iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Argentina YPF Nationalization: Energy Crisis Provoked Government Expropriation Of Repsol YPF

By LUIS ANDRES HENAO 04/22/12 05:45 PM ET AP

Argentina Ypf Expropriation
A worker gestures beside an YPF oil company truck near a plant in La Plata, Argentina, Thursday April 19, 2012. (AP Photo/Natacha Pisarenko)

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina — Less than a decade ago, Argentina was an exporter of oil and natural gas. Now the government has to spend billions of dollars to import fuel.

This dramatic reversal of fortune is why Argentina, already a global financial rogue after its historic debt default, is willing to risk becoming even more of a pariah by seizing control of its leading oil company from Spanish hands, analysts say.

President Cristina Fernandez infuriated Spain, its largest foreign investor, but elated many Argentines by expropriating Repsol YPF SA's majority stake in Argentina's formerly state-owned YPF energy company.

Only two months earlier, Repsol YPF had upped its estimate for the shale oil and gas it found in Argentina to nearly 23 billion barrels, enough to double the country's output in a decade. But the Spanish company said it would cost $25 billion a year to develop, and warned that Argentina would need to overhaul its energy policy to attract the necessary investment.

Instead, Fernandez simply seized the company, giving her government access to billions of dollars' worth of cash, enough energy to answer domestic demand in the short term, and potentially even solving Argentina's chronic money woes in the future.

She accused Repsol of draining YPF since gaining control in the 1990s, underinvesting in its oil and gas fields and failing to keep pace with the needs of Argentina's growing economy even as it paid huge dividends to shareholders.

Repsol blames Argentina's ever-changing mix of subsidies, price caps and export taxes for depressing production as the country's demand for energy soared since 2003, when her husband, President Nestor Kirchner, came to power.

Both are partly right, says Eduardo Fernandez, an independent consultant and former fuels director in Argentina's energy ministry.

The problem was a government approved practice of allowing Repsol to use profits to pay shareholder dividends rather than invest that money in the company's future. "That led to a lack of reinvestment in utilities, little exploration and dwindling reserves, as oil fields dried up and productivity fell," Fernandez said.

Argentine oil production plunged 22 percent from 2000 to 2010, even as demand surged more than 40 percent, according to data from the Argentine Oil and Gas Institute and the Energy Ministry compiled by a former energy secretary, Emilio Apud.

Argentina's production has fallen so low that the government now spends billions of dollars a year on expensive imported fuels that it provides at a loss to companies and consumers.

Cheap energy helped Argentines rebuild after a world-record debt default and devaluation in 2002 left the economy in ruins. It makes less sense now, after nearly a decade of growth, but letting consumer energy prices rise too quickly could cause already high inflation to spiral, and provoke popular discontent in a country where pot-banging street protests have driven other presidents from office.

The energy subsidies spiked by 63 percent in 2010 to $5.6 billion, according to a former energy secretary, Alieto Guadagni. At the time, oil traded at about $80 a barrel internationally. With oil now going for more than $100 a barrel, this year's bill could be nearly $10 billion, even as the economy cools with less demand from China and Brazil.

Fernandez squarely blamed Repsol's lack of investment for a $3 billion energy deficit when she announced the takeover.

"The worst thing is that if we don't do this, we'll turn into an unsustainable country, because of its business policies and not because of a lack of resources," she said, noting that Argentina holds the world's third largest reserves of shale oil and gas, after China and the United States – a resource that remains entirely untapped.

"Our model is one of recovering our sovereignty," she added, noting that the company will not be state-owned, but run as a mixed entity, able to bring in new private shareholders.

But rather than raise fuel prices that are now about five times lower than in Brazil and Uruguay, her expropriation measure insists that oil companies must serve Argentines first, even if it means selling the energy they produce at a loss.

In the lead up to the nationalization, as prospects for quick returns diminished in Argentina, Repsol YPF sought to protect its shareholders by diversifying and making long-term investments elsewhere in Latin America.

Other oil companies did the same. With oil capped at $55 a barrel in Argentina while trading above $100 on the world market, they followed the money, Eduardo Fernandez said.

"So there's no interest in making investments in Argentina when in other countries they're paying in full. So Repsol went to Brazil, Trinidad and Tobago, Bolivia. All of this provoked the disinvestment," he said.

Repsol President Antonio Bureau said Repsol invested billions of dollars in Argentina, and tried to head off the expropriation with promises to spend more. But by then, the Argentines were already determined to regain control. All Brufau could do in the end was demand $10.5 billion, which he said was the market price of the shares Argentina seized.

Deputy Economy Minister Axel Keillor accused Repsol of hiding the true value of its Argentine unit, and said a thorough review of its books now that he's in control of the company's offices in Buenos Aires will affect whatever compensation is eventually paid.

