iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Asteroid Mining May Yield Precious Metals, Cosmic Riches, Planetary Resources Adviser Predicts

By By DONNA BLANKINSHIP and SETH BORENSTEIN 04/24/12 06:12 PM ET AP

Asteroid Mining

SEATTLE -- Using space-faring robots to mine precious metals from asteroids almost sounds easy when former astronaut Tom Jones describes it – practically like clearing a snow-covered driveway.

Jones, an adviser to a bold venture that aims to extract gold, platinum and rocket fuel from the barren space rocks, said many near-Earth asteroids have a loose rocky surface held together only weakly by gravity.

"It shouldn't be too hard to invent a machine like a snow blower to pick up material," explained Jones, a veteran of four space shuttle missions.

But it will be risky and monstrously expensive, which is why some of the biggest and richest names in high-technology – including the barons of Google and filmmaker James Cameron – are behind the project.

If the plan gets off the ground as planned, robots could be extracting cosmic riches within 10 years.

Outside experts are skeptical because the program would probably require untold millions or perhaps billions of dollars, plus huge advances in technology. Yet the same entrepreneurs behind this idea also pioneered the selling of space rides to tourists – a notion that seemed fanciful not long ago.

"Since my early teenage years, I've wanted to be an asteroid miner. I always viewed it as a glamorous vision of where we could go," Peter Diamandis, one of the founders of Planetary Resources Inc., told a news conference Tuesday at the Museum of Flight in Seattle. The company's vision "is to make the resources of space available to humanity."

The inaugural step, to be achieved in the next 18 to 24 months, would be launching the first in a series of private telescopes that would search for the right type of asteroids.

The proposal is to use commercially built robotic ships to squeeze rocket fuel and valuable minerals out of the rocks that routinely whiz by Earth.

Several scientists not involved in the project said they were simultaneously thrilled and wary, calling the plan daring, difficult – and pricey. They don't see how it could be cost-effective, even with platinum and gold worth nearly $1,600 an ounce. An upcoming NASA mission to return just 2 ounces (60 grams) of an asteroid to Earth will cost about $1 billion.

The entrepreneurs of Planetary Resources have a track record of profiting from space ventures. Diamandis and co-founder Eric Anderson led the way in selling space rides to tourists, and Diamandis has a separate company that offers "weightless" airplane flights.

Investors and advisers to the new company include Google CEO Larry Page, Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt and Cameron, the man behind the Hollywood blockbusters "Titanic" and "Avatar."

Extracting water is key to deep space exploration, as well as for driving costs down, Anderson said. The water can be converted into fuel by separating the hydrogen and oxygen. On a manned flight, it could also be used for drinking and growing food.

The plan is to take water from an asteroid to a spot in space where it can be broken down into fuel. From there, it can easily and cheaply be shipped to Earth orbit for refueling commercial satellites or spaceships from NASA and other countries.

Anderson acknowledged the many potential pitfalls.

"There will be times when we fail," he said. "There will be times when we have to pick up the pieces and try again."

The mining, fuel processing and later refueling would all be done without humans, Anderson said.

The target-hunting telescopes would be tubes only a couple of feet long, weighing only a few dozen pounds and small enough to be held in your hand. They should cost less than $10 million, company officials said.

The idea that asteroids could be mined for resources has been around for years. Asteroids are the leftovers of a failed attempt to form a planet billions of years ago. Most of the remnants became the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, but some pieces were pushed out to roam the solar system.

Those free-flying asteroids – ranging from a couple of dozen feet wide to nearly 10 miles long – are the ones being targeted for rare Earth platinum metals that are used in batteries, electronics and medical devices, Diamandis said.

In the past couple of years, NASA and other space agencies have shifted their attention from the moon and other planets toward asteroids. Because asteroids don't have any substantial gravity, going after them costs less fuel and money than going to the moon, Anderson said.

There are probably 1,500 asteroids that pass near Earth that would be good initial targets. They are at least 160 feet (50 meters) wide, and Anderson figures 10 percent have water and valuable minerals.

"A depot within a decade seems incredible. I hope there will be someone to use it," said Andrew Cheng at John Hopkins University's Applied Physics Lab, who was the chief scientist for a NASA mission to an asteroid a decade ago. "And I have high hopes that commercial uses of space will become profitable beyond Earth orbit. Maybe the time has come."

Diamandis and Anderson would not disclose how much the project will cost overall. By building and launching quickly, their company hopes to operate much more cheaply than NASA.

Harvard's Tim Spahr, director of the Minor Planet Center, said getting drilling equipment into space and operating safely sounds "expensive and difficult."

"It would be awfully hard to make money on it," Spahr said.

Richard Binzel, professor of planetary science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said the effort "may be many decades ahead of its time. But you have to start somewhere."

