iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Keystone XL Bill Approved By Nebraska Lawmakers

Posted: 04/12/2012 10:01 am

LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — A bill that would relaunch a state review of the Keystone XL crude oil pipeline won final approval from Nebraska lawmakers Wednesday, although the project's strongest opponents said they will likely challenge it in court.

Lawmakers voted 44-5 to forward the measure to Republican Gov. Dave Heineman, who has said he supports the project.

The state review approved in a special legislative session last year was halted in January, when President Barack Obama denied a federal permit for the project after congressional Republican tried to force him to approve it quickly. Obama has since announced plans to expedite a permit for the southern half of the pipeline.

The full 1,700-mile, $7 billion pipeline would travel from Canada through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas. TransCanada wants to build the 36-inch pipeline to carry oil from tar sands in Alberta to refineries on the Texas Gulf Coast.

Nebraska became a pivotal battleground for the project last year, pitting environmentalists and some landowners against unions and the oil industry. Heineman called a special session to address concerns over the pipeline's proposed path, and TransCanada executive eventually agreed to route the pipeline away from Nebraska's groundwater-rich Sandhills.

The bill approved by Nebraska lawmakers would allow the state review to continue, regardless of what happens with the federal government.

The measure authorizes the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality to review possible routes through the state and hold at least one public hearing on its evaluation. Its findings would then be added to a federal environmental review, if the company reapplies for a project permit.

Environmentalists say the pipeline still threatens Nebraska's water and wildlife, and they dispute company claims that it will create tens of thousands of U.S. jobs and reduce the nation's dependence on oil from hostile foreign nations.

The review is expected to cost as much as $2 million. The state has spent roughly $153,000 since November but stopped the analysis after the permit was denied.

TransCanada spokesman Shawn Howard said the bill "puts the power for the final route selection in Nebraska back in the hands of Nebraskans, regardless of what takes place at the federal level."

Howard said the company plans to consult soon with the Department of Environmental Quality to resume the review.

"Even many of those who expressed opposition to the pipeline in 2011 had issue with the route only, not the pipeline, the oil or the economic and energy security benefits it will bring to Nebraska and America," he said.

The bill also requires an evaluation of the social, environmental and economic impact of any proposed route. But Ken Winston of the Nebraska Sierra Club said it doesn't define any of those impacts or specify whether they should factor into the final decision.

Opponents also complained that lawmakers changed the bill at the last minute, without public hearings. They say the project should be reviewed by the state's Public Service Commission, an independently elected group that regulates utilities.

"The Nebraska Legislature has turned a deaf ear to Nebraska citizens and lawmakers one more time while it allowed a foreign corporation to circumvent the already approved and appropriate (review) process signed into law," said John Hansen, president of the Nebraska Farmers Union.

Opponents have said the bill is unconstitutional special legislation, saying it can only be applied to TransCanada. Lawmakers said they have tried to work around those concerns.

__

The bill is LB1161

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — A bill that would relaunch a state review of the Keystone XL crude oil pipeline won final approval from Nebraska lawmakers Wednesday, although the project's strongest opponents ...
LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) — A bill that would relaunch a state review of the Keystone XL crude oil pipeline won final approval from Nebraska lawmakers Wednesday, although the project's strongest opponents ...
Filed by James Gerken  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 62
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:18 PM on 04/13/2012
Fact is we NEED oil. Renewables are great but do not produce the power we need and wont for several decades. The technology is just not good enough yet. As this president and the other greenies try and push up the cost of energy to make green energy LOOK viable they are forcing businesses to go overseas. When a businessman looks at the cost of doing business they look at several things. Cost of labor (unions jack that up), cost of energy (dems/greens jack that up),taxes Dems fight to keep them high. But as we all know its the republicans that send jobs overseas. Pull your head out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jack Davies
THEY OWN BOTH SIDES!
01:47 PM on 04/15/2012
1) We don't need oil. We have the technology, the hunger and the drive to wean completely off oil and benefit greatly from it in a good number of ways, what we don't have is the leadership to do it, which is sad.

2) As we run out of oil, which we are doing even as we hunt for more (and don't kid yourself into thinking that it's not being hunted down and drilled out with very much the full attention you think it deserves) the cost is going to go up anyway. Green energy brings the cost down, duh. Where did you learn your energy science? What do you think the cost differential is between generating your electricity via wind or solar versus burning coal for it? Do you have to mine, refine and transport your wind? Do you think that unsubsidized coal and oil have anywhere near the cost-saving power as wave generation?

3) Costs of labor? You mean what we get paid? Yes, I want that higher thanks. Cost of energy? See point 2. Cost of taxes? Taxes in the US are at the lowest point since LITERALLY a hundred years ago. This makes your statement kinda pointless.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
07:08 PM on 04/19/2012
But Keystone isn't going to be piping our oil.
That oil belongs to Canada, and is intended for export.

