iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Gerry Smith
GET UPDATES FROM Gerry:

Cybersecurity Bill Loses Key Provision, Dem Blames 'Extremely Partisan' House Republicans

Posted: 04/19/2012 3:48 pm Updated: 04/19/2012 4:37 pm

Cybersecurity Legislation

As the House prepares to vote next week on landmark legislation to protect the nation's computer systems, Republicans have stripped a key provision from a bill designed to secure the power grid and other critical infrastructure from being hacked.

A major piece of the PRECISE Act, which unanimously passed a House subcommittee on Feb. 1, sought to protect vital networks by allowing the Department of Homeland Security to help create cybersecurity standards that companies must meet.

But during a hearing on Wednesday, House Republicans offered an amended version of the bill that removed provisions enforcing cybersecurity standards. Rep. Dan Lungren (R-Calif.), who introduced the legislation, said he had to make the changes to gain political support.

"There was a requirement to reassess our bill as to whether or not it was too ambitious to be able to pass the floor," Lungren said at the hearing.

The question of whether DHS should be given power to enforce cybersecurity standards at private companies -- which own and operate 85 percent of critical infrastructure -- has become a major sticking point for cybersecurity legislation.

Many Republicans and business lobbyists, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, oppose legislation with regulations, claiming they would harm companies, while many Democrats say DHS enforcement is the only way to properly address cyber vulnerabilities within critical infrastructure.

Experts say leaving vital sectors of the economy unprotected from hackers could lead to the collapse of the banking system, sustained blackouts or even mass casualties.

"I remain convinced that we will not have adequate cybersecurity without minimum standards for the nation’s critical infrastructure, such as the electric grid, upon which we most rely," Rep. Jim Langevin (D-R.I.), who is co-chairman of the House Cybersecurity Caucus, said in a statement.

"House Republican leadership appears determined to approach this vital national security challenge like every other issue: in an extremely partisan way that impedes progress, in this case siding with those in critical industries who are neglecting public safety," Langevin added.

Thus far, more than 40 cybersecurity bills have been unveiled on Capitol Hill, emerging from a wide range of committees. The flurry of legislation reflects a growing sense of urgency in Congress after numerous revelations over the past year that hackers have infiltrated the networks of major corporations to steal corporate secrets or leak sensitive customer data.

Experts are particularly concerned about the potential for hackers to target critical infrastructure, such as the power grid. There have been nearly 50 reports of "attempted or successful cyber intrusions of critical infrastructure control systems" since President Barack Obama asked Congress to pass cybersecurity legislation during his State of the Union speech in late January, according to White House spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden.

Earlier this week, a team of senior officials from the Obama administration, including DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, FBI Director Robert Mueller and NSA Chief General Keith Alexander, held a classified briefing for House lawmakers to explain the cyber threat facing critical infrastructure.

The briefing "was intended to provide all House Members with an appreciation for the cyber threat facing the nation as they consider new legislative authorities that could help the U.S. Government prevent and more quickly respond to cyber intrusions and attacks," Hayden said in a statement.

The PRECISE Act will need to be reconciled with two competing bills in the Senate that differ over whether DHS should be given power to enforce cybersecurity standards at private companies.

It will also need to be reconciled with another bill, The Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, or CISPA, which seeks to give businesses and the federal government legal protection to share cyber threats with each other in an effort to thwart hackers. But the legislation, co-sponsored by Reps. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) and Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Md.), has been criticized by civil liberties groups who say it does not protect consumers from having their private data shared with the government.

CISPA also has been criticized by the White House for not enforcing cybersecurity standards on critical infrastructure.

Obama favors legislation that includes "risk-based performance standards to ensure the nation’s most vital of critical infrastructure systems meet a baseline level of security," Hayden said. Last May, the White House unveiled its cybersecurity proposal, which is similar to a Senate bill sponsored by Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn).

"The nation’s critical infrastructure cyber vulnerabilities will not be addressed by information sharing alone," Hayden said.

The House is expected to vote on CISPA next week, marking the first time that comprehensive cybersecurity legislation has ever reached the floor of Congress for a vote. The timeline for votes on other cybersecurity bills remains uncertain.

