iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Loren Berlin
GET UPDATES FROM Loren:

TARP Bailout Money Fails To Reach Neediest Homeowners After Two Years: Report

Posted: 04/12/2012 12:00 am Updated: 04/12/2012 9:44 am

A federal housing program funded with taxpayer money left over from the government's bailout of the banks and auto companies is failing to deliver on its promised relief to struggling homeowners.

The Hardest Hit Fund, a $7.6 billion initiative established by the federal government in February 2010 to help families in states most crippled by the collapsed housing market, has distributed just 3 percent of its money -- or $217.4 million -- to help homeowners, according to a report released Thursday by the Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Fund, or SIGTARP.

"Look at the TARP money that goes out to the banks," said Special Inspector General Christy Romero in an interview with The Huffington Post. "That goes out in a matter of days. This has been two years and only 3 percent of these funds have trickled out to homeowners."

The Hardest Hit Fund has helped just slightly more than 30,000 homeowners, or 7 percent of the roughly 480,000 homeowners targeted for assistance by the end of 2017 when the program expires, according to the report. The program is funded by TARP, the 2008 legislation that has provided a $600 billion to bail out various banks and other companies in the wake of the nation's financial crisis.

"The Hardest Hit Fund is really struggling to get off the ground and it's a real concern about whether this money can get out to these homeowners," Romero said.

The 76-page report reads like the autopsy of a dead housing program, placing the blame for the program's paltry performance squarely on the Treasury Department, the government agency responsible for TARP and, in turn, the Hardest Hit program.

According to the report, Treasury initially dragged its heels in getting the largest mortgage servicers to participate in the initiative, instead relying on the individual states to broker arrangements with the servicers. Some of the states lacked the necessary clout to secure servicer participation, thus limiting the program's ability to reach needy homeowners, concluded the report.

"These states don't have the bargaining power that Treasury has with these large servicers," Romero said. "Treasury is already working with these same servicers, having similar conversations with them for other housing programs, so Treasury should be using its influence to really get these servicers on board."

The Treasury Department was similarly slow in securing support from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-owned mortgage giants that collectively control nearly half of all outstanding loans, further curtailing the initiative's reach. The report also blames the Treasury Department for giving states too little time to roll out the program and for failing to establish clear, specific goals that would let the government and the public measure the program's success.

"Treasury actively and consistently engaged with servicers and [Fannie and Freddie] from the earliest stages of the program, encouraging support and addressing impediments to participation," wrote Tim Massad, the department's assistant secretary for financial stability, in a letter responding to the report's findings.

Massad also called the report "disappointing" for its focus on the program's early months instead of more recent progress asserting that last quarter the number of homeowners helped by the fund grew 60 percent and the amount of money delivered to homeowners increased 93 percent.

"This report misses the mark by not acknowledging the hard work of participating states and the innovative ways they are preventing foreclosures in their local communities," wrote Massad in an email to The Huffington Post. "The Hardest Hit Fund is helping states address some of the most difficult problems caused by the housing crisis in ways that suit local conditions and have already kept tens of thousands of families in their homes."

While the Hardest Hit Fund's performance is weak, it is not unique. Many of the federal government's housing assistance programs have underdelivered, most notably the flagship Making Home Affordable loan modification program. Announced in the spring of 2009, the program was designed to help 3 million to 4 million homeowners avoid foreclosure by changing the terms of loans and lowering monthly payments. Nearly three years later, fewer than 1 million homeowners have received a permanent loan modification.

The Home Affordable Refinance Program was also introduced in 2009 with the intent of helping 4 million to 5 million homeowners refinance their mortgages, taking advantage of the nation's historically low interest rates. As of this past January, fewer than 1.1 million homeowners have refinanced through the program, which is reserved for borrowers whose loans are backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

Thursday's report concludes with suggestions for how the Treasury Department can strengthen the Hardest Hit Fund's effectiveness, including establishing measurable program goals, making performance data available online for the public and developing a plan to win "industry support" for the initiative.

"If Treasury doesn't make a change, the Hardest Hit Fund risks becoming another government housing program with limited impact," Romero said. "It's time to change the status quo."

FOLLOW BUSINESS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,747
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (40 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS

photo
murphthesurf3 10:22 AM on 04/12/2012
"Look at the TARP money that goes out to the banks," said Special Inspector General Christy Romero in an interview with The Huffington Post. "That goes out in a matter of days. This has been two years and only 3 percent of these funds have trickled out to homeowners."
This quote is key.Why would banks and other mortgage holders NOT want to access this money for those  Read More...

