iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Postal Bill: Senate Votes To Allow USPS To Avert Bankruptcy, Delay Post Office Closings

By HOPE YEN 04/25/12 08:55 PM ET AP

Postal Bill Senate Vote

WASHINGTON — The Senate offered a lifeline to the nearly bankrupt U.S. Postal Service on Wednesday, voting to give the struggling agency an $11 billion cash infusion while delaying controversial decisions on closing post offices and ending Saturday delivery.

By a 62-37 vote, senators approved a measure which had divided mostly along rural-urban lines. Over the past several weeks, the bill was modified more than a dozen times, adding new restrictions on closings and cuts to service that rural-state senators said would hurt their communities the most.

The issue now goes to the House, which has yet to consider a separate version of the bill.

"The Postal Service is an iconic American institution that still delivers 500 million pieces of mail a day and sustains 8 million jobs," said Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., a bill co-sponsor. "This legislation will change the USPS so it can stay alive throughout the 21st century."

The mail agency, however, criticized the measure, saying it fell far short in stemming financial losses. Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe said if the bill became law, he would have to return to Congress in a few years to get emergency help.

"It is totally inappropriate in these economic times to keep unneeded facilities open. There is simply not enough mail in our system today," the Postal Service's board of governors said in a statement. "It is also inappropriate to delay the implementation of five-day delivery."

The Senate bill would halt the immediate closing of up to 252 mail-processing centers and 3,700 post offices, part of a postal cost-cutting plan to save some $6.5 billion a year. Donahoe previously said he would begin making cuts after May 15 if Congress didn't act, warning that the agency could run out of money this fall.

The measure would save about half the mail processing centers the Postal Service wants to close, from 252 to 125, allowing more areas to maintain overnight first-class mail delivery for at least three more years. It also would bar any shutdowns before the November elections, protect rural post offices for at least a year, give affected communities new avenues to appeal closing decisions and forbid cuts to Saturday delivery for two years.

At the same time, the Postal Service would get an infusion of roughly $11 billion, basically a refund of overpayments made in previous years to a federal retirement fund. That would give it immediate liquidity to pay down debt to forestall bankruptcy and finance buyouts to 100,000 postal employees.

The agency could make smaller annual payments into a future retiree health benefits account, gain flexibility in trimming worker compensation benefits and find additional ways to raise postal revenue under a new chief innovation officer.

Other bill provisions would:

_Place a one-year moratorium on closing rural post offices and then require the mail agency to take rural issues into special consideration. Post offices generally would be protected from closure if the closest mail facility was more than 10 miles away. The exception would be cases in which there was no significant community opposition.

_Shut five of the seven post offices on the Capitol grounds.

_Take into account the impact on small businesses before closing mail facilities.

_Cap postal executive pay through 2015 at $199,000, the same level as a Cabinet secretary, and create a system under which the top people at the Postal Service are paid based on performance.

The Senate bill faces an uncertain future. The House version, approved in committee last year, would create a national commission with the power to scrap no-layoff clauses in employee contracts and make other wide-ranging cuts.

"This of course kicks the can down the road," complained Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who unsuccessfully pushed for a commission in the Senate bill. He said the current proposal failed to address longer-term fixes and delayed major decisions. "We'll be on the floor in two years addressing this issue again, because it is not a solution."

Noting that more people every year are switching to the Internet to send letters and pay bills, Donahoe called the Postal Service's business model "broken." The agency has estimated that the Senate bill would only provide it enough liquidity to continue operating for two years or three years.

At stake are more than 100,000 jobs, The agency, $12 billion in debt, says it could run out of money for day-to-day operations as soon as this fall, forcing it to shut down some of its services. The mail agency forecasts a record $14.1 billion loss by the end of this year; without changes, it says annual losses will exceed $21 billion by 2016.

On Tuesday, the Postal Service circulated a smaller list of mail processing centers that probably would close under the Senate bill; many in more rural or small states would be spared. For instance, centers would survive in Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Missouri and Vermont, whose senators were sponsors of the postal bill or pushed amendments, according to the preliminary list obtained by The Associated Press. A facility in Easton, Md., also would stay open. Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., previously attempted to block the postal bill in protest of that specific closure.

