iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iran Nuclear Program May Suffer From Marine Insurance Ban Included In EU Oil Embargo

Posted: 04/17/2012 3:48 am Updated: 04/17/2012 11:09 am


* Few alternatives to Western ship insurance market

* Asia govts mull sovereign guarantees for ship insurers

* Chinese tankers look to state-owned insurers for cover

By Clare Baldwin and Osamu Tsukimori

HONG KONG/TOKYO, April 17 (Reuters) - Marine insurance, or lack of it, may yet turn out to be the most effective sanction used by Western nations in 17 years of tightening the screws on Iran's nuclear programme.

A European Union oil embargo on Iran, set to take effect in July, prohibits EU insurers from covering Iranian oil exports anywhere in the world. With around 90 percent of the world's tanker insurance based in the West, the arcane world of reinsurance and liability coverage has become a powerful weapon.

Iran, OPEC's second-largest producer, exports most of its 2.2 million barrels of oil per day to Asia, and the four main buyers - China, India, Japan and South Korea - have yet to find a way to replace the predominantly Western cover for the giant crude oil cargoes en route from Iran to refineries across Asia.

And that could dent Iranian crude exports to key markets, particularly Japan, cutting off a valuable source of Tehran's foreign exchange income. Crude oil prices have risen close to 40 percent to above $100 per barrel since October, partly on fears over supply disruptions from Iran.

"The bottleneck is insurance. If that's not settled, we will no longer be able to transport oil," said one Japanese buyer of Iranian oil, who wished not to be named.

Most maritime insurers pool their coverage and tap into the reinsurance market when coverage exceeds $8 million. A typical supertanker - the biggest can ferry some 2 million barrels of crude - is covered for $1 billion against personal injury and pollution claims.

"In China and Russia, the top players still need reinsurance support. The key reinsurance support and the top players always come from Europe," said Vivian Ho, chairwoman of the Marine Insurance Association at the Hong Kong Federation of Insurers.

As the deadline draws near, shippers are asking whether governments should guarantee the clean-up costs of any spills. Others are checking local laws to see if they can bring in shipments on Iranian tankers insured by Iran.




Japan and South Korea are lobbying EU officials to provide exemptions to the sanctions beyond July, but insurance and shipping executives believe a complete ban is likely. EU officials are due to meet on the issue in mid-May.

"The issue everybody has is that somehow they are reinsured or insured into Europe," said a UK-based ship insurance broker. "There's no obvious solution after sanctions are implemented."

Japanese non-life insurers have warned they will only cover a single tanker at a time carrying Iranian crude oil through the Middle East Gulf, industry sources have said.


THE STATE PAYS?

Without some kind of EU exemption, Tokyo and Seoul may need to provide sovereign guarantees to replace lost shipping insurance or force refiners to go elsewhere for crude supplies.

A source at South Korea's Economy Ministry said Seoul was considering sovereign guarantees, but needed to assess the financial impact before making any decision.

"We need to discuss this with other ministries and we're doing so now because government insurance means people's tax money. We need to check the costs and benefits," said the source who has direct knowledge of the matter.

India, too, is considering sovereign guarantees - where the state covers the clean-up cost of an oil spill or other damage - for its shipping lines, or importing oil on tankers insured by Iran, a shipping industry source said.

Some, though, hold out little hope that Tehran would pay up in the event of a collision or spill involving any of its 39-strong tanker fleet.

"The chance is zero," said another Japanese buyer of Iranian oil, who did not want to be named. "Even if Iran said it would, we would have no collateral for that, so we don't know if they really would deliver if such accidents happened."

Asked if Japan would accept Iranian P&I (protection and indemnity) insurance on independent Tehran-based NITC tankers bound for Japan, the source said: "No, we won't consider that. We have no plans to rely on Iranian P&I as we don't really know if they're going to deliver."

There would also be doubts about whether Iranian-backed insurance would be able to pay out against any claim as Western sanctions prohibit transferring cash out of Iran. Similarly, many ships are heavily mortgaged, and bank loan covenants typically state that vessels must be covered by triple-A rated insurers - raising the question as to whether any stop-gap insurance provider would meet that condition.

Another source at a major South Korean shipping firm noted it could be illegal to ship Iranian crude via NITC tankers insured by Iran into South Korea. "Port authorities would not allow the entry of such shipments unless they are insured by large firms such as P&I Club members."