Anderson said the benefit to humanity – and investors – is worth it.

"We do understand that the pot of gold at the end of this rainbow, if it's successful, will be big."

___

___

Online:

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW SCIENCE

SEATTLE -- Using space-faring robots to mine precious metals from asteroids almost sounds easy when former astronaut Tom Jones describes it – practically like clearing a snow-covered driveway. ...
SEATTLE -- Using space-faring robots to mine precious metals from asteroids almost sounds easy when former astronaut Tom Jones describes it – practically like clearing a snow-covered driveway. ...
Filed by David Freeman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 47
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:53 PM on 02/04/2013
Shanghai Metals Market(SMM) Is The Leading Metals Information Provider in China.http://www.metal.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beenzrgud
Can't say what I'd like to here.
08:15 AM on 04/27/2012
If it is possible to squeeze rocket fuel from an asteroid then maybe it makes more sense to use this fuel to steer the asteroid into a high earth orbit where it can then be more economically mined.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
11:34 AM on 04/27/2012
There will be two kinds of rocket fuel taken from asteroids. The first kind would be water that may be turned into hydrogen and oxygen using solar and nuclear energy. The second kind would be metallic pellets that may be used as a rocket propellant for an electromagnetic rail gun rocket. We should be able to slowly move a large asteroid nearer to Earth through the use of a rail gun shooting high velocity metallic pellets in the opposite direction. What we want to do is bring a large asteroid into Earth orbit Between the Moon and Earth without crashing it into the Earth so we may mine it for the "Good Stuff" , and use it as a fuel refilling base for our colonial freighters. We may trust our space mining corporations not to crash it into to Earth cuz that would be bad news for Wall Street. Mining companies never make mistakes.
photo
GarethJonesLives
תיקון עולם
01:47 PM on 08/27/2012
Wouldn't using a rail gun in that manner require just as much energy to keep it in position as it would to just mount rockets to the asteroid? I'm missing something here.
04:04 PM on 04/26/2012
is bo so anti industry that companies are now moving to outter space. yea just what we need four more years of him slowly picking apart this country.
photo
GarethJonesLives
תיקון עולם
01:49 PM on 08/27/2012
Right, they're moving to outer space because regulations are driving them to it, not because there are opportunities to make money in space.

And just for your information, space industry is one of the most regulated sectors there are, requiring compliance not only with national regulations but international regulations and treaties as well. That doesn't seem to be having much of an effect on space entrepreneurs.
08:12 AM on 04/26/2012
Sign me up!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrea Blackwell
Why watch the news? The truth's on Comedy Central!
01:59 AM on 04/26/2012
So, will the minerals mined be useful for say....a nice bullet train for the poor sods left earthbound? Will it power stuff? Does it cure diseases? Turn nuclear waste to organic fertilizer? Can it restore the ozone? Bring better education to the kiddies? Will it purify the water supply? Where's the flying cars?
Is it just a gold standard alternative?
30 years ago, I think they stopped at "Will this feed the poor?"
I've always thought space travel should be an international concern as it seemed rather stupid to have everybody rebuilding the same wheel at the same time.
So Google has been mining our personal information in order to buy their way into space dust?
Sure it sounds cool, but isn't just a little bit too Ferengi?
I'm just sayin'.
Being the maxi-zoom-dweebie that I am, sure, I'm a bit conflicted.
*&^%$#@ I must have grown up or somethin'.
Call me silly, but there's a more beneficial frontier we're ignoring. And it has far more possibilities of yielding something useful.
Why aren't we in the WATER?
photo
GarethJonesLives
תיקון עולם
01:50 PM on 08/27/2012
So no new industries should be developed unless they solve ALL problems on earth.

