iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Syria Ceasefire: UN Approves First Observers For Syria

By EDITH M. LEDERER 04/14/12 01:19 PM ET AP

UNITED NATIONS — For the first time since the Syrian conflict began more than a year ago, the U.N. Security Council on Saturday united behind a legally binding resolution calling for violence to end immediately and peace talks to begin.

The resolution authorized the deployment of the first wave of U.N. military observers to monitor a fragile cease-fire between the Syrian government and opposition fighters.

It also called for "the urgent, comprehensive, and immediate implementation" of international envoy Kofi Annan's six-point peace plan.

Russia and China vetoed two previous resolutions that would have condemned Syrian President Bashar Assad's government for its bloody crackdown on protesters, calling them unbalanced because they demanded that the government stop attacks, but not the opposition. Russia, Syria's most powerful ally, accused Western nations of seeking regime change.

The cease-fire, which formally took effect Thursday, is at the center of Annan's peace plan, which is aimed at ending more than a year of bloodshed that has killed over 9,000 people, according to the United Nations, and to launch inclusive Syrian-led talks on the country's political future.

But scattered violence continued on Saturday, sparking concern among council members.

"We hope that in the immediate term, this will open the way to a cessation of brutal violence, and we hope that we'll be able to say to the Syrian people that the time of indiscriminate violence is finally behind it," said France's U.N. Ambassador Gerard Araud.

Still, Saturday's attacks on the key city of Homs "lead to some doubts about the reality of the commitment of the Syrian regime," Araud said.

U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice called the government attacks in Homs a violation of the cease-fire.

The resolution calls on both sides to immediately "cease all armed violence in all its forms" and condemns "the widespread violations of human rights by the Syrian authorities, as well as any human rights abuses by armed groups."

Annan told the council Thursday that Syria failed to keep a commitment to pull troops and heavy weapons out of cities and towns, and the resolution calls on Assad's government to "visibly" implement this pledge.

The resolution calls for the deployment of an advance team of up to 30 unarmed military observers to initiate contacts with both sides and begin to report on whether there has been "a full cessation of armed violence in all its forms by all parties."

The council said it intends to immediately establish a larger U.N. supervision mission after consultations between Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and the Syrian government.

Deployment of a larger force will be "subject to a sustained cessation of armed violence in all its forms by all parties."

Annan's spokesman, Ahmad Fawzi, has said that Annan – who is an envoy on behalf of the U.N. and the Arab League – envisions a mission with about 250 observers. Troops already in the region from Asian, African and South American countries acceptable to Assad's regime could be used for the mission, he said.

Annan called for speedy deployment of U.N. monitors and Fawzi told a news conference in Geneva on Friday that an advance team of "around 10 or 12" observers, that could quickly be increased to 30, was "standing by to board planes and to get themselves on the ground as soon as possible" once the Security Council approved their deployment.

The resolution calls on the Syrian government to ensure "full, unimpeded, and immediate freedom of movement and access" for the advance team and the larger mission that will follow, and allow the observers "freely and privately to communicate with individuals throughout Syria without retaliation against any person as a result of interaction with the mission."

In the debate on the resolution adopted Saturday, Russia submitted a rival text to the U.S. and Western-backed draft eliminating those assurances, and raised questions Friday evening about the final draft, which kept them. But Ambassador Vitaly Churkin told reporters before Saturday's vote that Moscow "was satisfied" and would vote "yes."

Churkin told the council after the vote that the original resolution is "now more balanced."

"Now we are at an extremely critical juncture," he said, "All parties must stop" the violence.

"There have been too many casualties, too much suffering ... with too many destructive consequences if it ratchets up," not only for Syria but for the region, Churkin warned.

The original Western draft described the council as determined to consider "further measures" – which could include sanctions that Syria's allies Russia and China have opposed – if Syria does not follow through on its commitments. This language was weakened in the final resolution to say the council would consider "further steps."

The resolution was sponsored by the U.S., Britain, France, Germany, Portugal, Colombia and Morocco, the Arab representative on the 15-member council.

