iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Instagram Users Fret Over Facebook's Reach: 'I Feel Like The Purchase Has Sucked Me In'

Instagram Users Facebook

First Posted: 04/10/2012 6:34 pm Updated: 04/11/2012 9:35 am

NEW YORK (AP) — Poor Instagram users.

First, their beloved photo-sharing application moves from iPhone-only exclusivity to the Android phone masses. A week later, Facebook swallows up the tiny startup behind the app for $1 billion. The purchase sparked worries that Facebook might shutter Instagram or change it for the worse by harvesting their personal information or shoving ads into their carefully curated photo streams.

"I've tried very hard not to be part of the Facebook ecosystem," says Darwin Poblete, a Brooklyn, New York-based architect who has used Instagram since its early days. "Now I feel like the purchase has sucked me in. I'll have to see how the privacy settings change to decide if I will leave it."

Instagram has attracted more than 31 million users in less than two years. Its near-cult-like early followers were loyal iPhone users who flocked to the app for its ease-of-use, its playful filters that can make even boring photos look artistic, and its lack of ads, status updates and other clutter. Apple named Instagram the iPhone App of the Year in 2011.

To be fair, both Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Instagram CEO Kevin Systorm sought to reassure people that the app is here to stay. Unlike all the other startups Facebook has bought, Instagram will remain available to people who don't use Facebook or don't want to connect it to their accounts on the world's most populous online social network, the CEOs said.

"Millions of people around the world love the Instagram app and the brand associated with it, and our goal is to help spread this app and brand to even more people," Zuckerberg wrote on his Facebook page announcing the purchase on Monday.

It's hard to say, though, what Facebook might do a year or two from now. After all, its site's constant evolution has been a big reason for its success. Doing things the old way just because a few users complain isn't the Facebook way.

For Samantha Hutmacher, change isn't necessarily a bad thing. The college student, who uses both Facebook and —since last week— Instagram, says that if Facebook tweaks the app, "I assume it'll be more creative."

While a lot of people complain when Facebook makes changes to its site, Hutmacher says she "can't pinpoint any particular time" when she wished that her Facebook page didn't have the new features the company has added over the years.

"It kind of grows on you," says Hutmacher, who studies elementary school education at the University of Missouri in Columbia, Mo.

Instagram already feels a bit like Facebook, but with all the noise of status updates, links, ads, videos and games stripped away. That's part of its appeal, and a large part of why Facebook saw it as so much of a threat that it paid $1 billion to buy it.

"They are growing like mad on mobile, and Facebook's mobile platform (including its app) is mediocre at best," wrote tech blogger Om Malik on Tuesday on GigaOm. "Facebook is not a mobile-first company and they don't think from the mobile-first perspective. Facebook's internal ideology is that of a desktop-centric Internet company."

Instagram is a social network only for photos, but even those are different. Users seem to put more thought and caring into an Instagram photo than they do for a typical Facebook snapshot. These aren't your party group shots, tagged with the names of everyone there, nor are these the endlessly re-shared kitten photos with funny quotes attached to them. Instead, users are more likely to share, say, a photo of a cup of tea with a filter applied to it, so it looks like it was taken with a film camera 30 years ago. Children are popular subjects too, as are tulips and Easter eggs when they are in season.

Deb Johnson of Long Beach, Calif., likes to post photos of her dogs, two Rhodesian Ridgebacks. She also posts shots of food she eats, most recently a dish of Scottish salmon she had at a restaurant. To appreciate Instagram, she says, "you really have to appreciate the visual experience."

"Today I took a picture of something silly," says Johnson, who works in information technology, testing systems for insurance companies. Someone in her house had put a little Cookie Monster Pez dispenser inside a bigger Cookie Monster Pez dispenser, making a Pez dispenser-dispenser of sorts. So, Johnson snapped a photo. Instagram is so simple to use that these are the types of pictures that show up. In can take just three finger-taps to share an image on Instagram.

"There are hundreds of thousands of apps. Apps are not a matter of 'build it and they will come," says Rebecca Lieb, an analyst with the Altimeter Group. "The price tag indicates that Instagram was not without other suitors."

In other words, Facebook didn't just buy any company.

"If someone could bottle their recipe for success, I guarantee they would. It's easy to use, works extremely well and adds an extra layer of functionality (with the filters)," Lieb says. "All of that combines to create the mojo that is the brand. Why isn't every soft drink Coca-Cola? Because it isn't."

Instagram's overnight success is reminiscent of another sleek, easy-to-use application that's gotten a lot of users quickly — Pinterest. Both companies tap into people's desire to share little life moments as they happen. And both give users a social network that is simpler and less noisy than Facebook.

"There are a lot of interesting social networks out there," says Gartner analyst Brian Blau. "And those are competitors to Facebook. One around photographs, (that's) one of the most popular things we do. It's a perfect complement to Facebook."

Facebook's challenge will be to keep loyal Instagram users happy even as the service expands to include many more people.

"We have seen this happen before when Facebook opened up its membership base from (college students) to everyone," Lieb says.

People grumbled at the time that this was the end of Facebook. It wasn't.

"People don't like change, but user behavior indicates that people will accept change," she says.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 78
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
SoxFan1
In the long run we die
11:49 AM on 04/12/2012
What Facebook bought was a very scaleable technology by guys who wrote their own database oh and access to 30 million mobile users and more with the new android app.

