iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Planetary Resources: Google Execs And Director James Cameron Back Gold Rush To Mine Asteroids (VIDEO)

Reuters  |  By Posted: 04/24/2012 2:01 am Updated: 04/24/2012 12:25 pm


By Irene Klotz

CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida (Reuters) - Google Inc executives Larry Page and Eric Schmidt and filmmaker James Cameron are among those bankrolling a venture to survey and eventually extract precious metals and rare minerals from asteroids that orbit near Earth, the company said on Tuesday.

Planetary Resources, based in Bellevue, Washington, initially will focus on developing and selling extremely low-cost robotic spacecraft for surveying missions.

A demonstration mission in orbit around Earth is expected to be launched within two years, said company co-founders Peter Diamandis and Eric Anderson.

Planetary Resources' aim is to open deep-space exploration to private industry, much like the $10 million Ansari X Prize competition, which Diamandis created.

The prize, which galvanized the emerging commercial human spaceflight industry, was awarded in 2004 to Scaled Composites' SpaceShipOne for the first flights beyond Earth's atmosphere by a privately developed, manned spaceship. Commercial suborbital spaceflights are expected to begin next year.

Planetary Resources' first customers are likely to be science agencies, such as NASA, as well as private research institutes.

Within five to 10 years, however, the company expects to progress from selling observation platforms in orbit around Earth to prospecting services. It plans to tap some of the thousands of asteroids that pass relatively close to Earth and extract their raw materials.

Not all missions would return precious metals and minerals to Earth. In addition to mining for platinum and other precious metals, the company plans to tap asteroids' water to supply orbiting fuel depots, which could be used by NASA and others for robotic and human space missions.

"We have a long view. We're not expecting this company to be an overnight financial home run. This is going to take time," Anderson said in an interview with Reuters.

The real payoff, which is decades away, will come from mining asteroids for platinum group metals and rare minerals.

"If you look back historically at what has caused humanity to make its largest investments in exploration and in transportation, it has been going after resources, whether it's the Europeans going after the spice routes or the American settlers looking toward the west for gold, oil, timber or land," Diamandis said.

"Those precious resources caused people to make huge investments in ships and railroads and pipelines. Looking to space, everything we hold of value on Earth - metals, minerals, energy, real estate, water - is in near-infinite quantities in space. The opportunity exists to create a company whose mission is to be able to go and basically identify and access some of those resources and ultimately figure out how to make them available where they are needed," he said.

Diamandis and Anderson declined to discuss how much money has been raised for their venture so far. In addition to Google billionaires Page and Schmidt and filmmaker Cameron, Planetary Resources investors include former Microsoft chief software architect Charles Simonyi, a two-time visitor to the International Space Station, Google founding director K. Ram Shriram and Ross Perot Jr.

Planetary Resources also declined to discuss specifics about how and when asteroid mining would begin. A 30-meter long (98-foot) asteroid can hold as much as $25 billion to $50 billion worth of platinum at today's prices, Diamandis said.

The company's first step is to develop technologies to cut the cost of deep-space robotic probes to one-tenth to one-hundredth the cost of current space missions, which run hundreds of millions of dollars, Diamandis said.

Among the targeted technologies is optical laser communications, which would eliminate the need for large radio antennas aboard spacecraft.

"We're taking new approaches at design," Diamandis said. "Part of the philosophy we're taking is building very low cost, very small spacecraft. You put up six or 10 or dozens and you get reliability."

Planetary Resources, which currently employs about 20 people, is overseen by former NASA Mars mission manager Chris Lewicki. It was founded about three years ago, but has been operating quietly behind the scenes until now.

(Editing by Tom Brown and Lisa Shumaker)

Also on HuffPost:

Check out the slideshow (below) for a look at the companies and organizations with big goals for the next wave in space exploration.
Loading Slideshow...
  • Bloon - Zero2Infinity's Balloon

    The bloon, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/24/bloon-space-balloon-pictures-video_n_935415.html" target="_hplink">a helium-filled balloon</a>, will take a capsule with as many as six people to 118,000 feet -- not quite outer space, but near space. The company expects to make its first commercial flight in 2013. The cost? €110,000, or about $147,000.

