covering up rampant child abuse.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:10 PM on 04/29/2012
We are all in for a big surprise when it finally hits us that Global warming is ... lets say .... NOT REAL. I hope people wake up
09:22 PM on 04/29/2012
you must be the person who also thinks radiation is not real either because it's invisible. grow up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
08:14 PM on 05/01/2012
Whatever are you blathering about?
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
01:19 PM on 04/28/2012
One of our helpful friendos below has sent us a link to a web page from creationist Forrest Mims III, weighing in on climatology. Aside from the fact that creationists have an unfortunate tendency to show only science which they feel can justify Biblical inerrancy, the web page has statements like this in it..." If the record highs of 2011 are omitted, Texas cooled 0.055 degree from 1895 to 2010." He then shows a chart of Texas temperatures from 1896 to the present day. The chart starts with oscillations between 63.5 to 66 degrees in the 1896-1900 time frame, and ends with oscillations between about 64.5 to 67.5 in the current years. Please Forrest. Wake up.

Look. We are tired or your pseudo science, religious science, tidbit science, and anecdote science, none of which are real science. Texas is warming, like it or not. Texas warming doesn't prove global warming as that state is a small fraction of a percent of the earth's surface area.

Record temperatures this March in the US don't prove global warming but they are not inconsistent with it. And the records have been so high in some places as to have surprised a lot of weathermen. Climatologists, not so much.
12:29 PM on 04/27/2012
And this just in from an IPCC reviewer - weather is not climate!
http://www.mysanantonio.com/life/article/Research-shows-Texas-is-not-warming-3498409.php#ixzz1se48xusC
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
08:18 PM on 05/01/2012
Which is really, really funny, because over on this other thread, you're positively unable to make that distinction:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/sunsetter/antarctic-ice-sheet-collapse_n_1421504_151557675.html
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
10:16 AM on 04/22/2012
Let’s see, what are the denialists bringing to the table today? It looks like the fossil fuel think tanks have sent us their specialists from LaLa land to blow smoke and display their mirrors again.

*Mention of Al Gore…. Yep… saw that coming…scientific proof that animosity towards Al Gore still exists…

*A link to the financial post, that august body of petroleum priests and priestesses… scientific proof that a denialist can bring the opinion of vested interests into an argument on science.

*A link to an article about libertarian firemen in Tennessee letting a house burn to the ground for failure to pay a $75 dollar fee?? Grandpa, have you stopped taking your meds again??

*Once again, the inability or unwillingness to distinguish between the area of floating ice, the thickness of said ice, and the measured loss of ice on land.

According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, all 11 years in the 21st century so far, including 2011, rank among the 13 warmest in the 132-year temperature record. According to the GRACE satellites, Himalayan glaciers are still shrinking, and Antarctic and Greenland glaciers are melting faster.

Global warming is real, it's here, and it is a serious issue. If you can't deal with it, please take your caterwauling somewhere where it will be appreciated. Thanks.

And have a very, very pleasant day.
04:23 PM on 04/26/2012
World's crashing down, eh? The smart ones jumping ship, you should disengage too.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
08:52 PM on 04/21/2012
~BREAKING NEWS:

algore just gave up his jet-setting ways..

sold all his mansions..

and has moved into a very small apartment in nyc with jim hansen!
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
09:43 AM on 04/23/2012
Gore's policy recommendations have had a free-market orientation and he's argued that we can continue to live well if we take responsibility for our greenhouse pollution. Once again fumes, you speak from a position of ignorance.
04:28 PM on 04/26/2012
Cap and trade is a scam to price co2 emissions at the highest rate that emitters will NOT change practices, thereby purchasing "carbon offsets." It's a scam, invented by Enron, which compelled Gore, etc. to force into the Kyoto Protocols in 1998. It's a finance capital parasitisation of an environmental concern.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
08:19 PM on 05/01/2012
Hmm.

More of the same.

In other words,

You've got nothing.

Go smoke a fattie!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:35 AM on 04/21/2012
Aristotle’s climate

...Some climate extremists say there is a “consensus of evidence.” However, evidence cannot hold or express an opinion. There has been no global warming for a decade and a half; sea level has been rising for eight years at a rate equivalent to just three centimetres per century; hurricane activity is at its lowest in the 30-year satellite record; global sea-ice extent has hardly changed in that time; Himalayan glaciers have not lost ice overall; ocean heat content is rising four and a half times more slowly than predicted; and the 50 million “climate refugees” that the UN had said would be displaced by 2010 simply do not exist. To date, the “consensus of evidence” does not support catastrophism.
“Ah,” say the believers, “but there is a consensus of scientists and learned societies.” That is the argumentum ad verecundiam, the reputation or appeal-to-authority fallacy. Merely because a group has a reputation, it may not deserve it; even if it deserves it, it may not be acting in accordance with it; and, even if it is, it may be wrong.

http://opinion.financialpost.com/2012/04/20/aristotles-climate/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
08:55 PM on 04/21/2012
Orkneygal..

you've been missed around here!

ok..

maybe by just me LOL
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:37 AM on 04/22/2012
Are the Rommulans still foaming at the mouth around here or have they gone into full retreat like their fearless leader?
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
03:04 PM on 04/25/2012
Prominent Global Warming "Skeptic" Hides The Incline
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Orkneygal,

Isn't prominent global warming "skeptic" Dr. Robert M "Bob" Carter committing de facto global warming fraud by misrepresenting increasing global temperature trend lines as flat?*

Isn't that like a climate science scam, a global warming hoax, a blatant and indefensible lie?

