iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Iran Claims To Be Building Copy Of Captured U.S. Drone

By ALI AKBAR DAREINI 04/22/12 09:01 PM ET AP

Iran Drone Copy
This photo released on Thursday, Dec. 8, 2011, by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, claims to show US RQ-170 Sentinel drone which Tehran says its forces downed earlier this week, as an unidentified colonel, right, talks to the chief of the aerospace division of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, in an undisclosed location, Iran. (AP Photo/Sepahnews)

TEHRAN, Iran -- Iran claimed Sunday that it had recovered data from an American spy drone that went down in Iran last year, including information that the aircraft was used to spy on Osama bin Laden weeks before he was killed. Iran also said it was building a copy of the drone.

Similar unmanned surveillance planes have been used in Afghanistan for years and kept watch on bin Laden's compound in Pakistan. But U.S. officials have said little about the history of the particular aircraft now in Iran's possession.

Tehran, which has also been known to exaggerate its military and technological prowess, says it brought down the RQ-170 Sentinel, a top-secret drone equipped with stealth technology, and has flaunted the capture as a victory for Iran and a defeat for the United States.

The U.S. says the drone malfunctioned and downplayed any suggestion that Iran could mine the aircraft for sensitive information because of measures taken to limit the intelligence value of drones operating over hostile territory.

The drone went down in December in eastern Iran and was recovered by Iran almost completely intact. After initially saying only that a drone had been lost near the Afghan-Iran border, American officials eventually confirmed the plane was monitoring Iran's military and nuclear facilities.

Washington has asked for it back, a request Iran rejected.

The chief of the aerospace division of the powerful Revolutionary Guards, Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh, told state television that the captured drone is a "national asset" for Iran and that he could not reveal full technical details.

But he did provide some samples of the data that he claimed Iranian experts had recovered from the aircraft, state television reported.

"There is almost no part hidden to us in this aircraft. We recovered part of the data that had been erased. There were many codes and characters. But we deciphered them by the grace of God," Hajizadeh said.

Among the drone's past missions, he said, was surveillance of the compound in northwest Pakistan where bin Laden lived. Hajizadeh claimed the drone flew over bin Laden's compound two weeks before the al-Qaida leader was killed there in May 2011 by U.S. Navy SEALs.

He also listed tests and maintenance that the drone had undergone, all of which, he said, had been recorded in the aircraft's memory. According to Hajizadeh, the drone was taken to California on Oct. 16, 2010, for "technical work" and then to Kandahar, Afghanistan, on Nov. 18, 2010.

He said it carried out flights from Afghanistan but ran into some problems that U.S. experts were unable to fix. Then the drone was taken in December 2010 to Los Angeles, where the aircraft's sensors underwent testing, Hajizadeh said.

"If we had not achieved access to software and hardware of this aircraft, we would be unable to get these details. Our experts are fully dominant over sections and programs of this plane," he said.

Hajizadeh said he provided the details to prove to the Americans "how far we've penetrated into this aircraft."

The U.S. Defense Department said it does not discuss intelligence matters and would not comment on the Iranian claims.

The semiofficial Mehr news agency said Iran had reverse-engineered the aircraft and has begun using that knowledge to build a copy of the drone.

Sen. Joe Lieberman, an independent from Connecticut who chairs the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said on "Fox News Sunday" that he views the reports with skepticism.

"There is a history here of Iranian bluster, particularly, now when they are on the defensive because of the economic sanctions against them."

He acknowledged that it was "not good for the U.S. when the drone went down in Iran and not good when the Iranians grabbed it." But the senator said he did not "have confidence at this point that they are really able to make a copy of it."

Iran has gone a long way in reverse-engineering some key technologies in the past three decades, particularly in the areas of nuclear and missile technology.

Iran's famous Shahab-3 missile, first displayed in 1998, is believed to be based on North Korea's Nodong-1 design. Iran obtained its first centrifuge from Pakistan in 1986 and later reverse-engineered it to develop its now advanced uranium-enrichment program.

