iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

'Three Cups Of Tea' Author Greg Mortensen Sued By Readers For Book Fabrications

By MATT VOLZ 04/18/12 05:43 PM ET AP

Three Cups Of Tea

GREAT FALLS, Mont. — Regardless of whether claims are true that author Greg Mortenson fabricated portions of "Three Cups of Tea," neither he nor his publisher can be held liable because the First Amendment protects exaggerations or lies in memoirs, his publisher's attorney said Wednesday.

Penguin Group (USA) attorney Jonathan Herman and attorneys for Mortenson, co-author David Oliver Relin and Mortenson's charity, the Central Asia Institute, asked a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit filed by four people who bought Mortenson's bestselling books.

The lawsuit was filed after "60 Minutes" and author Jon Krakauer published reports last year that Mortenson fabricated parts of "Three Cups of Tea" and "Stones Into Schools," which recount his efforts to build schools in Central Asia.

The suit claims Mortenson and the others committed fraud, deceit and were involved in a racketeering conspiracy in publishing lies.

Mortenson headed the conspiracy to set himself up as a false hero so that he could sell millions of books and raise tens of millions of dollars for his charity, the plaintiffs' attorney Zander Blewett said.

"Mortenson obviously is the main, main liar," he said. "He has just drafted himself a web of deception ... and used it to raise $62 million."

In arguing to reject the case, neither Herman nor Mortenson attorney John Kauffman addressed the specific fabrication claims.

Herman said the proper place for someone to object to the books is in the sphere of public debate, not in a courtroom to be prosecuted by self-appointed "truth police." "The First Amendment permits someone who writes an autobiography to exaggerate or even lie," Herman said.

U.S. District Judge Sam Haddon did not make an immediate ruling, saying he wanted to consider the arguments further.

"Three Cups of Tea," which has sold about 4 million copies since being published in 2006, was conceived as a way to raise money and tell the story of his institute, founded by Mortenson in 1996.

The book and tireless promotion of the charity by Mortenson, who appeared at more than 500 speaking engagements in four years, resulted in tens of millions of dollars in donations.

The book recounts how Mortenson lost his way after a failed mountaineering expedition and was nursed back to health in a Pakistani village. Based on the villagers' kindness and the poverty he saw, he resolved to build a school for them.

The lawsuit – filed by two California residents, a Montana man and an Illinois woman who bought the books – says that tale is among more than two dozen alleged fabrications and accusations of wrongdoing by Mortenson and the others.

The hearing comes less than two weeks after Mortenson and the Montana attorney general announced a $1 million agreement to settle claims that Mortenson mismanaged the institute and misspent its funds. The agreement removes Mortenson from any financial oversight and overhauls the charity's structure, but did not address the books' contents.

That's where the civil lawsuit comes in.

The plaintiffs are asking Haddon to certify their lawsuit as a class action that would make everybody who bought the books a plaintiff.

They want an accounting of all the money collected form book sales, have that money refunded to the people who bought the books and have additional damages put into a trust for a humanitarian organization selected by their attorneys and approved by the court.

A First Amendment expert called the lawsuit absurd, regardless of whether the books contain fabrications.

Mortenson did not defame or harm anyone in his books and, barring narrow exceptions like national secrets, he can write what he wants and does not have to justify it, said Wayne Giampietro, a Chicago attorney and general counsel of the First Amendment Lawyers Association.

"It is what it is: Here's a book. If you want to buy it, buy it. If you don't, don't," Giampietro said.

The defendants' lawyers said such a case, if it were allowed to proceed, would damage the publishing industry and dampen free speech because it would require prohibitively expensive fact-checking for every book published.

In the case of Mortenson's memoir, it would be virtually impossible to independently verify all of his experiences in Central Asia, especially with several people cited who are now dead, Relin attorney Sonia Montalbano said. His story hasn't injured anyone, so there is no need to, she said.

"No one can be damaged by someone telling his own life story," she said.

After the "60 Minutes" and Krakauer reports last year, Penguin promised an internal investigation into the allegation that portions of the books were fabricated. Blewett referenced that investigation Wednesday. Herman declined to provide any updates, either during or after the hearing.