Keystone brings nothing to reduce our fuel costs, but the risks it brings are enormous.
http://17atheart.wordpress.com/2012/04/19/keystone-xl/
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
kmswriter
This mean we can't be friends?
09:35 AM on 04/13/2012
Transcanada reaps the benefit - they get the profit.....people sure are gullible...thank the Sierra Club for fighting the good fight...this ain't Mt. Rushmore - it is a dirty oil pipeline...
photo
Left of Right
Want to default your country? Default your job!
10:22 AM on 04/13/2012
Right! The profit won't be ours, the gas will not be ours, but we do, at least, get to keep the destruction!

A big day for big oil!
04:07 PM on 04/13/2012
People should watch the online video Chinatown, Africa and then think about how this pipeline will make Chinatown, USA
photo
Evil Twin Rove
No struggle, no progress
09:08 AM on 04/13/2012
Keep fighting this dirty pipeline!!
photo
MANOFCOMMONSENSE
The #1 Republican Team? Bush/Shady.WMD?$$
09:08 AM on 04/13/2012
Republicans never tell the truth...... Republican Gov. Dave Heineman rejected the pipe line before Obama did..............................................................................................................................................LINCOLN, Neb. -- Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman urged President Barack Obama and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Wednesday to deny a federal permit for a pipeline that would carry Canadian oil over an aquifer that supplies drinking and irrigation water to parts of several states.

Heineman said he supports pipeline projects but opposes the proposed TransCanada Keystone XL route that would cross the vast Ogallala aquifer.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/31/nebraska-governor-opposes-pipeline_n_943610.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oheart
08:20 AM on 04/13/2012
Someone below said "We need to keep in mind that we are debating a 3 foot pipe.";
well, lest we forget, here's a link to what happened when a 12 inch pipe broke:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/06/yellowstone-river-spill-response-plan_n_1408328.html
photo
MIKEBC
Old school Roosevelt democrat
07:48 AM on 04/13/2012
The truth - it would just be temp. jobs to build it and after it's built it will be just a few hundred maintenence jobs to keep it running, and that wouldn't exactly lower the unemployment rate very much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WhatDaBleep
Right is Wrong and Left is Correct
07:11 AM on 04/13/2012
Looks like the lobbyists have won again!
10:29 PM on 04/12/2012
All the GOPers who think their fuel costs will go down when the Pipeline is completed will be sorely disappointed when the bulk of this oil is refined and then SHIPPED OVERSEAS...LOL
05:28 AM on 04/13/2012
Talk about brainwashed. You only bring up the "GOPers" yet it's Obama that is expediting the process. If you're going to open your eyes...try to open them ALL the way.
photo
gochenaur8
who said that, I said that
08:45 AM on 04/13/2012
President Obama is only expediting part of the pipeline, pat of it, not all of it. As to your comment to another post from percheron1, the oil that is to flow from Canada to Texas, it not ear marked for use in the United States. This is what the GOP want the people to believe, that it will be used in the United States and the price at the pump will drop, that is a lie. The jobs that are promised by the GOP, are nothing close to what they have said, and the jobs that will be created will only last a few years. Once the pipeline is in and if approved for use, they oil will go where they want it to go and there isn't a thing the people can do except say that we were lied to again.
photo
gochenaur8
who said that, I said that
11:16 AM on 04/14/2012
If you haven't asked for help, there are many agencies that will help you. Your life is very shallow and you feel sorry for your self so you lash out because of the pain you feel about yourself. Have a great life if you can.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
09:42 PM on 04/12/2012
We need to keep in mind that we are debating a 3 foot pipe.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Marble
10:06 PM on 04/12/2012
That would run at higher pressures with thinner walls than the already built Keystone pipeline which was projected to have one small leak a year but ended up with more than a dozen spills.

