iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

John Edwards Jury Selection Continues

John Edwards Jury

MICHAEL BIESECKER   04/16/12 01:31 PM ET  AP

GREENSBORO, N.C. — A federal judge on Monday dismissed 47 potential jurors from the coming John Edwards trial, many because they said they couldn't fairly weigh evidence involving the former Democratic presidential candidate.

U.S. District Court Judge Catherine C. Eagles made her decisions Monday based on written questionnaires from 185 people summoned last week to the federal courthouse in Greensboro. Most of those dismissed indicated they had made up their minds about Edwards' guilt or innocence of alleged campaign-finance violations based on media reports. Others were dismissed because they had medical conditions or personal hardships that would make it difficult for them to be present for the trial, which is expected to last about six weeks.

Edwards has pleaded not guilty to six criminal counts related to nearly $1 million in secret payments from two wealthy campaign donors that was used to hide his pregnant mistress as he sought the White House in 2008.

Opening arguments are scheduled to begin next Monday.

Eagles said about 50 of the remaining people from the jury pool will be recalled Tuesday so she can ask questions based on their earlier written answers. Twelve jurors will be seated for the trial, along with four alternates.

Also on Monday, prosecutors and Edwards' defense team submitted lengthy lists of exhibits they intend to use in the trial.

The prosecution list includes more than 700 items, including campaign videos, voicemails left by Edwards for his former aide Andrew Young and emails and notes from Edwards' mistress Rielle Young and from Rachel "Bunny" Mellon, the 101-year-old socialite who provided much of the cash at issue in the case.

Much of the money flowed to Young, once so close to Edwards that he falsely claimed paternity of the baby that Edwards fathered with Hunter and invited the pregnant woman to live with him and his wife in their home near Chapel Hill. The exhibit list also includes copies of receipts for private jets and luxury hotels provided to Hunter and the Youngs after they fled their home, embarking on a cross-country journey intended to throw tabloid reporters and paparazzi photographers off the trail of the married politician's visibly pregnant mistress.

After repeated public denials, Edwards acknowledged he was the father of Hunter's daughter in 2010. The girl, now 4, lives with her mother in Charlotte.

The exhibit list filed by Edwards' lawyers includes a copy of the tell-all book that Andrew Young wrote about his experience, which the former aide later acknowledged contains inaccuracies – mistakes that the defense may use to try to undercut his credibility as a key government witness. The list also contains bank and financial records from the Youngs, which could indicate the defense will argue that much of the secret money was diverted by the couple for personal use.

Neither side indicated they will show the jury a video Hunter filmed of an intimate encounter with Edwards that was the subject of an extensive legal fight between the mistress and the Youngs, who found the tape and claimed ownership of it. A settlement reached earlier this year in state court dictates that all copies of the video be destroyed, though statements made in court indicate government investigators may have retained a copy.

_

Follow AP writer Michael Biesecker on Twitter at twitter.com/mbieseck

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
GREENSBORO, N.C. — A federal judge on Monday dismissed 47 potential jurors from the coming John Edwards trial, many because they said they couldn't fairly weigh evidence involving the former Dem...
GREENSBORO, N.C. — A federal judge on Monday dismissed 47 potential jurors from the coming John Edwards trial, many because they said they couldn't fairly weigh evidence involving the former Dem...
Filed by Katy Hall  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
politicsathome
The More I Know The Less I'm Sure Of.
05:22 PM on 04/16/2012
A new low for Mr. Edwards.
05:08 PM on 04/16/2012
Thats because most liberals still adore Edwards and consider him an Icon
SoCalGrandma
Question consumption.
06:27 PM on 04/16/2012
Not this liberal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinglenotsogreat
11:35 AM on 04/21/2012
Good for you. I don't understand why the tag: Liberal is now a dirty word. Lots of wonderful, smart, decent people were liberal. The "Progressive" ....now, that's a different matter.

IF Edwards broke campaign finance laws (and, golly, looks like he did) he should go to jail. If this dope was an evillllllllllllll Republican the "Progressives" would not be singing the "don't hurt his chid-ren" song. They would want him in jail, if that was what the jury decided.

