iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

'Care In Your Heart': Homeless Health Care Costs Prompt Experiments On The Margins

Posted:

Home For Health

BOSTON -- The first time Ron died, he had already been in the emergency room dozens of times.

He was 62 when he suffered that first heart attack in 2010 and momentarily flatlined. It happened again two months later, the result of years of drugs and alcohol abuse that left him homeless, uninsured and forced to rely on the ER for nearly every medical need he had collected during some 30 years of living on the street.

Ron, who agreed to speak with The Huffington Post on the condition that his last name be withheld, is an extreme case. A bipolar alcoholic and crack addict, he is wiry and worn at 64. Extreme or not, cases like Ron's place a significant burden on local health care systems. And for countless men, women and children themselves, homelessness is an insurmountable sentence to a lifetime of poor health and inadequate care -- both of which can feed on one another in an unforgiving cycle.

"Being homeless is not a nice life to be living," Ron says. "I'm constantly fighting with the devil."

Radical poverty puts enormous stress on the U.S. health care system, which often struggles to address poor patients' most basic needs. People who live in what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calls "low socioeconomic circumstances" are far more likely to engage in unhealthy behaviors, have limited access to health care, get poorer quality of care and, not least, simply wither and die.

For overworked emergency rooms and underfunded safety-net hospitals, chronic conditions are particularly hard to treat. In many cases, preventative care is all but a fantasy. As a result, low-income Americans are much more prone to preventable hospitalizations, to the tune of $6.7 billion and 1 million hospital visits per year, according to the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Once extreme poverty leads to homelessness, things get even worse. Homeless patients are less likely to seek out or have access to follow-up care or fill critical prescriptions, resulting in numerous return visits for the same problems. Research in the New England Journal of Medicine suggests that homeless hospital patients generally stay at least four days longer per visit, which can mean thousands a pop to a safety-net hospital teetering on the edge of bankruptcy.

"It's a horrible mess," says John Lozier, executive director of the National Health Care for the Homeless Council, "and it all becomes more pronounced with the longevity of homelessness."

Though precise data on the U.S. homeless population is fuzzy, the Department of Housing and Urban Development states that of the 636,000 Americans it estimates spent a night homeless last January, roughly 1 in 6 were chronically homeless, beginning another cycle from the street to a shelter, an emergency room or jail.

Within that group, many battle a complex "trimorbidity" of health problems, including substance abuse, mental health issues and chronic conditions like diabetes and heart disease exacerbated by years on the street. According to the not-for-profit housing-placement group Pathways to Housing, chronic homelessness cuts average lifespan by about 25 years.

Policy prescriptions for long-term homelessness have languished for decades. In the past two years, however, a radical pilot program launched by Boston Medical Center has helped top ER users like Ron more proactively, betting their health will improve with a permanent roof over their heads.

In addition to housing, the pilot program -- known as High Utilizers of Emergency Services to Home, or HUES to Home -- seeks to provide the most frequent homeless visitors to Boston Medical, a 508-bed, private, nonprofit safety-net hospital in the city's South End, with intensive case management, helping them get sober or get treatment for mental illness.

"You and I, and most of us who have a place to go to if we're sick, you know, have to deal with the disease," says Andy Ulrich, Boston Medical Center's executive vice chair of emergency medicine. "When you take that same medical condition, or that same psychiatric condition or that same level of substance abuse and you add to it that they're living under a bridge somewhere or they're living in the shelters, it adds to the complexity and difficulty."

Added complexity also means added costs. From October 2009 to June 2010, Medicaid reimbursed Boston Medical for more than $3.6 million in costs, excluding costs from other ERs and respite centers, as well as claims not yet paid. At that rate, a year's care would cost those 35 patients a combined $5.4 million, an average of roughly $155,000 each.

"You're talking about the most addicted, the most mentally affected people," says Boston city councilor Mike Ross who, in 2009, convened a city council meeting championing permanent supportive housing, and who, along with city mayor Thomas M. Menino, supported the HUES to Home program.

"These aren't choirboys," Ross admits. "Some of these people have done bad things."

Two years in, the program is still relatively unproven. Internal data suggests that participants have seen substantial drops in key measures like ER usage and calls to EMS. Yet the actual cost savings of those changes remains undetermined, and participants continue to battle serious, even life-threatening, addiction and other health issues. Meanwhile, more traditional homeless advocates argue that such funding is better spent on more broad-based shelters.

Still, even in these incipient stages, the program's directors and participants say even the smallest signs of success are promising, given the scope of the challenges the chronically homeless face.