Syrian U.N. Ambassador Bashar Ja'afari told reporters Friday that before any observers can be deployed, there would have to be a technical agreement on how the U.N. force will operate, Annan would have to make an independent report on the situation in Syria, and the Syrian government would have to approve the whole package.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW WORLD

UNITED NATIONS — For the first time since the Syrian conflict began more than a year ago, the U.N. Security Council on Saturday united behind a legally binding resolution calling for violence to...
UNITED NATIONS — For the first time since the Syrian conflict began more than a year ago, the U.N. Security Council on Saturday united behind a legally binding resolution calling for violence to...
Filed by Melissa Jeltsen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 43
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
wom122
Primum non nocere
12:36 PM on 04/15/2012
The Arab League sent observers to Syria not too long ago but it made no difference. Better still, back in 2002-03 the UN sent inspectors to search for Saddam's mythical WMD's but when they failed to find a "smoking gun", Bush invaded anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chykim1
sexy geek
03:42 AM on 04/15/2012
i remember as a kid first hearing about the holocast, i remember asking..why didnt anyone helped those poor innocent ppl, i also remember others saying not on our watch, yet its our watch and ppl are suffering by the hands of evil men again! and everyones sitting on the sidelines or taking thier poor time to help them! its quite disheartening! because its a human thing, were all in this world together!
11:46 PM on 04/14/2012
Boy.. now the UN is getting tough..these guys mean business... ....fast hard action that will bring any rogue regime to its knees......we sure get our monies worth out of the org...very impressive.
10:33 PM on 04/14/2012
"UNITED NATIONS — For the first time since the Syrian conflict began more than a year ago, the U.N. Security Council on Saturday united behind a legally binding resolution calling for violence to end immediately and peace talks to begin.

The resolution authorized the deployment of the first wave of U.N. military observers to monitor a fragile cease-fire between the Syrian government and opposition fighters."

Well now that the UN has said this, everything should be over in a matter of days . . . that's usually how it works isn't' it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
magicguy
Magic cures all ills
10:16 PM on 04/14/2012
How unlucky would you have be to be chosen for this assignment?
10:10 PM on 04/14/2012
Thank God it only took them a year, otherwise someone might have been hurt! The UN is a waste of the US taxpayers money! Observers? What to verify that people are actually being killed?
09:04 PM on 04/14/2012
From the comments here you'd think that if you can's start going in a-shooting in a short time-frame, then it isn't a solution. These missing link throwbacks begging for the next fascist war really need to travel.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
itzfatcat
Conservative voter – Small Gov FOOTPRINT
07:22 PM on 04/14/2012
The UN is a worthless organization and a money hole run by socialists.
06:12 PM on 04/14/2012
The United Natons is a useless organization and has been for decades. In general it is an anti-American entity, except when it comes to accepting our money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
leesmkt
05:25 PM on 04/14/2012
The UN. What a joke. Send them packing to, say Albania. Stop supporting all the "non" friends of America. They only want a check.
05:22 PM on 04/14/2012
Now that will end the killing. Right?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
MyTake
Release the Hydrogen Economy now!
04:56 PM on 04/14/2012
Can one suggest, after a year of carnage and killings, that you pack these twenty observers into "Google Street-view" cars and they can send live video back to the UN Youtube Command and Control Center for the viewing enjoyment of the Security Council members!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill Sr
03:24 PM on 04/14/2012
Well that totally solves the problem .... NOT
photo
the taoist
when memory and desire collide memory yields
02:40 PM on 04/14/2012
So the Useless Nations (oops I meant United) has finally decided to act ...bout time
02:19 PM on 04/14/2012
Now they should do the same when Isaelis start killing innocent Palestinians or anywhere in the world where people are killed. Not only to those who they don't like. These band of bloody hands should also set a powerful guidelines on good governance with clear emphasis on surrogates in countries who serve the interests of this band but instead serving their people. Furthermore, they must stop playing with constitutions in order to stay in power. This if implemented would reduce the rate of coup d'etat etc.
photo
dkandycrown
semper fi
05:01 PM on 04/14/2012
What do you think the Palestinians are doing first
05:06 PM on 04/14/2012
Right, go tell that to China. North Korea and any other dictatorship in the World. How about Iran and why not have them in Plaestine to stop Hamas from killing Isaelis ???