"These morons think that the government is stupid enough to buy everything" that Repsol demands, the 40-year-old Kicillof said, sporting an open shirt and long, Elvis-like sideburns in a heated senate session this week.

Latin America's third-biggest economy hasn't been able to tap international debt markets since its default, but has been able to manage with dollars rolling in from taxes on grains, nationalizing private pension funds and the flagship airline, and by tapping central bank reserves.

By re-nationalizing YPF – and not paying Repsol until international courts resolve the case years from now, if then – Argentina can reinvest profits to develop new reserves and use the fuel Repsol was exporting to save consumers from price shocks as it weans them off the subsidies.

The shale deposits trapped deep under the "Vaca Muerta" ("Dead Cow") basin of Neuquén province could increase Argentina's oil reserves by at least 750 million barrels, and probably three times that much, said Michael Lynch, president of Strategic Energy and Economic Research.

Strategic partners will be key, and the Argentines aren't waiting for them to come knocking. Planning Minister Julio de Vido assured Brazilian officials Friday that Argentine assets of their state-run oil giant Petrobras would not be expropriated, and secured a promise to increase their Argentine market share from 8 percent to 15 percent this year. Brazilian Energy Minister Edison Lobao called Petrobras' current investment of $500 million in Argentina "good business."

De Vido also secured promises of increased natural gas production from French-owned Total Austral, and planned meetings Monday with executives from Chevron and Exxon.

He said he had not heard from China's No. 2 Sinopec oil company, "but that doesn't mean that we won't have contacts in the future."

___

Associated Press writers Almudena Calatrava and Michael Warren in Buenos Aires contributed to this report.

FOLLOW WORLD

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina — Less than a decade ago, Argentina was an exporter of oil and natural gas. Now the government has to spend billions of dollars to import fuel. This dramatic reversal of...
BUENOS AIRES, Argentina — Less than a decade ago, Argentina was an exporter of oil and natural gas. Now the government has to spend billions of dollars to import fuel. This dramatic reversal of...
Filed by Ryan Craggs  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 66
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:11 AM on 04/30/2012
Interesting video prodduced by Platts, the worlds leading energy information providers, on the Argentina / Repsol dispute, and the general rise in energy nationalism.

http://plts.co/pcprepsol
ElCojonuo
I believe in WISDOM
08:57 PM on 04/23/2012
I'm reading this article listening to Tangos by Julio Sosa and Carlos Gardel on my iPad ( seriously, no kidding - Gardel is singing ' Pato ' ).
Anyway, with Brasil poised to be an Oil Super Producer, they really had very little choice but to do it.
At any rate, the Gallegos in the Peninsula are always looking for the way to Joderte in any business you transact with them ( Sosa is singing CAMBALACHE now ! ! ! ! ! ).
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
04:05 PM on 04/23/2012
Maybe Argentina will take after Brazil, and do up the ethanol.
ElCojonuo
I believe in WISDOM
08:59 PM on 04/23/2012
Ethanol doesn't bring the price that Oil does, they need the cash.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
01:03 PM on 05/01/2012
Argentina does not grow the sugercane that Brazil uses to make ethanol.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
American 69
03:04 PM on 04/23/2012
The real crisis in Argentina has been created by Kirchner's incompetence. She needed the cash so she stole it. First from pensions and now she's looking for other sources and found one. When that runs out, she''l just print some more money and eventually it'll be Zimbabwe all over again.
Woud YOU invest in Argentina ?
ElCojonuo
I believe in WISDOM
09:00 PM on 04/23/2012
You probably liked Alfonsin, didn't you ?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
American 69
09:33 AM on 04/24/2012
No. I just don't like corrupt and inept politicians that steal from the people that elected them. She and her husband fit this description.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spriddler
11:32 AM on 04/23/2012
She just keeps digging. Its sad to see such a catastrophe building in slow motion. It is amazing to me that in this day in age with so many historical examples to examine that a leader can make these same sorts of mistakes. Argentina's growth has primarily been a hollow affair driven by extreme government spending. To keep things going she has robbed Argentinians of their retirement savings, raided the central bank, and now doomed what should have been a vibrant spot in the economy. In the meantime inflation has been eating into people's pockets much faster than the government gravy train can fill them. The money is going to run out in the not so distant future and everyone without the wealth and know how to shelter themselves abroad is again going to be wiped out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
parabq
11:23 AM on 04/23/2012
Good for her !!! Obviously Repsol hasnt been doing the job !!!! And I love the fact that Argentina doesnt have access to the International debt market. This is how a responsible government operates. You live on the money you genrate !!!

The US and Europe should take a lesson. Im sure the Inernational banksters think this exclusion is a real threat to Argentina and hate the fact that Argentina doesnt need it. These same international banksters are the ones who screwed them in 2000.