Centrifuges, which purify uranium gas, are the central component of a process that can make fuel for power plants or – at higher levels of processing – weapons.

However, unlike the situation with the drone, the Iranian government usually touts these achievements as the result of an indigenous, home-grown research.

One area where there is concern is whether Iran or other states could reverse-engineer the chemical composition of the drone's radar-deflecting paint or the aircraft's sophisticated optics technology that allows operators to positively identify terror suspects from tens of thousands of feet in the air.

How much data there is on the drone is another question. Some surveillance technologies allow video to stream through to operators on the ground but do not store much collected data. If they do, it is encrypted.

Media reports claimed this week that Russia and China have asked Tehran to provide them with information on the drone, but Iran's Defense Ministry denied that.

Also on HuffPost:

Loading Slideshow...
  • Boeing Phantom Ray

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (U.S.) <strong>Description</strong>: Boeing's stealth Phantom Ray took to the skies for the <a href="http://www.boeing.com/Features/2011/05/bds_phantom_ray_first_flight_05_04_11.html" target="_hplink">first time in April 2011</a>. According to Boeing, the <a href="http://www.boeing.com/advertising/bma/unmanned/unmanned_05.html" target="_hplink">Phantom Ray can perform missions</a> such as intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance; suppression of enemy air defenses; and electronic attack. <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: Unknown. This is a "demonstrator" so there will likely be a future variation of the Ray.

  • General Atomics Predator Avenger

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (U.S.) <strong>Description</strong>: General Atomics Aeronautical Systems <a href="http://www.ga-asi.com/products/aircraft/predator_c.php" target="_hplink">Predator Avenger C</a> is a beast. According to the two-page brochure, the PAC is a "Next-Generation Multi-mission ISR and Strike Aircraft" and successor for the Predator B that can be stacked with a multitude of weaponry. <strong>Deployment</strong>: There is one <a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story.jsp?topicName=unmanned&id=news/awst/2011/12/19/AW_12_19_2011_p25-406500.xml&headline=USAF Plans Larger, More Capable Predator&channel=&from=topicalreports" target="_hplink">demonstration craft currently in Afghanistan</a>.

  • SOCOM Mini Drone Of Doom

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (U.S.) <strong>Description</strong>: Yo dawg, I heard you like drones so I <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/socom-warhead-drones/" target="_hplink">put a drone in your drone</a>. One small deadly warhead-equipped mini-drone stuffed into another, to be launched from the main drone and remotely aimed at a target. <strong> Potential Deployment</strong>: This <a href="http://defensenewsstand.com/NewsStand-General/The-INSIDER-Free-Article/socom-could-have-warhead-equipped-micro-uav-by-spring-2012/menu-id-720.html" target="_hplink">warhead-equiped micro-UAV</a> could be flown by SOCOM in the skies by spring 2012.

  • Suicide Switchblade

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (USA) <strong>Description</strong>: <a href="http://www.avinc.com/uas/adc/switchblade/" target="_hplink">AeroVironment's Switchblade</a> is meant to be a portable, rapid deployment, beyond line-of-sight, "loitering munition" that is a "magic bullet." A bit of advice, AeroVironment: Don't describe a remote-controlled bomb as a "loitering munition" that you call "Switchblade," as it conjures up images of 1950's-style greasers loitering on street corners, flipping open switchblades idly as they wait for their favorite gals. Luckily, greasers won't be in charge of flying Switchblades. They're to be controlled by infantry and <a href="http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=7982421&&s=TOP" target="_hplink">according to the AeroVironment</a>, "Flying quietly at high speed the Switchblade delivers its onboard explosive payload with precision while minimizing collateral damage." <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: Undisclosed.

