iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

African Pygmy Research Shows Genetics Behind Short Stature

Posted: 04/27/2012 7:45 am Updated: 04/27/2012 7:45 am

Pygmy Cameroon

By: Jennifer Welsh, LiveScience Staff Writer
Published: 04/26/2012 06:20 PM EDT on LiveScience

Why the Pygmies of West Africa have such short stature, while neighboring groups don't, has been somewhat of a mystery. Now new research suggests unique changes in the Pygmy's genome have both led to adaptations for living in the forest as well as kept them short.

Researchers analyzed the genomes, the "building code" that directs how an organism is put together, of Western African Pygmies in Cameroon, whose men average 4 feet, 11 inches tall, and compared them with their neighboring relatives, the Bantus, who average 5 feet, 6 inches, to see whether these differences were genetic or a factor of their environment.

"There's been a long-standing debate about why Pygmies are so short and whether it is an adaptation to living in a tropical environment," study researcher Sarah Tishkoff of the University of Pennsylvania said in a statement. "Our findings are telling us that the genetic basis of complex traits like height may be very different in globally diverse populations."

Short population

The Pygmy and Bantu populations separated genetically about 60,000 to 70,000 years ago; then roughly 4,000 to 5,000 years ago, they started interbreeding.

Some Pygmy women, after having sex with a Bantu man, have given birth to half-Bantu babies, a phenomenon that integrates Bantu genes into the Pygmy population. These women and their offspring stay in the Pygmy village, and so don't mix with the Bantu. However, offspring resulting from mating between a Pygmy man and Bantu woman are rare, so the Bantus don't have many Pygmy genes.

The researchers analyzed the genomes of 67 Pygmies and 58 Bantus for changes that would provide information about an individual's ancestry. These changes are small, nonharmful misspellings in the code (the chemical bases A, C, T and G) that makes up the genome. For example, a Bantu might have an A where a Pygmy has a T.

By analyzing large numbers of these changes, researchers can tell how much of an individual's genome is Bantu and how much is Pygmy.

Study researcher Alain Froment, of the Museum of Man in France, in the striped shirt with a group


Selected for statue

The researchers also used this letter-change data to look for areas of the genome associated with height and those that were "naturally selected" for — parts of the genome that are passed down through the generations because they provide some sort of survival advantage.

The data revealed height had a genetic component related to Bantu ancestry: The more Bantu ancestry an individual from the Pygmy tribe had, the taller that individual tended to be. One part of the genome, on chromosome 3, was especially important in this trait, the researchers said.

"We kept seeing a lot of them [these single-letter differences] highlight that region in chromosome 3," Tishkoff said. "It just seemed like a hot spot for selection and for very high differentiation and, as it turns out, very strong association with height as well."

1040444_img
Study researcher Sarah Tishkoff (center) with Pygmy women from Cameroon.


Height genes

The researchers zoomed in on the genes in this area of the genome. One of the genes they found had already been associated with height changes in other populations, but the rest hadn't.

They found new changes in hormone pathways and immunity that seemed to correlate to the pygmy's short stature. These could have been selected for because of their influence on height or because changes in these genes play other roles in the body that were advantageous to the Pygmies, Tishkoff said.

For example: An immunity component might be selected for because it helps the pygmies fight off infections, which are prevalent in their habitat. And the link to hormone pathways also makes sense, Tishkoff said, because changes to them could help the Pygmies reproduce at earlier ages. Shorter height could just be a byproduct of these changes.

The study was published Thursday (April 26) in the journal PLoS Genetics.

You can follow LiveScience staff writer Jennifer Welsh on Twitter, on Google+ or on Facebook. Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and discoveries on Twitter and on Facebook.

Copyright 2012 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW SCIENCE

Filed by Melissa Cronin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:42 AM on 05/01/2012
I swear! Now who would have figured that? Sort of like the study that was government funded to find out why children fell off tricycles. After years of study and countless tax payers dollars they came to this astounding finding: It was because the lose their balance. Not to be outdone by that study another group got government funding to find out why fried chicken tasted so good. I wish I were making this up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gerald OHare
Retired guy living in the great state of N.J.
10:32 PM on 04/30/2012
Am I the only person who is not surprised with this?
04:38 PM on 04/29/2012
it's good they still have a rich culture
03:33 PM on 04/29/2012
This leads to an interesting "what if" question. If they had continued their separation for an added 100,000 years, might there be another species of hominid?
TomMartin
Freedom and equality.
11:26 PM on 04/28/2012
I wonder if they are hot in all those clothes they have to wear now.
photo
Ossit
Ossit
10:43 PM on 04/28/2012
Being short can't figure out why I'm attracted to tall guys. 6' 5" bruisers with wide shoulders are sexy as heck.
photo
Ossit
Ossit
10:35 PM on 04/28/2012
It's all in the genes, and short stature doesn't end with them. I'm short. I'm 4' 9". My maternal grandmother was only 4'11. I'm 4'9. But mom and dad were both six footers. My maternal grandfather was six foot tall. My brother isn't as tall as dad was but he's a foot and some taller than me. Nutrition has nothing to do with it. Genes do what they do and being short isn't that bad. Has some pretty darn good advantages. I've seen pictures of me as even smaller. I was about 3 foot tall until I reached age 12. Being short for these people is normal. My height doesn't make me any more able to fight off infection than anyone else. I have a naturally strong constitution. Only problems I have with being short are couches. I can't sit all the way back. My feet don't touch the floor and being unable to get into a high cars without a running start and a grand leap.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
happyblackman
Gotta have more cowbell baby!
08:50 PM on 04/28/2012
Nutrition.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cuoi
I wish everyone happiness.
12:53 PM on 04/28/2012
I am trying to understand the process. It does not appear that one factor alone accounts for diversity. Some kind of inter-relationship between the environment and genetic changes. Genetic changes occur all the time. So we will continue to evolve. Is there any documented human change within the last 1,000 years?
photo
one1byke
Easy no Man.
07:56 AM on 04/28/2012
i feel the same way in ... India, France, Ireland, ....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ProudToBeVeryLiberal
Science is the antidote to the poison of religion
07:17 PM on 04/27/2012
Oddly enough, the Pigmys of Rwanda (they're not only in West Africa) don't live far from the Dinka, some of the tallest people on earth. The Tutsi tribe in the same area are also quite tall.
photo
crankyCrackPot
My imaginary friend says that you need a therapist
04:22 PM on 04/27/2012
An average troop of Chimpanzees has more genetic diversity within the troop than the whole of human civilization.
We may look a lot different from each other, but we are all about 99.99% the same.
And 98.4% the same as chimps... 60% the same as fruit flies...
Bananas perform more than half the same chemical processes as us.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cuoi
I wish everyone happiness.
12:55 PM on 04/28/2012
Is there a possibility that 00.01 of the population may have a genetic change that would promote their survival and provide another branch on the tree? And what is known about that small group?
photo
crankyCrackPot
My imaginary friend says that you need a therapist
01:13 PM on 04/28/2012
The chains are long enough that even though we are all 99.99% the same, the .01% difference can occur anywhere in the chain. The possibility of someone's genetic code being replicated is roughly 1 in 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nixlix
01:36 PM on 04/27/2012
They should all play hockey.
09:58 AM on 04/29/2012
no, they all be jockeys for the horse races
12:06 PM on 04/27/2012
Genetics are behind it. Wow. Shocking. I would have bet that it was lack of gummie vitamins, fast food and high fructose corn syrup that made them short.