iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Connecticut Death Penalty Repeal Passes State Legislature

04/11/12 11:11 PM ET AP

Connecticut Death Penalty

HARTFORD, Conn. — The Connecticut legislature has voted to repeal the state's death penalty, and the Democratic governor is expected to sign it into law. That would make the state the 17th to end capital punishment.

The House of Representatives voted in favor of the bill 86-62 late Wednesday night.

The bill would abolish the death penalty and replace it with a maximum sentence of life in prison without the possibility of release. It would not affect the sentences of the 11 inmates already on Connecticut's death row.

The proposal cleared its biggest hurdle last week when it won approval in the state Senate.

Connecticut has executed only one inmate in 51 years.

The death penalty has been on the books in Connecticut for more than 150 years.

Hours before the House debate Wednesday, repeal proponents had urged their legislators to follow the lead of the Senate. Milford resident Dawn Mancarella, whose mother, Joyce Masury, was murdered in 1996, said she represented more than 180 people who have lost loved ones to murder and were backing repeal. She said they do not believe the death penalty helps them.

"Some of us have seen the loss of their loved ones all but ignored while capital cases get months, or even years, of attention," she said during a morning news conference. "Some of us have endured capital cases and are horrified that the death penalty ensnares them in a never-ending wait for execution."

An effort to repeal the state's death penalty failed to clear the Senate last year as one of two men charged in a brutal 2007 home invasion was still facing trial. Dr. William Petit Jr., whose wife and two daughters were killed in the attack, lobbied lawmakers to keep the death penalty in place.

The two killers in that case are now on death row, and officials including Gov. Dannel P. Malloy insisted as a condition of their support for repeal that the law would not affect inmates already condemned to die. But Petit and some Republican critics say lawyers for death row inmates would inevitably use the new law as grounds for appeals.

Connecticut has carried out only one execution in 51 years, when serial killer Michael Ross was administered a lethal injection in 2005 after he gave up his appeal rights.

In the past five years, four states have abolished the death penalty – New Mexico, Illinois, New Jersey and New York. Repeal proposals are also pending in several other states including Kansas and Kentucky, while advocates in California have gathered enough signatures for an initiative that could go before the voters in November.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
HARTFORD, Conn. — The Connecticut legislature has voted to repeal the state's death penalty, and the Democratic governor is expected to sign it into law. That would make the state the 17th to en...
HARTFORD, Conn. — The Connecticut legislature has voted to repeal the state's death penalty, and the Democratic governor is expected to sign it into law. That would make the state the 17th to en...
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 116
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TraceyES
09:14 PM on 04/12/2012
Proud of my state. Connecticut: a land of marriage equality and no death penalty, giving the Red States simple-minded fits of tantrum since the Civil War. I think I'll put that on a bumper sticker.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
johnb123
All I ask..just be reasonable....do things my way
06:27 PM on 04/13/2012
Good can all of the other states send our murders to you...since you love the so much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TraceyES
07:17 PM on 04/13/2012
Thank you, but no...you can keep all your murders. We don't have that many compared to most other states.
07:16 AM on 04/12/2012
The death penalty serves no useful purpose other than to satisfy the blood lust of certain sections of the community, usually I think the religious right
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
johnb123
All I ask..just be reasonable....do things my way
10:02 AM on 04/12/2012
So you think Communist China if religious? This is about punishing one person for taking the life of another person. This country no longer values the innocent life, so this is what you get.
06:04 PM on 04/12/2012
I know that China doesn't value human life, that's what happens when you have an over abundance of it; as for religion I believe it to be the root of all evil. Now I expect you'll tell me that there is a god who agrees with the Americans use of the death penalty. After all it seems that the Americans believe that they have a direct line to any such thing and nobody else does. Why are you right and Islam is wrong? Who gives you the right to decide? I don't but then I'm atheist and have been and will forever be.
In my countries (England & Australia) we have no death penalty we also have nowhere near the murders that you have, legal murders or illegal murders. I think we are more civilized. I have expressed my views and reasons at www.Lordbeariofbow.com
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
johnb123
All I ask..just be reasonable....do things my way
01:43 AM on 04/12/2012
The death penalty is a punishment, not a deterrent or vengeance. A person who robs a bank, breaks the law, they are put in prison as a punishment....when you're caught speeding, you pay a fine...it's punishment....it's not vengeance. The punishment will deter some people, but not all. The punishment is enforce whether  it deters anyone or not.
04:32 PM on 04/12/2012
Punishment is an umbrella concept, Johnb123. You and RobH aren't really disagreeing, just talking at cross purposes.