However, a source at South Korea's Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs noted Iran-insured Iranian tankers may be allowed into South Korea, but it would be tough to let them in as Seoul is a close ally of the United States.

"Without European insurance, it will be impossible for South Korea to import Iranian oil from July 1,' the source said.

Iain Anderson, Singapore-based partner at law firm Ince & Co, said it was "difficult to see how sovereign guarantees could replace the essential P&I risk transfer."

"Something close to half of the world's oil passes through the Strait of Singapore. How would a sovereign guarantee respond to a serious collision or grounding situation in the Strait which involves pollution from such a "guaranteed" vessel?" he said.


CLOSER TO HOME

Most of China's tanker fleet, owned by firms such as China Shipping, COSCO Group and Nanjing Tankers , are covered by European insurers and would not be able to transport Iranian oil unless Chinese insurers step in to fill the void once sanctions hit, analysts said.

That's proving tougher since officials with private ship insurer, China P&I Club, told Reuters this month it would not provide cover for tankers carrying Iranian oil.

China's biggest property and casualty (P&C) insurer, the state-owned People's Insurance Company of China Group (PICC), has yet to decide whether to provide such coverage.

"It's not certain whether state-owned insurers like PICC will have to underwrite the business, or whether the government will take out the money, or whether oil companies will have to share some of the risks," said a Beijing-based marine underwriter with PICC. "The risks involved are huge and you often have to pay out more than what you get."

A source with China's only state-owned reinsurer, China Re, said the firm was acting "very cautiously" on Iran-related business, and had not yet decided on whether to cover oil tankers carrying Iranian crude after July.

But Chinese oil buyers may be more open than others to importing Iranian oil on tankers insured by the Middle East country, if the price is right.

"If the oil is shipping from Iran and freight is at a fair rate, of course we can consider taking more," said a trader with a Chinese oil firm that imports Iranian crude.

Relying more on Iranian-insured tankers could help China maintain its substantial crude imports from the OPEC producer. Iran's NITC plans to add at least 12 more supertankers by the end of next year. (Additional reporting by Samuel Shen in SHANGHAI, Meeyoung Cho in SEOUL, Nidhi Verma in NEW DELHI, Myles Neligan in LONDON and Luke Pachymuthu in SINGAPORE; Writing by Randy Fabi; Editing by Ian Geoghegan)

FOLLOW BUSINESS

* Few alternatives to Western ship insurance market * Asia govts mull sovereign guarantees for ship insurers * Chinese tankers look to state-owned insurers for cover ...
* Few alternatives to Western ship insurance market * Asia govts mull sovereign guarantees for ship insurers * Chinese tankers look to state-owned insurers for cover ...
Filed by Reuters  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 329
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Frank
My last name is FRANK so thats what I am..
09:16 AM on 04/18/2012
One of these days someone in the world is going to get together with a bunch of other nations and tell the U.S. and its flunkies to go to hell and work around all the controlling and petty things that we do ..NO WAR WITH IRAN
11:49 PM on 05/12/2012
Thanks, man.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BudMax77
It's okay to be "The Last Angry Man!"~
12:30 AM on 04/18/2012
Iran, you walk!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heikhali
12:11 AM on 04/18/2012
Criticism could cripple Iran. Their leaders fear this more than anything else.
02:44 AM on 04/18/2012
The real question what is your obsession with Iran?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heikhali
02:48 AM on 04/18/2012
I missed that in the article.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stick4013
11:34 PM on 04/17/2012
He craves the attention just like N. Korea. I agree with REANATUS. Anyone can enrich Uranium or Plutonium (Even THE BEARS- Good comment REAN) - Thing is that they have no delivery system. Last I heard they were using MapQuest as a guidance system - Also their containment vessels are made out of sheet metal. -Richard Stickney ( I can feel the DOD watching - Hi guys. Remember me? I bet you do)
11:10 PM on 04/17/2012
The French will cave.
10:51 PM on 04/17/2012
Paul Harvey was right....lets spray their country down border to border with pork grease and deep fried pork rinds, the hot and spicy ones. Let them "cleanse themselves before Allah then!"
Bet they wouldn't care to fight much, if so... turn them into a 2 mile thick sheet of radioactive glass border to border. Make a great skating rink in about 40-50 thousand half-life years.