"The publisher knows only what the author has told it. That's it," Herman said.

One of the lawyers in the case is Larry Drury, who also represented plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit against James Frey, who admitted on the "Oprah Winfrey Show" that he lied in his memoir "A Million Little Pieces." That lawsuit ended in a settlement that offered refunds to buyers of the book.

Drury and Blewett say the Mortenson and Frey cases "are stunningly close," but Haddon said he would not consider that case in these proceedings because it was settled without addressing any of the issues before him now.

FOLLOW IMPACT

GREAT FALLS, Mont. — Regardless of whether claims are true that author Greg Mortenson fabricated portions of "Three Cups of Tea," neither he nor his publisher can be held liable because the Firs...
GREAT FALLS, Mont. — Regardless of whether claims are true that author Greg Mortenson fabricated portions of "Three Cups of Tea," neither he nor his publisher can be held liable because the Firs...
Filed by Emily Heinz  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:46 PM on 04/25/2012
Teachable moment. There are still some doing the same. Using charities to self promote for gains . We are parents who have formed a group to highlight unethical practices by parents to promote their children. Neha Gupta from Pennsbury High School PA.This is done so their children get a advantage in the college admission process. Neha's mother works for a has hired a PR person to develop their strategy and help in grant writing .
Neha's first grant that was awarded , was recommended by Aunt who is a client of Wachovia. The family has used the PR from one grant to get awards and grants from other including. Neha visits India for one to two weeks . In period that she spends time with friends and family. They send press release and press articles from previous grants to get the next one. 90% of the funds that Neha has raised are from Grants or awards and not from local on the ground fund raising.
The same person who is positioned by her parents as champion of orphans in India. During her trips stays in totally luxury with underage servants doing all her chores. They have well scripted photo shoot and video shoot. This is all done to pad her application for college. Previous cases have been reported locally.(2006 case of Plagiarism by Harvard student) (Three cups of tea)We believe that our children should not believe that there are no consequences for such action.
09:09 AM on 04/25/2012
It’s a shame when a seemingly positive intent results in such a negative story. Every good person wants to contribute and make a difference. While this situation started as a source of inspiration for so many, its outcome stresses the importance of supporting well-meaning human intent with due diligence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Redv14
Evolve Beyond Belief
10:59 AM on 04/23/2012
I read the book a few years ago and was so impressed with Mortensen. What a disappointment to find out that he is a fraud.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:07 PM on 04/22/2012
Follow the money.

What happened to the money "raised" for the charitable cause?

Free peech is one thing; fraud is another.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:22 AM on 04/22/2012
I am planning to sue the litigants for fraudulently wasting court time and taxpayers money.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:20 AM on 04/22/2012
American litigation system is out of control, and has become a serious retardant force in its intellectual, commercial and industrial development.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:38 AM on 04/21/2012
People are too quick to be cynical about this. Mortensen is a decent man who has done some amazingly good work who exaggerated it. 3 Cups of Tea had a co-author and it is hard to believe that the co-author didn't have a hand in "spicing up" the account of Mortensen's adventures in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Nobody seems to doubt that he has actually built schools for girls where they were needed.

Unfortunately we seem to want our heroes to be saints and wise men and when they prove to be frail and human and just like us, with all our foibles, we want to exact revenge. Weakness seems to reaffirm our right to be cynical. But cynicism is a way of escaping our own responsibility to be better human beings by demanding that others be better than us.

I continue to support Mr. Mortensen's efforts. I hope that that all the criticism doesn't leave him feeling equally cynical about his critics, the people who purport to "support" his efforts but in fact were simply buying off their own consciences for a pittance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trekie70
Lifelong bibliophile and political junkie
06:54 PM on 04/20/2012
While an interesting premise, the idea that you can be sued for lying in a book(barring libel) is proposterous. This is a waste of everyone's time. While exploiting readers for money is unethical, there was no implied contract or promise accompanying the purchase of this book. The only "crime" against readers is that it should have been placed in the Fiction section. It is no different than people giving up everything on the word of Harold Camping that the Rapture was imminent and then it didn't.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:20 AM on 04/22/2012
Agreed.
03:16 PM on 04/19/2012
Unfortunately for the media and opportunistic litigation lawyers, Judge Haddon tossed out the merit of any argument that Greg Mortenson's story is similiar to James Frey case.