Of course they overpaid but it's all funny money as it's not like it was real cash
10:53 AM on 04/12/2012
Long live the new flesh!
10:47 PM on 04/11/2012
We should all be thankful for Facebook. The way gas prices are headed, we may never actually see our friends again.
09:55 PM on 04/11/2012
R.I.P. Instagram
10:51 AM on 04/12/2012
drama
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stephvelander
We are all zombies.
09:29 PM on 04/11/2012
I don't understand how Instagram effects my life on facebook. Does this mean I have to stop pretending to like people on my friend's list?
10:18 AM on 04/12/2012
What life?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stephvelander
We are all zombies.
01:51 PM on 04/12/2012
My facebook life? There's life where you eat and breathe and then there's facebook life? You must not have facebook.
06:27 PM on 04/11/2012
I was intrigued with Pinterest - until I found that to become a member I had to "upgrade" (read downgrade) my newsfeed with Facebook to their new Timeline, which is one of the most onerous changes. One can't find anytthing on one's own Timeline, much less other people's timelines. I decided that having Pinterest was worthy, but not worthy enough to give Facebook control.
photo
thereisonlyoneparty
more amazing than you
06:13 PM on 04/11/2012
The people complaining should really check out the ToS for both services. Even before Instagram was bought for way too much money it had essentially the same terms, made the same claims, and required users to give it the same license as Facebook.

The difference then? One was Facebook; one was not.

It is so odd how people fear a name when the practices associated with the brand are pretty much universal on the intarwebs. How do you think that a company like Instagram is going to make money? Not even profit. Enough money to continue running its servers and updating its software. These are all businesses. They are not your friends. They are looking to make money through providing a platform for you to "share" your works and data.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
melissasusan24
04:43 PM on 04/11/2012
All the whining about Facebook drives me up the wall. If you don't want your stuff to be on the internet, don't put it there. It's so freaking customizable at this point, with a little common sense, I've never had a serious problem. (I clicked one bad link, which was my fault and not Facebook's. I'm the idiot there.)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CgGardner
Queer Southern Gentleman
03:13 PM on 04/11/2012
I love my Instagram. I hate Facebook. I'm a social networker, I use Twitter along with other apps to keep up with things happening in the world. Facebook has had issues with privacy over the years.

The simplicity of Instagram is what makes it awesome. The moment they add anything to make it complicated, ads, etc. I'm ditching this app.
05:29 PM on 04/11/2012
first off, instagram features arent really all that different than the capabilities that already exist on your smart phone's camera.

secondly, picasa and flckr both have mobile apps if you are desparate to share you pics... or you could just upload them to your twitter feed directly with their mobile app.

and you should keep in mind, that you dont have to link everything to facebook. its an option that you can turn on and off.

i dont really see what all the uproar is about... its not FB's fault you cant figure out the settings on your apps. it just takes about ten seconds worth of reading. seriously...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CgGardner
Queer Southern Gentleman
06:05 PM on 04/11/2012
It has nothing to do with the settings on the apps. That is simple in and of itself: choosing which social networks you want to link with.

It is the fact that FB is notorious for changing privacy settings, linkage, etc without notifying its users. This is one of the areas that I feel most are concerned about.

FB is at fault when it changes privacy settings, etc w/o notifying it's users. "seriously..."

Thanks for bringing up those other two apps, was unaware of them and will have to check them out.
03:13 PM on 04/11/2012
You know....being online all the time...going to Facebook, or Instagram, Google + whatever....it's essentially a narcissistic enterprise. It's a "Hey, look at me" kinda thing.

So when people raise issues of privacy, content use, etc....I don't get it. They're essentially using these services for free....but nothing is every really free is it? A $100 billion dollar company does not do things for free no matter how hard you want to believe it.

It's like wanting police, fireman, basic city/state/federal government services but not wanting to pay the taxes to make these services work. It's lazy...selfish and just a symptom of yet more narcissism.

People, stop complaining. If you use the services, you will pay one way or another. In fact, it may just be better to get offline instead. No cloud, not instant gratification. Just get offline and live in the "real" world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FatherKindly
02:51 PM on 04/11/2012
People who are complaining should realize that it is quite possible to have a happy and fulfilling life without signing on to Facebook. If they don't like the whole business model, don't join. I didn't. And if they did join and now regret it, quit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kandis SupaStar Hill
There is no such thing as two sets of facts
02:21 PM on 04/11/2012
The problem is people just want to enjoy the apps on their phones without being bombarded with privacy "issues" and stupid "like" ads. I'd rather pay $1.99 or so to use an app, than deal with the dread "Hey everyone that last post was not me, my FB was hacked, don't click they hyperlink..." status everytime I log on. I never understood how a site/application with so much "privacy" can continuoulsy have "hacking issues".... and no, it's not always due, to the user not havng their privacy "turned on" either.
photo
GoDogGo
A fiscally realistic, socially progressive citizen
02:12 PM on 04/11/2012
Big Brother is not the government. It is Facebook. If any of you knew the actual extent of what personal information they sell, down to the individual user, they're IPO wouldn't happen. Overpaying for Instagram doesn't help with confidence much either so, if we're lucky, a more privacy-minded competitor might have a chance.
02:06 PM on 04/11/2012
Take your stinking paws off my instagram, you damned dirty facebook!
01:33 PM on 04/11/2012
When Facebook first changed privacy defaults with no warning, I stopped using it. I am not alone. A competitor that has better privacy settings, is less easy to hack, and is not so ready to sell your information to the rest of the world, will have some success, IMHO.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:38 PM on 04/11/2012
and when you moved over to istagram ou thought you'd escaped your fate. Po' thang !
02:01 PM on 04/11/2012
If it's a free service you are using they are harvesting and selling.  It is how they survive.
02:04 PM on 04/11/2012
That's what you call it, survival? Having a billion dollars to kill a small, potential competitor is survival? With just a little restraint, Facebook could be very profitable. The problem is, being profitable is not enough for them.