Also surviving were all four mail processing centers in Nevada, home to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, as well as all eight centers in Colorado and all five centers in Utah.

"This bill is a vital first step in pulling the Postal Service back from the edge of a fiscal abyss," said Art Sackler, coordinator of the Coalition for a 21st Century Postal Service, a group representing the private sector mailing industry.

"It's now critical that the House follow suit quickly or we risk a shutdown of the Postal Service and an ensuing economic calamity," he said.

The Postal Service, an independent agency of government, does not receive taxpayer money for its operations but is subject to congressional control.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — The Senate offered a lifeline to the nearly bankrupt U.S. Postal Service on Wednesday, voting to give the struggling agency an $11 billion cash infusion while delaying controversial...
WASHINGTON — The Senate offered a lifeline to the nearly bankrupt U.S. Postal Service on Wednesday, voting to give the struggling agency an $11 billion cash infusion while delaying controversial...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 70
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
09:41 PM on 05/01/2012
Seems that congress knows the USPS is broken, yet in an an attempt to influence and game the system for their own benefit they are trying to artificially trying to prop up the service.

related article
http://gas2.org/2012/05/01/congress-is-buying-usps-employee-votes-with-your-money
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:22 PM on 04/28/2012
Thousands of small businesses rely on USPS.

In attacking the Post Office, Republicans are attacking small business.

to illustrate: Pacino is small business - Spacey is corporate Repubs:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ac6cOJb2FvI&feature=related
11:48 AM on 04/27/2012
"A refund of overpayments" is not a GIFT, it is an initial repayment of unfairly siphoned off funds due to sneaky Republican Senators in 2006.

A massive benefits fund covering 75 years was mandated and the USPS was given just 10 years to do so. No other organization anywhere must do this, a devious 'poison pill' knife in the back.
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
08:34 PM on 04/26/2012
Instead of a bailout, let the raise their rates to cover what it actually cost to run the Post Office.
01:27 PM on 04/27/2012
It's not a bailout.
""A refund of overpayments" is not a GIFT, it is an initial repayment of unfairly siphoned off funds due to sneaky Republican Senators in 2006.

A massive benefits fund covering 75 years was mandated and the USPS was given just 10 years to do so. No other organization anywhere must do this, a devious 'poison pill' knife in the back."
-PalinEffect

In addition to that, the USPS is limited by law as to how much they can raise postage. This is why customers see the ridiculous penny postage raises every so often. I agree with you, lift this burden.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Phil-EA
02:28 PM on 04/26/2012
It’s strange to hear about these “overpayments” when it’s been discovered that they weren’t really that at all (http://huff.to/oheRup). That said, you hope this “fix” is more than just stall tactics, delaying the inevitable. The writing has been on the wall for a while now for the USPS We’ve seen of that both volume of mail processed and net income have seen steady declines (http://bit.ly/oBezLD). If this time bought is not used to totally rethink the business model of the USPS then we’ll continue to see these problems.

Success can be had in the shipping industry; Fed Ex and UPS are two of the more profitable companies out there. Looking to private sector business theory could go a long way in providing ideas to at least help transition the USPS into a new phase. However, looking at Congress’s track record on handling the USPS through regulation, it’s hard to be hopeful. Congress seems content to let the USPS lay off employees and suffer a slow, drawn out death, instead of embracing the times and looking for solutions that could work long into the future.
satyrday
If my micro-bio is way too long, will it be trunca
03:55 PM on 04/26/2012
Fedex and UPS are 2 of the USPS biggest customers.

They use them to get packages to/from rural areas, because they can't seem to make enough profit with those.

And ask Fedex and UPS to deliver a letter for you, and find out what they want.
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
08:32 PM on 04/26/2012
By law, USPS is the only entity that can deliver first class mail. They have to ship special service i.e. Next Day Air or Overnight.