If you disagree please provide a scientifically-valid explanation for Bob Carter's gross misrepresentation of scientific data.

Bob Carter is a leader of and/or major contributo­r to several of the most prominent organizati­ons that are "skeptical­­" of man-made global warming, including:

* The Heartland Institute
* The Science & Public Policy Institute (SPPI)
* The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF)
* The Science & Environmen­tal Policy Project (SEPP)
* The Nongovernm­ental Internatio­nal Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC)
* The Internatio­nal Climate Science Coalition (ICSC)

Also:

You Orkneygal have indicated that you live in New Zealand - what relationship do you have with Bob Carter's global warming "skeptic" organization the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition (NZCSC)?

Please finally answer these questions instead of continuing to run away from them - thank you.

------------------
* http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2011/07/bob_carters_trend_lines.php
04:33 AM on 04/22/2012
Your post borders on being spam. You didn't even write it. It's written by Chris Walters, otherwise known as Monckton. That's sad when you have to attempt to pass off Walters as some sort of expert on anything. Walters claims have been so thoroughly debunked by real experts that he should be addressed by his more appropriate title, Lord Swiss Cheese. No need to thank me for pointing this out to you. It's a service I provide.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
03:01 PM on 04/25/2012
Orkneygal's again parroting without credit Christopher "Fake Member of the House of Lords"* Monckton... thanks again for the laugh, Orkney.

-------------------------------------------
* Letter from the Clerk of the Parliaments to Christopher Monckton (July 2011):

"I must repeat my predecessor's statement that you are not and have never been a Member of the House of Lords."

http://www.parliament.uk/business/news/2011/july/letter-to-viscount-monckton/
01:46 PM on 04/20/2012
Looks like Steve Zwick is off the deep end. Scary what happens when people don't beleive in the political science of all of this.
http://www.infowars.com/climate-alarmist-calls-for-burning-down-skeptics-homes/
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
09:59 AM on 04/23/2012
I have no idea who Steve Zwick is, and certainly have no responsibility for what he says, but it appears that his point is to let the deniers suffer the consequences of the their poor choices. The burning houses is merely a metaphor.
10:10 PM on 05/01/2012
You've completely misinterpreted Zwick's point. Read DocSkull's commentary, then find Zwick's essay and read it in the original, rather than reading someone else's take on it.
01:45 PM on 04/20/2012
What a bunch of BS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
08:24 PM on 05/01/2012
Compelling argument. Built any rockets lately? Or are you a one trick 'O' ring-ineer?
04:39 AM on 04/20/2012
Global warming or climate change?
Whether atmospheric pollution is the cause or not is irrelevant.
The forest are dying, farmland is dying, the oceans are dying and the only thing growing is the deserts.
Carbon is not the only thing we put in the air and water and the most dangerous chemicals on the planet we put on our food and vast amounts of fossil fuels are burnt to grow food we could grow in the back yard.
The problem is the military industrial complex.
We need to adopt sustainable agriculture practices and learn to rely on village technology solutions.
Unfortunately not a great deal of profit potential for the big companies.
organicandsustainablegardening.yolasite.com
09:25 PM on 04/29/2012
how is atmospheric pollution not relevant?
10:26 PM on 04/19/2012
How about some science. we know the GW crowd ignores clouds for the most part because their affect on climate is hard to prove - and of course they have their "culprit" CO2.

the fact is clouds and the bacteria they carry may be far more important.

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/11/29/the-clouds-are-alive-my-new-podcast-on-aerobiology/

but then the GW folks are never going to listen to any science they don't agree with...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeWebster
Always happy.
03:45 AM on 04/20/2012
So, you agree that the Earth's weather is wildly swinging, and the average climate is continuing to warm, but you want to blame the clouds?

Do you have anything sensible to contribute?
01:03 PM on 04/20/2012
what does "wildly" mean. yes we have some warming. the point is how much if any is due to man made CO2 - nothing proven yet...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
08:25 PM on 05/01/2012
Coming from you that is positively hilarious.
10:15 PM on 04/19/2012
so when its cold its not reported but warm gets the usual GW nuts all a tither.....

typical unscientific nonsense
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeWebster
Always happy.
03:47 AM on 04/20/2012
I guess for you, science is all about lying, which is what you've just done.