After someone is convicted of a crime, sentencing metes out punishment, which serves any or all of the following societal needs:

1. Retribution (vengenance)
2. Restitution (trying to bring the victims back to as close to whole as possible)
3. Restriction or incapacitation (lock 'em away to protect society)
4. Deterrence (which we've pretty well established is defunct)
5. Rehabilitation (which is moot in capital cases)

So now, armed with this structure of understanding, the debate is trying to decide where the punishment of execution fits, and whether it's a necessary and effective means of filling societal needs. If you answer "yes" to that question, then analyze why you believe so -- because it gets back at the perpetrator for his crime, or because it gives something back to the victims, or because it's the ultimate in societal protection, or because it deters someone else from committing a similar crime? Once you answer those questions, you will have begun to formulate a logical argument to support your position.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
johnb123
All I ask..just be reasonable....do things my way
06:16 PM on 04/12/2012
It's called Capital Punishment....not Capital Vengeance. You're trying to group punishment with vengeance....they have different meaning and intent. The pain may be the same, but that's about it.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
johnb123
All I ask..just be reasonable....do things my way
01:05 AM on 04/12/2012
I find it amazing, how some people will use the argument, they don't want to take the chance of putting an innocent person to death. But that argument falls apart, when you ask them about putting to death a person, where there is no doubt of their guilt. The innocent argument is a false front, they don't want the death penalty on anyone, no matter their innocents or guilt.
02:10 PM on 04/12/2012
No one has the right to take a life, not even a government.
photo
bespoken
My micro bio is filled with emptiness
03:17 PM on 04/12/2012
learn to spell, simpleton.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chykim1
sexy geek
12:44 AM on 04/12/2012
here in florida..if u kill someone, we'll kill u back! & i gotta tell ya, im comfortable with that! some ppl commits cimes that are so evil..,u know that person has no appreciation for life, so they dont deserve to have one!!
photo
bespoken
My micro bio is filled with emptiness
12:55 AM on 04/12/2012
then I'm sure you have no issue being executed for something you were innocent of.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chykim1
sexy geek
02:04 AM on 04/12/2012
no...im not comfortable with that..obvioulsy!
but if they are found guilty..of a heionous crime..im comfortable with them being exicuted!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RobH413
Game Six: All Things Are Possible
12:41 AM on 04/12/2012
Maybe someday the entire country will join the civilized world in abandoning the death penalty and leave that barbarism to the Iranians, Afghans, Chinese, Saudis and other such champions of human rights. Interesting that the one execution in the last half century in Connecticut was a guy who gave up his appeal rights, in other words the guy who WANTED to die. The worst murderers are usually the ones who are either consciously or subconsciously seeking attention or seeking to kill themselves or both. I believe Gary Gilmore, who basically revived executions in the US in 1976 when he INSISTED on being executed, actually committed his crime in a way that would make him qualify for the dormant death penalty and by which he could make himself famous by bringing back the death penalty after a nearly 20-year virtual moratorium in the US.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimmy Gitz
Independent - and it shows...
01:00 AM on 04/12/2012
Thank you Gary Gilmore - may your soul NEVER "Rest In Peace."
07:05 AM on 04/12/2012
I was beginning to doubt there was a civilized person left in the USA.. I've been saying what you have for years but it always seems to follow on deaf ears. Americans do not seem to be aware of the company they are in. But it is countries that they continue to abuse and condemn. It's time to get rid of the death penalty for good.and for America to join with it's more civilized partners.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:37 AM on 04/12/2012