"In all of the shelters, in the street life, in the places I've been, there's a lot of people out there that need help, believe me," Ron says. "We really, seriously need some help."


FOLLOW HEALTHY LIVING

BOSTON -- The first time Ron died, he had already been in the emergency room dozens of times. He was 62 when he suffered that first heart attack in 2010 and momentarily flatlined. It happened again...
BOSTON -- The first time Ron died, he had already been in the emergency room dozens of times. He was 62 when he suffered that first heart attack in 2010 and momentarily flatlined. It happened again...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 545
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
  1 of 1  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
mikey09 02:47 PM on 04/26/2012
Was watching the show 'Rock Center' last night, seems the problems are even bigger than homeless people, according to the show hospitals cannot release patients that do not have someplace to go. One women, an illegal polish lady had a stroke, no insurance, and when well enough to be released the hospital couldn't because she had no place to go, so she stayed in the hospital for two and a half years, the  Read More...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:58 PM on 06/01/2012
They will care for a homeless person in a hospital faster than they do people who have a place to live. I've seen that myself. they will give a drug addict state health care before they will give it to a person who is law abiding and has been paying into the system for years. And I've seen that too as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lady Gato
Knee deep in Hippie
07:37 PM on 05/20/2012
I work at a VA hospital that has a great program for vets with drug problems and/or are homeless. Yeah- really- it is a VA hospital. When they come to the Domicile, these guys are given a job in the hospital- usually janatorial. They have to get up early, exercise, go to meals, and they have counseling. It helps a lot of guys, but some drop out and go back to the streets. Some of them make it because they just needed a hand up. To me, this system could be modified to work for the unemployed who lost it all and want work but can't find it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joanne Cee
01:07 PM on 05/05/2012
The problem is that homelessness is a hydra-headed issue. While you have homeless people who've been laid off and foreclosed upon, and homeless families, and people with mental illness who are homeless, you also have those with mental illness who abuse drugs, and ex-prisoners who have committed serious, violent crime and have been (probably rightfully) ditched by their relatives. Good luck trying to get those with mental illness and/or substance abuse to follow a code of conduct in a government-provided housing situation or a shelter; even people with decent health insurance can have a lot of trouble finding and sticking to a medication regimen for a mental health issue. Bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, etc. are nightmarish.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
xiolableu01
Logic is food for your brain...EAT!
09:48 AM on 05/05/2012
I think this article is addressing the wrong public health concern and an issue of getting to the problem too late. Our problem is not that homeless people exploit the ER and cost billions in unpaid visits. The problem is in the way this country addresses mental illness and the poor (Ron's bipolarity could have been managed correctly rather than him self-medicating with drugs and becoming homeless) and has addressed an idiotic "war on drugs" by putting people who need help into prison (where they can still get drugs) instead in treatment facilities.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Gina Ryder
Community Editor
03:14 PM on 05/04/2012
Hi all. Thanks for your comments. We noticed a common question popping up which is, "Are we restoring the lives of the homeless in the right way?" Join the debate happening here http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/04/homeless-health-care-what-doing-wrong_n_1460079.html
06:51 PM on 05/03/2012
Informative article .. the rough estimate of $155,000 on each homeless person the hospitals are burdened with is quite an eye opener :(
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:13 PM on 04/30/2012
I'vd often wondered why the business community in large cities don't crunch the numbers and find it would help their bottom line to act, at least on a trial basis. Perhaps they could buy or lease an old building and install or repair some full baths and laundry equipment and kitchen equipment--but not living space.

Willing church groups and/or other volunteers could operate the place and maybe enable some of the homeless to at least look less hopeless-- which should make at least some feel a little less hopeless and, just maybe, make them more willing to put forth an effort to cooperate with those trying to help.

As the homeless move through the facility daily or weekly, different volunteers and even government agencies, could have access to and/or make themselves available to the homeless to try to address the underlying problems.

But then, that would cost the bu$ine$$e$--cost the people who own or are coporations that pay the lower capital gains tax--and those bu$ine$$es really believe that those human people that pay the higher percentage income tax should bear all the social burdens--including those that negatively impact their own bu$ine$$.