  • Nano Hummingbird

    <strong>Type</strong>: Surveillance (USA, DARPA Funded) <strong>Description</strong>: AeroVironment is at it again. In partnership with DARPA, they've actually managed to build a human mechanically engineered version of one of nature's most amazing flying machines: the hummingbird. The <a href="http://www.avinc.com/media_gallery/" target="_hplink">Nano Hummingbird</a> is a perfect bid for James Bond-esque style spy shenanigans. Once these hit the field, we'll never look at hummingbirds the same way. "Stop looking at me! That bird is following me!" <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: Within five years.

  • Army A160 Hummingbird Drone

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (U.S. Army) <strong>Description</strong>: Though the military's <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/30/us-army-hummingbird-a160-helicopter-drone_n_1176763.html?ref=technology" target="_hplink">A160 Hummingbird drone</a> doesn't resemble an actual hummingbird so much as AeroVironment's take, it is <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/06/nprs_domestic_drone_commercial/" target="_hplink">raising just as many alarms</a> because of its potential to be deployed on the U.S. home front. <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: May or June 2012, Afghanistan

  • Firescout

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (U.S. Navy) <strong>Description</strong>: Northrop Grumman <a href="http://www.as.northropgrumman.com/products/mq8bfirescout_navy/index.html" target="_hplink">describes the Firescout</a> as a "Transformational Fire Scout Vertical Takeoff and Landing Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicle system provides unprecedented situation awareness and precision targeting support for U.S. Armed Forces of the future. The MQ-8B Fire Scout has the ability to autonomously take off and land on any aviation-capable warship and at prepared and unprepared landing zones in proximity to the soldier in contact." <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: <a href="http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=237497" target="_hplink">March 2013</a>

  • Euro Hawk

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (German Ministry of Defense, purchased from Northrop Grumman) <strong>Description</strong>: NG touts its <a href="http://www.as.northropgrumman.com/products/euro_hawk/index.html" target="_hplink">Euro Hawk</a>, built for German Ministry of Defense, as having a "wingspan larger than a commercial airliner, endurance of more than 30 hours and a maximum altitude of more than 60,000 feet, EURO HAWK is an interoperable, modular and cost-effective replacement to the aging fleet of manned Breguet Atlantic aircraft, which have been in service since 1972 and will be retired in 2010." <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: 2015, 2016 (<a href="http://www.as.northropgrumman.com/products/euro_hawk/assets/SIGINT_NewsRelease_101211.pdf" target="_hplink">PDF</a>)

  • X-47B

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (U.S. Navy) <strong>Description</strong>: A carrier-based combat drone, <a href="http://www.as.northropgrumman.com/products/nucasx47b/index.html" target="_hplink">Northrop Grumman's futuristic X-47B</a> flew in its cruise configuration <a href="http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.html?d=239278" target="_hplink">for the first time</a> on November 22, 2011. It can land with precision on the deck of a moving aircraft carrier, and features twin weapons payload bays that hold up to 4,500 lbs. (<a href="http://www.as.northropgrumman.com/products/nucasx47b/assets/X-47B_Navy_UCAS_FactSheet.pdf" target="_hplink">PDF</a>). <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: <a href="http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/11/navy-killer-drone-refuel/" target="_hplink">2018</a>

  • Taranis

    <strong>Type</strong>: Military (British) <strong>Description</strong>: BAE System's Taranis (<a href="http://www.baesystems.com/BAEProd/groups/public/documents/bae_publication/bae_pdf_taranis_fact_sheet.pdf" target="_hplink">PDF</a>) is aiming to "Push the boundaries by providing advancements in low observability capability and autonomous mission systems operations demonstrating the feasibility and utility of UAVs." Such a statement starts to push the idea of fully autonomous flight from science fiction into science fact, though we're still a long way off from having an actual real debate on fully autonomous drones fighting our battles and flying our skies. Potential Deployment: TBD, test flights have been delayed to 2012.