My goodness, the hypocrisy of the Left. It never fails to amaze me.
photo
Otherday
Chief Imperial Sage, Earth, Milky Way Quadrant
03:26 PM on 04/16/2012
What a waste. Americans shouldn't be making a federal case out of anybody's sexual indiscretions. Whether John Edwards was faithful to his wife is a question of morals, not of law. Raking people over the coals for their sexual decisions is pathetic. It's a mighty sorry spectacle.
05:10 PM on 04/16/2012
how about taking campaign funds to pay for his mistress,thats what he is on trial for 1 million dollars
05:47 PM on 04/16/2012
Well, he didn't actually take the money. Bunny Mellon gave it to Hunter, declared it to the IRS, and paid the gift tax on it. Considering that neither Edwards nor his campaign ever controlled this money, calling this a campaign finance violation is a big stretch, and the judge in this case has already indicated her skepticism. The smart money is on the judge granting a motion to dismiss at the close of the government's case.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Finn
02:41 PM on 04/16/2012
I can't believe that Edwards was the Democratic VP Candidate not that long ago. Of course, he was running with Carey who is even richer than Romney. It's funny how Obama and the press doesn't talk about that.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
enigma2
Moby..One of these mornings
04:30 PM on 04/16/2012
Maybe it's because they don't know who 'Carey' is..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Finn
07:37 PM on 04/16/2012
Actually, it's John Kerry vs. Carey. Sorry about that. But I blame that because the press hasn't reported about him and his money during all of this. Or did they mention the Kennedy's millions. How convenient that President Obama and the Press leaves all of this out.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinglenotsogreat
11:40 AM on 04/21/2012
When the truth stings, get yer little red pencil out!
04:56 PM on 04/16/2012
He ran with John Kerry, though a multimillionaire in his own right, is NOT richer than Romney, though his wife might be. The fact is that the media mentions that very very often - ignoring that in 2004, they watched like hawks in the primary to insure that none of Teresa's money - above the maximum contribution anyone could give - was used.

As to Obama, what exactly do you want him to say. Kerry voted AGAINST the Bush tax cuts that benefited him and Teresa. He ran on rolling them back for the top 2%.

As to Edwards being the VP nominee, look back at the 2004 coverage. The media pushed hard for Edwards, while they insulted Kerry saying if Edwards were not picked it was because Kerry, who had just solidly beaten Edwards, would out shine him -- though that had obviously not happened in the primaries. Edwards was a media and party favorite. None of the things that led to Edwards downfall had yet happened. The media loved the choice, but Edwards then proceeded to be a useless, primadonna, uncooperative VP - although less obviously than Palin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ariel Finn
12:28 PM on 04/18/2012
John Kerry is not worth more than Romney? John Kerry and his wife are worth over $750 MILLION. Ted Kennedy alone was worth over $150 MILLION. It's funny how the biased media never mentioned that or brings it up now.

Truth is, President Obama can't run on his horrific record as President.

He can't talk about job creation when unemployment is worst when he started.

He can't talking about the turning around the economy with 25 MILLION Americans out of work and millions more losing their homes, farms, businesses and life savings.

He can't talk about his failed energy policies with gasoline doubling in price to over $4 a gallon and the billions of dollars he kicked back to his contributor's green companies have gone down the drain.

He can't even talk about the one thing he FOCUSED ALL HIS ATTENTION instead of the economywhen he controlled Both Houses: ObamaCare. Because as we all know by now, it's unconstitutional and it's about to be kicked out by the Supreme Court.

So instead, President Obama and his PR media machine is playing the race card and class warfare and blaming everyone else in the world, but President Obama.

Instead of bringing the country together, the President is pitting Americans against each other. What a disappointment.
01:59 PM on 04/16/2012
Ok, Johnny...don't get too comfortable thinking they won't seat a jury for you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinglenotsogreat
11:47 AM on 04/21/2012
Oh, my heart! Maybe he can get a lawyer to channel him as he is croaking. Worked for Silky.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cherubim
01:40 PM on 04/16/2012
This John Edwards trial is an ongoing travesty of justice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janzee12000
You're all individuals!
01:17 PM on 04/16/2012
Hard to believe that it wold be difficult to seat a jury for this case. Edwards has been such an upstanding guy...
photo
JBS
Part time misanthrope & full time curmudgeon
02:10 PM on 04/16/2012
"they said they couldn't fairly weigh evidence" - If you want to get out of jury duty, that's the easiest way.