Iceland and Argentina have both told the banksters to take a hike and better off for it !!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spriddler
02:23 PM on 04/23/2012
But Argentina does not live on the money it generates. To maintain government spending the government has robbed people of their pensions (with a promise to take care of them of course), and has ransacked the central bank and forced it to print much more money than it should resulting in painfully high inflation that's over twice the artificially inflated growth rate.

Repsol didn't invest in Argentina because the government made it impossible for them to make anything but a negative return on their investment. Now the government is going to develop the sector? With what money and with whose expertise? More than likely they will continue to see decreased production as has been the case in Venezuela.

Then there is the fact that she has done significant long term damage to her country's ability to attract investment. Argentina had been starting to attract more investment. Less than it should have, but still things were improving. But then price controls and government theft of private property became more and more the norm. Now Argentinians with the means and smarts have gotten their capital out of the country, no one from the outside is willing to bring any in, and the government is rapidly running out of the money necessary for the lavish subsidies they give people to buy their approval. When that money runs out life gets much harder for everyone and there is nothing but a very long and painful road to recovery. She has ruined that country's economy.
photo
freedom1947
San Juan River Fishin'
10:43 AM on 04/23/2012
Bien hecho!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TRUTHHURTS500
08:26 AM on 04/23/2012
Europe and America, with their imperialistic ways have been stealing profits from oil rich countries years. They talk about how bad Iran is but they don't tell you why their is a conflict between the US and Iran. They don't tell you that Iran privatised their oil because the British was stealing profits. The US sent the CIA in to overthrow a democraticlly elected government. Iraq and Libya invasion was because of currency. Iraq and Libya no longer wanted to trade with the dollar and euro. They wanted to trade with their own currency, the Dinar. Qaddahfi was a bigger threat to the West dominance in the world because he was helping the Africa Nations become independent of the West imperialism by creating an African currency with their own world and central banks.

So people need to look at history and the imperialism of the West to understand why their turning away from the control of the West. It is not in the best interest of their countries or people.
08:55 AM on 04/23/2012
Not to mention African development bank and African Monetary Found which were bankrolled by him and are now scrapped.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keedyk87
06:14 AM on 04/23/2012
No Corporo Bullying or Hostage taking there! And look Jimmy! the Horse is Actually Pulling the Cart!
04:10 AM on 04/23/2012
So Argentina wants as many friends as possible over its dispute with the UK over the Falklands/Malvinas and it goes about this by alienating its biggest friend in Europe. Interesting strategy.
05:36 AM on 04/23/2012
... a sure-fire way to encourage desperately needed foreign investment.
photo
Yank in France
Rien se cree tout se transforme
01:22 AM on 04/23/2012
The author of this article set the tone in their first paragraph and continued from there to expostulate in favor of expropriation. But no where do this person talk about a fair price for Repsol's majority stake.

After al,, the government could have just bought out the Repsol shares at a mutually agreed upon price, like people have done throughout the world for thousands of years!

For those rare birds who are actually interested in results, instead of just sloganeering, what has been the result of nationalizations in the past? In Venezuela, nationalization of the oil sector has led to low production and zero refinery. But in other countries, nationalized oil companies have also underproduced their private sector peers.

Ms Kirchner has rallied Argentine public opinion around her, and it is true that precedent suggests that Spanish shareholders may never obtain justice via international institutions, but this expropriation is bad economices for Argentina. Investors will continue to invest in the country but they will surely add a not so subtle risk discount to any price they pay for any Argentine company or resource in the future!
12:58 AM on 04/23/2012
Important fact: Repsol took from YPF more in dividends than what YPF had earned in the period. And even then, they indebted the company. Production output was less and less each year. Repsol might blame price controls but... how come they got such huge dividends? (they completely recovered the investments in some years). According to some reports, the company is so indebted that an analysis of the fair price to pay for the expropriation (required by Argentina constitution) could result in: Repsol should pay Argentina instead.
11:09 PM on 04/22/2012
Nationalisation is obviously the way forward for Argentina and soon it will have a state run energy sector every but as vibrant, productive and safe as those of North Korea and Cuba. Nationalisation of under performing industries has a long and ignoble history with their over manning, low productivity and endless appetite for public money. Argentineans will pay dearly for their leaders cynicism.
Peabodies
We are the Many. They are the Few.
10:30 PM on 04/22/2012
Well done, Ms. President. If you have read "The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein, and "Confessions of an Economic Hitman" by John Perkins, you are aware of how to protect the interests of your country. The earth isn't flat, just yet.

Take care, take good care, Ms. Kirchner.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
08:45 PM on 04/22/2012
Every government should do this.

We also realize that the trolls will come here to rant against socialism, lacking even basic understanding of its definition.