  • NASA

    NASA announced in September that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/14/nasa-space-launch-system-sls_n_962051.html" target="_hplink">it's developing the Space Launch System (SLS)</a>, a heavy-lift rocket that will one day take humans farther than ever before. The 34-story rocket will carry six astronauts aboard the <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/systems/mpcv/" target="_hplink">Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle</a>. <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2392960,00.asp" target="_hplink">According to PC Mag</a>, NASA will spend $18 billion over the next five years developing the SLS. With <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/14/space-shuttle-program-qa-_n_861994.html" target="_hplink">the retirement of the space shuttle program</a>, NASA currently pays Russia around $60 million per person to get American astronauts into space. Remember, there's still time <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/15/nasa-to-hire-new-astronauts_n_1095686.html" target="_hplink">to apply to be an astronaut</a>.

  • Virgin Galactic

    Over 450 "astronauts" have already booked a $200,000 spot on Sir Richard Branson's SpaceShipTwo, a craft that will take passengers to an altitude of 110 km (68.3 miles). Branson hopes to begin commercial flights in 2013, but that date could get pushed back. "We want to be sure we've really tested the craft through and through before turning it over to the astronauts who bought tickets to go up," he said in October, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/18/richard-branson-dedicates_n_1017226.html" target="_hplink">according to the Associated Press</a>. "If it takes a bit longer, we'll take a little bit longer." Passengers will experience about five minutes of weighlessness during the 2 1/2 hour sub-orbital spaceflight.

  • SpaceX

    In December 2010, SpaceX <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/16/spacex-international-space-station_n_927916.html" target="_hplink">became the first private company</a> to have a spacecraft re-enter orbit, <a href="http://www.spacex.com/press.php?page=20101208" target="_hplink">when its Dragon spacecraft</a> orbited earth twice and then landed in the Pacific Ocean. Next stop? The International Space Station. A representative from SpaceX told HuffPost that a Dragon capsule carrying supplies to the ISS will launch in early 2012. It will be the first commercial company to berth a spacecraft with the space station. But you're going to have to be a NASA astronaut to hitch a ride to space with SpaceX, as the company doesn't have any plans in the near future for space tourism.

  • Blue Origin

    Blue Origin, the notoriously-secretive company underwritten by Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos, is developing both orbital and sub-orbital launch vehicles to take people into space. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/03/blue-origin-spaceship-fai_n_947731.html" target="_hplink">The company recently released video</a> of a test of its New Shepard rocket, a three-person capsule and launch vehicle that the company is planning to use to take space tourists "to the edge of space." The cost and timeline of the completion of the New Shepard is unclear. <a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nasa-awards-next-set-of-commercial-crew-development-agreements-120113774.html" target="_hplink">In April, Blue Origin was awarded</a> $22 million from NASA "to advance commercial crew space transportation system concepts and mature the design and development of elements of their systems, such as launch vehicles and spacecraft."

  • Space Adventures/Armadillo Aerospace

    Space Adventures, a company that has sent seven private citizens to the International Space Station, <a href="http://www.spaceadventures.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=news.viewnews&newsid=791" target="_hplink">announced in 2010</a> that it would partner with Armadillo Aerospace to provide suborbital spaceflights. The <a href="http://www.spaceadventures.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=suborbital.Vehicle_Design" target="_hplink">two-passenger rocket</a> will land and take-off vertically and allow for a 360-degree view of the earth below. According to Jaunted, the rocket will travel 62 miles above the earth. <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/13/space-adventures-undercuts-virgin-galactic-announces-100-000/" target="_hplink">Engadget reports</a> that a flight to space will set you back $102,000.

  • Orbital Technologies' Space Hotel

    Of course, you'll need somewhere to put your bags once you're in space. Orbital Technologies, a Russian company, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/21/space-hotel-pictures-video_n_931951.html" target="_hplink">is building a space hotel</a> where 7 guests will be able to dine on veal cheeks and wild mushrooms at 217 miles above the earth. The company is planning to open the hotel in 2016. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/19/russia-space-tourism-idUSLDE77F0PF20110819" target="_hplink">According to Reuters</a>, a five-day stay will set you back a cool $1 million.