Although not a large number, several convicted murder's have been exonerated in the last decade because of DNA evidence. This should give us pause when using the death penalty. I'm not against it when there absolutely no doubt. But too often there is enough doubt. It should only be used when it's really proven, not when we are not absolutely sure. My pregnant wife was nearly killed 35 yrs ago by a guy with a hammer, so I have personal involvement with murderous violence. The guy escaped prison twice, and I had a carry permit just in case and would have shot him on site. There was no doubt he was guilty, none. And if she had died I would have asked for the death penalty. He's dead now from a car wreck in which he was drunk and took out an older couple in the wreck. The sob is buried in a veteran's cemetary. What irony. And there's more to story but not for here..........our justice system, the cops and prosecutors and courts don't always do their jobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SPAIN62
“Solidarity is the tenderness of the people.”
12:34 AM on 04/12/2012
¡Bravo Connecticut!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:34 AM on 04/12/2012
Doesn't matter really, because the fed's can still assassinate anybody they desire.
photo
Teacher Trish
The Enlightenment was a good idea.
12:32 AM on 04/12/2012
The death penalty is -
-paradoxical
-irreversible
-expensive
-a non-deterrent
-based on emotions of revenge and not on formulative justice
-often applied in a biased manner
-unethical
photo
bespoken
My micro bio is filled with emptiness
12:37 AM on 04/12/2012
Yes, though the knuckle draggers will be out in force on this.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:37 AM on 04/12/2012
So are the people subjected to it.
photo
Teacher Trish
The Enlightenment was a good idea.
01:21 AM on 04/12/2012
I am going to guess you are in favor of the "eye for an eye" school of justice. This means that the rules of ethical behavior are void once you become a victim. For example - if someone steals your TV (bad) you get to steal their TV (good). This is a paradox. Someone r_apes your wife you get to do the same to their wife. Can you see how this erases ethics completely? You are a proponent of situational ethics instead of hard and fast rules of behavior. Perhaps I misunderstood your point, but it seems you are fine if the justice system can sink as low as the criminal.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
omobob
left coast, usa
12:30 AM on 04/12/2012
> The Connecticut legislature has voted to repeal the state's death penalty, and the Democratic governor is expected to sign it into law. That would make the state the 17th to end capital punishment. This is the right and proper decision. The Death Penalty doesn’t work. FBI data shows that all 14 states without capital punishment in 2008 had homicide rates at or below the national rate. //www.amnestyusa.org/our-work/issues/death-penalty/us-death-penalty-facts/the-death-penalty-and-deterrence?id=1101085
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimmy Gitz
Independent - and it shows...
12:30 AM on 04/12/2012
At last, Martha Stewart can breathe easy....
photo
PlutocratsSuck
Godless heathen liberal...and loving it.
12:29 AM on 04/12/2012
Well done Connecticut. Well done.
MHT73
words matter
12:28 AM on 04/12/2012
Well done, Connecticut.

The death penalty is not about the murderer, or about the crime, it is about all of us law-abiding citizens. Having the death penalty on the books makes all of us party to a system that would kill someone. Taking it off the books takes that burden off of all of us. Many, many people deserve to die, but the rest of us have done nothing to warrant us having blood on our hands, even the blood of a guilty person.
photo
Teacher Trish
The Enlightenment was a good idea.
12:43 AM on 04/12/2012
Your ethical precision is spot on. I am against the death penalty because it debases citizens. I am not a supporter of criminals. I become an accessory to a crime every time California kills a prisoner.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
greytunes
99% of GOP/TPers make the rest look bad
12:28 AM on 04/12/2012
There may be a time for the death penalty, but only in completely undisputed cases, no ability to twist the story. Unless thats in place, it is actually cheaper for life without parole than the litigation for the death penalty.
12:43 AM on 04/12/2012
So for people with no lawyer to dispute the facts, it's OK? Who's to decide what undisputed means? Confessions can be coerced, as can witnesses. Is a murder on video undisputed, or might that even be fabricated evidence? The problem with the death penalty is that humans are fallible and WILL mistakenly execute innocent people along with the guilty. The only way not to is not to have the death penalty.