iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Joshua Hersh
GET UPDATES FROM Joshua:

Kabul Attacks: Even Before Taliban Siege Ends, A Battle For Messaging Rages

Posted: 04/15/2012 8:14 pm

Kabul Afghanistan Attacks Taliban
Afghan security forces rush into battle against Taliban militants during a siege of Kabul on Sunday.

WASHINGTON -- It didn't take long after the first suicide bomber blew himself up in Sunday's dramatic -- and still ongoing -- siege of central Kabul by Taliban militants for both sides to claim victory.

"The Kabul administration and the invading forces had said some time ago that the Taliban will not be able to launch a spring offensive," Zabihullah Mujahid, the Taliban spokesman, told Agence France Presse on Sunday. "Today's attacks were the start of our spring offensive."

But after a day in which some two-dozen self-proclaimed Taliban militants stormed high-profile sites across the Afghan capital and several other cities, resulting in few casualties, American officials had a different take.

"The Taliban are very good at issuing statements, less good at fighting," said Ryan Crocker, the U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan, in an interview on CNN.

The statements demonstrate the public relations tug-of-war -- a war of words and analysis about who the Sunday siege most benefited -- before the fighting was even over.

Militants claimed to be affiliated with the Taliban stormed into the normally peaceful and secure diplomatic areas of central Kabul around 1:30 p.m. Sunday, in a series of coordinated strikes that appeared to target embassies and high-profile hotels.

Suicide bombers also attacked in three other cities in Afghanistan simultaneously. More than 12 hours later, the fighting continued, but Afghan Security forces -- who led the security response in the capital -- appeared to have most surviving militants pinned down.

For American and Western officials, the day's fighting was a sign of the security forces' vastly improved capabilities, something that has been in doubt ahead of the scheduled drawdown of NATO forces in 2014.

Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Secretary General of NATO, issued a statement from his Twitter account praising the actions of the Afghan security forces for "their courage & professionalism in dealing with today's attacks."

"Absolutely," replied Ivo Daalder, America's ambassador to the NATO, in a tweet. "And swift, decisive response by Afghan security forces shows transition process is proceeding well."

Still, as the fighting carried on into the night, American officials found themselves forced to ever-so-slightly modify their initial assessments.

An early press release from the headquarters of the International Security Assistance Force, the American-led coalition of troops in Afghanistan, described the attacks as "largely ineffective," and added -- in an accompanying tweet -- that the Afghan security forced had "repel[led]" the assault in Kabul.

Another tweet had mocked the assailants -- who reportedly used full-length burkas to avoid detection at checkpoints, mirroring a tactic from last September's attack on the U.S. Embassy in Kabul -- for having "dressed as women again."

But an hour later, with the fighting ongoing, ISAF put out a second, softer statement, attributed to force commander Gen. John Allen.

"No one is underestimating the seriousness of today's attacks," Allen said, adding, "I am enormously proud of how quickly Afghan security forces responded to today's attacks in Kabul. They were on scene immediately, well-led and well-coordinated. They integrated their efforts, helped protect their fellow citizens and largely kept the insurgents contained."

The accolades for Afghan security forces were not nearly as uniform from early eyewitness accounts on the ground.

"I was nearly shot in the back as I was walking down the street, not by a terrorist but by the Afghan police who were just shooting at everything," Wazhma Frogh, an Afghan member of Parliament, told the Guardian. "They had no idea where they were firing."

"This shows just how ridiculous the transition policy is," Frogh added. "I've never seen a street battle before, but what I saw today was the fragility of these police officers. It really shows how poor police training has been."

The attack was described by many observers as one of the most brazen by the Taliban. It was also seen as a sign that rendering the Taliban no longer capable of complex, coordinated military action is still a long way off.

"We do not know the number of casualties, but the important thing is the spectacular nature of the attack," Al Jazeera’s Bernard Smith reported Sunday. "Taliban will claim that once again they have struck at the heart of the city."

At one point, the fighting became so chaotic around the Parliament building that a lawmaker from Kandahar, Mohammad Nahim Lalai Hamidzai, went to the roof and fired back himself.

“I shot up to 400 or 500 bullets from my Kalashnikov at the attackers,” Hamidzai later told the Associated Press.

By Sunday evening in the U.S. -- early morning Monday in Kabul -- some fighting still lingered, mainly attributed to Taliban holdouts who were expected to fight until their deaths. But the attack itself largely seemed to be a tactical failure.

Sediq Seddiqi, a spokesman for the Afghan Ministry of the Interior, told CNN late Sunday that most of the attackers had been killed, and of the 19 suicide bombers who had been deployed to attack the country, 15 had been stopped by Afghan security forces before they could blow themselves up.

"They came today with more than 20 insurgents and suicide bombers and attacked four provinces," Seddiqi said. "As a result, they got nothing, and 19 of them were killed."

Nevertheless, with the so-called "ring of steel" that supposedly keeps Kabul safe from the chaos of greater Afghanistan once again penetrated, the Taliban persisted in claiming strategic victory.

“Some days back the Secretary General of NATO on his visit to Kabul said that the Taliban are not strong enough now,” the Taliban's Mujahid told the Christian Science Monitor in a phone interview. “This was a clear message to him to show how strong we are."