  • Video: "Nasa Searches For Life Clues on Mars" info

FOLLOW TECH

From our partners


By Irene Klotz CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida (Reuters) - Google Inc executives Larry Page and Eric Schmidt are among those bankrolling a venture to survey and eventually extract precious meta...
By Irene Klotz CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida (Reuters) - Google Inc executives Larry Page and Eric Schmidt are among those bankrolling a venture to survey and eventually extract precious meta...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 582
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lives
The Venus Project ... look it up
03:21 AM on 04/25/2012
This is amusing. And it won't benefit humanity. At least not all of us. As long as we maintain our social institutions in the manner we do today, this will benefit the ultra rich if it is attainable, but humanity will take it in the rear like we do today. I won't provide jobs, unless you are a robot. This will definitely be an automated process. This isn't like the gold rush of the late 1800's.

How about using all this amazing technology to free man kind from scarcity, so your life isn't valued by how much money you earn. A world of access abundance would have no need for money, then we could all benefit from such endeavors. This is known as a Resource Based Economy (The Venus Project) or an Earth Economy (The Zeitgeist Movement).
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:46 AM on 04/25/2012
As Larry Niven forecast in the 60s in his novels.

I've long said that no true sustained space program will exist until there's profit out there encouraging the corporations to go get it. The New World was explored because people thought there was money there, and the same will be true beyond our world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rav1267
Hare Krishna
11:56 PM on 04/24/2012
Ok what next, a futuristic landing on the sun.
Tim The Enchanter
Gary Johnson 2016
09:56 PM on 04/24/2012
Interesting, though I just don't see any payoff any time soon, either for them or mankind.

But hey, why work on energy technology when you can dream stupid?
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
10:02 PM on 04/24/2012
Interactive robots and later androids building and maintaining solar energy platforms for us in Earth orbit out of asteroid and moon materials will help to solve our energy problems.
Tim The Enchanter
Gary Johnson 2016
10:10 AM on 04/25/2012
And when we have those up and running, it would be a good time to start a company. They're doing this simply to be first and try to gobble up the market down the road. Also to bilk investers.
10:07 PM on 04/24/2012
Are we to believe that there isn't any energy technology on any of the other planets and/or moons in our solar system?
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
10:15 PM on 04/24/2012
There will be big time energy technology spin-offs from this, but the patents will be owed by the investors so they may get a return on their investment. No more free technology from NASA.
Tim The Enchanter
Gary Johnson 2016
10:09 AM on 04/25/2012
Well, I suppose the Martians might have left something.
09:39 PM on 04/24/2012
What is sad is that we have lost sight in the fact that space is the future of mankind. Overpopulation and new jobs in the space industry are just a few good reasons to explore space. Just imagine if the "new world" had never been explored.
09:24 PM on 04/24/2012
yes, off world asteroid mining
the international space station is a joke
the asteroider naughts want off of there
the drink their own urine'
i wouldnt like it
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
09:42 PM on 04/24/2012
The space race had to wait until robotic technology was of age. Now we're gonna get somewhere. We'll need the science that NASA created for us in the years ahead as our robots conquer our solar system and provide a habitat base for us to colonize.
09:54 PM on 04/24/2012
i was educated in robot welding systems and machine intrigation
i know what the can do
hook up some solar cells and some batteries, a thermodynamic heat source reactor'
you can get them darn machines to do a lot of stuff
Make Way For The Humans
Were Coming Through
09:22 PM on 04/24/2012
i do recomend bacon cheese burgers and a can of beans
its not fancy but it fuells the fires
and it tastes good
its brain food
09:21 PM on 04/24/2012
we are made of stars
dont fool yourself
09:16 PM on 04/24/2012
It is about time we got off Earth, and looked about a bit. Like any prospecting, it may be a few missions before they find anything worth bringing home.
But, think of the tourist potential of stopping off at an asteroid or two.
09:12 PM on 04/24/2012
bringing asteroids close enough to earth, parking them in orbit and trying to mine them would be extremely problematic and stupid. id love to know the insurance company that would underwrite this venture. see my other post. go to the moon and mine it. much safer much more predicable.
photo
Ferrariqx
Who's NEXT?
09:18 PM on 04/24/2012
I'm fairly certain that the engineers and scientists assigned to tackle the technical difficulties have determine the feasibility. One thing is for sure too. They probably have mastered good grammar and know how to spell "predictable."

NEXT!
10:10 PM on 04/24/2012
i think i spelled everything correctly in that last answer to you. NEXT.
photo
The Zen Parrot
TheParrotCafe.com
10:14 PM on 04/24/2012
Feasibility and practicality are two entirely separate questions. So somebody makes millions of dollars mining platinum or water on orbiting asteroids. If it costs billions of dollars to produce it's hardly practical.
11:47 PM on 04/24/2012
The moon would be cool too and their are ways around the gravity well for off loading materials into space--- electromagnetic rail propulsion for one.