  • Boeing Phantom Eye

    <strong>Type</strong>: Communications <strong>Description</strong>: Boeing's hydrogen-powered <a href="http://www.boeing.com/Features/2010/07/bds_feat_phantom_eye_07_12_10.html" target="_hplink">Phantom Eye</a> is a High Altitude Long Duration Craft designed to fly at <a href="http://www.boeing.com/Features/2011/11/bds_phantom_eye_11_16_11.html" target="_hplink">65,000 feet for up to four days</a>. <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: Unknown

  • DARPA Vulture

    <strong>Type</strong>: Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) <strong>Description</strong>: <a href="http://www.darpa.mil/Our_Work/TTO/Programs/Vulture.aspx" target="_hplink">DARPA's description</a> says the "Vulture technology enables a re-taskable, persistent pseudo-satellite capability, in an aircraft package." Basically, DARPA is attempting to develop a super long duration craft capable of five year continuous flight. Think about that - the Vulture is intended to fly for up to five years continuously. If it were to launch this year it would be in the air for two Olympics. <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: Unknown

  • AVIATR: Drone To Fly Saturn's Moon

    <strong>Type</strong>: Government Funded Space Exploration <strong>Description</strong>: While the proposal probably won't go through for this mission, this is an aerial drone we can really get behind. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/04/aviatr-probe-proposed-mission-titan_n_1184028.html" target="_hplink">AVIATR</a> would be a long distance drone that would fly the skies of Saturn's moon Titan. <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: Beyond 2020

  • Japan Defense Ministry Ball Drone

    <strong>Type</strong>: Surveillance (Japan) <strong>Description</strong>: Techcrunch <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/10/25/video-japans-defense-ministry-develops-awesome-ball-shaped-drone/" target="_hplink">tells us</a> that the drone can "stand still in mid-air, fly vertically and horizontally through narrow spaces at up to 60km/h, and (which is very cool) keep on moving when it hits the ground or a wall. Thanks to three gyro sensors in its body, the machine can keep also flying even if it's hit by an obstacle." And all for only $1,400. <strong>Potential Deployment</strong>: Undisclosed

FOLLOW WORLD

Filed by Peter Finocchiaro  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,976
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (47 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alicia Westberry
college student & Wordpress blog/ website owner
04:55 PM on 05/08/2012
If the Iranians have a history of making up stories, there's very little, way to know what's true; at least at this point.
08:43 PM on 05/04/2012
Hajizadeh said he provided the details to prove to the Americans "how far we've penetrated into this aircraft."

It sounds so HOT when he says it.
07:42 AM on 04/30/2012
I know I'm a little late with this but I would be more concerned about the drones than the A bomb. China, Russia already have them and the means to deploy. They probably have some sort of R&R on drones. Wish I was going to be around in 10 years to see what's going to happen. I think it's going to be exciting times to say the least.
08:36 AM on 04/25/2012
Copying something illegally flying in your airspace does not make you aggressive or evil
10:19 PM on 04/24/2012
First North Korean rocket ( ballistic missile ) and now an Iranian drone, these will be known as things that fall out of the sky. Even if it fly, will it do anything else?
11:21 PM on 04/24/2012
Then you go & ask them
11:22 PM on 04/24/2012
ask them
08:15 PM on 04/24/2012
hopefully the next drone that goes down over Iran will be booby trapped. That should wipe the smirks off their hateful faces.
KarasudaJay
My micro-bio is empty.
12:22 PM on 04/24/2012
I would be shocked if Russian engineers haven't already examined the drone.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
futbol4fun
A lot of you are too obtuse to understand sarcasm
02:39 PM on 04/24/2012
As well as the Chinese.
08:13 PM on 04/24/2012
they probably examined the drone in it's hangar in the US.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Omega2012
11:40 AM on 04/24/2012
It will be exactly the same asides from the manly stash.
11:27 AM on 04/24/2012
Now, let's assume that Iran has successfully reversed the technology embodied in the drone. What are they going to do with it? If they attempt to use in any foreign territory, the likelyhood of the drone being shot down is great (we know how to track it). What the drone was doing in Iran was obviously illegal, and we will pay the price for that.So unfortunate, however in this world of disinformation, nobody knows where the truth lays: this is not the first time Iranians make up stories, and this is not the first time we make up stories. Go figure. I only hope that we wanted the drone to fail to better penetrate Iranians' information systems.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
futbol4fun
A lot of you are too obtuse to understand sarcasm
02:41 PM on 04/24/2012
Well IF they are able to reverse-engineer, the drone, the technology would be of great value to Russia and China.
05:25 PM on 04/24/2012
You are right. So unfortunate if that is the case, and so bizarre that we did not think about a self destructing mechanism.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:58 AM on 04/24/2012
Can't wait to see the Iranian version of the drone sputtering like a toy airplane over some city with hoards of people underneath screaming and cheering the latest demonstration of Iranian engineering and military supremecy.
11:28 PM on 04/24/2012
are you afraid of them?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:02 PM on 04/25/2012
No, but as I said, we should encourage Isreal to nuke Iran just to be safe. I wish Iran was afraid of the US, but that's laughable considering who our President is now (even Iran knows Obama wouldn't touch them even if they commit terrorists acts in the US).
07:27 AM on 04/24/2012
There isn't a signal aircraft in the Iranian Air Force that they didn't buy from Russia, the US or China. If they can clone this, I'll eat my hat.