A more accurate analogy would be to compare the UPS and FedEx to the USPS overnight service.
08:07 PM on 04/26/2012
The Link that you included in your post actually contradicts you. Did you even read the article? Try again...
01:26 PM on 04/26/2012
Has anyone challenged the Post Master General's claim?!?! While its true that internet access has slowly decreased first class letter delivery, it has rapidly increased parcel volume. How come the press isn't questioning this?.. asking for documentation? Is one man's word that credible?

I believe the Post Office is wasting opportunity. Restructure the service starting from top going down. Start with electing a new Post Master General who holds Post Office interest.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:29 AM on 04/28/2012
I'd like to know Patrick Donahoe's true motivations. What's his background, where is he coming from ideologically ? Because he talks like a privatizing mole.
01:12 PM on 04/28/2012
Now this is just a theory of observation but it seems Post Master General Pat Do is getting his palms greased by an individual or entity that hold interest in closing the postal service and privatizing mail delivery for profit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
usna73
We are all in this together
11:28 AM on 04/26/2012
Emblematic of what truly ails us. Buy votes,... kick the can down the road,.... waste money. Nobody truly happy with the outcome. Rinse and repeat.

If I didn't know better, I'd say our Congress must be the problem. LOL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Janet Eason
mphseason
10:26 AM on 04/26/2012
Eventually the Post Office is going to charge everybody to have a post office box, where you pick it up, and there will no longer be delivery to your residence, unless you pay for parcel delivery. 3rd class mail, people could actually stop it being sent to their mailbox, and theft would be actually controlled.
01:38 PM on 04/27/2012
When did postal officials make this statement?
01:24 AM on 04/30/2012
I think the PO should charge every person who has a mailbox (other than at the PO itself) $10 a year to have that box.
09:38 AM on 04/26/2012
Post Master General
475 Lenfant Plz SW
Washington, DC 20260


To Who It May Concern:

TOPIC: Future USPS Mail Deliveries

Business - Continue 6 Day Deliveries

Residents - Split Delivery for Residents

Residents ~ Monday, Wednesday, & Friday
and
Residents ~ Tuesday, Thursday, & Saturday

My recommendation is limiting your mail delivery to residents in the USA.
3 times a week is enough
Let each post office have employees deliver the mail to half (½) of the residents per 3-day cycle. Thus, most of your employees will be busy and more efficient.

With the USPS trucks driving through half of the neighborhoods each day, this will save the USPS and allow the USPS to become profitable without FUNDING from the USA Government
11:57 AM on 04/27/2012
Three day delivery - a terrible idea. This is a government mandated agency that does a great job.
A better idea: eliminate walking routes in single family dwelling neighborhoods. Just think of the expense of the extra time for porch delivery and the work related health care costs.

Where I live the rules are based on zip code, not home spacing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:34 AM on 04/28/2012
Are you considering small business shipping ? It appears that, like many others, you are only thinking in terms of your personal relation to the mail, which may indeed be very slim to nil. But 6 day delivery is vital to the one growing sector of our economy - small internet sales. USPS rates are far lower than F/U at this level, so it's like an indirect subsidy to thousands of small businesses, and a benefit for their customers as well.
09:05 AM on 04/26/2012
Postal bill passage
means 100,000 more
unemployed voters.

@snarkyhaiku
08:36 AM on 04/26/2012
I have always found the employees at our US Postal service to be helpful and professional. Please remember; they deliver mail all over the world; both coming and going.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dee Cortex
07:53 AM on 04/26/2012
The last sentence about the taxpayer not being on the hook for the postal service is completely false. If you look at the off budget bank called the federal financing bank, they have been funneling one billion dollars a day into the post office, loaning the agency money at one tenth of a percent interest!
http://www.treasury.gov/ffb/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:49 AM on 04/28/2012
"USPS is able to borrow up to $3400 million with a maximum term of up to one year. In addition, USPS can borrow up to$ 600 million on an overnight basis. The USPS is also limited by statute to net annual debt increases of $3 billion with a total borrowing authority of $15 billion.

