iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Major Retailers Contribute To Severe Water Pollution In China: Report

Posted: 04/23/2012 2:13 pm Updated: 04/23/2012 2:31 pm

Water Pollution
Red polluted water flowing from a sewer into the Jian River in Luoyang, north China's Henan province in December 2011. Red dye was being dumped into the city's storm water pipe network by two illegal dye workshops. ( STR/AFP/Getty Images)

The sassy spring colors flooding into America's stores are also polluting Chinese rivers, according to a new report.

Textile suppliers of Zara, H&M, Ann Taylor, Guess, Target, Disney and Uniqlo, among other big brands, have violated China's environmental laws by contaminating water supplies with chemicals from dyes and printing, according to a new report released from the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs, a Beijing-based nonprofit whose founder, Ma Jun, won this year's Goldman Environmental Prize for Asia.

The report, entitled "Cleaning up the Fashion Industry," bases its findings on the Institute's online database of 90,000 environmental supervision records from Chinese government agencies, dating back to 2004. As of February, 6,000 of the Institute's records were from textile plants, according to the report.

The report also tracked down the names of 48 international brands who source goods from polluters, in hopes of convincing fashion's big names to establish stricter rules for suppliers.

When chemicals used in dying and printing are released into water supplies, they hurt both humans and animals, causing mass deaths of aquatic life and diseases like cancer in humans, according to the report. Access to water is limited in China, where one-fifth of cities have unhygienic water supplies and 300 million rural residents lack safe drinking water all together, according to ChinaDaily.

While the Chinese government does regulate water pollution, manufacturers have found a myriad of ways of getting around the rules, including constructing secret pipes or directly dumping wastewater into rivers. Many factories in the Institute's database have violated standards multiple times. "Fines and punishments that are inflicted are insufficient to prevent factories from accruing repeat violations," the report writes.

The Institute hopes that disclosing the relationships between international brands and suppliers who pollute might be more effective. Before releasing its report, the Institute sent letters to the CEOs of the 48 companies outlining the violations and received responses from 16. Many of the international brands named, like H&M, Walmart, Burberry and Adidas had already begun investigating violations. Others, like Abercrombie & Fitch, Puma, Guess and Zara have yet to address or respond to charges.

The naming and shaming strategy has worked in the past for the Institute. Since the nonprofit was founded in 2006, 50 companies, including Nike and Walmart, have begun cooperating with it in order to become more environmentally friendly -- and to get their names removed from its blacklist. Last week, Apple agreed to have one of its factories audited by the Institute, who has been pressuring the company for nearly two years and has released multiple reports about problems within its supply chain.

FOLLOW BUSINESS

Filed by Alice Hines  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 430
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Earl Gray
Lighting up straw men everywhere
08:43 AM on 04/25/2012
Instead of "naming and shaming", how about legislation that requires that all goods sold in this country be manufactured in plants that meet our nation's environmental and worker safety standards?

If they want to cripple their pown people making poison goods in toxic plants for their own consumption, God bless 'em. If they want to sell those goods in America, they need to comply with our regulations.

It would certainly level the playing field for American manufacturers, instead of the GOP mantra that we need to gut our own environmental and worker safety laws to remain "competitive".