FOLLOW TECH

From our partners


As the House prepares to vote next week on landmark legislation to protect the nation's computer systems, Republicans have stripped a key provision from a bill designed to secure the power grid and ot...
As the House prepares to vote next week on landmark legislation to protect the nation's computer systems, Republicans have stripped a key provision from a bill designed to secure the power grid and ot...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 121
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
Almondo
Agnostic Realist Tradevknaught
07:17 PM on 04/22/2012
The Republicans had to bow to their cybercriminal backers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
authorized-user
macho macho man
07:10 PM on 04/22/2012
How far will the GOP go to discredit Obama and harm the country?
RSGmusic
Instrumental music is great
07:46 PM on 04/22/2012
Extremely far!!!!

If you deregulate something that is like leaving your door unlocked and open,
when you go on a two week vacation!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rottnkid
Do as I say, not as I do-Oh wait that's the 1%
10:37 AM on 04/22/2012
No sense in commenting..
photo
Moxo
Our enemies are in the GOP.
01:20 AM on 04/21/2012
Experts say leaving vital sectors of the economy unprotected from hackers could lead to the collapse of the banking system, sustained blackouts or even mass casualties.
-----------------
If you haven't yet figured out that Right-Wing Republicans actively HATE America and Americans, then this should convince you!
03:14 PM on 04/20/2012
So we don't need this, but we need CISPA? I guess the important part of CISPA is the ability to spy on US citizens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjcc1987
You can't have everything. Where would you put it?
07:01 AM on 04/21/2012
See that would pass. Keeping these critical infrastructures secure is socialism apparently and allowing governments and companies to spy and track you is "dem freedoms" wes alls been talk'n bout.....
Pstein
Ex GOP
12:18 PM on 04/20/2012
Naturally they will not support gov standards on anything that affects corporations wether it be cyber or the environment. The GOP are simply supported by business and they will cater to them for cash.
groucho42
Radical Moderate
12:09 PM on 04/20/2012
"'Extremely Partisan' House Republicans"

Isn't that a tad redundant?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
A Dub
Conservative government is an organized hypocrisy
11:59 AM on 04/20/2012
“Those who desire to give up freedom in order to gain security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”

Benjamin Franklin
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carbon Forteetoo
Not enough characters to say anything clev
11:50 AM on 04/20/2012
Are Republicans protecting Rupert Murdoch's hacking activities?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
woody7
Always a Dem, but..............
11:48 AM on 04/20/2012
Just gut the "CISPA" part.................................
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OldCowboy
Against stupidity the Gods contend in vain.
11:44 AM on 04/20/2012
They might as well have said, "It's more important to obey our corporate masters than it is to protect the country."
photo
Trapster
Veni, vidi, vomui
11:29 AM on 04/20/2012
Guess this is what Americans need to know:
Republicans are soft on Terrorism!
They are strong on corporate graft.
When the power grid goes down some day watch them scramble to blame everyone else. Maybe they are setting the grid up for attack so they can blame (pick anybody but themselves) Just wondering.....
Never forget: They arranged to have Iran hold the hostages until the election was won by Reagan. Every American can be and will be their pawns if they wish.
lurkinman
Clear thinking is best served non-partisan
11:06 AM on 04/20/2012
One party says yes, one party says no.

Same outcome, different issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Young
Repubs you lost GET OVER IT!
10:35 AM on 04/20/2012
Why am I not surprised?
photo
Hoodoo X
tanstaafl
11:28 AM on 04/20/2012
because you don't want the TSA running your IT department?
10:18 AM on 04/20/2012
This must have been quite a conflict for the repubs. They created the HSA with ongoing fear mongering that we could be attacked at anytime, that there are terrorists just waiting to take down the US, that set up the TSA and all other sorts of regulations to 'keep us safe'. Now in conflict with regulations that might affect corporate profit margins.
The risk of 'cyberattack' is probably much more real, and potentially more damaging, than another shoe bomber, companies have already been hacked affecting corporate and personal data.
Not overly surprising that the repubs come down on the save the profit side.
Of course, had this been proposed by the right and challenged by the left, you would hear howls of being soft on terrorism coming from the repubs.