The states would have some discretion into how the program money would be used, but by and large they would either use forbearance or principal reductions to save the homes of the suddenly unemployed until they got back on their feet.

State agencies, banking and mortgage institutions have failed to advertise the program, to contact those who are likely beneficiaries of the program, or to follow through on applications.

California, Nevada and Arizona teamed up to create a plan to match any principal reductions from lenders dollar-for-dollar, doubling the benefit to the borrower. And the banks, along with the GSEs, simply rejected the plan.

WHY would lenders/mortgage  holders not be interestws?

The banks make bilions in fees by foreclosing that is why they are being sued by Attorney Generals (like AZ) for consumer fraud.

They are only the servicers and only make big money by foreclosing, owning, managing and reselling. In about 70% of cases the taxpayer takes the huge foreclosure sale loss.

HAMP and all the other addons are great. The Net Present Value test proves it is in the best interest for whoever owns the mortgage to modify vs foreclose.

But the banks lie, delay, pretend because the bank that services the mortgage doesn’t own it in almost all cases. Modification help the taxpayer or the investor if in a pool with no GSE behind. Modifications hurt the servicer who loses fees and makes billions by foreclosing not modifying.

Furthermore, the banks, having been saving by massive federal bailouts as an industry, are run by those who regard "give-aways" to the unworthy as bad policy. Hypocrisy, yes, but easily explained away within their own circles.

Finally, there is a concern by the lenders/mortgage holders that cooperation with programs like this might lead to forceable re-valuing (i.e. devaluing) the face value of the home whose prices are generally tied to the artificial housing bubble. Virtually everyone agrees that those valuations are completely artificial. But, devaluation by a mortgage holder has the effect of shrinking their paper assets as they "write off" a percentage of that value. 
01:17 PM on 04/21/2012
Sorry, the link in my post below had a typo in the web address.

It should have been:
http://www.newjerseyhomeKEEPERprogram.info
01:09 PM on 04/21/2012
From all I've read, TARP simply handed these millions over to the states with substantial fees coming straight off the top and handed over to the Housing Agencies for their "alleged" expenses. This nothing but yet another way to pass tax monbey to the rich and powerful. Because of they don't wind up giving out the money to the homeowners, I bet they keep all the bogus expense money.

NEW JERSEY got $38,000,000 FOR EXPENSES to administer the program, but could only find 54 people to approve in over one year. Thousands waiting for 6 months or longer to just get a response.

Lots of pissed off people commenting about NJ Hardest Hit on this site:
http://www.newjerseyhomeownerprogram.info
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
02:37 AM on 04/20/2012
The public doesn't know about any of this or else it would be anarchy!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
02:36 AM on 04/20/2012
No.3

The title company can pick a start date and a plant date to insert negative history on the property that never really happened but clouding the title so they can collect once the home has closed. These encumbrances are added to the property history after the preliminary title report is issued but before the property closes escrow.
The public doesn't know about any of this or else it would be anarchy!
To add injury to insult, the government ends up paying for the fraud as well through RESPA, HUD claims and through a Federal Reserve bank account held by Wells Fargo unbeknownst to the Federal Government. The RESPA and HUD claims are made possible by keeping the limit of the transactions below the HUD insured thresholds. The Federal Reserve account is an retired payroll withholding account Wells Fargo was supposed to close when Bank of America took over payroll (EFTPS) withholding electronic transfers for the government in the early 90's.”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
02:35 AM on 04/20/2012
No. 2

The trustee for the lender adds the outstanding debt on the second bogus loan to the bid price for the property. Since the bid is now 80% +(typical value of second loan) of the original appraisal, the lender is able to clear the first and second loan off their books and now owns the property. The owner never knows what has happened but technically, the real first loan and bogus second loan is cleared by right of the non-judicial foreclosure, the lender now owns the property free and clear and the owner becomes a renter. If someone other than the lender buys the foreclosure, they are issued a Substitution of Trustee and a Deed of Reconveyance from MERS (Mortgage Electronic Recording System). The payment for the foreclosure (generally the amount of the borrowers loan balance at the time) is the price of admission into the loan pool of funds. Instead of getting to take ownership of the foreclosure property, they now have an investor number and an investor loan number which puts them in the real estate investment trust and secures there position in line to collect..
There is always the title policy that is often time collected on by the group as well since most of the title policies issued pay the lender for the property because of unmarketable title either because of easements, restrictions or other title flaws that are placed on the property using DMS Order Management Software.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
02:35 AM on 04/20/2012
No. 1