FOLLOW WORLD

 
 
  • Comments
  • 143
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
10:45 PM on 04/17/2012
Karzai lies like a cheap rug. He has no honor nor integrity. He will probably yield as soon as the US is gone, but still die almost immediately. Meanwhile his fighters and the civilians know that a grave situation will exist upon the US departure. The Taliban have been fighting forever, and will be fighting 1000 years from now. He has given the west his behind to kiss and shown us the door. The point of diminishing returns has been reached. It's time to accommodate his request and vacate as soon as reasonably possible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
07:58 PM on 04/17/2012
The Afghan Insurgency has fought the US Military, the most battle hardened military on earth, to a stand still. Imagining that the Afghan Army can do the same is wishful thinking. Who will fight for the corrupt Karzai Government once we are gone? Karzai will capitulate the moment we leave.
photo
papapj
..light as a feather..
04:06 PM on 04/17/2012
Can someone tell me what our argument was with the Taliban in the first place?...BTW, they're sworn enemies of Al Qaeda.
AnneBoleyn1501
Lose your head and all is lost.
02:58 PM on 04/17/2012
.................................................................. will it ever be safe to bring our troops home?
08:22 AM on 04/17/2012
"I've never seen a street battle before, but what I saw today was the fragility of these police officers. It really shows how poor police training has been."

Or, how inept the students are. Ask someone who has been over there, the "police" are corrupt and fairly useless.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heikhali
12:45 AM on 04/17/2012
Don't forget, suicide bombers have amnesty for war crimes in Afghanistan.
11:01 PM on 04/16/2012
BRING THEM HOME!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
repugnicansfearme
Here endeth the lesson.
10:37 PM on 04/16/2012
Bad guys attacked, bad guys surrounded, bad guys killed. Sounds like the Afghans handled themselves well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bdoug25000
Bio? Nope, Mostly mechanical
04:50 PM on 04/16/2012
Big talkers, poor fighters. OK, except for one small detail- the Taliban in some form or fashion have waged war against western invaders, eastern invaders and northern and southern invaders for oh, what a couple thousand years, give or take a few hundred? Every country in the world knows that to defeat the US they must keep sending our soldiers home in boxes and outlast us. Sooner or later Americans will get fed up with the killing of our children for the greater glory of our military and the arms manufacturers. Eventually we will declare victory and go away, just like we did in Korea, Vietnam and Iraq. The Grand American Tradition of kicking A** and losing continues...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eevestigio
Divided we fall...
01:22 PM on 04/17/2012
We know how to end the war quickly and decisively, but we're not allowed to do it.
WWII is an example.
03:30 PM on 04/16/2012
"The Taliban are very good at issuing statements, less good at fighting," said Ryan Crocker, the U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan, in an interview on CNN." What silly but stupid nonsense! That's what was said about the VC during the Vietnam War, and some of us know what happened in 1973--- South Vietnam fell.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eevestigio
Divided we fall...
01:22 PM on 04/17/2012
1974...after we left. Go back and re-read your texts.
01:34 PM on 04/17/2012
Our troops left South Vietnam on March 29, 1973, and our Ambassador Martin evacuated from South Vietnam on April 29, 1975. You'd too need to re-read your history books.
photo
NormalAmericanMan
If we knew anything, we would not be here.
08:24 PM on 04/17/2012
Texts or not, seems no one learned a thing from history.
03:17 PM on 04/16/2012
How interesting that the author of this article does not even once bring up the atrocities recently committed against Afghans. Most recently the Kandahar massacre.

How is that that crime is never put into the context of what is happening today?

Would such a massacre have been ignored had it been done in a European country or in the US?

I hardly think so.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
xstevejx
03:51 PM on 04/16/2012
What context?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eevestigio
Divided we fall...
01:23 PM on 04/17/2012
No one ignored it. What's ignored is all of the good our troops are doing over there. Those stories are the ones getting buried. Open your eyes.
12:04 PM on 04/16/2012
If they keep blowing themselves up it won't be much of an offensive.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eevestigio
Divided we fall...
01:40 PM on 04/17/2012
Exactly...though it seems there are many more expendables for them to use.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hugh Albert
Moderation in somethings
11:53 AM on 04/16/2012
During the Pira mainland campaign we saw just how porous a ring of steel can be, even when the Met at its mightiest is the constructor. The Afghan police are notoriously corrupt, the ANA is better lead and trained but still learning their limits, so I think we can substitute putty for steel in this case.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fattrucker
10:52 AM on 04/16/2012
apparently lawmakers, on duty in the Parliament building have access to kalashnikovs and 500 rounds of ammo, this country reminds me of "Walking Dead" you never know when you'll be over run
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drkharbinger
Healthcare provider, Educator, husband and father
10:48 AM on 04/16/2012
My god....just bring our sisters and brothers home...its not right or left just bring them home.
11:07 AM on 04/16/2012
.... there is about 80 million of them so the recruit line will never end. Imagine If The US was ever invaded by a technologically superior power. Would Americans put up the same fight against the invader as the Afghans have, time and again by the way?

If the answer is yes, than it should be clear that the war is lost and the troops should come home.

If the answer is no, than it is time for the troops to come home and for America to begin a rebuilding.