Do we really want to "compete" in this kind of filth?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dvmweb1984
Thinking, ..thinking.
09:12 PM on 04/24/2012
Cheap...Cheap...China. At any price. And, no one cares.
photo
4eva
.-.. --- ...- . --..-- / -. --- - / .... .- - .
04:41 PM on 04/24/2012
I have never seen so much blame shifting as in these comments.
DON'T BUY THE PRODUCTS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JacklynD
Just tell me the truth...
01:33 PM on 04/24/2012
It was criminal when the clothing companies moved facilities to poor and third world countries in order to dodge our EPA standards. I personally believe that the CEOs should face criminal charges for knowingingly polluting the waters with toxins. They know the risks and effects of the chemicals and dyes. Just because you CAN operate within the borders of another country does not make it acceptable human behavior. Just because the human population is not of your race or nationality does not make it acceptable human behavior.
01:17 PM on 04/24/2012
I guess the Chinese Gob'mint don't got no EPA, eh?! And if they do, there are NO enforcer employees.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:35 PM on 04/24/2012
The Chinese EPA is called the State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA).
photo
maninal2
Without knowledge action is useless
02:16 PM on 04/24/2012
A version of which Republicans want here
11:49 PM on 04/24/2012
Fines are so low it is an easy corporate decision to pay up and keep on polluting.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberalcomesfromliberty
Stand Strong for Change!
11:19 AM on 04/24/2012
The Koch-Cain brothers, along with their political party, wants to turn the US into China by making us use dirty water and breath dirty air for their own VAIN GAIN!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rob Vann
Hope for the best,Plan for the worst,Take what cms
12:11 PM on 04/24/2012
The capitalist knows no country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
usa1alltheway
10:54 AM on 04/24/2012
Where are the United Nations when it comes to the betterment of our world? Seems most of them aould rather fight over money, oil and not helping defenseless nations.
China now holds 8% of our total debt. How can we stop them when we continue to borrow money from them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rob Vann
Hope for the best,Plan for the worst,Take what cms
12:13 PM on 04/24/2012
The UN has been hijacked by the 1%.. for profit of course..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
usa1alltheway
01:10 PM on 04/24/2012
No, regretfully it both sides of congress and our Fed Govt.
11:51 PM on 04/24/2012
The united nations was not conceptualized to improve the world for the poor. It was chartered to improve opportunity for business.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
afterallthat
Let's Move Forward.
09:58 AM on 04/24/2012
"...a myriad of ways..." should be: myriad ways. Other than that bit of exposing the reporter's ignorance of proper English, this is a tragic situation for mega millions of people, animals and plant life. Unsafe water is a global problem. In South America products like Monsanto's Roundup have created enormous health and environmental problems. As usual, corporate priorities are designed to benefit shareholders first.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karelh
When fact is fiction and TV reality
09:47 AM on 04/24/2012
Lucky for them they don't have an EPA, imagine striving to mantain clean water in your rivers? Such audacity!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:56 AM on 04/24/2012
China does have an EPA...

http://www.wwfchina.org/english/loca.php?loca=4
China’s Top 10 Environmental Problems

"...SEPA (State Environmental Protection Administration) is the agency that oversees China’s national environmental protection efforts. For more information, check their website at http://www.sepaeic.gov.cn/english/. "
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lensman3
10:41 AM on 04/24/2012
Thanks for the URL. Sounds like China was where the USA of in 1970. (And it will get worse over there before it is better).

Wonder if they have a lake or canal that catches on fire?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dimplesmile7
08:27 AM on 04/24/2012
Actually this story is not new. I saw this on youtube 4 months ago.
photo
gdauth
Dogs rule
08:24 AM on 04/24/2012
And this is what the Repubs want for the USA,
photo
ken607
Nothing natural about gas,nothing clean about coal
08:00 AM on 04/24/2012
NO DUH! YOU THINK THOSE CHEAP PRODUCTS ARE TO BLAME? AFTER ALL THEIR IS A PRICE! there always is, and by wanting cheaper products they dont have the EPA like we do here, but it will come back to hurt us all! not like the repubs or big corps care they care only of money! time to start ,making products back here in america WITH standards. anyone ever buy a cheap product from elsewhere and wonder why it only lasted a few uses? use your brain pay now or later its that simple! you get what you pay for.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:59 AM on 04/24/2012
High labor costs is only part of the corporate move-jobs-overseas paradigm.  The cost to produce items here got more expensive because We The People insisted on Safe Working Conditions (OSHA), no dumping of toxic waste (Clean Air and Clean Water).  We the People made doing business in USA by "interfering" (I call it REGULATING") with business (private, publically traded, for-profit or non-profit) on behalf of employees, environment, or even customers (Consumer Protection) under the premise that business does not adequately regulate itself (in most instances ... There are profitable companies that do, which should be lauded every time we can:

For 2011:  http://www.greenawards.com/winners
In 2010 Nike won an award as top environmentally sensitive company here in USA. Sad to see here on China violator list

This is a great link to see companies that are worker friendly, growing, how many employees in USA versus Overseas (some zero),  and more .   They are making it profitable to employee here even with Regulations.  The overseas trend is about greed.  
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/best-companies/2012/full_list/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cobobs
07:55 AM on 04/24/2012
China has simple solutions to wicked CEOs: just tries them( sort of) and shoots them. Hey don't look at me like that! Just google it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:50 AM on 04/24/2012
Chinese are just following GW's lead....

http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/water_drinking.asp