Scarlett Johansson Vogue Cover Reminds Us Of Someone (PHOTOS, POLL)

Scarlett Johansson may be having a hard time with her red carpet fashion choices, but the "Avengers" actress definitely turns some heads in her couture on the May cover of Vogue, looking glam in a pink dress and retro waves.

And while we love the ScarJo pics (um, especially the ones with Mark Ruffalo), we couldn't help but be reminded of another stylish lady's Vogue cover: Sarah Jessica Parker, who's doing pretty much the same arms-akimbo, smile-towards-the-left pose on her Vogue cover from August 2011.

Johansson opens up about her love life and her nude photo leak in the interview to writer Jason Gay, but we're kind of loving this nugget from Gay's chat with Stella McCartney, who shares that ScarJo is more than just a fashion plate:

“We started sipping dirty martinis with some friends of hers, and she opened a debate, which was ‘Are you born a killer, or are you made into a killer?’ ” McCartney recalls. “I thought, Wow, she’s not just a pretty blonde actor.”

Check out both ScarJo and SJP's covers below and tell us: whose do you prefer? And make sure to read the full interview with Johansson over at Vogue.

Quick Poll

Who Vogued it better?

ScarJo!

SJP!

VOTE

Share your vote on Facebook so your friends can take this poll

See ScarJo's style evolution!

Loading Slideshow

• 2003

  Getty Images

• 2003

  Getty Images

• 2003

  Getty Images

• 2003

  Getty Images

• 2003

  Getty Images

• 2004

  Getty Images

• 2004

  Getty Images

• 2004

  Getty Images

• 2005

  Getty Images

• 2006

  Getty Images

• 2006

  Getty Images

• 2006

  Getty Images

• 2007

  Getty Images

• 2008

  Getty Images

• 2008

  Getty Images

• 2008

  Getty Images

• 2009

  Getty Images

• 2009

  Getty Images

• 2009

  Getty Images

• 2009

  Getty Images

• 2010

  Getty Images

• 2010

  Getty Images

• 2010

• 2010

  Getty Images

• 2011

  Getty Images

• 2011

  Getty Images

• 2011

  Getty Images

• 2011

  Getty Images

• 2012

  Getty Images

• 2012

• 2012

• 2012

• 2012

• Getty

• 2012

• 2012

• 2012

• 2013

• 2013

• 2013

Comments

[srj]

05:07 PM on 04/16/2012

Good gawd, they are both so photo-shopped, it's scary.

[kallen87]

10:28 PM on 04/15/2012

Scarlett hands down! I think she's more beautiful and radiant on the cover.

[FXBelle]

12:13 AM on 04/17/2012

you mean her photo shopped self does!

[kaysings]

03:52 PM on 04/14/2012

The poses are similar, but then this is merely a variation on the classic "S" pose. This pose -- and the 3/4 angle used in it -- is very popular with photographers and their female subjects because (a) it's flattering and sexy, and (b) it makes the subject look thinner.

I like SJP's version a little better because I think she looks more relaxed, and I like the angle of her head better. Just my opinion.

[Koifish]

03:09 PM on 04/14/2012

Really people, you writers obviously don't know what to write about any more. Comparing these two vogue photos as being similar? They couldn't be more different!!

[ejbt]

12:04 PM on 04/14/2012

human vs. horse? not really fair is it?

[Andrew Bruno]

09:47 AM on 04/14/2012

This article is ridiculous! Does the writer of it have to churn out a story every time a dopey thought comes into his/her head? The word we is used by the writer, so it must be a committee of morons looking at these magazine covers.
There are only so many poses out there, so of course you will notice some similarities in photos over time. Just thumb through your high school yearbook to see what I mean.
Here's a tip for you. Take a dozen or two issues of Vouge, each with a different actress on the cover and look at them while holding them upside down. They will all look the same!

[Dan Slander]

06:23 AM on 04/14/2012

In the good old days this would be Marylyn Monroe vs. Ruth Buzzi. We are not blind here.

[Catherine Held]

08:49 PM on 04/13/2012

I vote for the human. I never found horses attractive.

[mistlesuede]

03:40 PM on 04/13/2012

It's funny that they chose to compare these two women. These are the two women who always confuse me as to how they look. Both of them at times look stunningly pretty and then other times they look completely the opposite.
It doesn't matter though because I admire both of them and their work.

[edejan]

03:32 PM on 04/13/2012

Love #22 dress!

[edejan]

03:29 PM on 04/13/2012

Who can deny that Scarlett is one of the most beautiful women in Hollywood? Her looks are unique in a town full of Barbie doll clones.

[Lechiffre]

04:12 PM on 04/13/2012

she is fit ! ROWRRR!!!

[staziaw]

02:40 PM on 04/13/2012

This is a very popular cover pose. Personally, I like the Scarlett version better than the Sarah Jessica version. The lighting, the make-up, the dress, the hair, and the pose all work together nicely.

The photo of Ms. Parker would have been better if the lighting came from the right side of her face. The suit, however, is quite groovy.

I have to say that the photo with the big cat is wonderful! Again, very old school and very well done. Except for the guy ... I'm not thrilled with him. Cute, but the look is bunchy and choppy.

Ah well ... just my opinion.

[Coinspinner2011]

01:43 PM on 04/13/2012

You cannot compare new hawtness to old leather face. SJP face is so jacked up it makes me want to loose my lunch

[gemini68]

01:38 PM on 04/13/2012

Really?? These photos look nothing alike

[edejan]

03:30 PM on 04/13/2012

Same pose is the point.

[gemini68]

03:33 PM on 04/13/2012

Well one is a close up and the other isn't. You can't even see Scarlett's arm to know if it is in fact the same pose. Which was MY point.

[redheaded stranger]

12:28 PM on 04/13/2012

Having seen some very recent pictures of Ms Parker's face, all I can say is Vogue got mucho carried away with photoshop. Seriously, this lady has some major wrinkles going on and that mag cover makes her look like she's got the skin of a baby.