Washington, D.C., March 2010: “We have been talking here about the enormous mortgage scandal and in response to many questions from readers, here are comments, suggestions and certain solutions: If the bank owns the mortgage company and is also the trustee for the loan and the title companies and the insurance company, the only thing they need to make a deal is the consumer. They issue one loan to the consumer and one to themselves. One is recorded in the county the property is located with the lender as the beneficiary; one is recorded with MERS with MERS as the beneficiary.
Since the consumer only pays on the loan he signed up for, the second loan eventually goes into default because of non-payment, which activates the foreclosure process by the trustee. These non-judicial foreclosures are kept in-house and are only known about by the insiders (the MERS network). This includes the lenders, real estate brokers, lawyers and title companies and other criminals, all of whom are breaking the law. Three months later the non-judicial foreclosure takes place without public knowing about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
02:30 AM on 04/20/2012
It's an f.. in joke !
11:06 PM on 04/13/2012
We should all stop the complaining and just do one "RIGHT" thing to bring the banks and criminals down to their knee's and that is, everyone should stop paying there mortgage payments!! If there is no money going into the banks and government (Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac), they can't run a business and the inside criminals won't get a pay check either. We should all go on a "MORTGAGE STRIKE" for 30 days minimum starting on the 1st of May 2012. That is, all you individuals that purchased your homes with your own hard working money who really deserve to keep your homes want to bring an end to all this crap. So, if you have the guts to save what is rightfully yours, then start doing something about it!!!
11:30 PM on 04/15/2012
Right on..! These crooks collected gagillions in derivatives fraud and interest on money they never lent. The banks are the borrowers of hundreds of trillions in U.S. Taxpayer money that they STOLE from the U.S. TREASURY Dept. We The People are who funded and paid for everything these sheisters did. That is why the ORIGINATION FRAUD occurred and there are no legal liens. They are arrogant slobs and they are bankrupting and stealing our National Sovereignty under the guise of money lent. The American people must accept NO FIXES FOR FRAUD like a WORLD TAX.....WE THE PEOPLE MUST DEMAND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT RESCIND AND GIVE CLEAR TITLE TO ALL HOMEOWNERS. Because these loans were never made. The mortgages and notes aren't worth the paper they are printed on. Time to end our manufactured serfdom.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Siebenstein
> there is no endless growth
02:31 AM on 04/20/2012
There are always too many fearmongers who will spoil such ideas.
10:06 PM on 04/13/2012
An Alternative to Capitalism (if the people knew about it, they would demand it)

Several decades ago, Margaret Thatcher claimed: "There is no alternative".
She was referring to capitalism. Today, this negative attitude still persists.

I would like to offer an alternative to capitalism for the American people to consider.
Please click on the following link. It will take you to an essay titled: "Home of the Brave?"
which was published by the Athenaeum Library of Philosophy:

http://evans-experientialism.freewebspace.com/steinsvold.htm

John Steinsvold

“Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."
~ Albert Einstein
02:30 PM on 04/13/2012
Aww, the people who couldn't afford their mortgages in the first place aren't getting their handouts. Waaaah.
01:13 AM on 03/25/2013
But the banks are sure getting theirs!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
07:21 AM on 04/13/2012
Mr. President setup the American Bank for the Citizens and a Medical Care System for the Citizens.
Let the Corporation have their Banks for Commerical Business and their Health Care for that Corporate Person !
We the People are only harmed by the Corporate Needs !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
06:41 AM on 04/13/2012
Like anyone with a brain actually thought it would do anything except bring immunity to the criminals in the banks and millions to the puppet politicians.

Got something to say,
Say it here on Huffington Post, and get it censored or scrapped all together.
01:17 AM on 04/13/2012
I still don't understand why anyone should be helped over their bad decision to buy real estate at the top of the market with credit that they should have never gotten. If you buy stocks commodities or mutual funds and they drop should the taxpayer bail you out? Let the homes hit the market or let the banks and mortgage companies figure it out with the owners but taxpayers should be left out of this. Zero regulation and fraudulently made loans had a hand in this debacle but the vast majority of the problem was people buying homes they could not afford just because credit became available to anyone who could fog a mirror.
nonethewyzzer
Master of neither subtlety nor style.....
07:22 AM on 04/13/2012
Mitt? Is that you??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gunrunner99
freedom of speech
11:47 AM on 04/14/2012
Well said,faved.
11:29 PM on 04/12/2012
A dollar late .... and a....dollar short.
10:43 PM on 04/12/2012
Are we now supposed to understand that the Bush Admin 3 page proposal for the TARP was not clear enough to show where that bail out was to go?????