Never mind that the bu$ine$$e$ could get a charity tax break, use it in a PR campaign and maybe help clear the area of some of the homeless which could help their business image--for most, it seems, it is all about the love of money.
02:01 PM on 04/27/2012
And then there are the homeless, that made mistakes by paying all their bills while looking for work for over 2 years. Being told that they are over qualified even when they say they will take anything. Wanting to earn a decent living and knowing a part time job wont pay the rent etc.
Living in their cars, in shame. Relatives dont want to help. There are many decent people who are homeless and not on drugs but have unfortunately made the wrong decisions and are in thier late 50's or 60's and no one will hire them. The shelters are dangerous, even the social workers know that and tell that to some of the people.
What a sad state of affairs. There should be a special place for educated homeless, that are really upstanding citizens that are constantly told they are over qualified and just want a decent job so that they can get back on their feet and be on their feet again and be a plus to their community and live a normal life.
photo
jimtpat
Hell's Pretty Pink Bells
02:20 AM on 04/27/2012
The same old story: Liberal Democrats think we should all pay a little extra to try and get more people productive in keeping our county going, while Conservative Republicans demand we pay whatever it takes to keep people from getting high so they can skim profits off the hospitals and prisons for themselves.

Just a heads up to anyone forgetting why we vote...
photo
cornelison
College grad. Life-long liberal.
12:46 AM on 04/27/2012
Both conservative & liberal voters will be joining (if not already) that man if Republicans continue to control the country. The difference is the new homeless will be Americans from the middle class because they lost their jobs, homes and health. When that happens who will pay for their medical care in overflowing emergency rooms?

Paul Ryan's favorite quote from Herman Cain must be; "Don't blame Wall Street, don't blame the big banks. If you don't have a job and you are not rich, blame yourself!"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:17 PM on 04/30/2012
Hopefully what will happen is that they will be jolted out of their religious stupor and begin to vote (if they can get the oft-required ID), finally, in their own economic best interest instead of being those one-issue "values voters".

Not to anyone about to lose your home: if you lose the license you need to vote, you might be able to renew that ID early?
12:23 AM on 04/27/2012
Reminds me of the bible story of Lazrus and the crumbs trickling down...I mean falling from the rich mans table.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:19 PM on 04/30/2012
Trickle down economics is really p*$$ on you economics. Voter apathy is the enemy.
11:53 PM on 04/26/2012
If our nation is in decline this will become an ever growing issue. The homeless must be housed and get medical and dental care as well. I do wonder if some of the addicts and alcoholics need to be in facilities that are remote enough to make much harder to get drugs or alcohol.
photo
BadHaBritt
Always looking for the broader perspective
11:38 PM on 04/26/2012
This shows just a part of the problem that is not even considered by the anti-national health care advocates who would rather a few made a fortune than all of us had intelligent health coverage. A single payer system, that we all get the benefits from, should also handle preventive health care needs as well as treatments when we actually get sick. This has proven to lower health care costs as part of the overall strategy to maintain a healthy nation while controlling costs. The full scope of intelligent health care goes way beyond the dysfunctional insurance ofter your sick system we currently have.
10:54 PM on 04/26/2012
Are these Homeless categorized as American citizens? Or are illegal immigrants included in the figures as well? Many hospitals see them coming and tell them it will be HOURS before they are seen and TURF them to another hospital. The Homeless at countless hospitals are treated inhumanly by the hospital staff and belittled. You won't hear the staff complaining about the ones who have Medicare or insurance. I worked for hospitals doing clerical work, mainly in the ER for 17 years. I witnessed the Homeless being verbally abused, lied to, and some were hit. Reporting such behavior did no good. This problem goes much deeper than the ALMIGHTY DOLLAR. Some staff have developed an absolute hatred for the Homeless. No wonder they do not get better.
10:30 PM on 04/26/2012
Preventative care sounds great but doesn't work. How come all the countries with universal health care have the highest proportions of smokers - the number one preventable health risk? Its all about equalizing the citizenry. That may be fine for most people - because we have created a culture where a small percentage of the populace pays the way for everyone else. Even most who pay taxes are net recipients. The repubs are too busy figuring out ways to appropriate their own welfare from the treasury for elites before the party ends. I'm sure we'll move to a two tiered system with a big universal component soon, and the responsible people will just get less for more.
photo
BadHaBritt
Always looking for the broader perspective
11:44 PM on 04/26/2012
It's a complicated subject and one cannot just cherry pick ones pet peeves as one's entire argument. A single payer system taken out of income earned is a fairer way of distributing the costs for health care that we all receive. This is NOT an entitlement but a far more cost effective way for everyone to get the coverage they pay for. (There will always be a few who benefit without paying but they should be kept to those who fall below a certain income level that is close the the poverty line.) A national health care system that is all about profit is obscene. Surely we can develop to a higher level of social responsibility than we are at the present time.