The usps had a fiscal year 2011 deficit due to a decline in mail volume, higher retiree health benefit costs, and cost of living adjustments. The Administration, Congress, and other stakeholders are aware of the current and long-term financial issues of the USPS. The USPS provides an essential service to the United States and there are several potential legislative solutions to help ensure the financial liquidity fo the USPS.

The Bank has not incurred any credit-related losses on its loans as of the date of these statements and as stated above, all FFB assets are, or have a commitment to be, full faith and credit obligations of the US Government."

http://www.treasury.gov/ffb/financial-statements/29747WDC_FedFinancBank_FS_Final.pdf

In other words, keep your shirt on.
photo
K August
Research Alec Exposed
03:43 AM on 04/26/2012
Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe < traitor to the USPS.

He's made it obvious that he's all for gutting the USPS.
He KNOWS full well why the USPS went from being profitable to basically owing Congress Billions per year.

Back in late 2006 just before the GOP lost power they forced the USPS to come up with over 100 Billion in just 10 years to PRE-FUND pensions for 75 years out.
That means they had to come up with money to pay for pensions for future employees, people not hired or even born yet!

The Senate did the right thing, suggesting that the USPS should have their 11 Billion in over-funding back and the Poster Master General (GOP tool) should not get in the way.
I have yet to see him do something supportive of the USPS.......all he does is bash his own.
Get rid of him!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean Wilde
Lefty trapped in Righty land
11:15 PM on 04/25/2012
So they are going to put on a 11 billion $ BANDAID Just so they can fix it again in a few years?
FIX THE REAL PROBLEM! Wasting more money. They need to revisit the 2006 law they passed requiring the post office to fun pensions for 75 years.
photo
K August
Research Alec Exposed
03:49 AM on 04/26/2012
Yes, they should revisit that law.....abolish it would be good.
The 11 Billion isn't a Bandaid....they're giving the USPS back the over-funded money that dumb GOP law caused.

This is a bit only so I'm not sure this is the Bill the Senate voted on?

"The Postal Service Protection Act would:

• Fix the Postal Service's immediate financial crisis by allowing the USPS to recover the overpayments it made to its retiree pension funds — both the $7 billion overpayment to the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) and the $50 billion to $75 billion overpayment to the Civil Service Retirement System. In addition, the bill would eliminate the unique requirement that the USPS pre-fund 75 years worth of future retiree health benefits in just 10 years. No other agency is required to pre-fund these benefits.'

This is the real enemy though... ending Home mail delivery? Really?

"Republica­n Representa­tive Darrell Issa of California is co-sponsor­ing a bill that would Phase Out most residentia­l to the door deliveries in four years."
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
08:38 PM on 04/26/2012
Why? So that pension can be underfunded like every other government pension? Fact is even without the extra cost of operating the business, the Post Office was losing money. They lost roughly 10 billion last year, 11 billion the year before and the pension funding only accounts for 5.5billion of that each year. Where did the rest go?

Raise the rates to what it cost to run the Post Office.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:53 PM on 04/25/2012
Anybody hear Harry Reid's "reasoning" for keeping the post offices?
Senior citizens love junk mail; they look forward to it. It's they way of keeping in touch with the outside world. ---- He actually said that with a dead pan face. How ludicrious!
Retire, Harry!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean Wilde
Lefty trapped in Righty land
11:12 PM on 04/25/2012
Whatever! Get a sense of Humor
photo
K August
Research Alec Exposed
03:52 AM on 04/26/2012
A lot of seniors don't use the internet.....for paying bills etc. Some can't afford the cost
and some are just too old to learn about computers etc.

Many have their prescriptions mailed to them and this GOP Congressman thinks we should all stand in Post Office lines to pick up our mail....including seniors!

"Republica­n Representa­tive Darrell Issa of California is co-sponsor­ing a bill that would phase out most residentia­l to the door deliveries in four years."