I do like the idea of mining the asteroids though-- the potential of finding highly concentrated ores and not having to dip into a steep gravity well would be a great thing for the prospector.
photo
othel
I believe I don't believe
09:08 PM on 04/24/2012
Rich guys doing space exploration. Why don't they do something noteworthy like helping to end hunger and poverty.
Another classic case of what happens when the super rich aren't being taxed enough.
photo
paultec1
my bio is private
09:15 PM on 04/24/2012
They could do more good like helping us old Americans who can't wipe their own but.ts anymore.but that wouldn't be exciting them.
photo
Ferrariqx
Who's NEXT?
09:20 PM on 04/24/2012
How do you know they're not doing that too? Why is it necessary for you to tell them how to invest their money???

NEXT!
photo
othel
I believe I don't believe
09:38 PM on 04/24/2012
If they are they aren't spending enough, with all this money they're p*ssing away chasing asteroids.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigflash
09:07 PM on 04/24/2012
this will never happen. Or if, not in several lifetimes. Spend a fraction of this wasted money to help the EARTH now. These guys are building a movie to sell. We've been to the Moon 42+ years ago. What did that do? NOTHING.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
09:35 PM on 04/24/2012
We do help the Earth by switching our natural resource base from Earth to the rest of our solar system. Our population is out stripping Earth's natural resources as it is, and the people refuse to limit their numbers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigflash
10:17 PM on 04/24/2012
I don't care. silly to discuss because this will not help anyone on Earth now. Only going to create hype. So much money could be wasted. The cost of transporting material back to Earth? All situations can and will change. By the time this happens solar power could actually become viable. The vast amounts of money spent should be put to a more reasonable use. Also, if this has any validity to it, China will be on it and done with the project faster and cheaper. Done dreaming.
11:49 PM on 04/24/2012
You are not a very forward thinker.
09:01 PM on 04/24/2012
i think mining the asteroids is great. for the future. a more realistic goal would be mining the moon. unlike asteroids, it is closer, has a predictable orbit and predictable gravity. there is water ice on the moon so water would not be a problem, and it could be a staging area for future missions farther out to mars or the asteroids. the added benefit would be, the more you mine up there, the more tunnels and caverns would be created so the miners/colonists would have ready made underground habitats to move into. i think the moon is a much for realistic and logical start for something of this nature.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
09:10 PM on 04/24/2012
Also since asteroids have been hitting the dark side of he Moon for ages, there must be millions of tons of asteroid gold, and rare earth metals to be gotten. The problem is one of ownership. The United Nations would need to give land grants to the mining companies. Every nation on Earth would be fighting over the "Good Stuff" found there. Star Wars?
10:05 PM on 04/24/2012
i have visions of it being like the "wild west" where you go up there, stake your claim for yourself and country of origin.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jburner09
08:34 PM on 04/24/2012
So let me get this straight, they want to bring an ASTEROID or ASTEROIDS near earth to Mine and possibly have this thing come in our orbit and eventually have it crash to earth.

YEA REAL SMART, LET ME TELL.
cosmicdart
paragon of paradigms
08:42 PM on 04/24/2012
The big hole in the ground where it crashes may be mined for valuable metals. Most of our valuable metals come from ancient asteroids crashes. Since most of the asteroids would be small ones between one and fifty tons, it would most likely burn up in the atmosphere first. But we'd be able to push it away from the Earth so that would not happen.
photo
dave1marine
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful.
08:45 PM on 04/24/2012
You'll more than likely have to "get this straight" by reading it again, and again...., and again. These guys have more intelligence under their FINGERNAILS than you have in your miniscule brain.
09:15 PM on 04/24/2012
Thanks, Marine. Saved me some verbal violence.
photo
paultec1
my bio is private
08:26 PM on 04/24/2012
paultec1 is a really cool dude !
09:10 PM on 04/24/2012
Paultec1 has, against all logic, 466 "fans." That's NOT actually cool, it means the Apocalypse is loooong overdue.
photo
paultec1
my bio is private
09:16 PM on 04/24/2012
Thats not my fault.