You haven't got any moral integrity or decency. You also don't have the first idea about science, or the concept of average global temperatures, which are rising, and hence global warming is certainly happening.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
01:47 AM on 04/19/2012
AGW "Skeptics": God Protects Us From Global Warming

Senator James Inhofe (R-OK), the leading climate science denier in Congress, believes that per the Bible God protects us from global warming.

http://tinyurl.com/7fr6z36

Other prominent global warming "skeptics" including Roy Spencer (a climate scientist favored by "skeptics"), Ross McKitrick (economist / purported "hockey stick" slayer), and Joseph D'Aleo (weatherman / Icecap blogger) and other signatories of the Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation's "Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming" also preach that per the Bible God protects from global warming:

http://www.cornwallalliance.org/blog/item/prominent-signers-of-an-evangelical-declaration-on-global-warming/

Roy Spencer is also on the Cornwall Alliance for the Stewardship of Creation's Board:

http://www.cornwallalliance.org/about/board-of-advisors/

More from the Cornwall Alliance on their belief that per Biblical prophesy God protects us from global warming:

-----------------------
The world is in the grip of an idea: that burning fossil fuels... is causing global warming that will be so dangerous that we must stop it by reducing our use...

We believe that idea... fails the tests of theology... with a worldview of the Earth and its climate system contrary to that taught in the Bible...
 
God’s wisdom, power, and faithfulness justify confidence that Earth’s ecosystems are robust and will, by God’s providence, accomplish the purposes He set for them.
------------------------
http://tinyurl.com/27murl6

Banana Republican: "...the global warming religion..."

Science denier irony is eternal.
photo
banana republican
Next in line for crumbs from the King's Table
06:30 PM on 04/18/2012
It was established very early in the development of the global warming religion that conditions that were consistent with what one would expect during a global warming trend would be classified as 'further evidence', and conditions that were contrary to what one would be expected would be classified as 'weather events.' Its ingenious in that it enables the religion to be perpetuated no matter what happens.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
08:21 PM on 04/19/2012
woo woo. Hoax! Climate religion! Uninformed tinfoilers in the area. Alert!
10:30 PM on 04/19/2012
sure galloon. and the Mann saga continues with this dirt bag doing everything he can to cover his fraud....
.
"Last fall, Mann decided that the University of Virginia was not protecting his interests vigorously enough and moved to be added as a party to the case. Subsequently, the university sent the dossier to Mann, who is no longer an employee.
ATI has applied for the documents provided to Mann, arguing that they can’t give the documents out selectively, citing a 1983 precedent. Several leading Virginia FOIA experts told the Washington Post that ATI has a good argument.
UVA lawyers defended the selective disclosure saying that Mann was “not an adverse party essentially” and, using a not entirely apt phrase, explained that they were “sharing information with a teammate as opposed to the other side”. Ironically, Mann originally asked to be a separate party to the litigation because he felt that “his interest is not currently being adequately protected” – a position that seems inconsistent with UVA’s present position that they are “teammates”.
In addition, ATI has applied to depose Mann on his affidavit, a pretty standard aspect to civil cases. Mann has argued that he should not have to be deposed, with his main argument being (more or less) that ATI are bad people, a perspective frequently held by parties in civil litigation, but not relevant to mundane procedures like depositions.
:

http://climateaudit.org/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:47 PM on 04/20/2012
A lot of thus far completely empty and therefore rather heinous assertions, which amount to SMEAR TACTICS.

For example, I could make equally empty claims, so as, oh... that YOU must be a Senegalese pirate, collaborating with Chinese Communists, to keep Americans confused, muddling our energy policies.

Then I could just as superciliously CHALLENGE YOU TO PROVE to us that you're not a Senegalese pirate (while knowing full well that attempting to do so would compromise your anonymity here).

That is, the logic behind your smear attempts is as silly and mischievous as the above challenge.

I mean, where's the support for your claims? What or who are you referencing?
Where's your proof?

Show us some links.
photo
banana republican
Next in line for crumbs from the King's Table
07:51 PM on 04/20/2012
Uh. . . .it was sacrasm. But the fact that you at least considered there MIGHT be supporting evidence, says a lot.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SvrWx
Eileen, toora tooluri Eh..
08:16 AM on 04/18/2012
Here is the official assessment of 2012 Eastern Heatwave from NOAA. As many of you have proven, you just can't jump on the bandwagon and start screaming. As per these folks, this heatwave doesn't have anything to do with Global Warming or Climate Change, just like last years deep freeze doesn't prove that a 2nd Ice Age is on it's way.

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/csi/events/2012/marchheatwave/anticipation.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
08:33 PM on 05/01/2012
Did you read the article? I don't believe your conclusion is warranted, based on the paper. It actually says this:

A black swan most probably was observed in March 2012 (lest we forget 1910). Gifted thereby to a wonderful late winter of unprecedented balmy weather, we also now know that all swans are not white. The event reminds us that there is no reason to believe that the hottest, "meteorological maddest" March observed in a mere century of observations is the hottest possible. But this isn't to push all the blame upon randomness. Our current estimate of the impact of GHG forcing is that it likely contributed on the order of 5% to 10% of the magnitude of the heat wave during 12-23 March. And the probability of heatwaves is growing as GHG-induced warming continues to progress".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
08:34 PM on 05/01/2012
In case you missed it...

5-10% isn't "nothing".

It is in fact, "something".