Why are we dealing with these idiots? Why are we wasting a second of time or energy on them in any way, they have been fighting someone ever since the tower of Babel was there 2000 years ago. Let them have at it.
If they want a piece of US, radiactive glass would be a solution. Remember they kept our hostages there for years until Terry negotiated a lot of money to get them to set our American Hostages Free. Let them kick rocks or sand or radioactively roller skate forever.
10:50 PM on 04/17/2012
The world (countries) need the oil and I would bet 60/40 that they find a way to get the oil from Iran...... money talks. Do you think they will sacrafice ?
10:40 PM on 04/17/2012
Why are we thinking about invading Iran and not North Korea? Sure they have the "potential" to make nuclear weapons, but so does Japan, and we were at war with Japan even at one point. Hell anyone has the "potential" to make nuclear weapons, why not declare war on the Chicago Bears while we're at it, they don't have nuclear weapons, but they could possibly attempt to make nuclear weapons someday. Also like I said, North Korea actually HAS NUCLEAR WEAPONS. But of course I know why Iran is somehow more of a danger of getting nuclear weapons, because they have oil!

Also if anyone suggests that it's because Iran is more of a threat to the US, keep in mind we've actually been to war on N. Korea and they're technically still at war with S Korea, not to mention they're developing the missiles needed to deliver the warhead. N. Korea is far more of a risk at the moment than Iran.
02:47 AM on 04/18/2012
we are programmed to be obsessed with them and any new enemies we can find. Meanwhile, the real thieves are robbing us blind through the banks and leaving us 16 trillion dollars of deficit. Do you see any passion about those real issues.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Frank
My last name is FRANK so thats what I am..
09:19 AM on 04/18/2012
we wouldn't dare do anything to N.Korea BECAUSE they have nukes
10:05 AM on 04/18/2012
So what, it's not like they can really do anything with them at the moment, are you expecting them to shot putt it across the pacific. If they were to try to do it the old fashioned bomb drop method of deployment we'd shoot the plane down before it hits the South Korean border. Their missiles are nowhere near being capable of actually reaching any target of any importance, as evidenced by their recent rocket launch. I say strike them before they can actually become capable of doing something with those nukes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AKBarb2U
10:36 PM on 04/17/2012
Why are we waiting till July???? No time like the present to stop this mad man.
02:49 AM on 04/18/2012
I guess the picture worked on you. The put an ugly picture and you said "he is a mad man." Looks like George Bush with a beard to me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Frank
My last name is FRANK so thats what I am..
09:20 AM on 04/18/2012
are YOU going to volunteer for the front lines? didn't think so
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfgarrison
10:30 PM on 04/17/2012
that guy looks seriously constipated.
02:50 AM on 04/18/2012
another comment inspired by a picture.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfgarrison
09:32 AM on 04/18/2012
another comment inspired by a comment inspired by a picture
10:26 PM on 04/17/2012
I have a feeling that the EU is going to pay double for gas when all is over.....Iran is the one with oil not the EU. All the EU has is a piece of paper.
10:22 PM on 04/17/2012
Whatever,
Fact is if Iran can not use legal means of becoming a Nuclear Power. They will obviously use other alternatives like the black market. Now days you can pretty much get anything from the black market with countries like Russia and others selling off stockpiles of everything you needto start your own private war. Along with almost every arms dealer in the world. So people really think this little idea in the article will work.
10:20 PM on 04/17/2012
Ahmedinejad, or whatever. He has an innocent face, a righteous one. He believes the world should have an Iranian society. he thinks he is right, but he is so deluded.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Baghooli
Immortals!
10:13 PM on 04/17/2012
"Whereas in the West power is exercised through the banking system, in the developing world it is exercised by those who control resources, and particularly valuable and saleable energy resources like oil and gas.

A secure messaging system - which is all that SWIFT actually comprises - is actually pretty trivial to replicate, and all it needs is participants, which may or may not be banks, that are looking to clear and settle obligations.

When the BRICS nations met late last month in New Delhi, at the top of their agenda was a BRICS bank. There is no reason at all why such a credit institution need pay heed to US sanctions in respect of Iran because, quite simply, the US needs the BRICS more than the BRICS need the US. In fact, there's no reason why it needs to be a bank at all, as opposed to a BRICS credit clearing network or clearing union."

By Chris Cook, former director of the International Petroleum Exchange.
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/ND12Dj03.html
09:59 PM on 04/17/2012
Sounds like this could work.