In Frey's case, the case did not go to trial and never was heard in a courtroom, as there was a quick settlement. The judge in the James Frey case, also stated that the settlement would not have any bearing or prescient on future cases.

Larry Drury, attorney from Chicago who filed the lawsuit against James Frey, received over $ 780,000 in the settlement (legal fees), and three charities were given a total of $ 230,000, and the sad, disgruntled readers who wanted compensation for the harm caused them from reading a fictitious book received only a whopping $ 22,000 combined in refunds (split amongst a few hundred people out of three million total sales). It is all about money for the attorneys.

Bigger problem is to get tort reform again. President Bush failed with 14 bills to make any dent in tort reform. Wealthy liberals, powerful Democrat lawyers and Senators support the second most powerful and affluent lobby (next to NRA) on Capital Hill (oppportunist litigators are thriving under Obama administration) to make sure no tort reform happens under the Democratic watch.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trekie70
Lifelong bibliophile and political junkie
06:48 PM on 04/20/2012
Amazing! Your'e actually attempting to blame Obama for this lawsuit. I can definitely tell you are a card-carrying GOTPer.
photo
shocktreatment
Just barely standing it
07:44 PM on 04/20/2012
Tort "reform", gotta love these "too much gubbmint" republicans, crying "over-reach" on things like the NLRB, but eager to strip or limit common law protections like damage awards.

"...Bigger problem is to get tort reform again...Wealthy liberals, powerful Democrat lawyers and Senators support the second most powerful and affluent lobby..."

Well, first, lawyers, law firms are thirteenth on the list of lobbyists ranked by sector, far from "the second most powerful and affluent lobby ".
Next, the US Chamber of Commerce is by far, the biggest spender in lobbying, more than three times the expenditures of number 2, The American Medical Association.

'Coincidently', not only are the top 2 big spenders pro-tort "reform", so are numbers 4, the American Hospital Association and 5, the Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America.

Oh sure, insurers, re-insurers, HMO groups, pharmaceutical companies, Chambers of Commerce, tobacco, liquor, etc, just being outspent on the issue, yeah right--
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cara DePalma
Thinking will not overcome fear but action will. -
03:11 PM on 04/19/2012
Sad part is so many schools put this book into their curriculum as a way to teach students about different cultures. I guess they learned most about how lying can make you rich and famous. Nice Mr. Mortensen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
QueenOfViolets
01:51 PM on 04/19/2012
The worst lie he told was when he called some ordinary tribal Pashtuns "Taliban." That's like pointing to an average group of white people in the South and telling everyone they belong to the KKK.

He tried to make us believe that he was able to get Taliban members to support education for girls just by having tea with them.

But most ordinary Pashtuns support education for girls, because they understand that an educated mother can raise the standard of living for her children, and they really want to escape from poverty.

The Taliban can't be converted to supporting education for girls. They take a hard line on that subject . That's one of their defining positions as a movement.
GWBear
Reality focused educated progressive
12:44 PM on 04/19/2012
This is just plain silly!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The Promised Land
I do not forgive, I do not forget.
11:49 AM on 04/19/2012
I read the book and yeah, it was only two cups of Tea and NOT three.....this warrants an expensive lawsuit fer sure!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
QueenOfViolets
01:57 PM on 04/19/2012
The tribal Pashtun leader who was wrongly called "Taliban" by Mortenson was pretty steamed up about it.

I saw him on TV. The guy appeared clean shaven and didn't wear a turban or a hat. His uncovered head and clean-shaven face prove that he was no Taliban, because the Taliban will punish severely any man who shaves his face or fails to cover his head with a turban.

The Taliban are evil towards men, not just women. They'll kill a man for refusing to grow a beard or wear a turban. Or for playing a musical instrument, even. The Taliban even ban music, that's how evil they are.

It's a big deal over in Pakistan to call someone "Taliban." It puts them under government scrutiny. It could get them arrested or even killed.

It's horrible that Mortenson would do that to someone who had given him hospitality in his home.