Also important to remember that they are transporting Bitumen and not Light Sweet Crude. Bitumen is significantly more difficult to clean up when it spills. The Kalamazoo River spill of over a million gallons should have taken two months to clean up. It is still ongoing 22 months later. Light Sweet Crude mostly floats to the top of a body of water, but once bitumen is exposed to air the chemicals keeping it thin enough to push through the pipe evaporate and the oil sinks to the bottom. This contaminates the water supply, which trust me you do not want. Drinking water that smells like gasoline isn't cool. I live a couple of miles from the Kalamazoo River spill, it was quite awful for a long time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WhatDaBleep
Right is Wrong and Left is Correct
07:13 AM on 04/13/2012
Yest that can pump hundreds of barrels of oil into a river every minute into a river if the pipe breaks. And what they are pumping is worse than crude oil.
03:26 PM on 04/12/2012
Yeah,forget the people.Oil rules the world.Sad to see what the US really is.
10:37 PM on 04/12/2012
would you like to go back, to the 1700 century to ride a donkey, or walk if you don't have the money to buy and take care of a donkey, idiots, your damm brains have been indoctrinated to the max.oil comes from the grownd and if a leak developes it will go back to the grownd, where it came from. besides that, what assurance does any body have that yopu will live for ever, what is killing you is already in your food, thanks to monsanto and their satanic genetic experimentations whith the human race, that is what is killing and getting people sick the lack of natural food and drinks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heikhali
02:09 PM on 04/12/2012
The Trilateral Commission of the New World Order expresses its gratitude to the Nebraska Legislature for forward thinking in preparation for the merger of Canada, Mexico, and the US.
photo
Conspiracy2Riot
Go ahead, try and eat that fiat currency
07:08 PM on 04/12/2012
so it seems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WhatDaBleep
Right is Wrong and Left is Correct
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heikhali
02:03 PM on 04/12/2012
The Trilateral Commission of the New World Order thanks the Nebraska legislature for their forward thinking to a time when Canada, Mexico and the US are one country.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bmattix
01:45 PM on 04/12/2012
The Keystone Pipeline is a class on rhetoric drowning out reality. Transcanada says this bill puts the power of choosing the route in the hands of Nebraskans. You know, by taking the power away from an independent board made up of Nebraskans and giving it to the state DEQ, an agency that reports to the Governor, who wants the project going as soon as possible. This is the same project that is sold to us as "keeping oil in the US, to keep us from relying on middle eastern oil", yet when pressed on this very statement in a US House Energy Committee hearing in December, Transcanada President of Pipelines Alex Pourbaix could not guarantee one drop of oil would stay in the US, because Transcanada "does not own the oil, you would have to ask those oil companies". These would be the same companies that plan to drive up oil prices in the Midwest by shipping all of this Keystone carried oil to other countries. We're basically letting foreign companies move oil across our land to drive up our prices, making them richer, and being sold on this by telling ourselves the opposite will happen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:02 PM on 04/12/2012
So building pipelines is bad for the economy? Would you recommend that we then help the economy by destroying some of the pipelines we already have.

Import the raw material. Upgrade it with skilled labor. Sell it to the highest bidder. This seems like a sensible economic strategy for the country to follow. Yet when the raw material is bitumen, and the upgraded product is gasoline, diesel fuel, and propane, somehow this strategy no longer makes sense?

Sorry, you're the clueless one. It's called jobs - jobs building the pipeline, jobs at the refinery, and yes, jobs at the dock.
photo
Milo B
Don't be so humble...you're not that great...
04:10 PM on 04/12/2012
Start out with a straw man and than proceed to knock it down...a process so easy that even a slow witted con can do ti...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Marble
10:10 PM on 04/12/2012
You should not route this pipeline above or through sources of drinking water. If you don't think that is true ask someone (like myself) who lives near the Kalamazoo River spill that happened almost two years ago that they are still cleaning up. Oil flavored water is disgusting and I imagine pretty terrible for you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
01:14 PM on 04/12/2012
They could grow more this just start planting it!

http://www.naturalnews.com/035534_hemp_paper_clothing.html

(NaturalNews) It's all about corporate greed and government-control of the population. Hemp - one of the world's most useful plants - has been used to create fuel, paper, clothing, food and natural medicine. So why has the United States (plus other countries) criminalized the production of this valuable commodity? ("Dirty" details below)

Discover the awesome healing power of hemp on the next NaturalNews Talk Hour - visit: http://www.naturalhealth365.com and enter your email address for free show details.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heikhali
02:07 PM on 04/12/2012
Hemp is illegal under Federal law.
02:13 PM on 04/15/2012
A silly federal law based on a complete lack of understanding of plant species.
04:19 PM on 04/12/2012
Makes for all sorts of good building materials, too. Some of the oldest bridges, hundreds of years old, still standing today were made from kemp. The product is better than wood, grows much faster so is much more sustainable as well as cheaper to grow and use than trees. It contains no toxicities, fumes, or harmful wastes and residues.

The only ones that making kemp illegal, makes any sense to, is Monsanto and the oil and gas industry. Yeah, these guys can bury toxic waste and contaminate the whole world and no one blinks an eye. Grow one hemp plant and you've got a SWAT TEAM battering down your door.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Moose Luck 99
GEOENGINEERINGWATCH DOT ORG
06:06 PM on 04/12/2012
Hi KSA :)

INCREASE MPG 30% ON THE CAR YOU OWN NOW!

Decrease NOX and unburned hydrocarbo­ns.70%!

http://www.thevitalizer.com/index.htm

Sonic Spark Plugs (Piezo) or Halo or Pulstar

Tornado Vortex Generator

Even More Mpgs Torque & HP.
http://www.hydrogenboostnow.com/HHO-Dry-Cell.htm

Biofuels: Thinking Outside the Barrel
Why a positive energy future could be closer than you think
http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/energy/biofuels-thinking-outside-the-barrel.html
photo
Conspiracy2Riot
Go ahead, try and eat that fiat currency
07:09 PM on 04/12/2012
i finally agree with you.