With ketchup and fries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rbenjamin
Rule 5 rules
08:37 AM on 04/24/2012
Iran has a long history of manufacturing licensed/reverse/re-engineered Western aerospace products. The US F-5 fighter and MQM-107 Streaker drone are just two examples of (old) US designs that have "gone native." The Iranian versions aren't exactly clones, but their lineages are pretty obvious.

You might want to prepare a hat marinade, just in case.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:46 PM on 04/24/2012
Why waste billions of dollars, like the US does, when aircraft are no longer viable as weapons systems?

Iran has figured out that thousands of INEXPENSIVE, reasonably accurate missiles easily trump very, very expensive aircraft.
04:18 PM on 04/24/2012
That worked out well for them in the Iran/Iraq war?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fireslayer
01:16 AM on 04/24/2012
The Iranians would not know what to do with a drone if it bit them on the keister. The real brains of drones are om the command and control systems that are far beyond them and having a non-pilot plane is available on the internet or most anywhere published. This scares me not.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:14 AM on 04/24/2012
Total BS and delusions about American capability.

The command and control systems for drones are not magic and are easily within the capabilities of Iranian engineers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:52 AM on 04/24/2012
Sure. Iran's "powerful" Revolutionary Guard" and its aerospace division will surely utilize their unmatched engineering expertise to not only reproduce the US-drone, but improve on it. Clearly, Iran only wants drones for peaceful, civilian purposes - like their nuclear program. We should also fear Iran's military power the way we were told to fear Sadam Hussein and Iraq's "powerful" Revolutionary Guard" in 1990.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
futbol4fun
A lot of you are too obtuse to understand sarcasm
02:44 PM on 04/24/2012
Yeah, because eye-hand coordination are solely Americna traits. The best way to keep from being concerned about things is to know absolutely nothing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kinogod
word farmer
01:09 AM on 04/24/2012
Yes they are building it in the lair see, with mini me.
photo
blutopie
no longer 'chosen'
12:10 AM on 04/24/2012
"The U.S. says the drone malfunctioned and downplayed any suggestion that Iran could mine the aircraft for sensitive information because of measures taken to limit the intelligence value of drones operating over hostile territory"

Oh yeah, these geniuses have it all under control. Which is why they made sure to provide the drone with a self-destruct mechanism so exactly what happened didn't happen.

What clowns - wouldn't a self-destruct mechanism be first on the list of measures to 'limit the intelligence value'?

Aside from the fact that the whole spying operation was completely illegal - this is a U2 without Gary Powers but it still is outrageous
photo
fauxshammity005
GOP=corporate lobbying group
12:01 AM on 04/24/2012
...and as a reward for your actions you now get to try to solve the puzzle of just what the heck infected the computers that run your oil system...