And just a little piece of information, we ARE in the water. There are 7 billion of us. We can do more than one thing at a time.
10:26 PM on 04/25/2012
If a company can control asteroids, they can cause an extinction level event on earth. All you need is one dr evil and good bye humanity. I think as we get more and more technology, the opportunity for a renegade to destroy mankind increases.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
05:31 AM on 04/26/2012
They can't control asteroids. They can only control the manufacture of good publicity for their movies.
photo
GarethJonesLives
תיקון עולם
01:50 PM on 08/27/2012
Then maybe we should only allow bronze age technology. At least then you'd have to kill everyone one at a time and by hand.
photo
MichaelMcKLA
I'm moving to Pandora.
08:10 PM on 04/25/2012
Maybe they'll strike oil. :)
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
05:33 AM on 04/26/2012
Seems unlikely, but if they did, the price of oil would have to rise to over $50m per barrel or they'd be losing money on it.
JNarragansett
Check your premises
04:49 PM on 04/26/2012
Yeah, there are a lot of living organisms on the asteroids.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kinogod
word farmer
06:31 PM on 04/25/2012
Prometheus. Be careful what you look for, you might find something else.
photo
GarethJonesLives
תיקון עולם
01:51 PM on 08/27/2012
Unobtanium?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:05 PM on 04/25/2012
asteroids are perfect for colonization. hollow them out, set them to spin for .5G, and build a city.
04:38 PM on 04/25/2012
energon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrea Blackwell
Why watch the news? The truth's on Comedy Central!
02:29 PM on 04/26/2012
gold-pressed latinum.
photo
GarethJonesLives
תיקון עולם
01:51 PM on 08/27/2012
And synthale!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goodlucktu
no thanks
03:34 PM on 04/25/2012
This is interesting, and the design for gathering asteroids sound legit but....... use this a vehicle like this to clean the garbage that is building up above us first..
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
03:42 PM on 04/25/2012
They'll do that to and get paid for it by the governments of the world who need to safeguard their satellite communication systems. Their interactive robots will also do maintenance and refueling for a price. Big money to be made here. It's the same equipment either way.
GonzoFactor
Rationality and rationalization are not the same
04:10 PM on 04/25/2012
The big stuff up there that's being tracked would be the easiest to get, but it's also the easiest to avoid. The real danger is the small pieces and particles that can't be tracked or avoided, and that also can't be collected or dropped from orbit. After all, a mere paint fleck that's moving ten times the speed of a rifle bullet is deadly. Being hit by a one-ounce bolt would be catastrophic.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goodlucktu
no thanks
04:33 PM on 04/25/2012
Thanks for the great answer!! have a great day
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theveggiedude
my body is a temple, not a living graveyard
03:20 PM on 04/25/2012
The plot of Alien had a mining spacecraft, and one of the crew was an android. Cameron co-wrote and directed the sequel. The 'bad guy' was the company whose mission directive made the human crew dispensable should it find alien life. I hope it doesn't come to that in real life.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
03:37 PM on 04/25/2012
But not knowing that they were gonna run into dangerous aliens, why did they carry onboard all that fire power, big time machine guns, and grenades? It should have been an unarmed mining spacecraft. Remember that other asteroid movie whereby a big machine gun was unloaded onto the asteroid.
GonzoFactor
Rationality and rationalization are not the same
04:14 PM on 04/25/2012
Wrong movie. In Cameron's movie, Aliens (the sequel), they sent in the marines to find out why the colony had gone offline, and they were well armed. In the original movie, Alien (by Ridley Scott), the only weapon they had was an improvised flame thrower.

The movie Prometheus, out this summer, seems to be a prequel to Alien and is helmed again by Ridley Scott.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sanders McGrillin
03:11 PM on 04/25/2012
I'm down, where do I sign up?
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
03:09 PM on 04/25/2012
And so the era of asteroid mining Robonauts begins. I think that the 21st Century will be known as the Age of the Robot, or Android. Robots will be doing everything soon. The trick is to fool a girl using virtual reality equipment into thinking that she's inside the body of an interactive robot being controlled from a distance. Once Robots evolve into full fledged autonomous Androids by the end of this century they won't need to be controlled interactively by human beings.
03:06 PM on 04/25/2012
I hope they include space based processing facilities were alloys not possible in a gravity environment can be produced in the micro gravity of space, high strength low weight foamed metals that can be used for construction of larger space habitats and ultimately a permanent human occupation of space. They are taking the first steps toward that end – their success is not a done deal but who else is pursuing that vision? The government –phttt!!. Not if it causes an increase in the 1%'s tax rates or subsidies to a slowly dying and increasingly damaging fossil fuel industry .
They are risking their wealth and reputations for a grand vision that will benefit all of humanity – more power to them.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
03:19 PM on 04/25/2012
If free enterprise does it instead of our government, big business gets to keep all the technology patents that may be applied elsewhere which could be worth trillions of dollars. If NASA was receiving royalties on all of the technology that it gave away, it would now be awash in money for space exploration. NASA wasn't doing it for a profit, but rather to enrich humanity, and this is the real reason why NASA is short on money.
GonzoFactor
Rationality and rationalization are not the same
04:21 PM on 04/25/2012
Even so, the only way to learn to do difficult engineering is to try to do it. Lab research and theory are essential, but if we'd tried to go from the lab directly to the moon in the '60's, we probably would have only ended up with dead astronauts. NASA learned along the way that too many old assumptions and too much scientific theory didn't hold up in practical application. Actually working on the advances in a real-world, practical environment is the only way to get it done.

I hope that their efforts lead to improved propulsion, cheaper and better ways to build spacecraft and space suits, better automation, and the ability to bring things back from space cheaply and quickly.

Of course, one of the constraints must be failsafeing return of materials to earth or to orbit. A few thousand tons of metals dropped in the wrong place would not be a good thing.